Effectiveness of public health and education programs for creating awareness of and managing cardiovascular disease

References

• National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence. Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease at Population Level. London, UK: National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease. Guidelines for Assessment and Management of Cardiovascular Risk. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. Building on the Best. Choice, Responsiveness and Equity in the NHS. London, UK: Department of Health; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence. Secondary Prevention in Primary and Secondary Care for Patients Following a Myocardial Infarction. London, UK: National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Artinian N, Fletcher G, Mozaffarian D, et al; on behalf of the American Heart Association Prevention Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. Interventions to promote physical activity and dietary lifestyle changes for cardiovascular risk factor reduction in adults: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;122:406–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner M, Allender S, Scarborough P; British Heart Foundation Health Promotion Research Group. Cardiovascular disease in Europe. Eur JCardiovasc PrevRehabil. 2009;16 Suppl 2:S43- S47.
   Google Scholar
• Rose G. Sick individuals and sick populations. Int J Epidemiol. 1985;14:32–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson R, Lynch J, Harper S. Preventing coronary heart disease. Does Rose’s population prevention axiom still apply in the 21st century? BMJ. 2006;332:617–618.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manuel D, Lim J, Tanuseputro P, et al. Revisiting Rose: Strategies for reducing coronary heart disease. BMJ. 2006;332:659–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joint British Societies. JBS 2: Joint British Societies’ guidelines on prevention of cardiovascular disease in clinical practice. Heart. 2005; 91 Suppl V:1–52.
   Google Scholar
• Piepoli M, Corra U, Benzer W, et al. Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: From knowledge to implementation. A position paper from the Cardiac Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010;17:1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Needs and Action Priorities in Cardiac Rehabilitation and Secondary Prevention in Patients with CHD. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. Alcohol advice. 2009. Available from: www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publichealth/Healthimprovement/Alcoholmisuse/DH_085385. Accessed December 22, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Kotseva K, Wood D, DeBacker G, et al; EUROASPIRE Study Group. Cardiovascular prevention guidelines in daily practice: A comparison of EUROASPIRE I, II and III surveys in eight European countries. Lancet. 2009;373:929–940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie C, Thomas R, Squires R, Allison T, Milani R. Exercise training and cardiac rehabilitation in primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. Mayo Clinic Proc. 2009;84:373–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah N, Ting H, Montori V Wagie A, Roger V Evidence-based therapy for myocardial infarction: Medication adherence in the community. Circulation. 2007;116(16 Suppl):797.
   Google Scholar
• Certo C. History of cardiac rehabilitation. Phys Ther. 1985;65:1793–1795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health. Nation al Service Frameworkfor Coronary Heart Disease. London, UK: Department of Health; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• British Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation. Standards and Core Components for Cardiac Rehabilitation. London, UK: British Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Williams M, Ades P, Hamm L, Keteyian S. Clinical evidence for a health benefit from cardiac rehabilitation: An update. Am Heart J. 2006;152:835–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alter D, Oh P, Chong A. Relationship between cardiac rehabilitation and survival after cardiac hospitalization within a universal health care system. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009;16:102–113.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson D, Clark A. Cardiac rehabilitation: Into the future. Heart. 2009;95:1897–1900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bethell H, Lewin R, Dalal H. Cardiac rehabilitation in the United Kingdom. Heart. 2009;95:271–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briti sh Heart Foundation. The National Audit of Cardiac Rehabilitation. Annual Statistical Report 2010. London, UK: British Heart Foundation; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence. Cardiac Rehabilitation Service Commissioning Guide. London, UK: National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Korenfeld Y, Mendoza-Bastidas C, Saavedra L, et al. Current status of cardiac rehabilitation in Latin America and the Caribbean. Am Heart J. 2009;158:480–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas R, King M, Lui K, Oldridge N, Pina I, Spertus J. AACVPR/ ACC/AHA 2007 Performance measures on cardiac rehabilitation for referral to and delivery of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention services. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:1401–1435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health. Building for the Future: The Coronary Heart Disease National Service Framework. Progress Report for 2007. London, UK: Department of Health; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong D. The rise of surveillance medicine. Sociol Health Illn. 1995;17:393–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen A, Lupton D. The New Public Health: Health and Self in the Age of Risk. London, UK: Sage; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Wheatley E. Disciplining bodies at risk: Cardiac rehabilitation and the medicalisation of fitness. Journal of Sport and Social Issues. 2005;29:198–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennant M, Davenport C, Bayliss S, Greenheld W, Marshall T, Hyde C. Community programs for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172:501–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison C, Davey Smith G, Frankel S. Lay epidemiology and the prevention paradox: The implications of coronary candidacy for health education. Sociol Health Illn. 1991;13:1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison C, Frankel S, Davey Smith G. The limits of lifestyle: Re-assessing “fatalism” in the popular culture of illness prevention. Soc Sci Med. 1992;34:675–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel S, Davison C, Davey Smith G. Lay epidemiology and the rationality of responses to health education. Br J Gen Pract. 1991;41:428–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emslie C, Hunt K, Watt G. Invisible women? The importance of gender in lay beliefs about heart problems. Sociol Health Illn. 2001;23:203–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emslie C, Hunt K, Watt G. ‘I’d rather go with a heart attack than drag on’: Lay images of heart disease and the problems they present for primary and secondary prevention. Coronary Health Care. 2001 ;5: 25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Ruston A, Clayton J. Coronary heart disease: Women’s assessment of risk - a qualitative study. Health Risk Soc. 2002;4:125–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt K, Emslie C, Watt G. Lay constructions of a family history of heart disease: Potential for misunderstandings in the clinical encounter. Lancet. 2001;357:1168–1171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston R. Ethnography: Studying the fate of health promotion in coronary families. J Adv Nurs. 1997;25:554–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooqi A, Nagra D, Edgar T, Khunti K. Attitudes to lifestyle risk factors for coronary heart disease amongst South Asians in Leicester: A focus group study. Fam Pract. 2000;17:293–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angus I, Rukholm E, St Onge R. Habitus, stress and the body: The everyday production of health and cardiovascular risk. QualHealth Res. 2007;17:1088–1102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frich J, Ose L, Malterud K, Fugelli P. Perceived vulnerability to heart disease in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia: A qualitative interview study. Ann Fam Med. 2006;4:198–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frich J, Malterud K, Fugelli P. How do patients at risk portray candidates for coronary heart disease? A qualitative interview study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2007;25:112–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollman G, Ek A, Olsson A, Bertero C. The meaning of life among patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2004;19:243–250.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Senior V, Smith J, Michie S, Marteau T. Making sense of risk: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of vulnerability to heart disease. J Health Psychol. 2002;7:157–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durack-Bown I, Giral P, d’Ivernois J, et al. Patients and physicians perceptions and experience of hypercholesterolaemia: A qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract. 2003;53:851–857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troein M, Rastam L, Selander S, Widlund, Uden G. Understanding the unperceivable: Ideas about cholesterol expressed by middle-aged men with recently discovered hypercholesterolaemia. Fam Pract. 1997;14:376–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolmie E, Lindsay G, Kerr S, Brown M, Ford I, Gaw A. Patients’ perspectives on statin therapy for treatment of hypercholesterolaemia: A qualitative study. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2003;2:141–149.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark A, Barbour R, White M, MacIntyre P. Promoting participation in cardiac rehabilitation: Patient choices and experiences. J Adv Nurs. 2004;47:5–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark A, Whelan H, Barbour R, MacIntyre P. A realist study of the mechanisms of cardiac rehabilitation. J Adv Nurs. 2005;52:362–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murie J, Ross A, Lough M, Rich D. Exploring post-myocardial infarction patients’ perceptions of patient-mediated interventions for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease (SIGN Guideline 41). Qual Prim Care. 2006;14:77–83.
   Google Scholar
• Wingham J, Dalal H, Sweeney K, Evans P. Listening to patients: Choice in cardiac rehabilitation. Eur JCardiovasc Nurs. 2006;5:289–294.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hird C, Upton C, Chesson R. “Getting back to normal”: Patients’ understanding of cardiac rehabilitation. Physiotherapy. 2004;90:125–131.
   Google Scholar
• Day W, Batten L. Cardiac rehabilitation for women: One size does not fit all. Aust J AdvNurs. 2006;24:21–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higginson R. Why do women attend and continue cardiac rehabilitation? British Journal of Cardiac Nursing. 2006;1:95–102.
   Google Scholar
• Tod A, Lacey E, McNeill F. “I’m still waiting ...”: Barriers to accessing cardiac rehabilitation services. J Adv Nurs. 2002;40:421–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell P, Arthur H, Rideout E. Lives of rural women after myocardial infarction. Can J Nurs Res. 2005;37:54–67.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper A, Jackson G, Weinman J, Horne R. A qualitative study investigating patients’ beliefs about cardiac rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:87–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McSweeney J, Crane P. An act of courage: Women’s decision-making processes regarding outpatient cardiac rehabilitation attendance. Rehabil Nurs. 2001;26:132–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Driscoll J, Shave R, Cushion C. A National Health Service Hospital’s cardiac rehabilitation programme: A qualitative analysis of provision. J Clin Nurs. 2007;16:1908–1918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paquet M, Bolduc N, Xhignesse M, Vanasse A. Re-engineering cardiac rehabilitation programmes: Considering the patient’s point of view. JAdvNurs. 2005;51:567–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arif H, Aijaz B, Islam M, Aftab U, Kumar S, Shafqat S. Drug compliance after stroke and myocardial infarction: A comparative study. NeurolIndia. 2007;55:130–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke L, Dunbar-Jacob J. Adherence to medication, diet and activity recommendations: From assessment to maintenance. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 1995;9:62–79.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Choudry N, Winkelmayer W. Medication adherence after myocardial infarction: A long way left to go. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:216–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho P, Magid D, Masoudi F, McClure D, Rumsfeld J. Adherence to cardioprotective medications and mortality among patients with diabetes and ischemic heart disease. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2006;6:48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kopjar B, Sales A, Pineros S, Sun H, Li Y, Hedeen A. Adherence with statin therapy in secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in Veterans Administration male population. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:1106–1108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Grace K, Foster T, et al. How should we measure medication adherence in clinical trials and practice? Ther Clin Risk Manage. 2007;3:685–690.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Newby L, Allen LaPointe N, Chen A, et al. Long-term adherence to evidence-based secondary prevention therapies in coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2006;113:203–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen J, Chong A, Alter D. Relationship between adherence to evidence-based pharmacotherapy and long-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2007;297:177–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sud A, Kline Rogers E, Eagle K, et al. Adherence to medications by patients after acute coronary syndromes. Ann Pharmacother. 2005;39:1792–1797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye X, Gross C, Schommer J, Cline R, Peter W. Association between copayment and adherence to statin treatment initiated after coronary heart disease hospitalisation: A longitudinal, retrospective cohort study. Clin Ther. 2007;29:2748–2757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong J, Molassiotis, Marsh H. Adherence to health recommendations after a cardiac rehabilitation programme in post-myocardial infarction patients: The role of health beliefs, locus of control and psychological status. Clin Eff Nurs. 2004;8:26–38.
   Google Scholar
• MacDermott A. Living with angina pectoris - a phenomenological study. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2002;1:265–272.
   Google Scholar
• White S, Bissell P, Anderson C. A qualitative study of patients’ perspectives on cardiac rehabilitation, lifestyle change and taking medicines: Implications for service development. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2010;15 Suppl 2:47–53.
   Google Scholar
• Wiles R, Kinmonth A. Patients’ understandings of heart attack: Implications for prevention of recurrence. PatientEduc Couns. 2001;44:161–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane P. I want to know: Exploring how older women acquire health knowledge after a myocardial infarction. J Women Aging. 2001;13:3–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugbolle L, Sorensen E, Gundersen B, Petersen K, Lorentzen L. Basing pharmacy counselling on the perspective of the angina pectoris patient. Pharm World Sci. 2002;24:71–78.
   Google Scholar
• Haugbolle L, Sorensen E, Henriksen H. Medication and illness-related factual knowledge, perceptions and behaviour in angina pectoris patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;47:281–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolmie E, Lindsay G, Belcher P. Coronary artery bypass graft operation: Patients’ experience of health and well-being over time. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2006;5:228–236.
   Google Scholar
• Karner A, Goransson A, Bergdahl B. Conceptions on treatment and lifestyle in patients with coronary heart disease - a phenomenographic analysis. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;47:137–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ononeze V, Murphy A, Byrne M, Bradley C, Macfarlane A. Patients and health professionals’ perspectives on the sociocultural influences on secondary cardiac behaviour: A qualitative study of the implications in policy and practice. Fam Pract. 2006;23:587–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehane E, McCarthy G, Collender V, Deasy A. Medication-taking for coronary artery disease - patients’ perspectives. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2008;7:133–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attebring M, Herlitz J, Ekman I. Intrusion and confusion - the impact of medication and health professionals after acute myocardial infarction. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2005;4:153–159.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman E, Bertero C. You can do it if you set your mind to it: A qualitative study of patients with coronary artery disease. J Adv Nurs. 2001;36:733–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson A, Dahlberg K, Ekebergh M. Living with experiences following a myocardial infarction. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2003;2:229–236.
   Google Scholar
• Roebuck A, Furze G, Thompson D. Health-related quality of life after myocardial infarction: An interview study. J Adv Nurs. 2001;34:787–794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treloar C. Developing a multilevel understanding of heart disease: An interview study of MONICA participants in an Australian center. Qual Health Res. 1997;7:468–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• East L, Brown K, Twells C. “Knocking on St Peter’s door”. A qualitative study of recovery after a heart attack and the experience of cardiac rehabilitation. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2004;5:202–210.
   Google Scholar
• Ford J. Living with a history of heart attacks: A human science investigation. J Adv Nurs. 1989;14:173–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambling T. A qualitative study into the informational needs of coronary heart disease patients. International Journal of Health Promotion and Education. 2003;41:68–76.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen B, Petersson K. The illness experience of patients after a first time myocardial infarction. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;51:123–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiles R. Patient’s perceptions of their heart attack and recovery: The influence of epidemiological “evidence” and personal experience. Soc Sci Med. 1998;46:1477–1486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutin-Foster C. Getting to the heart of social support: A qualitative analysis of the types of instrumental support that are most helpful in motivating cardiac risk factor modification. Heart Lung. 2005;34:22–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condon C, McCarthy G. Lifestyle changes following acute myocardial infarction: Patients perspectives. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2006;5:37–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LaCharity L. The experiences of postmenopausal women with coronary artery disease. West J Nurs Res. 1997;19:583–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaCharity L. The experiences of younger women with coronary artery disease. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 1999;8:773–785.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plach S, Stevens P. Midlife women’s experiences living with heart disease. ApplNurs Res. 2001;14:201–209.
   Google Scholar
• Sjostrom-Strand A, Fridlund B. Stress in women’s daily life before and after a myocardial infarction: A qualitative analysis. Scand J Caring Sci. 2007;21:10–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas D. Women and heart disease: Living with lifestyle changes - a pilot study. AACN Clin Issues Crit Care Nurs. 1994;5:21–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fleury J, Sedikides C. Wellness motivation in cardiac rehabilitation: The role of self-knowledge in cardiovascular risk modification. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30:373–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson J, Morse J. Regaining control: The process of adjustment after myocardial infarction. Heart Lung. 1990;19:126–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherck K. Coping with acute myocardial infarction. Heart Lung. 1992;21:327–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr E, Fothergill-Bourbonnais F. The recovery mosaic: Older women’s lived experiences after a myocardial infarction. Heart Lung. 2002;31:355–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart M, Davidson K, Meade D, Hirth A, Makrides L. Myocardial infarction: Survivors’ and spouses’ stress, coping and support. J Adv Nurs. 2000;31:1351–1360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sriskantharajah J, Kai J. Promoting physical activity among South Asian women with coronary heart disease and diabetes: What might help? Fam Pract. 2007;24:71–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton J, Ruston A. Exercising for a healthy heart: A qualitative study of women’s beliefs. Health Educ J. 2003;62:29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Webster R, Thompson D, Mayou R. The experiences and needs of Gujarati Hindu patients and partners in the first month after myocardial infarction. Eur JCardiovasc Nurs. 2002;1:69–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• King K, LeBlanc P, Sanguins J. Gender-based challenges faced by older Sikh women as immigrants: Recognizing and acting on the risk of coronary artery disease. Can J Nurs Res. 2006;38:16–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Department of Health. Healthy Lives, Healthy People: Our Strategy for Public Health in England (Cm 7985). London, UK: The Stationary Office; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Dalal H, Zawada A, Jolly K, Moxham T, Taylor R. Home based versus centre based cardiac rehabilitation: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010;340:b5631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neubeck L, Redfern J, Fernandez R, Briffa T, Bauman A, Freedman S. Telehealth interventions for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: A systematic review. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009;16:281–289.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar