Usefulness of Trabecular Metal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in a Korean Population: A Case Series

References

• Kim TW, Kang SB, Chang CB, Moon SY, Lee YK, Koo KH. Current trends and projected burden of primary and revision total knee arthroplasty in Korea between 2010 and 2030. J Arthroplasty. 2021;36(1):93–101. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engh GA, Ammeen DJ. Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction. Instr Course Lect. 1999;48:167–175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lotke PA, Carolan GF, Puri N. Impaction grafting for bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;446:99–103. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000214414.06464.00
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engh GA, Ammeen DJ. Use of structural allograft in revision total knee arthroplasty in knees with severe tibial bone loss. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(12):2640–2647. doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meneghini RM, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(1):78–84. doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.01495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer BD, Hanssen AD, Sim FH, Lewallen DG. The kinematic rotating hinge prosthesis for complex knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;392:283–291. doi:10.1097/00003086-200111000-00037
   Google Scholar
• Long WJ, Scuderi GR. Porous tantalum cones for large metaphyseal tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(7):1086–1092. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2008.08.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao BM, Kamal TT, Vafaye J, Moss M. Tantalum cones for major osteolysis in revision knee replacement. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B(8):1069–1074. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.95B8.29194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter GD, Abdel MP, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD. Midterm results of porous tantalum femoral cones in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(15):1286–1291. doi:10.2106/JBJS.15.00874
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslaris A, Layher F, Bungartz M, et al. Sagittal profile has a significant impact on the explantability of well-fixed cemented stems in revision knee arthroplasty: a biomechanical comparison study of five established knee implant models. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019;139(7):991–998. doi:10.1007/s00402-019-03160-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandiford NA, Misur P, Garbuz DS, Greidanus NV, Masri BA. Difference between trabecular metal cones and femoral head allografts in revision TKA: minimum 5-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(1):118–124. doi:10.1007/s11999-016-4898-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:13–14. doi:10.1097/00003086-198911000-00004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:9–12. doi:10.1097/00003086-198911000-00003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard JL, Kudera J, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD. Early results of the use of tantalum femoral cones for revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(5):478–484. doi:10.2106/JBJS.I.01322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panni AS, Vasso M, Cerciello S. Modular augmentation in revision total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(12):2837–2843. doi:10.1007/s00167-012-2258-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derome P, Sternheim A, Backstein D, Malo M. Treatment of large bone defects with trabecular metal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty: short term clinical and radiographic outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(1):122–126. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen CL, Winther N, Schroder HM, Petersen MM. Outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of trabecular metal cone for reconstruction of severe bone loss at the proximal tibia. Knee. 2014;21(6):1233–1237. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2014.08.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Martino I, De Santis V, Sculco PK, D’Apolito R, Assini JB, Gasparini G. Tantalum cones provide durable midterm fixation in revision TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(10):3176–3182. doi:10.1007/s11999-015-4338-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh IJ, Kim TK, Chang CB, Cho HJ, In Y. Trends in use of total knee arthroplasty in Korea from 2001 to 2010. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(5):1441–1450. doi:10.1007/s11999-012-2622-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Losina E, Thornhill TS, Rome BN, Wright J, Katz JN. The dramatic increase in total knee replacement utilization rates in the United States cannot be fully explained by growth in population size and the obesity epidemic. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(3):201–207. doi:10.2106/JBJS.J.01958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancuso F, Beltrame A, Colombo E, Miani E, Bassini F. Management of metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty. Acta Biomed. 2017;88(2S):98–111. doi:10.23750/abm.v88i2-S.6520
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zanirato A, Cavagnaro L, Basso M, Divano S, Felli L, Formica M. Metaphyseal sleeves in total knee arthroplasty revision: complications, clinical and radiological results. A systematic review of the literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018;138:993–1001. doi:10.1007/s00402-018-2967-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett SL, Mayer RR, Gondusky JS, Choi L, Patel JJ, Gorab RS. Use of stepped porous titanium metaphyseal sleeves for tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: short term results. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(6):1219–1224. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backstein D, Safir O, Gross A. Management of bone loss: structural grafts in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;446:104–112. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000214426.52206.2c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgen V, Citak M, Vettorazzi E, et al. 10-year results following impaction bone grafting of major bone defects in 29 rotational and hinged knee revision arthroplasties: a follow-up of a previous report. Acta Orthop. 2013;84(4):387–391. doi:10.3109/17453674.2013.814012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar