527
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Psychometric Properties of the Peruvian Version of the MOS Scale for Social Support in Cancer Patients and Convergent Network with Quality of Life

, , , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1999-2011 | Received 23 Feb 2023, Accepted 30 May 2023, Published online: 14 Aug 2023

References

  • American Cancer Society. Children diagnosed with cancer: understanding the healthcare system - ACCO [Internet]. American Cancer Society; 2015. Available from: https://www.acco.org/blog/children-diagnosed-with-cancer-understanding-The-healthcare-system/. Accessed August 7, 2023.
  • International Agency for Research on Cancer. Latest global cancer data: cancer burden rises to 18.1 million new cases and 9.6 million cancer deaths in 2018 – IARC [Internet]; 2018. Available from: https://www.iarc.who.int/featured-news/latest-global-cancer-data-cancer-burden-rises-to-18-1-million-new-cases-and-9-6-million-cancer-deaths-in-2018/. Accessed August 7, 2023.
  • Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. doi:10.3322/caac.21492
  • The World Cancer Observatory. Peru. Source: globocan 2020 [Internet]; 2019. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/604-peru-fact-sheets.pdf. Accessed August 7, 2023.
  • Mallet J, Huillard O, Goldwasser F, Dubertret C, Le Strat Y. Mental disorders associated with recent cancer diagnosis: results from a nationally representative survey. Eur J Cancer. 2018;105:10–18. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2018.09.038
  • Uchino BN, Bowen K, Kent R. Social support and mental health. In: Encyclopedia of Mental Health. 2nd ed. Academic Press; 2016:189–195.
  • Cobb S. Social Support as a Moderator of Life Stress. Psychosom Med. 1976;38(5):300–314. doi:10.1097/00006842-197609000-00003
  • Nuñez-Leyva RE, Lozano-López TE, Calizaya-Milla YE, Calizaya-Milla SE, Saintila J. Excess weight and body fat percentage associated with waist circumference as a cardiometabolic risk factor in university students. In: Zeni S, editor. Scientifica (Cairo). Hindawi; 2022:1–8.
  • Warner EL, Kent EE, Trevino KM, Parsons HM, Zebrack BJ, Kirchhoff AC. Social well-being among adolescents and young adults with cancer: a systematic review. Cancer. 2016;122(7):1029–1037. doi:10.1002/cncr.29866
  • Korotkin BD, Hoerger M, Voorhees S, Allen CO, Robinson WR, Duberstein PR. Social support in cancer: how do patients want us to help? J Psychosoc Oncol. 2019;37(6):699–712. doi:10.1080/07347332.2019.1580331
  • Pérez P, Gónzalez A, Mieles I, Uribe AF. Relationship between social support, coping strategies, clinical and socio demographic factors in cancer patients. Pensam Psicológico. 2017;15(2):41–54.
  • Hu T, Xiao J, Peng J, Kuang X, He B. Relationship between resilience, social support as well as anxiety/depression of lung cancer patients: a cross-sectional observation study. J Cancer Res Ther. 2018;14(1):72–77. doi:10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_849_17
  • Kroenke CH, Hershman DL, Gomez SL, et al. Personal and clinical social support and adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy among hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients in an integrated health care system. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;170(3):623–631. doi:10.1007/s10549-018-4774-2
  • Henoch I, Bergman B, Gustafsson M, Gaston-Johansson F, Danielson E. The impact of symptoms, coping capacity, and social support on quality of life experience over time in patients with lung cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007;34(4):370–379. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.12.005
  • Gottlieb BH, Bergen AE. Social support concepts and measures. J Psychosom Res. 2010;69(5):511–520. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.10.001
  • Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL. The MOS social support survey. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(6):705–714. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(91)90150-B
  • Gjesfjeld CD, Greeno CG, Kim KH. A confirmatory factor analysis of an abbreviated social support instrument: the MOS-SSS. Res Soc Work Pract. 2008;18(3):231–237. doi:10.1177/1049731507309830
  • Priede A, Andreu Y, Martínez P, Conchado A, Ruiz-Torres M, González-Blanch C. The factor structure of the Medical Outcomes Study-Social Support Survey: a comparison of different models in a sample of recently diagnosed cancer patients. J Psychosom Res. 2018;108:32–38. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2018.02.008
  • Yu Y, Shiu CS, Yang JP, et al. Factor analyses of a social support scale using two methods. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(4):787–794. doi:10.1007/s11136-014-0815-4
  • Margolis R, Bellin MH, Sacco P, Harrington D, Butz A. Evaluation of MOS social support in low-income caregivers of African American children with poorly controlled asthma. J Asthma. 2019;56(9):951–958. doi:10.1080/02770903.2018.1510504
  • Khuong LQ, Vu T-VT, Huynh V-AN, Thai TT. Psychometric properties of the medical outcomes study: social support survey among methadone maintenance patients in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: a validation study. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2018;13(1):8. doi:10.1186/s13011-018-0147-4
  • Zanini DS, Peixoto EM. Social support scale (MOS-SSS): analysis of the psychometric properties via item response theory. Paideia. 2016;26(65):359–368.
