Corporate Social Responsibility and the Reciprocity Between Employee Perception, Perceived External Prestige, and Employees’ Emotional Labor

References

• Aguinis H, Glavas A. What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: a review and research agenda. J Manage. 2012;38(4):932–968. doi:10.1177/0149206311436079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glavas A. Corporate social responsibility and organizational psychology: an integrative review. Front Psychol. 2016;7(144):1–13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MDP. A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: its evolutionary path and the road ahead. Int J Manag Rev. 2008;10(1):53–73. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00226.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockett A, Moon J, Visser W. Corporate social responsibility in management research: focus, nature, salience and sources of influence. J Manag Stud. 2006;43(1):115–136. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00585.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis JD, Walsh JP. Misery loves companies: rethinking social initiatives by business. Adm Sci Q. 2003;48(2):268–305. doi:10.2307/3556659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlitzky M, Schmidt FL, Rynes SL. Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organ Stud. 2003;24(3):403–441. doi:10.1177/0170840603024003910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya CB, Korschun D, Sen S. Strengthening stakeholder–company relationships through mutually beneficial corporate social responsibility initiatives. J Bus Ethics. 2009;85(2):257–272. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9730-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glavas A, Kelley K. The effects of perceived corporate social responsibility on employee attitudes. BEQ. 2014;24(2):165–202. doi:10.5840/beq20143206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarkson ME. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Acad Manag Rev. 1995;20(1):92–117. doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9503271994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nigel M, Suprawan L. Most valuable stakeholders: the impact of employee orientation on corporate financial performance. Public Relat Rev. 2012;38(2):280–287. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood M, Anderson E. ‘I used to be an employee but now I am a stakeholder’: implications of labelling employees as stakeholders. Asia Pac J Hum Resour. 2009;47(2):186–200. doi:10.1177/1038411109105441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stites JP, Michael JH. Organizational commitment in manufacturing employees: relationships with corporate social performance. Bus Soc. 2011;50(1):50–70. doi:10.1177/0007650310394311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine S, Fleischman G. Ethics programs, perceived corporate social responsibility and job satisfaction. J Bus Ethics. 2008;77(2):159–172. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9306-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones DA, Willness CR, Madey S. Why are job seekers attracted by corporate social performance? Experimental and field tests of three signal-based mechanisms. Acad Manag J. 2014;57(2):383–404. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooq O, Payaud M, Merunka D, Valette-Florence P. The impact of corporate social responsibility on organizational commitment: exploring multiple mediation mechanisms. J Bus Ethics. 2014;125(4):563–580. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1928-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooq M, Farooq O, Jasimuddin SM. Employees response to corporate social responsibility: exploring the role of employees’ collectivist orientation. Eur Manag J. 2014;32(6):916–927. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2014.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooq O, Rupp DE, Farooq M. The multiple pathways through which internal and external corporate social responsibility influence organizational identification and multifoci outcomes: the moderating role of cultural and social orientations. Acad Manag J. 2017;60(3):954–985. doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameed I, Riaz Z, Arain GA, Farooq O. How do internal and external CSR affect employees’ organizational identification? A perspective from the group engagement model. Front Psychol. 2016;7(788):1–13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turker D. How corporate social responsibility influences organizational commitment. J Bus Ethics. 2009;89(2):189–204. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9993-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh SH, Hwang Y, Kim H. Is deep acting prevalent in socially responsible companies? The effects of CSR perception on emotional labor strategies. Front Psychol. 2019;10:308. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik K. Employee Labour Techniques Used by the Bankers of Pakistan: A Cross Gender Study. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Hülsheger UR, Schewe AF. On the costs and benefits of emotional labor: a meta-analysis of three decades of research. J Occup Health Psychol. 2011;16(3):361–389. doi:10.1037/a0022876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hur W-M, Han S-J, Yoo -J-J, Moon TW. The moderating role of perceived organizational support on the relationship between emotional labor and job-related outcomes. Manag Decis. 2015;53(3):605–624. doi:10.1108/MD-07-2013-0379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brotheridge CM, Lee RT. Development and validation of the emotional labour scale. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2003;76(3):365–379. doi:10.1348/096317903769647229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey RH, Ashforth BE, Diefendorff JM. The bright side of emotional labor. J Organ Behav. 2015;36(6):749–769. doi:10.1002/job.2019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandey AA, Gabriel AS. Emotional labor at a crossroads: where do we go from here? Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2015;2(1):323–349. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111400
   Google Scholar
• Mishra SK. Perceived external prestige and employee outcomes: mediation effect of organizational identification. Corp Reput Rev. 2013;16(3):220–233. doi:10.1057/crr.2013.9
   Google Scholar
• Zulfiqar S, Sadaf R, Popp J, Vveinhardt J, Máté D. An examination of corporate social responsibility and employee behavior: the case of Pakistan. Sustainability. 2019;11(13):3515. doi:10.3390/su11133515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelius N, Todres M, Janjuha-Jivraj S, Woods A, Wallace J. Corporate social responsibility and the social enterprise. J Bus Ethics. 2008;81(2):355–370. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9500-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller K, Hattrup K, Spiess S-O L-HN. The effects of corporate social responsibility on employees’ affective commitment: a cross-cultural investigation. J Appl Psychol. 2012;97(6):1186–1200. doi:10.1037/a0030204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Akremi A, Gond J-P, Swaen V, De Roeck K, Igalens J. How do employees perceive corporate responsibility? Development and validation of a multidimensional corporate stakeholder responsibility scale. J Manage. 2018;44(2):619–657. doi:10.1177/0149206315569311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll AB. Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: taking another look. Int J Corp Soc Responsib. 2016;1(1):1–8. doi:10.1186/s40991-016-0004-6
   Google Scholar
• Dahlsrud A. How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag. 2008;15(1):1–13. doi:10.1002/csr.132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matten D, Moon J. “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: a conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Acad Manage Rev. 2008;33(2):404–424. doi:10.5465/amr.2008.31193458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamali D. A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: a fresh perspective into theory and practice. J Bus Ethics. 2008;82(1):213–231. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9572-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamali D, Safieddine AM, Rabbath M. Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships. Corp Govern Int Rev. 2008;16(5):443–459. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00702.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll AB. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Acad Manag Rev. 1979;4(4):497–505. doi:10.5465/amr.1979.4498296
   Google Scholar
• Aguilera RV, Rupp DE, Williams CA, Ganapathi J. Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: a multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Acad Manag Rev. 2007;32(3):836–863. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.25275678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hur WM, Moon TW, Choi WH. When are internal and external corporate social responsibility initiatives amplified? Employee engagement in corporate social responsibility initiatives on prosocial and proactive behaviors. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag. 2019;26(4):849–858. doi:10.1002/csr.1725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman RE, Velamuri SR. A new approach to CSR: company stakeholder responsibility. In: Corporate Social Responsibility. Springer; 2006:9–23.
   Google Scholar
• Brammer S, Millington A, Rayton B. The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2007;18(10):1701–1719. doi:10.1080/09585190701570866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du S, Bhattacharya CB, Sen S. Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): the role of CSR communication. Int J Manag Rev. 2010;12(1):8–19. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turker D. Measuring corporate social responsibility: a scale development study. J Bus Ethics. 2009;85(4):411–427. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9780-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dohnalová Z, Zimola B. Corporate stakeholder management. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2014;110:879–886. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.933
   Google Scholar
• Dupont C, Ferauge P, Giuliano R. The impact of corporate social responsibility on human resource management: GDF SUEZ’s case. Int Bus Res. 2013;6(12):145–155. doi:10.5539/ibr.v6n12p145
   Google Scholar
• Abrams DE, Hogg MA. Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances. Springer-Verlag Publishing; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Hu B, Liu J, Zhang X. The impact of employees’ perceived CSR on customer orientation: an integrated perspective of generalized exchange and social identity theory. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag. 2020;32(7):2345–2364. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-10-2019-0822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albasu J, Nyameh J. Relevance of stakeholders theory, organizational identity theory and social exchange theory to corporate social responsibility and employees performance in the commercial banks in Nigeria. J Bus Econ Manag. 2017;4(5):95–105.
   Google Scholar
• Korschun D, Bhattacharya C, Sen S. Using corporate social responsibility to strengthen employee and customer relationships. ACR Asia Pac Adv. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Azim MT. Corporate Social Responsibility and employee behavior: mediating role of organizational commitment. Rev Bras de Gestao de Negocios. 2016;18(60).
   Google Scholar
• He J, Zhang H, Morrison AM. The impacts of corporate social responsibility on organization citizenship behavior and task performance in hospitality. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag. 2019;31(6):2582–2598. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-05-2018-0378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin L, Ruiz S, Rubio A. The role of identity salience in the effects of corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. J Bus Ethics. 2009;84(1):65–78. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9673-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Humphrey RH. Emotional labor in service roles: the influence of identity. Acad Manag Rev. 1993;18(1):88–115. doi:10.5465/amr.1993.3997508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Zhu W. Exploring emotion in teaching: emotional labor, burnout, and satisfaction in Chinese higher education. Commun Educ. 2008;57(1):105–122. doi:10.1080/03634520701586310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra SK. Linking perceived organizational support to emotional labor. Pers Rev. 2014;43(6):845–860. doi:10.1108/PR-09-2012-0160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild AR. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Univ of California Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Morris JA, Feldman DC. The dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of emotional labor. Acad Manag Rev. 1996;21(4):986–1010. doi:10.5465/amr.1996.9704071861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen JA, Diefendorff JM, Ma Y. Differences in emotional labor across cultures: a comparison of Chinese and US service workers. J Bus Psychol. 2014;29(1):21–35. doi:10.1007/s10869-013-9288-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandey AA. Emotional regulation in the workplace: a new way to conceptualize emotional labor. J Occup Health Psychol. 2000;5(1):95–110. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.5.1.95
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kruml SM, Geddes D. Exploring the dimensions of emotional labor: the heart of Hochschild’s work. Manag Commun Q. 2000;14(1):8–49. doi:10.1177/0893318900141002
   Google Scholar
• Grove SJ, Fisk RP. The service experience as theater. ACR N Am Adv. 1992;19(1):455–462.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel AS, Daniels MA, Diefendorff JM, Greguras GJ. Emotional labor actors: a latent profile analysis of emotional labor strategies. J Appl Psychol. 2015;100(3):863–879. doi:10.1037/a0037408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapf D. Emotion work and psychological well-being: a review of the literature and some conceptual considerations. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2002;12(2):237–268. doi:10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00048-7
   Google Scholar
• Mishra SK, Bhatnagar D, D’cruz P, Noronha E. Linkage between perceived external prestige and emotional labor: mediation effect of organizational identification among pharmaceutical representatives in India. J World Bus. 2012;47(2):204–212. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2011.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gergen KJ. Social exchange theory in a world of transient fact. Behav Theor Soc. 1977;91–114.
   Google Scholar
• Carmeli A, Gilat G, Waldman DA. The role of perceived organizational performance in organizational identification, adjustment and job performance. J Manag Stud. 2007;44(6):972–992. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00691.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavelle JJ, Rupp DE, Manegold J, Thornton MA. Multifoci Justice and Target Similarity: Emerging Research and Extensions. The Oxford Handbook of Justice in Work Organizations; 2015:165–186.
   Google Scholar
• Smidts A, Pruyn ATH, Van Riel CB. The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification. Acad Manag J. 2001;44(5):1051–1062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutton JE, Dukerich JM, Harquail CV. Organizational images and member identification. Adm Sci Q. 1994;39(2):239–263. doi:10.2307/2393235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller JB, Hester K, Barnett T, Frey L, Relyea C, Beu D. Perceived external prestige and internal respect: new insights into the organizational identification process. Hum Relat. 2006;59(6):815–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boğan E, Dedeoğlu BB. Hotel employees’ corporate social responsibility perception and organizational citizenship behavior: perceived external prestige and pride in organization as serial mediators. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag. 2020;27(5):2342–2353. doi:10.1002/csr.1996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su L, Huang S, van der Veen R, Chen X. Corporate social responsibility, corporate reputation, customer emotions and behavioral intentions: a structural equation modeling analysis. JCTR. 2014;10(4):511–529. doi:10.1080/19388160.2014.958606
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhary R, Akhouri A. CSR perceptions and employee creativity: examining serial mediation effects of meaningfulness and work engagement. Soc Responsib J. 2019;15(1):61–74. doi:10.1108/SRJ-01-2018-0018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H-R, Lee M, Lee H-T, Kim N-M. Corporate social responsibility and employee–company identification. J Bus Ethics. 2010;95(4):557–569. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0440-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigo P, Aqueveque C, Duran IJ. Do employees value strategic CSR? A tale of affective organizational commitment and its underlying mechanisms. Bus Ethics. 2019;28(4):459–475. doi:10.1111/beer.12227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De-Roeck K, Delobbe N. Do environmental CSR initiatives serve organizations’ legitimacy in the oil industry? Exploring employees’ reactions through organizational identification theory. J Bus Ethics. 2012;110(4):397–412. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1489-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gürlek M, Tuna M. Corporate social responsibility and work engagement: evidence from the hotel industry. Tour Manag Perspect. 2019;31:195–208. doi:10.1016/j.tmp.2019.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamir B. Calculations, values, and identities: the sources of collectivistic work motivation. Hum Relat. 1990;43(4):313–332. doi:10.1177/001872679004300402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner JC, Oakes PJ. The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism and social influence. Br J Soc Psychol. 1986;25(3):237–252. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1986.tb00732.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R, Stinglhamber F, Vandenberghe C, Sucharski IL, Rhoades L. Perceived supervisor support: contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87(3):565–573. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoades L, Eisenberger R. Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87(4):698–714. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson H, Levinson H. Reciprocation: the relationship between man and organization. In: Freedman AM, Bradt KH, editors. Consulting Psychology. 2009:31–47.
   Google Scholar
• Blau PM. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New Brunswick; 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Gürlek M, Düzgün E, Uygur SM. How does corporate social responsibility create customer loyalty? The role of corporate image. Soc Responsib J. 2017;13(3):409–427. doi:10.1108/SRJ-10-2016-0177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brammer S, Millington A. Firm size, organizational visibility and corporate philanthropy: an empirical analysis. Bus Ethics. 2006;15(1):6–18. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00424.x
   Google Scholar
• Fryxell GE, Wang J. The fortune corporate ’reputation’ index: reputation for what? J Manage. 1994;20(1):1–14. doi:10.1177/014920639402000101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya CB, Sen S, Korschun D. Using corporate social responsibility to win the war for talent. MIT Sloan Manag Rev. 2008;49(2):1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Park SY, Baek I, Lee C-S. The impact of the brand management system on brand performance in B–B and B–C environments. Ind Mark Manag. 2008;37(7):848–855. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mael F, Ashforth BE. Alumni and their alma mater: a partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. J Organ Behav. 1992;13(2):103–123. doi:10.1002/job.4030130202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dick R. Identification in organizational contexts: linking theory and research from social and organizational psychology. Int J Manag Rev. 2001;3(4):265–283. doi:10.1111/1468-2370.00068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benkhoff B. Ignoring commitment is costly: new approaches establish the missing link between commitment and performance. Hum Relat. 1997;50(6):701–726. doi:10.1177/001872679705000604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Mael F. Social identity theory and the organization. Acad Manag Rev. 1989;14(1):20–39. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4278999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anwar F, Ahmed I, Waqas M, Ismail WKW, Islam T. Effects of external prestige on emotional labour: mediation by organisational identification and moderation by perceived organisational support. Middle East J Manag. 2019;6(2):186–203. doi:10.1504/MEJM.2019.097816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akoorie M, Ahmed I, Ismail WKW, Amin SM, Nawaz MM. A social exchange perspective of the individual guanxi network. Chinese Manag Stud. 2013;7(1):127–140. doi:10.1108/17506141311307640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouldner AW. The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. Am Sociol Rev. 1960;25(2):161–178. doi:10.2307/2092623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hur WM, Moon TW, Jun JK. The role of perceived organizational support on emotional labor in the airline industry. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag. 2013;25(1):105–123. doi:10.1108/09596111311290246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquitt JA, Conlon DE, Wesson MJ, Porter CO, Ng KY. Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86(3):425–445. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R, Armeli S, Rexwinkel B, Lynch PD, Rhoades L. Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86(1):42–51. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Hur W-M, Moon T-W, Jun J-K. Is all support equal? The moderating effects of supervisor, coworker, and organizational support on the link between emotional labor and job performance. BRQ Bus Res Q. 2017;20(2):124–136. doi:10.1016/j.brq.2016.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupp DE, Shao R, Thornton MA, Skarlicki DP. Applicants’ and employees’ reactions to corporate social responsibility: the moderating effects of first‐party justice perceptions and moral identity. Pers Psychol. 2013;66(4):895–933. doi:10.1111/peps.12030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown SP, Leigh TW. A new look at psychological climate and its relationship to job involvement, effort, and performance. J Appl Psychol. 1996;81(4):358–368. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhiqiang M, Siddiqui SH, Khan MAS. Be aware not reactive: testing a mediated-moderation model of dark triad and perceived victimization via self-regulatory approach. Front Psychol. 2020;11(2141). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MAS, Du Jianguo AAH, Mushtaq TU, Usman M, Usman M. Affective commitment foci as parallel mediators of the relationship between workplace romance and employee job performance: a cross-cultural comparison of the People’s Republic of China and Pakistan. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2018;11:267. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S168542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff N, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gürlek M, Uygur A. Service-oriented high-performance human resource practices and employee service performance: a test of serial mediation and moderation models. J Manag Organ. 2020;1–37. doi:10.1017/jmo.2020.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekaran U, Bougie R. Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. John Wiley & Sons; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R, Cummings J, Armeli S, Lynch P. Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment, and job satisfaction. J Appl Psychol. 1997;82(5):812–820. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diefendorff JM, Croyle MH, Gosserand RH. The dimensionality and antecedents of emotional labor strategies. J Vocat Behav. 2005;66(2):339–357. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2004.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. Multivariate Data Analysis (Vol. 6): Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River. NJ; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Min J, Iqbal S, Khan MAS, Akhtar S, Anwar F, Qalati SA. Impact of supervisory behavior on sustainable employee performance: mediation of conflict management strategies using PLS-SEM. PLoS One. 2020;15(9):e0236650. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications Sage CA; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. 1999;6(1):1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharif M, Rashid K. Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting: an empirical evidence from commercial banks (CB) of Pakistan. Qual Quant. 2014;48(5):2501–2521. doi:10.1007/s11135-013-9903-8
   Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Berg JM. Prosocial Motivation. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Khan MAS, Jianguo D, Usman M, Ahmad MI. Moderated mediation model of interrelations between workplace romance, wellbeing, and employee performance. Front Psychol. 2017;8:2158. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar