Psychometric Assessment of the Mandarin Version of the Decisional Conflict Scale with Pregnant Women Making Prenatal Test Decisions

References

• Greydanus DE, Pratt HD. Syndromes and disorders associated with mental retardation. Indian J Pediatr. 2005;72(10):859–864. doi:10.1007/BF02731116
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roizen NJ, Patterson D. Down’s syndrome. Lancet. 2003;361(9365):1281–1289. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12987-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Qian X, Zhang J, Li J, Chu A, Schweitzer SO. Preliminary study into the economic burden of Down syndrome in China. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2008;82(1):25–33. doi:10.1002/bdra.20409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal GN, Kabra M. Diagnosis and management of down syndrome. Indian J Pediatr. 2014;81(6):560–567. doi:10.1007/s12098-013-1249-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang R, Yu Y, Xi Q, et al. Analysis of prenatal diagnosis before and after implementation of the two-child policy in northeastern China. Medicine. 2019;98(38):e17200. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000017200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Public Health of China. Measures for administration of health care during pregnancy and child and standardization for health care during pregnancy and child; 2021. Available from: http://www.nhc.gov.cn/cms-search/xxgk/getManuscriptXxgk.htm?id=52320. Accessed September 12, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Alldred SK, Deeks JJ, Guo B, Neilson JP, Alfirevic Z. Second trimester serum tests for down’s syndrome screening. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;2012(6):D9925.
   Google Scholar
• Akolekar R, Beta J, Picciarelli G, Ogilvie C, D’Antonio F. Procedure-related risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(1):16–26. doi:10.1002/uog.14636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe SA. Genetic counselling, patient education, and informed decision-making in the genomic era. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;23(2):142–149. doi:10.1016/j.siny.2017.11.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton ME, Brar H, Weiss J, et al. Non-Invasive Chromosomal Evaluation (NICE) Study: results of a multicenter prospective cohort study for detection of fetal trisomy 21 and trisomy 18. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(2):131–137. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2012.05.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Wei Y, Ming J, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome in China. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019;35(3):237–242. doi:10.1017/S0266462319000308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renga B. Non invasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy using cell free fetal DNA. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;225:5–8. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.03.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun M, Thongpriwan V, Choi KS. Experiences of prenatal genetic screening and diagnostic testing among pregnant Korean women of advanced maternal age. J Transcult Nurs. 2017;28(6):550–557. doi:10.1177/1043659616662913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller C, Cameron LD. It’s complicated – factors predicting decisional conflict in prenatal diagnostic testing. Health Expect. 2016;19(2):388–402. doi:10.1111/hex.12363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartwig TS, Borregaard MC, Malmgren CI, Tabor A, Jørgensen FS. High risk – what’s next? A survey study on decisional conflict, regret, and satisfaction among high-risk pregnant women making choices about further prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy. Prenat Diagn. 2019;39(8):635–642. doi:10.1002/pd.5476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger AM, Buzalko RJ, Kupzyk KA, Gardner BJ, Djalilova DM, Otte JL. Preferences and actual chemotherapy decision-making in the greater plains collaborative breast cancer study. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(12):1690–1697. doi:10.1080/0284186X.2017.1374555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickman RJ, Daly BJ, Lee E. Decisional conflict and regret: consequences of surrogate decision making for the chronically critically ill. Appl Nurs Res. 2012;25(4):271–275. doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2011.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo TK, Chan KY, Kan AS, et al. Decision outcomes in women offered noninvasive prenatal test (NIPT) for positive Down screening results. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(2):348–350. doi:10.1080/14767058.2017.1378323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riffin C, Pillemer K, Reid MC, Tung J, Ckenhoff L. Decision support for joint replacement: implications for decisional conflict and willingness to undergo surgery. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2018;73(3):387–398. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbw023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Jung D, Choi M. Relationship of social support and decisional conflict to advance directives attitude in Korean older adults: a community-based cross-sectional study. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2016;13(1):29–37. doi:10.1111/jjns.12081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garvelink MM, Boland L, Klein K, et al. Decisional conflict scale use over 20 years: the anniversary review. Med Decis Making. 2019;39(4):301–314. doi:10.1177/0272989X19851345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam WW, Kwok M, Liao Q, et al. Psychometric assessment of the Chinese version of the decisional conflict scale in Chinese women making decision for breast cancer surgery. Health Expect. 2015;18(2):210–220. doi:10.1111/hex.12021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koedoot N, Molenaar S, Oosterveld P, et al. The decisional conflict scale: further validation in two samples of Dutch oncology patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2001;45(3):187–193. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(01)00120-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawaguchi T, Azuma K, Yamaguchi T, et al. Development and validation of the Japanese version of the decisional conflict scale to investigate the value of pharmacists’ information: a before and after study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13(1):50. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-13-50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Légaré F, Stacey D, Turcotte S, et al. Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(9):D6732.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant FB, Yarnold PR. Principal components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In: Grimm LG, Yarnold RR, editors. Reading and Understanding Multivariate Statistics. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1995:99–136.
   Google Scholar
• Gorsuch RL. Factor Analysis. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Devellis RF. Scale Development: Theory and Application. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995;15(1):25–30. doi:10.1177/0272989X9501500105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor AM. User manual-decisional conflict scale; 2021. Available from: https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/eval_dcs.html. Accessed October 13, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Zung WW. A rating instrument for anxiety disorders. Psychosomatics. 1971;12(6):371–379. doi:10.1016/S0033-3182(71)71479-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zung WW. The measurement of affects: depression and anxiety. Mod Probl Pharmacopsychiatry. 1974;7:170–188.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gao L, Qu J, Wang AY. Anxiety, depression and social support in pregnant women with a history of recurrent miscarriage: a cross-sectional study. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2020;38(5):497–508. doi:10.1080/02646838.2019.1652730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Muyiduli X, Wang S, et al. Prevalence and relevant factors of anxiety and depression among pregnant women in a cohort study from south-east China. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2018;36(5):519–529. doi:10.1080/02646838.2018.1492098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao SY. Theoretical basis and application in research of social support rating scale. J Clin Psychiatry. 1994;4(2):98–100.
   Google Scholar
• Yue C, Liu C, Wang J, et al. Association between social support and anxiety among pregnant women in the third trimester during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic in Qingdao, China: the mediating effect of risk perception. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2021;67(2):120–127. doi:10.1177/0020764020941567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton MF, Pett MA. AMOS versus LISREL: one data set, two analyses. Nurs Res. 2008;57(4):283–292. doi:10.1097/01.NNR.0000313487.64412.be
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guangzhou Statistic Bureau. Average annual income of non-private and private employees in Urban areas of Guangzhou in 2020; 2021. Available from: http://tjj.gz.gov.cn/tjgb/qtgb/content/post_7319136.html. Accessed October 13, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35(6):382–385. doi:10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol. 1975;28(4):563–575. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens JP. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. 5th ed. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kong X, Ai B, Kong Y, et al. Artificial intelligence: a key to relieve China’s insufficient and unequally-distributed medical resources. Am J Transl Res. 2019;11(5):2632–2640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim JA, Shin JS, Park SM, et al. Association between information provision and decisional conflict in cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(9):1974–1980. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdv275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;4(4):D1431.
   Google Scholar