Time Perspectives and Delay of Gratification – The Role of Psychological Distance Toward the Future and Perceived Possibility of Getting a Future Reward

References

• Zimbardo P, Boyd J. The Time Paradox: The New Psychology of Time That Will Change Your Life. Simon and Schuster; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Zimbardo PG, Boyd JN. Putting time in perspective: a valid, reliable individual-differences metric In: Time Perspective Theory; Review, Research and Application. Springer; 2015:17–55.
   Google Scholar
• Zimbardo PG, Boyd JN. Putting time in perspective: a valid, reliable individual-differences metric. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999;77(6):1271–1288. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carelli MG, Wiberg B, Wiberg M. Development and construct validation of the Swedish Zimbardo time perspective inventory. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2011;27(4):220–227. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd J, Zimbardo P. Time perspective health and risk taking In: Strahman A, Joireman J, editors. Understanding Behavior in the Context of Time: Theory, Research and Applications. Mahwah, NJ: erlbaum; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Boniwell I, Osin E, Alex Linley P, Ivanchenko GV. A question of balance: time perspective and well-being in British and Russian samples. J Posit Psychol. 2010;5(1):24–40. doi:10.1080/17439760903271181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang JW, Howell RT, Stolarski M. Comparing three methods to measure a balanced time perspective: the relationship between a balanced time perspective and subjective well-being. Happiness Stud. 2013;14(1):169–184. doi:10.1007/s10902-012-9322-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake L, Duncan E, Sutherland F, Abernethy C, Henry C. Time perspective and correlates of wellbeing. Time Soc. 2008;17(1):47–61. doi:10.1177/0961463X07086304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdejo-García A, Lawrence AJ, Clark L. Impulsivity as a vulnerability marker for substance-use disorders: review of findings from high-risk research, problem gamblers and genetic association studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008;32(4):777–810. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.11.00318295884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgins DC, Engel A. Future time perspective in pathological gamblers. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2002;190(11):775–780. doi:10.1097/00005053-200211000-0000812436018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keough KA, Zimbardo PG, Boyd JN. Who’s smoking, drinking, and using drugs? Time perspective as a predictor of substance use. Basic Appl Soc Psych. 1999;21(2):149–164. doi:10.1207/S15324834BA210207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daugherty JR, Brase GL. Taking time to be healthy: predicting health behaviors with delay discounting and time perspective. Pers Individ Dif. 2010;48(2):202–207. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teuscher U, Mitchell SH. Relation between time perspective and delay discounting: a literature review. Psychol Rec. 2011;61(4):613–632. doi:10.1007/BF03395780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romer D, Duckworth AL, Sznitman S, Park S. Can adolescents learn self-control? Delay of gratification in the development of control over risk taking. Prev Sci. 2010;11(3):319–330. doi:10.1007/s11121-010-0171-820306298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bembenutty H, Karabenick SA. Inherent association between academic delay of gratification, future time perspective, and self-regulated learning. Educ Psychol Rev. 2004;16(1):35–57. doi:10.1023/B:EDPR.0000012344.34008.5c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avci S. Relations between self regulation, future time perspective and the delay of gratification in university students. Education. 2013;133(4):525–537.
   Google Scholar
• Mischel W, Underwood B. Instrumental ideation in delay of gratification. Child Dev. 1974;45(4):1083–1088. doi:10.2307/11280984143856
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mischel W, Ayduk O. Self-regulation in a cognitive–affective personality system: attentional control in the service of the self. Self Identity. 2002;1(2):113–120. doi:10.1080/152988602317319285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds B, Schiffbauer R. Delay of gratification and delay discounting: a unifying feedback model of delay-related impulsive behavior. Psychol Rec. 2005;55(3):439–460. doi:10.1007/BF03395520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittmann M, Leland DS, Paulus MP. Time and decision making: differential contribution of the posterior insular cortex and the striatum during a delay discounting task. Exp Brain Res. 2007;179(4):643–653. doi:10.1007/s00221-006-0822-y17216152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beenstock J, Adams J, White M. The association between time perspective and alcohol consumption in university students: cross-sectional study. Eur J Public Health. 2011;21(4):438–443. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckp22520068027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosenza M, Ciccarelli M, Nigro G. The steamy mirror of adolescent gamblers: mentalization, impulsivity, and time horizon. Addict Behav. 2019;89:156–162. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.10.00230316141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nigro G, Cosenza M, Ciccarelli M. The blurred future of adolescent gamblers: impulsivity, time horizon, and emotional distress. Front Psychol. 2017;8:486. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.0048628421013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petry NM, Bickel WK, Arnett M. Shortened time horizons and insensitivity to future consequences in heroin addicts. Addiction. 1998;93(5):729–738. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.1998.9357298.x9692271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafikhani M, Bagherian F, Shokri O. The mediating role of time perspective in the relationship between general self-efficacy and the tendency toward substance abuse in female adolescents. Int J Psychol. 2018;12(1):208–231. doi:10.24200/ijpb.2018.58149
   Google Scholar
• Cosenza M, Griffiths MD, Nigro G, Ciccarelli M. Risk-taking, delay discounting, and time perspective in adolescent gamblers: an experimental study. J Gambl Stud. 2017;33(2):383–395. doi:10.1007/s10899-016-9623-927256371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavarria J, Allan NP, Moltisanti A, Taylor J. The effects of present hedonistic time perspective and past negative time perspective on substance use consequences. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;152:39–46. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.04.02726003335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuttin J. Future Time Perspective and Motivation: Theory and Research Method. Psychology Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Göllner LM, Ballhausen N, Kliegel M, Forstmeier S. Delay of gratification, delay discounting and their associations with age, episodic future thinking, and future time perspective. Front Psychol. 2018;8(2304). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks M, Miller E, Abebe K, Mulvey E. The observed longitudinal relationship between future orientation and substance use among a cohort of youth with serious criminal offenses. Subst Use Misuse. 2018;53(12):1925–1936. doi:10.1080/10826084.2018.144131129509061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mischel W, Baker N. Cognitive appraisals and transformations in delay behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1975;31(2):254–261. doi:10.1037/h0076272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazur JE. Quantitative analyses of behavior: the effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value In: An Adjusting Procedure for Studying Delayed Reinforcement. NJ: Hillsdale; 1987:55–73.
   Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N. Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychol Rev. 2010;117(2):440–463. doi:10.1037/a001896320438233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman N, Trope Y. The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: a test of temporal construal theory. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;75(1):5–18. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N. Temporal construal. Psychol Rev. 2003;110(3):403–421. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.40312885109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit RG, Gilbert SJ, Burgess PW. A neural mechanism mediating the impact of episodic prospection on farsighted decisions. J Neurosci. 2011;31(18):6771–6779. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6559-10.201121543607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters J, Büchel C. Episodic future thinking reduces reward delay discounting through an enhancement of prefrontal-mediotemporal interactions. Neuron. 2010;66(1):138–148. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.02620399735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolarski M, Bitner J, Zimbardo PG. Time perspective, emotional intelligence and discounting of delayed awards. Time Soc. 2011;20(3):346–363. doi:10.1177/0961463X11414296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaskill AC, Hunt MJ, Milfont TL. On the associations between delay discounting and temporal thinking. Pers Individ Dif. 2019;141:166–172. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estle SJ, Green L, Myerson J, Holt DD. Discounting of monetary and directly consumable rewards. Psychol Sci. 2007;18(1):58–63. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01849.x17362379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKillop J, Miller JD, Fortune E, et al. Multidimensional examination of impulsivity in relation to disordered gambling. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014;22(2):176–185. doi:10.1037/a003587424708148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connell G, Christakou A, Haffey A, Chakrabarti B. The role of empathy in choosing rewards from another’s perspective. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:174.23734112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheong K, Kim J. Effects of reward magnitude on the performance of delayed discounting task: focusing on smoking and drinking behaviors. Korean J Clin Psychol. 2013;32(1):55–76. doi:10.15842/kjcp.2013.32.1.004
   Google Scholar
• Johnson MW, Bickel WK. Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. J Exp Anal Behav. 2002;77(2):129–146. doi:10.1901/jeab.2002.77-12911936247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden GJ, Begotka AM, Raiff BR, Kastern LL. Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2003;11(2):139–145. doi:10.1037/1064-1297.11.2.13912755458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton JH, Stanford MS, Barratt ES. Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. J Clin Psychol. 1995;51(6):768–774. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(199511)51:6<768::AID-JCLP2270510607>3.0.CO;2-18778124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiken LS, West SG, Reno RR. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Fox J, Long JS. Modern Methods of Data Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Myerson J, Green L, Warusawitharana M. Area under the curve as a measure of discounting. Exp Anal Behav. 2001;76(2):235–243. doi:10.1901/jeab.2001.76-235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Jochemczyk Ł, Pietrzak J, Buczkowski R, Stolarski M, Markiewicz Ł. You only live once: present-hedonistic time perspective predicts risk propensity. Pers Individ Dif. 2017;115:148153. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mühlberger A, Neumann R, Wieser MJ, Pauli P. The impact of changes in spatial distance on emotional responses. Emotion. 2008;8(2):192–198. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.8.2.19218410193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen HS, Mitchell RK, Brigham KH, Howell R, Steinbauer R. Perceived psychological distance, construal processes, and abstractness of entrepreneurial action. J Bus Ventur. 2018;33(3):296–314. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar