692
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

The Preferences of Modes of Child Delivery and Associated Factors Among Pregnant Women in Southern Ethiopia

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 59-73 | Published online: 15 Jul 2022

References

  • World Health Organization. WHO Recommendations Non-Clinical Interventions to Reduce Unnecessary Caesarean Sections. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
  • World Health Organization. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. World Health Organization; 2015. WHO/RHR/15.02. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/161442/WHO_RHR_15.02_eng.pdf. Accessed July 8, 2022.
  • Thanh BYL, Lumbiganon P, Pattanittum P, et al. Mode of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in preterm birth: a secondary analysis of the WHO Global and Multi-country Surveys. Sci Rep. 2019;9:15556. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-52015-w
  • Berhan Y, Haileamlak A. The risks of planned vaginal breech delivery versus planned caesarean section for term breech birth: a meta-analysis including observational studies. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;13(1):49–57. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.13524
  • Adane F, Mulu A, Seyoum G, Gebrie A, Lake A. Prevalence and root causes of surgical site infection among women undergoing caesarean section in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Patient Saf Surg. 2019;13:34. doi:10.1186/s13037-019-0212-6
  • Regan J, Thompson A, DeFranco E. The influence of mode of delivery on breastfeeding initiation in women with a prior caesarean delivery: a population-based study. Breastfeed Med. 2013;8(2):181–186. doi:10.1089/bfm.2012.0049
  • Betran A, Temmerman M, Kingdon C, et al. Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):P1358–P1368.
  • Shi Y, Jiang Y, Zeng Q, et al. Influencing factors associated with the mode of birth among childbearing women in Hunan Province: a cross-sectional study in China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(108):1–9. doi:10.1186/s12884-016-0897-9
  • Hannah M. Planned elective caesarean section: a reasonable choice for some women? Can Med Assoc J. 2004;170(5):813–814. doi:10.1503/cmaj.1032002
  • Tenaw Z, Kassa Z, Kassahun G, Ayenew A. Maternal preference, mode of delivery and associated factors among women who gave birth at public and Private Hospitals in Hawassa City, Southern Ethiopia. Ann Glob Health. 2019;85(1):115. doi:10.5334/aogh.2578
  • Sayiner F, Ozerdogan N, Giray S, Ozdemir E, Savei A. Identifying the women’s choice of delivery methods of and the factors that affect them. J Perinat. 2009;17(3):104–112.
  • Roudsari R, Zakerihamidi M, Khoei E. Socio-cultural beliefs, values and traditions regarding women’s preferred mode of birth in the North of Iran. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2015;3(3):165–176.
  • Murphy DJ, Fahey T. A retrospective cohort study of mode of delivery among public and private patients in an integrated maternity hospital setting. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e003865. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003865
  • Amjad A, Amjad U, Zakar R, et al. Factors associated with caesarean deliveries among child-bearing women in Pakistan: secondary analysis of data from the demographic and health survey, 2012–13. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18:113. doi:10.1186/s12884-018-1743-z
  • Silva T, Dumont-Pena E, Moreira A, et al. Factors associated with normal and caesarean delivery in public and private maternity hospitals: a cross-sectional study. Rev Bras Enferm. 2020;73(suppl 4). doi:10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0996
  • Das P, Samad N, Sapkota A, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with caesarean delivery in Nepal: evidence from a nationally representative sample. Cureus. 2021;13(12):e20326. doi:10.7759/cureus.20326
  • Alabdullah HA, Ismael L, Alshehri LA, et al. The prevalence of C-section delivery and its associated factors among Saudi women attending different clinics of King Khalid University Hospital. Cureus. 2021;13(1):e12774. doi:10.7759/cureus.12774
  • Wang L, Xu X, Baker P, et al. Patterns and associated factors of caesarean delivery intention among expectant mothers in China: implications from the implementation of China’s New National Two-Child Policy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(7):686. doi:10.3390/ijerph13070686
  • Konlan K, Baku E, Japiong M, Konlan K, Amoah R. Reasons for women’s choice of elective caesarean section in Duayaw Nkwanta hospital. J Pregnancy. 2019;2019:2320743. doi:10.1155/2019/2320743
  • Liu NH, Mazzoni A, Zamberlin N, et al. Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study. Reprod Health. 2013;10:1–7. doi:10.1186/1742-4755-10-2
  • Kasai KE, Nomura RM, Benute GR, de Lucia MC, Zugaib M. Women’s opinions about mode of birth in Brazil: a qualitative study in a public teaching hospital. Midwifery. 2010;26(3):319–326. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2008.08.001
  • Yaya S, Uthman OA, Amouzou A, et al. Disparities in caesarean section prevalence and determinants across sub-Saharan Africa countries. Glob Health Res Policy. 2018;3:19. doi:10.1186/s41256-018-0074-y
  • Yisma E, Smithers LG, Lynch JW, Mol BW. Caesarean section in Ethiopia: prevalence and sociodemographic characteristics. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(7):1130–1135. PMID: 29103331. doi:10.1080/14767058.2017.1401606
  • Welay F, Gebresilassie B, Asefa G, Mengesha M. Delivery mode preference and associated factors among pregnant mothers in Harar regional state, Eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BioMed Res Int. 2021;2021:1–7. doi:10.1155/2021/1751578
  • Guittier M, Cedraschi C, Jemei N, Boulvain M, Guillemin F, Impact of mode of delivery on the birth experience in first-time mothers: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14(1):1–9. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-14-254
  • Taha Z, Hassan A, Wikkeling-Scott L, Papandreou D. Prevalence and associated factors of caesarean section and its impact on early initiation of breastfeeding in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Nutrients. 2019;11(11):2723. doi:10.3390/nu11112723
  • Karim F, Ali NB, Khan ANS, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with caesarean section in four Hard-to-Reach areas of Bangladesh: findings from a cross-sectional survey. PLoS One. 2020;15(6):e0234249. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0234249
  • Muleta G, Moges A, Ademe B. Prevalence and outcome of caesarean section in Attat Hospital, Gurage zone, SNNPR, Ethiopia. Arch Med. 2015;7(4):8.
  • Bago BJ. Prevalence and its associated factors among women undergone operative delivery at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Southern Ethiopia, 2017. Gynecol Obstet. 2018;8:461. doi:10.4172/2161-0932.1000461
  • Tsegaye H, Desalegne B, Wassihun B, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of caesarean section in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Pan Afr Med J. 2019;34:136. doi:10.11604/pamj.2019.34.136.16264
  • Melesse MB, Geremew AB, Abebe SM. High prevalence of caesarean birth among mothers delivered at health facilities in Bahir Dar city, Amhara region, Ethiopia. A comparative study. PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0231631. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231631
  • Shitu S, Shifera A, Eyado R, et al. Prevalence of caesarean section and associated factor among women who give birth in the last one year at Butajira General Hospital, Gurage Zone, SNNPR, Ethiopia, 2019. Int J Pregn Chi Birth. 2020;6(1):16‒21. doi:10.15406/ipcb.2020.06.00188
  • Gedefaw G, Demis A, Alemnew B, et al. Prevalence, indications, and outcomes of caesarean section deliveries in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Patient Saf Surg. 2020;14:11. doi:10.1186/s13037-020-00236-8
  • Mose A, Abebe H. Magnitude and associated factors of caesarean section deliveries among women who gave birth in Southwest Ethiopia: institutional-based cross-sectional study. Arch Public Health. 2021;79:158. doi:10.1186/s13690-021-00682-5
  • Loke A, Davies L, Li S. Factors influencing the decision that women make on their mode of delivery: the health belief model. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:1–12. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0931-z
  • Adageba A, Danso KA, Adusu-Donkor A, Kakroe A. Awareness and perception of and attitudes towards Caesarean section among antenatal client. Ghana Med J. 2008;42(4):137–140.
  • Ogunlaja O, Ogunlaja I, Akinola S, Aworinde O. Knowledge, attitude and willingness to accept caesarean section among women in Ogbomoso, southwest Nigeria. South Sudan Med J. 2018;11(4):89–92.
  • Favilli A, Laganà AS, Indraccolo U, et al. What women want? Results from a prospective multicenter study on women’s preference about pain management during labour. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;228:197–202. PMID: 29990827. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.06.038
  • Omona K. Determinants of caesarean section rates in private-not-for-profit healthcare facilities: St Joseph’s Hospital_ Kitovu. Cogent Med. 2021;8(1). doi:10.1080/2331205X.2021.1928939
  • Margo S, Tewodros L, Ephrem K, et al. Mode of delivery among women with a history of prior caesarean birth at Mizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital. J Women’s Health Dev. 2021;4:1–9.
  • Birara M, Gebrehiwot Y. Factors associated with success of vaginal birth after one caesarean section (VBAC) at three teaching hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a case control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:31. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-13-31