  • Baca DR. Reliability and validity of the survey of social support in patients with cancer fromTrujillo. Rev Investig en Psicol. 2016;19(1):177.
  • Martín-Carbonell M, Cerquera-Córdoba A, Fernández-Daza M, et al. Factorial structure of the MOS Social Support Survey among senior and elder Colombian population diagnosed with chronic pain. Ter psicológica. 2019;37(3):211–224. doi:10.4067/S0718-48082019000300211
  • Dumitrache CG, Rubio L, Cabezas Casado JL, Cordón-Pozo E. Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey Instrument in a sample of Spanish older adults. Eur J Ageing. 2022;19(1):143–154. doi:10.1007/s10433-021-00612-y
  • Requena GC, Salamero M, Gil F. Validación del cuestionario MOS-SSS de apoyo social en pacientes con cáncer. Med Clin. 2007;128(18):687–691. doi:10.1157/13102357
  • DeMars CE. A tutorial on interpreting bifactor model scores. Int J Test. 2013;13(4):354–378. doi:10.1080/15305058.2013.799067
  • Rodriguez A, Reise SP, Haviland MG. Evaluating bifactor models: calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychol Methods. 2016;21(2):137–150. doi:10.1037/met0000045
  • Clarke SA, Booth L, Velikova G, Hewison J. Social support: gender differences in cancer patients in the United Kingdom. Cancer Nurs. 2006;29(1):66–72. doi:10.1097/00002820-200601000-00012
  • Hann D, Baker F, Denniston M, et al. The influence of social support on depressive symptoms in cancer patients age and gender differences. J Psychosom Res. 2002;52(5):279–283. doi:10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00235-5
  • Pedersen AF, Olesen F, Hansen RP, Zachariae R, Vedsted P. Social support, gender and patient delay. Br J Cancer. 2011;104(8):1249–1255. doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.87
  • Manzoor F, Wei L, Hussain A, Asif M, Shah SIA. Patient satisfaction with health care services; An application of physician’s behavior as a moderator. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(18):3318. doi:10.3390/ijerph16183318
  • Kolankiewicz ACB, de Souza MM, Magnago TSB, de Sde S, de Domenico EBL. Social support perceived by cancer patients and its relation with social and demographic characteristics. Rev Gauch Enferm. 2014;35(1):31–38. Spanish. doi:10.1590/1983-1447.2014.01.42491
  • Goodwin BC, Ralph N, Ireland MJ, et al. The role of masculinities in psychological and emotional help seeking by men with prostate cancer. Psychooncology. 2020;29(2):356–363. doi:10.1002/pon.5264
  • Chen FF. Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struct Equ Model. 2007;14(3):464–504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834
  • Putnick DL, Bornstein MH. Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: the state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Dev Rev. 2016;41:71–90. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
  • Dilas D, Flores R, Morales-García WC, et al. Social support, quality of care, and patient adherence to tuberculosis treatment in Peru: the mediating role of nurse health education. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023;17:175–186. doi:10.2147/PPA.S391930
  • Faller H, Brähler E, Härter M, et al. Unmet needs for information and psychosocial support in relation to quality of life and emotional distress: a comparison between gynecological and breast cancer patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(10):1934–1942. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2017.05.031
  • Finck C, Barradas S, Zenger M, Hinz A. Quality of life in breast cancer patients: associations with optimism and social support. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2018;18(1):27–34. doi:10.1016/j.ijchp.2017.11.002
  • Schmittmann VD, Cramer AOJ, Waldorp LJ, Epskamp S, Kievit RA, Borsboom D. Deconstructing the construct: a network perspective on psychological phenomena. New Ideas Psychol. 2013;31(1):43–53. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.02.007
  • Contreras A, Nieto I, Valiente C, Espinosa R, Vazquez C. The study of psychopathology from the network analysis perspective: a systematic review. Psychother Psychosom. 2019;88(2):71–83. doi:10.1159/000497425
  • Isvoranu A-M, Abdin E, Chong SA, Vaingankar J, Borsboom D, Subramaniam M. Extended network analysis: from psychopathology to chronic illness. BMC Psychiatry. 2021;21(1):119. doi:10.1186/s12888-021-03128-y
  • Soper D. A-priori sample size calculator for structural equation models [Software]; 2021.
  • Saavedra JE, Giraldo KA, Martell WHC, et al. Epidemiological study on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of the population of Metropolitan Lima. Diagnóstico. 2022;61(3):e374–e374. doi:10.33734/diagnostico.v61i3.374
  • Schwartz KI, Zapata-Vega MI, Mezzich JE, Mazzotti G. Validation study of the Multicultural Quality of Life Index (MQLI) in a Peruvian sample. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2006;28(1):24–28. doi:10.1590/S1516-44462006000100006
  • Escobar-Pérez J, Cuervo-Martínez Á. Content validity and experts judgment: an approach to its usage. Av en Medición. 2008;6(1):27–36.
  • Muthén B, Kaplan D. A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non‐normal Likert variables. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1985;38(2):171–189. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1985.tb00832.x
  • Bandalos DL, Finney SJ. Factor analysis: exploratory and confirmatory. In: Hancock GR, Mueller RO, editors. The Reviewer’s Guide to Quantitative Methods in the Social Sciences. 2nd Editio. Second Edition|New York: Routledge, 2019|Revised Edition of the Reviewer’s Guide to Quantitative Methods in the Social Sciences, 2010. Routledge; 2018:98–122.
  • Satorra A, Bentler PM. A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychom. 2001;66(4):507–514. doi:10.1007/BF02296192
  • Gana K, Broc G. Structural Equation Modeling with Lavaan. Structural Equation Modeling with Lavaan. Wiley; 2019:1–273.
  • Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. hStructural Equ Model a Multidiscip J. 2009;6(1):1–55.
  • Hair J, Hult G, Ringle C. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Uniwersytet Śląski. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications; 2014.
  • Epskamp S, Waldorp LJ, Mõttus R, Borsboom D. The gaussian graphical model in cross-sectional and time-series data. Multivariate Behav Res. 2018;53(4):453–480. doi:10.1080/00273171.2018.1454823
  • Epskamp S, Fried EI. A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. Psychol Methods. 2018;23(4):617–634. doi:10.1037/met0000167
  • Mardia KV. Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika. 1970;57(3):519. doi:10.1093/biomet/57.3.519
  • Del Carpio Ovando PS, Robles Estrada E, Quintero Hernández Y, et al. Mexican validation of the MOS questionnaire on perceived social support in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Suma Psicológica. 2022;29(2):100–109. doi:10.14349/sumapsi.2022.v29.n2.2
  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. The standards for educational and psychological testing [Internet]. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education; 2014. Available from: https://www.apa.org/science/programs/testing/standards. Accessed August 7, 2023.
  • Yoo H, Shin DW, Jeong A, et al. Perceived social support and its impact on depression and health-related quality of life: a comparison between cancer patients and general population. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2017;47(8):728–734. doi:10.1093/jjco/hyx064
  • Bishop-Fitzpatrick L, Mazefsky CA, Eack SM. The combined impact of social support and perceived stress on quality of life in adults with Autism spectrum disorder and without intellectual disability. Autism. 2018;22(6):703. doi:10.1177/1362361317703090
  • Reevy GM, Maslach C. Use of social support: gender and personality differences. Sex Roles. 2001;44(7–8):437–459. doi:10.1023/A:1011930128829
  • Soares A, Biasoli I, Scheliga A, et al. Validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Medical Outcomes Study-Social Support Survey in Hodgkin’s lymphoma survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20(8):1895–1900. doi:10.1007/s00520-011-1292-8