Advanced search
Publication Cover
Patient Preference and Adherence Volume 16, 2022 - Issue
Submit an article Journal homepage
179
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Treatment Decision-Making in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Perceptions of Locus of Control Among Patient, Caregiver, and Physician Triads

Frank A Schumacher1 Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USACorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9995-7456
ORCID Icon,
Irene B Helenowski1 Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
,
Laura B Oswald2 Program of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USAORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6281-2512
ORCID Icon,
Brian D Gonzalez2 Program of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USAORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5108-5735
ORCID Icon,
James T Benning1 Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
&
Alicia K Morgans1 Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
Pages 235-244 | Published online: 28 Jan 2022

References

  • American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures; 2021.
  • NCCN guidelines; 2021.
  • Oswald LB, Schumacher FA, Gonzalez BD, Moses KA, Penson DF, Morgans AK. What do men with metastatic prostate cancer consider when making treatment decisions? A Mixed-methods Study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020;14(14):1949–1959. doi:10.2147/PPA.S271620
  • National comprehensive cancer network clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Prostate Cancer, Version 4; 2013. Available from: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/prostate.pdf. Accessed March 20, 2015.
  • Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2001. Accessed January 12, 2022.
  • Levit L, Balogh E, Nass S, Ganz PA. Institute of Medicine. Delivering High-Quality Cancer Care: Charting a New Course for a System in Crisis. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2013. PMID: 24872984. Available from: http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=18359. Accessed December 16, 2021.
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: 2015Annual Progress Report to Congress: National Strategy for Quality Improvement in Health Care. 2015. Available from: https://www.ahrq.gov/workingforquality/reports/2015-annual-report.html. Accessed January 12, 2022.
  • Elkin EB, Kim SHM, Casper ES, et al. Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: elderly cancer patients’ preferences and their physician perceptions. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5275–5280. PMID: 18024875. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.11.1922
  • Degner LF, Sloan JA. Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play? J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(9):941–950. PMID: 1432023. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(92)90110-9
  • Keating NL, Guadagnoli E, Landrum MB, Borbas C, Weeks JC. Treatment decision making in early-stage breast cancer: should surgeons match patients’ desired level of involvement? J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(6):1473–1479. PMID: 11896094. doi:10.1200/JCO.2002.20.6.1473
  • Oswald LB, Kasimer R, Rappazzo K, Fought AJ, Penson DF, Morgans AK. Patient expectations of benefit from systemic treatments for metastatic prostate cancer. Cancer Med. 2020;9(3):980–987. doi:10.1002/cam4.2783
  • Hawley ST, Lantz PM, Janz NK, et al. Factors associated with patient involvement in surgical treatment decision making for breast cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65(3):387–395. PMCID: PMC1839840. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2006.09.010
  • Kehl KL, Landrum MC, Arora NK, et al. Association of actual and preferred decision roles with patient-reported quality of care: shared decision making in cancer care. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(1):50–58. PMID: 26182303. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.112
  • Degner LF, Kristjanson LJ, Bowman D, et al. Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. JAMA. 1997;277(18):1485–1492. PMID: 9145723. doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03540420081039
  • Beaver K, Luker KA, Owens RG, Leinster SJ, Degner LF. Treatment decision making in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Cancer Nurs. 1996;19:8–19. doi:10.1097/00002820-199602000-00002
  • Bilodeau BA, Degner LF. Information needs, sources of information, and decisional roles in women with breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1996;23:691–696.
  • Makoul G, Krupat E, Chang CH. Measuring patient views of physician communication skills: development and testing of the communication assessment tool. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;67(3):333–342. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2007.05.005
  • McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med. 2012;22(3):276–282. doi:10.11613/BM.2012.031
  • LeBlanc TW, Bloom N, Wolf SP, et al. Triadic treatment decision-making in advanced cancer: a pilot study of the roles and perceptions of patients, caregivers, and oncologists. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26(4):1197–1205. doi:10.1007/s00520-017-3942-y
  • Entwistle VA, Carter SM, Cribb A, McCaffery K. Supporting patient autonomy: the importance of clinician-patient relationships. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(7):741–745. doi:10.1007/s11606-010-1292-2
  • Zhang AY, Siminoff LA. The role of the family in treatment decision making by patients with cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003;30(6):1022–1028. doi:10.1188/03.ONF.1022-1028
  • Ha Dinh TT, Bonner A, Clark R, Ramsbotham J, Hines S. The effectiveness of the teach-back method on adherence and self-management in health education for people with chronic disease: a systematic review. JBI Database Syst Rev Implement Rep. 2016;14(1):210–247. doi:10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2296

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.