Single-port versus conventional multiport access prophylactic laparoscopic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in high-risk patients for ovarian cancer: a comparison of surgical outcomes

References

• LancasterJMPowellCBKauffNDSociety of Gynecologic Oncologists Education CommitteeSociety of Gynecologic Oncologists Education Committee statement on risk assessment for inherited gynecologic cancer predispositionsGynecol Oncol2007107215916217950381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FinchAPLubinskiJMøllerPImpact of oophorectomy on cancer incidence and mortality in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutationJ Clin Oncol201432151547155324567435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FinchAEvansGNarodSABRCA carriers, prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy and menopause: clinical management considerations and recommendationsWomens Health (Lond Engl)20128554355522934728
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• AraiMTakiKIwaseHTakizawaKNishimuraSIwaseTPresent status and tasks for genetic testing and risk-reducing surgery in patients with hereditary breast and ovarian cancerGan To Kagaku Ryoho2012394525531 Japanese22504676
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• AngioniSMereuLMaricosuGMencagliaLMelisGBSingle port access laparoscopy (SPAL) for endometrioma excisionJ Endometr2010229598
   Google Scholar
• AngioniSMaricosuGMereuLMencagliaLMelisGBSingle-port access laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a case of uterine ventrofixation using a new reusable deviceJ Obstet Gynaecol Res201137793393621410830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AngioniSPontisASorrentinoFNappiLBilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and adhesiolysis with single port access laparoscopy (SPAL) and use of diode laser in a BRCA carrierEur J Gynaecol Oncol2015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AngioniSPontisACelaVSingle-port access laparoscopic hysterectomy: a literature reviewJ Gynecol Surg2014306329337
   Google Scholar
• MereuLAngioniSPontisACarriGMencagliaLSingle port access laparoscopic myomectomy with X-ConeGynecol Surg201183337340
   Google Scholar
• GuerrieroSAjossaSGeradaMVirgilioBAngioniSMelisGBDiagnostic value of transvaginal ‘tenderness-guided’ ultrasonography for the prediction of location of deep endometriosisHum Reprod200823112452245718664469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Spiezio SardoABettocchiSSpinelliMReview of new office-based hysteroscopic procedures 2003–2009J Minim Invasive Gynecol201017443644820621007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AngioniSMaisVPontisAPeirettiMNappiLFirst case of prophylactic salpingectomy with single port access laparoscopy and a new diode laser in a woman with BRCA mutationGynecol Oncol Case Rep20149212325426409
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SongTKimTJChoJCosmesis and body image after single-port access surgery for gynaecologic diseaseAust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol201252546546923045987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RizzoASpedicatoMMutinatiMPeritoneal adhesions in human and veterinary medicine: from pathogenesis to therapy. A reviewImmunopharmacol Immunotoxicol201032348149420128633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MereuLAngioniSMelisGBMencagliaLSingle access laparoscopy for adnexal pathologies using a novel reusable port and curved instrumentsInt J Gynaecol Obstet20101091788020070967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PluchinoNLittaPFreschiLComparison of the initial surgical experience with robotic and laparoscopic myomectomyInt J Med Robot201410220821224123629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KurmanRJShihIeMThe origin and pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian cancer: a proposed unifying theoryAm J Surg Pathol201034343344320154587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HirasawaAMasudaKAkahaneTExperience of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for a BRCA1 mutation carrier and establishment of a system performing a preventive surgery for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome in Japan: our challenges for the futureJpn J Clin Oncol201343551551923487443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AngioniSPontisADessoleMSuricoDDe Cicco NardoneCMelisIPain control and quality of life after laparoscopic en-block resection of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) vs. incomplete surgical treatment with or without GnRHa administration after surgeryArch Gynecol Obstet2015291236337025151027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TinelliRLittaPMeirYAdvantages of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in extremely obese women (BMI >35) with early-stage endometrial cancer: a multicenter studyAnticancer Res20143452497250224778066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChoJELiuCGossnerGNezhatFRLaparoscopy and gynecologic oncologyClin Obstet Gynecol200952331332619661747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MencagliaLMereuLCarriGSingle port entry – are there any advantages?Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol201327344145523337497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AngioniSPontisACelaVSurgical technique of endometrioma excision impacts on the ovarian reserve. Single-port access laparoscopy versus multiport access laparoscopy: a case control studyGynecol Endocrinol2015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SongTChoJKimTJCosmetic outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy compared with multi-port surgery: randomized controlled trialJ Minim Invasive Gynecol201320446046723541248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeeYYKimTJKimCJSingle port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery versus conventional laparoscopic adnexal surgery: a comparison of peri-operative outcomesEur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol2010151218118420392556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AngioniSPontisAPisanuAMereuLRomanHSingle-port access subtotal laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective case-control studyJ Minim Invasive Gynecol Epub 2015 Mar 18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KimTJLeeYYAnJJDoes single-port access (SPA) laparoscopy mean reduced pain? A retrospective cohort analysis between SPA and conventional laparoscopyEur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol20121621717422336230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KimTJLeeYYChaHHSingle-port-access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomesSurg Endosc20102492248225220177921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FagottiABottoniCVizzielliGPostoperative pain after conventional laparoscopy and laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) for benign adnexal disease: a randomized trialFertil Steril2011961255259.e221565338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SongTKimMLJungYWYoonBSJooWDSeongSJLaparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trialsAm J Obstet Gynecol20132094317.e1e923860211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar