Low vision rehabilitation: current perspectives

References

• Raasch TW, Leat SJ, Kleinstein RN, Bullimore MA, Cutter GR. Evaluating the value of low-vision services. J Am Optom Assoc. 1997;68(5):287–295.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya’ale D, et al. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82(11):844–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne RR, Stevens GA, White RA, et al. Causes of vision loss worldwide, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet Global Health. 2013;1(6):e339–e349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascolini D, Mariotti SP. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(5):614–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens GA, White RA, Flaxman SR, et al. Global prevalence of vision impairment and blindness magnitude and temporal trends, 1990–2010. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(12):2377–2384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez Ferreiro AV, Miguéns Vázquez X. Letter to the editor. Visual rehabilitation in low vision. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2013;88(3):123–124.
   Google Scholar
• Brody BL, Gamst AC, Williams RA, et al. Depression, visual acuity, comorbidity, and disability associated with age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2011;108(10):1893–1900.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz A, Reinhardt JP, Boerner K, Travis LA. The influence of health, social support quality and rehabilitation on depression among disabled elders. Aging Ment Health. 2003;7(5):342–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin G. Vision rehabilitation for patients with age related macular degeneration. Eye. 2001;15 Part 3:430–435.
   Google Scholar
• Crossland MD, Macedo AF, Rubin GS. Electronic books as low vision aids. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(8):1109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossland MD, Rui SS, Macedo AF. Smartphone, tablet computer and e-reader use by people with vision impairment. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014;34(5):552–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill K, Mao A, Powell AM, Sheidow T. Digital reader vs print media: the role of digital technology in reading accuracy in age-related macular degeneration. Eye. 2013;27(5):639–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TapTapSee. Available from: http://www.taptapseeapp.com/. Accessed June 8, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• VizWiz. Available from: http://www.vizwiz.org/. Accessed June 8, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Optelec. Available from: http://www.optelec.com/. Accessed June 8, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Walker R. An iPad app as a low-vision aid for people with macular disease. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97(1):110–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peli E. Vision multiplexing: an engineering approach to vision rehabilitation device development. Optom Vis Sci, 2001;78(5):304–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargas-Martin F, Peli E. Augmented-view for restricted visual field: multiple device implementations. Optom Vis Sci. 2002;79(11):715–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peli E, Luo G, Bowers A, Rensing N. Applications of augmented vision head-mounted systems in vision rehabilitation. J Soc Inf Disp. 2007;15(12):1037–1045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo G, Peli E. Development and evaluation of vision rehabilitation devices. Presented at the 33rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, Boston, MA, USA, August 30 to September 3, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Massof RW, Rickman DL. Obstacles encountered in the development of the low vision enhancement system. Optom Vis Sci. 1992;69(1):32–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culham LE, Chabra A, Rubin GS. Clinical performance of electronic, head-mounted, low-vision devices. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004;24(4):281–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang AD, Peli E. Augmented edge enhancement for vision impairment using Google Glass. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91(8):1021–1030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ianchulev T, Minckler DS, Hoskins HD, et al. Wearable technology with head-mounted displays and visual function. JAMA. 2014;312(17):1799–1801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarita-Nistor L, Gonzalez EG, Mandelcorn MS, Lillakas L, Steinbach MJ. Fixation stability, fixation location and visual acuity after successful macular hole surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(1):84–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez EG, Tarita-Nistor L, Mandelcorn ED, Mandelcorn M, Steinbach MJ. Fixation control before and after treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(7):4208–4213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarita-Nistor L, Gonzalez EG, Markowitz SN, Steinbach MJ. Fixation characteristics of patients with macular degeneration recorded with the MP-1 microperimeter. Retina. 2008;28(1):125–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossland MD, Culham LE, Rubin GS. Fixation stability and reading speed in patients with newly developed macular disease. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004;24(4):327–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuchard RA. Preferred retinal loci and macular scotoma characteristics in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Can J Ophthalmol. 2005;40(3):303–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contestabile MT, Recupero SM, Palladino D, et al. A new method of biofeedback in the management of low vision. Eye. 2002;16(4):472–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giorgi D, Contestabile MT, Pacella E, Balacco Gabrieli C. An instrument for biofeedback applied to vision. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2005;30(4):389–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales MU, Saker S, Amoaku WM. Bilateral eccentric vision training on pseudovitelliform dystrophy with microperimetry biofeedback. BMJ Case Rep. 2015;2015:bcr2014207969.
   Google Scholar
• Vingolo EM, Cavarretta S, Domanico D, Parisi F, Malagola R. Microperimetric biofeedback in AMD patients. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2007;32(3–4):185–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vingolo EM, Salvatore S, Cavarretta S. Low-vision rehabilitation by means of MP-1 biofeedback examination in patients with different macular diseases: a pilot study. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2009;34(2):127–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nistor LT, Gonzalez EG, Markowitz SN, Steinbach MJ. Plasticity of fixation in patients with central vision loss. Vis Neurosci. 2009;26(5–6):487–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grenga PL, Trabucco P, Meduri A, Fragiotta S, Vingolo EM. Microperimetric biofeedback in a patient with oculocutaneous albinism. Can J Ophthalmol. 2013;48(5):e105–e107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vingolo EM, Salvatore S, Domanico D, Spadea L, Nebbioso M. Visual rehabilitation in patients with myopic maculopathy: our experience. Can J Ophthalmol. 2013;48(5):438–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verboschi F, Domanico D, Nebbioso M, Corradetti G, Scalinci SZ, Vingolo EM. New trends in visual rehabilitation with MP-1 microperimeter biofeedback: optic neural dysfunction. Funct Neurol. 2013;28(4):285–291.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toto L, Di Antonio L, Mastropasqua A, De Nicola C, Mastropasqua L. Rehabilitation with MP1 biofeedback training of a posterior microphthalmos case. Can J Ophthalmol. 2013;48(5):e107–e111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabel BA, Kasten E. Restoration of vision by training of residual functions. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2000;11(6):430–436.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sabel BA, Kenkel S, Kasten E. Vision restoration therapy (VRT) efficacy as assessed by comparative perimetric analysis and subjective questionnaires. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22(6):399–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vingolo EM, Salvatore S, Grenga P, Limoli PG. . Visual training in retinitis pigmentosa patients: neural plasticity and function recovery. In: Catlin RB, editor. Retinal Degeneration: Causes, Diagnosis and Treatment. New York, NY, USA: Nova Publisher; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Vingolo EM, Salvatore S, Limoli PG. MP-1 Biofeedback: luminous pattern stimulus versus acoustic biofeedback in age related macular degeneration (AMD). Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2013;38(1):11–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker CI, Peli E, Knouf N, Kanwisher NG. Reorganization of vision processing in macular degeneration. J Neurosci. 2005;25(3):614–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker CI, Dilks DD, Peli E, Kanwisher NG. Reorganization of visual processing in macular degeneration: replication and clues about the role of foveal loss. Vision Res. 2008;48(18):1910–1919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amore FM, Paliotta S, Silvestri V, Piscopo P, Turco S, Reibaldi A. Biofeedback stimulation in patients with age-related macular degeneration: comparison between 2 different methods. Can J Ophthalmol. 2013;48(5):431–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humayun MS, Dorn JD, da Cruz L, et al. Interim results from the International Trial of Second Sight’s visual prosthesis. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(4):779–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zrenner E, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Benav H, et al. Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words. Proc Biol Sci. 2011;278(1711):1489–1497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen SJ, Mahadevappa M, Roizenblatt R, Weiland J, Humayun M. Neural responses elicited by electrical stimulation of the retina. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2006;104:252–259.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ahuja AK, Dorn JD, Caspi A, et al. Blind subjects implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis are able to improve performance in a spatial-motor task. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95(4):539–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorn JD, Ahuja AK, Caspi A, et al. The detection of motion by blind subjects with the Epiretinal 60-Electrode (Argus II) retinal prosthesis blind subjects and motion detection. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(2):183–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marc RE, Jones BW, Anderson JR, et al. Neural reprogramming in retinal degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(7):3364–3371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Cruz L, Coley BF, Dorn J, et al. The Argus II epiretinal prosthesis system allows letter and word reading and long-term functions in patients with profo vision loss. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97(5):632–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar