Mitochondrial DNA in Fresh versus Frozen Embryo Culture Media of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Patients Undergoing Invitro Fertilization: A Possible Predictive Marker of a Successful Pregnancy

References

• Legro RS. Evaluation and treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome. Endotext. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Angin P, Yoldemir T, Atasayan K. Quality of life among infertile PCOS patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;300(2):461–467. doi:10.1007/s00404-019-05202-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong KM, van Wely M, Mol F, Repping S, Mastenbroek S. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;(3). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011184.pub2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao J, Feng HL. Extra-and intra-ovarian factors in polycystic ovary syndrome: impact on oocyte maturation and embryo developmental competence. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;17(1):17–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatemi HM, Garcia-Velasco J. Avoiding ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome with the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist trigger. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(4):870–873. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Wang E-Y, Du Q-Y, et al. Progesterone elevation on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration adversely affects the outcome of IVF with transferred embryos at different developmental stages. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13(1):82. doi:10.1186/s12958-015-0075-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roque M, Lattes K, Serra S, et al. Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(1):156–162. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong KM, Mastenbroek S, Repping S. Cryopreservation of human embryos and its contribution to in vitro fertilization success rates. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(1):19–26. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.05.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z-J, Shi Y, Sun Y, et al. Fresh versus frozen embryos for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(6):523–533. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1513873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates A, Kung A, Mounts E, et al. Optimal euploid embryo transfer strategy, fresh versus frozen, after preimplantation genetic screening with next generation sequencing: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(3):723–730. e723. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.12.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stormlund S, Schmidt L, Bogstad J, et al. Patients’ attitudes and preferences towards a freeze-all strategy in ART treatment. Hum Reprod. 2019;34(4):679–688. doi:10.1093/humrep/dez006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Q, Chen Q, Wang L, et al. Live birth rates in the first complete IVF cycle among 20 687 women using a freeze-all strategy. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(5):924–929. doi:10.1093/humrep/dey044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teh WT, Polyakov A, Garrett C, Edgar D, Mcbain J, Rogers PAW. Reduced live birth rates in frozen versus fresh single cleavage stage embryo transfer cycles: a cross-sectional study. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2020;18(7):491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecchino GN, Garcia-Velasco JA. Mitochondrial DNA copy number as a predictor of embryo viability. Fertil Steril. 2019;111(2):205–211. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.11.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capalbo A, Rienzi L, Cimadomo D, et al. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(6):1173–1181. doi:10.1093/humrep/deu033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz-Jaffe MG, McReynolds S. Embryology in the era of proteomics. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(4):1073–1077. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.12.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May-Panloup P, Chrétien MF, Savagner F, et al. Increased sperm mitochondrial DNA content in male infertility. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(3):550–556. doi:10.1093/humrep/deg096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson S, Bankier AT, Barrell BG, et al. Sequence and organization of the human mitochondrial genome. Nature. 1981;290(5806):457–465. doi:10.1038/290457a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaneda H, Hayashi J, Takahama S, Taya C, Lindahl KF, Yonekawa H. Elimination of paternal mitochondrial DNA in intraspecific crosses during early mouse embryogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1995;92(10):4542–4546. doi:10.1073/pnas.92.10.4542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyedhassani SM, Houshmand M, Kalantar SM, Modabber G, Aflatoonian A. No mitochondrial DNA deletions but more D-loop point mutations in repeated pregnancy loss. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27(11):641–648. doi:10.1007/s10815-010-9435-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigliani S, Persico L, Lagazio C, Anserini P, Venturini P, Scaruffi P. Mitochondrial DNA in day 3 embryo culture medium is a novel, non-invasive biomarker of blastocyst potential and implantation outcome. Mol Hum Reprod. 2014;20(12):1238–1246. doi:10.1093/molehr/gau086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESHRE TR, Group A-SPCW. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(1):19–25. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfaraj S, Alzaher F, Alshwaiaer S, Ahmed A. Pregnancy outcome of day 3 versus day 5 embryo transfer: a retrospective analysis. Asian Pac J Reprod. 2019;2:89–92.
   Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Maxson WS, Hoffman DI, et al. Maximizing pregnancy rates and limiting higher-order multiple conceptions by determining the optimal number of embryos to transfer based on quality. Fertil Steril. 1998;69(4):650–657. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00024-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajaz S, Czajka A, Malik A. Accurate measurement of circulating mitochondrial DNA content from human blood samples using real-time quantitative PCR. Mitochondrial Med. 2015;117–131.
