On the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Genomics to Enhance Precision Medicine

References

• Becker A. Artificial intelligence in medicine: what is it doing for us today? Health Policy Technol. 2019;8:198–205. doi:10.1016/j.hlpt.2019.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesko B. The role of artificial intelligence in precision medicine. Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Develop. 2017;2:239–241. doi:10.1080/23808993.2017.1380516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elenko E, Underwood L, Zohar D. Defining digital medicine. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33:456–461. doi:10.1038/nbt.322225965750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang F, Jiang Y, Zhi H, et al. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future. Stroke Vascular Neurol. 2017;2:e000101. doi:10.1136/svn-2017-000101
   Google Scholar
• deAndrés-Galiana EJ, Fernández-Martínez JL, Saligan LN, Sonis ST. Impact of microarray preprocessing techniques in unraveling biological pathways. J Comp Biol. 2016;23:957–968. doi:10.1089/cmb.2016.0042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams AM, Liu Y, Regner KR, Jotterand F, Liu P, Liang M. Artificial intelligence, physiological genomics, and precision medicine. Physiol Genomics. 2018;50:237–243. doi:10.1152/physiolgenomics.00119.201729373082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesko B, Drobni Z, Benyei E, Gergely B, Gyorffy Z. Digital health is a cultural transformation of traditional healthcare. mHealth. 2017;3:1–8. doi:10.21037/mhealth.2017.08.0728293618
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cernea A, Fernández-Martínez JL, deAndrés-Galiana EJ, et al.. Comparison of different sampling algorithms for phenotype prediction. International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering Springer, Cham; 2018 Vol. 10814: 33–45.
   Google Scholar
• Cernea A, Fernández-Martínez JL, deAndrés-Galiana EJ, et al. Sampling Defective Pathways in Phenotype Prediction Problems via the Fisher’s Ratio Sampler. International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering Springer, Cham.; 2018 Vol. 10814: 15–23.
   Google Scholar
• Cernea A, Fernández-Martínez JL, deAndrés-Galiana EJ, et al. Sampling defective pathways in phenotype prediction problems via the Holdout sampler. International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering Springer, Cham.; 2018 Vol. 10814: 24–32.
   Google Scholar
• de Dombal FT, Leaper DJ, Staniland JR, McCann AP, Horrocks JC. Computer-aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain. Br Med J. 1972;2:9–13. doi:10.1136/bmj.2.5804.94552594
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams ID, Chan M, Clifford PC, et al. Computer aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain: a multicentre study. Br Med J. 1986;293:800–804. doi:10.1136/bmj.293.6550.8003094664
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrar JT. Use of a digital computer in the analysis of intestinal motility records. IRE Trans Med Electron. 1960;ME-7:259–263. doi:10.1109/IRET-ME.1960.500807413698266
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brodman K, van Woerkom AJ. Computer-aided diagnostic screening for 100 common diseases. JAMA. 1966;197:901–905. doi:10.1001/jama.1966.031101101250295952781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaf PJ. Automation in medicine. Proc R Soc Med. 1964;1148-1149:57.
   Google Scholar
• Fujita H, Doe K, Pencil LE, Chua KG. Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. 2. Computerized determination of vessel sizes in digital subtraction angiography. Med Phys. 1987;14:549–556. doi:10.1118/1.5960663626994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geivers H, Schaper W, Serves J, Xhonneux R. Cardiac excitability determined by electronic computer. Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere. 1967;298:185–190. doi:10.1007/BF00364699
   Google Scholar
• Chan HP, Doi K, Galhotra S, Vyborny CJ, MacMahon H, Jokich PM. Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. 1. Automated detection of microcalcifications in mammography. Med Phys. 1987;14:538–548.3626993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debray JR, Chrétien J, Gueniot M, et al. A new concept of preventative medicine using automatic data processing by computer. II. Application to diseases and risks of the digestive apparatus and to cardiovascular diseases and risks. Ann Med Interne (Paris). 1969;120:589–596.4928452
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fernández-Martínez JL, Fernández-Muñiz Z, Tompkins MJ. On the topography of the cost functional in linear and nonlinear inverse problems. Geophysics. 2012;77:W1–W5. doi:10.1190/geo2011-0341.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Martínez JL, Pallero JLG, Fernández-Muñiz Z, Pedruelo-González LM. From Bayes to Tarantola: new insights to understand uncertainty in inverse problems. J App Geophys. 2013;98:62–72. doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2013.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Luo M, Zheng J, et al. An artificial neural network prediction model of congenital heart disease based on risk factors: a hospital-based case-control study. Medicine. 2017;96:e6090. doi:10.1097/MD.000000000000609028178169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kind Y, Akiva P, Choman E, et al. Performance analysis of a machine learning flagging system used to identify a group of individuals at a high risk for colorectal cancer. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0171759. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.017175928182647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mai NV, Krauthammer M. Controlling testing volume for respiratory viruses using machine learning and text mining. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017;2016:1910–1919.28269950
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fuller C, Cellura AP, Hibler BP, Burris K. Computer-aided diagnosis of melanoma. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2016;35:25–30. doi:10.12788/j.sder.2016.00426963114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González G, Ash SY, Vegas Sanchez-Ferrero G, et al. Disease staging and prognosis in smokers using deep learning in chest computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;197:193–203. doi:10.1164/rccm.201705-0860OC28892454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young SD, You W, Wang W. Toward automating HIV identification: machine learning for rapid identification of HIV-related social media data. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;74:S128–S131. doi:10.1097/QAI.000000000000124028079723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dente CJ, Bradley M, Schobel S, et al. Towards precision medicine: accurate predictive modeling of infectious complications in combat casualties. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83:609–616. doi:10.1097/TA.000000000000159628538622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagliati A, Marini S, Sacchi L, et al. Machine learning methods to predict diabetes complications. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017;12:295–302. doi:10.1177/193229681770637528494618
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sinha N, Dauwels J, Kaiser M, et al. Predicting neurosurgical outcomes in focal epilepsy patients using computational modelling. Brain. 2017;140:319–322. doi:10.1093/brain/aww29928011454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Liu H, Du X, et al. Integrated machine learning approaches for predicting ischemic stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2016;2016:799–807.28269876
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fernández-Ovies FJ, Alférez-Baquero ES, de Andrés-galiana EJ, Cernea A, Fernández-Muñiz Z, Fernández-Martínez JL. Detection of breast cancer using infrared thermography and deep neural networks In: Rojas I, Valenzuela O, Rojas F, Ortuño F, editors. Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering. Vol. 11466 IWBBIO 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science; 2019:514–523.
   Google Scholar
• Sunwoo L, Kim YJ, Choi SH, et al. Computer-aided detection of brain metastasis on 3D MR imaging: observer performance study. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0178265. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.017826528594923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Troschel FM, Tajmir S, et al. Pixel-level deep segmentation: artificial intelligence quantifies muscle on computed tomography for body morphometric analysis. J Digit Imaging. 2017;30:487–498. doi:10.1007/s10278-017-9988-z28653123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Tajmir S, Lee J, et al. Fully automated deep learning system for bone age assessment. J Digit Imaging. 2017;30:427–441. doi:10.1007/s10278-017-9955-828275919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki K, Shiraishi J, Abe H, MacMahon H, Doi K. False-positive reduction in computer-aided diagnostic scheme for detecting nodules in chest radiographs by means of massive training artificial neural network. Acad Radiol. 2005;12:191–201. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2004.11.01715721596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park E, Chang HJ, Nam HS. Use of machine learning classifiers and sensor data to detect neurological deficit in stroke patients. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19:e120. doi:10.2196/jmir.709228420599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsipouras MG, Giannakeas N, Tzallas AT, et al. A methodology for automated CPA extraction using liver biopsy image analysis and machine learning techniques. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2017;140:61–68. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.11.01228254091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niel O, Boussard C, Bastard P. Artificial intelligence can predict GFR decline during the course of ADPKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2018;71:911–912. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.01.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Song Y, Xia F, et al. Rapid and accurate intraoperative pathological diagnosis by artificial intelligence with deep learning technology. Med Hypotheses. 2017;107:98–99. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2017.08.02128915974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez-Machancoes O, Fernández-Martínez JL. Using artificial intelligence methods to speed up drug discovery. Exp Opin Drug Discov. 2019;14:769–777. doi:10.1080/17460441.2019.1621284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scannel JW, Blanckley A, Boldon H, et al. Diagnosing the decline in pharmaceutical R&D efficiency. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012;11:191–200. doi:10.1038/nrd368122378269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speck-Planche A, Cordeiro MNDS. Enabling virtual screening of potent and safer antimicrobial agents against noma: mtk-QSBER model for simultaneous prediction of antibacterial activities and ADMET properties. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2015;15(15):194–202. doi:10.2174/13895575150315031212051925769968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenorio-Borroto E, Ramirez FR, Speck-Planche A, et al. QSPR and flow cytometry analysis (QSPR-FCA): review and new findings on parallel study of multiple interactions of chemical compounds with immune cellular and molecular targets. Curr Drug Metab. 2014;15:414–428. doi:10.2174/138920021566614090810115225204826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Arzate SG, Tenorio-Borroto E, Barbabosa Pliego A, et al. PTML model for proteome mining of B-cell epitopes and theoretical-experimental study of Bm86 protein sequences from Colima, Mexico. J Proteome Res. 2017;16:4093–4103. doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b0047728922600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenorio-Borroto E, Ramírez FR, Speck-Planche A, et al. QSPR and flow cytometry analysis (QSPR-FCA): review and new findings on parallel study of multiple interactions of chemical compounds with immune cellular and molecular targets. Curr Drug Metab. 2014;15:414–428. doi:10.2174/138920021566614090810115225204826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira Da Costa J, Silva D, Caamaño O, et al. Perturbation theory/machine learning model of ChEMBL data for dopamine targets: docking, synthesis, and assay of New l-Prolyl-l-leucyl-glycinamide Peptidomimetics. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2018;9:2572–2587. doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.8b0008329791132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero-Duran FJ, Alonso N, Yanez M, et al. Brain-inspired cheminformatics of drug-target brain interactome, synthesis, and assay of TVP1022 derivatives. Neuropharmacology. 2016;103:270–278. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.12.01926721628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speck-Planche A. Multicellular target QSAR model for simultaneous prediction and design of anti-pancreatic cancer agents. ACS Omega. 2009;4:3122–3132. doi:10.1021/acsomega.8b03693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speck-Planche A, Cordeiro MNDS. De novo computational design of compounds virtually displaying potent antibacterial activity and desirable in vitro ADMET profiles. Med Chem Res. 2017;26:2345–2356. doi:10.1007/s00044-017-1936-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleandrova VV, Ruso JM, Speck-Planche A, et al. Enabling the discovery and virtual screening of potent and safe antimicrobial peptides simultaneous prediction of antibacterial activity and cytotoxicity. ACS Comb Sci. 2016;18:490–498. doi:10.1021/acscombsci.6b0006327280735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinney DC, Jason TI. How were new medicines discovered? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10:507–519. doi:10.1038/nrd348021701501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie L, Ge X, Tan H, et al. Towards structural systems pharmacology to study complex diseases and personalized medicine. PLOS Comp Bio. 2009;10:e1003554. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrell DK, Terzic A. Network systems biology for drug discovery. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010;88:120–125. doi:10.1038/clpt.2010.9120520604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulshan V, Peng L, Coram M, et al. Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographs. JAMA. 2016;316:2402–2410. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.1721627898976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halevy A, Norvig P, Pereira F. The unreasonable effectiveness of data. IEEE Intell Syst. 2009;24:8–12. doi:10.1109/MIS.2009.36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Muñiz Z, Fernández-Martínez JL, Srinivasan S, Mukerji T. Comparative analysis of the solution of linear continuous inverse problems using different basis expansions. J App Geophys. 2015;113:92–102. doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Martínez JL, Cernea A. Exploring the uncertainty space of ensemble classifiers in face recognition. Int J Pattern Recognit Artif Intell. 2015;29:1556002. doi:10.1142/S0218001415560029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks JL, Uchida TK, Seth A, Rajagopal A, Delp SL. Is my model good enough? Best practices for verification and validation of musculoskeletal models and simulations of movement. J Biomech Eng. 2015;137:0209051–02090524. doi:10.1115/1.4029304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hulse V, Khoshgoftaar TM, Napolitano A. Experimental perspectives on learning from imbalanced data Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning; 2007: 935–942.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hulse J. Data Quality in Data Mining and Machine Learning. Boca Raton (FL): s.n.; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Martínez. JL. High-dimensional data analysis. US20140222749A1 US. 3 06, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Martínez. JL. Model reduction and uncertainty analysis in inverse problems. Leading Edge. 2015;34:1006–1016. doi:10.1190/tle34091006.1
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Martínez JL, Fernández-Muñiz Z. The curse of dimensionality in inverse problems. J Comp App Math. 2019;369:112571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins FS, Varmus H. A new initiative on precision medicine. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:793–795. doi:10.1056/NEJMp150052325635347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libbrecht MW, Noble WS. Machine learning applications in genetics and genomics. Nature Rev Genet. 2015;16:321–332. doi:10.1038/nrg392025948244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng SF, Reps J, Kai J, Garibaldi JM, Qureshi N. Can machine-learning improve cardiovascular risk prediction using routine clinical data? PLoS One. 2017;12:e0174944. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.017494428376093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger MF, Mardis ER. The emerging clinical relevance of genomics in cancer medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15:353–365. doi:10.1038/s41571-018-0002-629599476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Do H, Dobrovic A. Sequence artifacts in DNA from formalin-fixed tissues: causes and strategies for minimization. Clin Chem. 2015;61:64–71. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2014.22304025421801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Network, Cancer Genome Atlas Research. Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature. 2008;455:1061–1068. doi:10.1038/nature0738518772890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Allen EM, Wagle N, Stojanov P, et al. Whole-exome sequencing and clinical interpretation of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples to guide precision cancer medicine. Nat Med. 2014;20:682–688. doi:10.1038/nm.355924836576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frampton GM, Fichtenholtz A, Otto GA, et al. Development and validation of a clinical cancer genomic profiling test based on massively parallel DNA sequencing. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:1023–1031. doi:10.1038/nbt.269624142049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerami E, Gao J, Dogrusoz U, et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:401–404. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-009522588877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• deAndrés-Galiana EJ, Fernández-Martínez JL, Sonis ST. Design of biomedical robots for phenotype prediction problems. J Comp Biol. 2016;23:678–692. doi:10.1089/cmb.2016.0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Martínez JL, Pallero J, Fernández-Muñiz Z. The effect of noise and Tikhonov’s regularization in inverse problems. Part I: the linear case. J Appl Geophys. 2014;108:176–185. doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Martínez JL, Pallero J, Fernández-Muñiz Z. The effect of noise and Tikhonov’s regularization in inverse problems. Part II: the nonlinear case. J Appl Geophys. 2014;108:186–193. doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• deAndrés-Galiana EJ, Fernández-Martínez JL, Sonis ST. Sensitivity analysis of gene ranking methods in phenotype prediction. J Biomed Inf. 2016;64:255–264. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2016.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cernea A, Fernández-Martínez JL, deAndrés-Galiana EJ, Galván JA, Pravia CG. Analysis of clinical prognostic variables for triple negative breast cancer histological grading and lymph node metastasis. J Med Inf Decis Making. 2018;1:14. doi:10.14302/issn.2641-5526.jmid-18-2488
   Google Scholar
• Jiang X, Barmada MM, Visweswaran S. Identifying genetic interactions in genome-wide data using Bayesian networks. Genet Epidemiol. 2010;34:575–581. doi:10.1002/gepi.2051420568290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hageman RS, Leduc MS, Korstanje R, Paigen B, Churchill GA. A Bayesian framework for inference of the genotype-phenotype map for segregating populations. Genetics. 2011;187:1163–1170. doi:10.1534/genetics.110.12327321242536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGeachi MJ, Chang HH, Weiss ST. CGBayesNets: conditional gaussian Bayesian network learning and inference with mixed discrete and continuous data. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014;10:e1003676. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.100367624922310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josan A. Conditional reasoning with subjective logic. J Multiple Valued Logic Soft Comput. 2008;15:5–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassells W, Schoenberger A, Graboys TB. Interpretation by physicians of clinical laboratory results. N Engl J Med. 1978;299:999–1001. doi:10.1056/NEJM197811022991808692627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su C, Andrew A, Karagas MR, Borsuk ME. Using Bayesian networks to discover relations between genes, environment and disease. BioData Min. 2013;6:6. doi:10.1186/1756-0381-6-623514120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman NS. An Introduction to Kernel and Nearest-Neighbor Nonparametric Regression. Vol. 46 The American Statistician; 1992:175–185.
   Google Scholar
• Huang GB, Zhu QY, Siew CK. Extreme learning machines: theory and applications. Neurocomputing. 2006;70:489–501. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2005.12.126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L. Random Forests. Mach Learn. 2001;45:5–32. doi:10.1023/A:1010933404324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortes C, Vapnik VN. Support-vector networks. Mach Learn. 1995;20:273–297. doi:10.1007/BF00994018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaccone G, Karim MR, Menshawy A. Deep Learning with TensorFlow. Birmingham (UK): Packt Publishing Ltd; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Cernea A, Fernández-Martínez JL, deAndrés-Galiana EJ, Galván JA, García Pravia C. Analysis of clinical prognostic variables for triple negative breast cancer histological grading and lymph node metastasis. J Med Inf Decis Making. 2018;1:14. doi:10.14302/issn.2641-5526.jmid-18-2488
   Google Scholar
• Cernea A, Fernández-Martínez JL, deAndrés-Galiana EJ, et al. Prognostic networks for unraveling the biological mechanisms of Sarcopenia. Mech Ageing Dev. 2019;182:111129. doi:10.1016/j.mad.2019.11112931445068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• deAndrés-Galiana EJ, Bea G, Fernández-Martínez JL, Saligan LN. Analysis of defective pathways and drug repositioning in multiple sclerosis via machine learning approaches. Comput Biol Med. 2019;115:103492. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.10349231627017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Martínez JL, deAndrés-Galiana EJ, Fernández-Ovies FJ, Cernea A, Kloczkowski A. Robust sampling of defective pathways in multiple myeloma. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:4681. doi:10.3390/ijms20194681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Martínez JL, Álvarez O, deAndrés EJ, de la Viña JFS, Huergo L. Robust sampling of altered pathways for drug repositioning reveals promising novel therapeutics for inclusion body myositis. J Rare Dis Res Treat. 2019;4:7–15. doi:10.29245/2572-9411
   Google Scholar
• Jezequel P, Loussouarn D, Guerin-Charbonnel C, et al. Gene-expression molecular subtyping of triple-negative breast cancer tumours: importance of immune response. Breast Cancer Res. 2015;20:43. doi:10.1186/s13058-015-0550-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cernea A, Fernandez-Martinez JL, deAndres-Galiana EJ, Fernandez-Ovies FJ, Alvarez-Machancoses O, Fernandez-Muñiz Z, Saligan LN, Sonis ST, Robust pathway sampling in phenotype prediction. Application to triple negative Cancer. BMC Bioinformatics. 2020;21(2):89. doi:10.1186/s12859-020-3356-6.
   Google Scholar
• Qin N, Wang C, Lu Q, et al. A cis-eQTL genetic variant of the cancer-testis gene CCDC116 is associated with risk of multiple cancers. Hum Genet. 2017;136:987. doi:10.1007/s00439-017-1827-228653172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyama T, Miyoshi Y, Koyama K, et al. Isolation of a novel gene on 8p21. 3-22 whose expression is reduced significantly in human colorectal cancers with liver metastasis. Cancer. 2000;29:9–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan M, Huang W, Kute TE, et al. Yin Yang 1 plays an essential role in breast cancer and negatively regulates p27. Am J Pathol. 2012;180:2120–2133. doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.01.03722440256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganguly KK, Pal S, Moulik S, Chatterjee A. Integrins and metastasis. Cell Adh Migr. 2013;7:251–261. doi:10.4161/cam.2384023563505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez O, Fernández-Martínez JL. The importance of biological invariance in drug design. J Sci Tech Res. 2019;18:13211–13212.
   Google Scholar
• Subramanian A, Narayan R, Corsello SM, et al. A next generation connectivity map: L1000 platform and the first 1,000,000 profiles. Cell. 2017;171:1437–1452. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.04929195078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan J, Wang X, Turner JA, Baldwin NE, Gu J, Stegle O. Breaking the paradigm: dr Insight empowers signature-free, enhanced drug repurposing. Bioinformatics. 2019;35:2818–2826. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz00630624606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderton GK. Targeting MYC? You BET. Nature Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10:732–733. doi:10.1038/nrd3569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucchetti B, Shimada AK, Katz A, Curigliano G. The role of histone deacetylase inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer. Breast. 2019;43:130–134. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2018.12.00130553187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Nie J, Ma X, et al. Targeting PI3K in cancer: mechanisms and advances in clinical trials. Mol Cancer. 2019;18:26. doi:10.1186/s12943-019-0954-x30782187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crown J, O’Shaughnessy J, Gullo G. Emerging targeted therapies in triple-negative breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:vi56–vi65. doi:10.1093/annonc/mds19623012305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roux NL, Schmidt M, Bach FR. A stochastic gradient method with an exponential convergence _rate for finite training sets. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2012;2663–2671.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Z 2018, Improved Adam optimizer for deep neural networks. 2018 IEEE/ACM 26th International Symposium on Quality of Service (IWQoS) 1–2.
   Google Scholar