   Google Scholar
• Wood JR, Dumesic DA, Abbott DH, Strauss III JF. Molecular abnormalities in oocytes from women with polycystic ovary syndrome revealed by microarray analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(2):705–713. doi:10.1210/jc.2006-2123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(6):1155–1158. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00518-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Spath K, Wells D. Morphological and cytogenetic assessment of cleavage and blastocyst stage embryos. Mol Hum Reprod. 2013;20(2):117–126. doi:10.1093/molehr/gat073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott RT, Upham KM, Forman EJ, Zhao T, Treff NR. Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):624–630. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fragouli E, McCaffrey C, Ravichandran K, et al. Clinical implications of mitochondrial DNA quantification on pregnancy outcomes: a blinded prospective non-selection study. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(11):2340–2347. doi:10.1093/humrep/dex292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi H-J, Koo -J-J, Choi S-Y, Jeong H-J, Roh S-I. Fragmentation of embryos is associated with both necrosis and apoptosis. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(1):187–192. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.04.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigliani S, Anserini P, Venturini P, Scaruffi P. Mitochondrial DNA content in embryo culture medium is significantly associated with human embryo fragmentation. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(10):2652–2660. doi:10.1093/humrep/det314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desquiret-Dumas V, Clément A, Seegers V, et al. The mitochondrial DNA content of cumulus granulosa cells is linked to embryo quality. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(3):607–614. doi:10.1093/humrep/dew341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto S, Morimoto N, Yamanaka M, et al. Quantitative and qualitative changes of mitochondria in human preimplantation embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34(5):573–580. doi:10.1007/s10815-017-0886-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diez-Juan A, Rubio C, Marin C, et al. Mitochondrial DNA content as a viability score in human euploid embryos: less is better. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(3):534–541. e531. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.05.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigliani S, Orlando G, Massarotti C, et al. Non-invasive mitochondrial DNA quantification on day 3 predicts blastocyst development: a prospective, blinded, multi-centric study. Mol Hum Reprod. 2019;25(9):527–537. doi:10.1093/molehr/gaz032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos MA, Kuijk EW, Macklon NS. The impact of ovarian stimulation for IVF on the developing embryo. Reproduction. 2010;139(1):23–34. doi:10.1530/REP-09-0187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson N-G, Wang J, Wilhelmsson H, et al. Mitochondrial transcription factor A is necessary for mtDNA maintenance and embryogenesis in mice. Nat Genet. 1998;18(3):231–236. doi:10.1038/ng0398-231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeviani M, Di Donato S. Mitochondrial disorders. Brain. 2004;127(10):2153–2172. doi:10.1093/brain/awh259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Z, Puigserver P, Andersson U, et al. Mechanisms controlling mitochondrial biogenesis and respiration through the thermogenic coactivator PGC-1. Cell. 1999;98(1):115–124. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80611-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon JW, Rungi AA, Inagaki H, Hood DA. Plasticity in skeletal, cardiac, and smooth muscle: selected contribution: effects of contractile activity on mitochondrial transcription factor A expression in skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol. 2001;90(1):389–396. doi:10.1152/jappl.2001.90.1.389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melser S, Chatelain EH, Lavie J, et al. Rheb regulates mitophagy induced by mitochondrial energetic status. Cell Metab. 2013;17(5):719–730. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2013.03.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milachich T, Shterev A. Are there optimal numbers of oocytes, spermatozoa and embryos in assisted reproduction? JBRA Assist Reprod. 2016;20(3):142. doi:10.5935/1518-0557.20160032
   Google Scholar
• Lu X, Chen Q, Fu Y, Ai A, Lyu Q, Kuang YP. Elevated progesterone on the trigger day does not impair the outcome of human menotrophins gonadotrophin and medroxyprogesterone acetate treatment cycles. Sci Rep. 2016;6:31112. doi:10.1038/srep31112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venetis C, Kolibianakis E, Bosdou J, Tarlatzis B. Progesterone elevation and probability of pregnancy after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 60 000 cycles. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19(5):433–457. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmt014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo HS, Cha SH, Kim HO, et al. A high response to controlled ovarian stimulation induces premature luteinization with a negative impact on pregnancy outcomes in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycle. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2015;42(4):149–155. doi:10.5653/cerm.2015.42.4.149
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C, Thomas S. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen–thawed embryo transfer in normal responders. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(2):344–348. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Damián EP, Jiménez-Medina JA, Alarcón MA, et al. Cryopreservation induces higher oxidative stress levels in Bos indicus embryos compared with Bos taurus. Theriogenology. 2019;143:74–81. doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatone C, Di Emidio G, Vento M, Ciriminna R, Artini PG. Cryopreservation and oxidative stress in reproductive cells. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2010;26(8):563–567. doi:10.3109/09513591003686395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee S, Gagnon C. Evidence for the production of oxygen free radicals during freezing/thawing of bull spermatozoa. Mol Reprod Dev. 2001;59(4):451–458. doi:10.1002/mrd.1052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar