Validation of the Psychometric Properties of the NEO-FFI-3 in an Arabic Context

References

• Costa PT Jr, McCrae RR, Löckenhoff CE. Personality across the life span. Annu Rev Psychol. 2019;4(70):423–448. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae RR, Costa PT Jr. Personality trait structure as a human universal. Am Psychol. 1997;52(5):509–516. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.5.509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunnel JR, Xavier B, Waldmeier A, Meyer A, Gaab J. Psychometric evaluation of the BFI-10 and the NEO-FFI-3 in Indian adolescents. Front Psychol. 2019;9(10):1057. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg LR. The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychol Assess. 1992;4(1):26–42. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26
   Google Scholar
• Patki SM, Abhyankar SC. Big-five personality factors as predictors of organizational citizenship behavior: a complex interplay. Int J Indian Psychol. 2016;3(2):137–146.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou X, Saucier G, Gao D, Liu J. The factor structure of Chinese personality terms. J Pers. 2009;77(2):363–400. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00551.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolland JP. The cross cultural generalizability of the five factors of personality. In: McCrae RR, Allik J, editors. The Five-Factor Model of Personality Across Cultures. New York: Springer Science-Business Media; 2002:7–28.
   Google Scholar
• Costa P, McCrae R. The revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R). In: Boyle GJ, Matthews G, Saklofske DH editors. The SAGE Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment: Volume 2- Personality Measurement and Testing. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2008:179–198.
   Google Scholar
• Morizot J. Construct validity of adolescents’ self-reported big five personality traits: importance of conceptual breadth and initial validation of a short measure. Assess. 2014;21(5):580–606. doi:10.1177/1073191114524015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digman JM. Personality structure: emergence of the five-factor model. Annu Rev Psychol. 1990;41(1):417–440. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.00222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John OP, Naumann LP, Soto CJ. Paradigm shift to the integrative big-five trait taxonomy. In: John OP, Ronibs RW, Pervin LA, editors. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. New York: Guilford Press; 2008:114–158.
   Google Scholar
• Costa PT, McCrae RR. Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: the NEO personality inventory. Psychol Assess. 1992;4(1):5–13. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5
   Google Scholar
• McCrae RR, Terracciano A, Khoury B, et al. Universal features of personality traits from the observer’s perspective: data from 50 cultures. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005;88(3):547–561. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae RR, Costa PT, Del Pilar GH, et al. Age differences in personality across the adult life span: parallels in five cultures. Devel Psychol. 1999;35(2):466–477. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.2.466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae RR, Costa PT, Del Pilar GH, Rolland JP, Parker WD. Cross-cultural assessment of the five-factor model: the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. J Cross-Cult Psychol. 1998;29(1):171–188. doi:10.1177/0022022198291009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piedmont RL, Chae JH. Cross-cultural generalizability of the five-factor model of personality: development and validation of the NEO-PI-R for Koreans. J Cross-Cult Psychol. 1997;28(2):131–155. doi:10.1177/0022022197282001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae RR, Costa PT, Yik MS. Universal aspects of Chinese personality structure. In: Bond MH, editor. The Handbook of Chinese Psychology. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press; 1996:189–207.
   Google Scholar
• Fountoulakis KN, Siamouli M, Moysidou S, et al. Standardization of the NEO-PI-3 in the Greek general population. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2014;13(1):36. doi:10.1186/s12991-014-0036-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aluja A, García Ó, Rossier J, García LF. Comparison of the NEO-FFI, the NEO-FFI-R and an alternative short version of the NEO-PI-R (NEO-60) in Swiss and Spanish samples. Pers Ind Dif. 2005;38(3):591–604. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae RR, Costa PT. A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Pers Ind Dif. 2004;36(3):587–596. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00118-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa PT, McCrae RR, Dye DA. Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: a revision of the NEO personality inventory. Pers and Ind Dif. 1991;12:887–898. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(91)90177-D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas RE, Donnellan MB. Age differences in personality: evidence from a nationally representative Australian sample. Dev Psychol. 2009;45(5):1353–1363. doi:10.1037/a0013914
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae RR, Costa PT. Brief versions of the NEO-PI-3. J Ind Dif. 2007;28(3):116–128. doi:10.1027/1614-0001.28.3.116
   Google Scholar
• Marjanovic Z, Holden R, Struthers W, Cribbie R, Greenglass E. The inter-item standard deviation (ISD): an index that discriminates between conscientious and random responders. Per Ind Dif. 2015;84:79–83. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.08.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allik J, Realo A. Universal and specific in the five factor model of Personality. In: Widgier TA, editor. The Oxford Handbook of the Five Factor Model. New York: Oxford University Press; 2017:173–190.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor MC, Paunonen SV. Big Five personality predictors of post-secondary academic performance. Pers Ind Dif. 2007;43(5):971–990. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.03.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbas M, Khan MN. Big-five personality factors and emotional intelligence among university students: a gender perspective. Int J Res Stud Psychol. 2018;7:1–12. doi:10.5861/ijrsp.2017.2000
   Google Scholar
• Karmakar R. Exploring the big five factor traits of college going adolescents. Biomed J Sci Tech Res. 2017;1(2):265–267. doi:10.26717/bjstr.2017.01.000170
   Google Scholar
• Singh J, Ullah F. Personality factors as determinants of the stress experienced by the adolescents. Int J Ind Psychol. 2016;4(1):47–58. doi:10.25215/0401.167
   Google Scholar
• Magalhães E, Salgueira A, Gonzalez AJ, et al. NEO-FFI: psychometric properties of a short personality inventory in Portuguese context. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica. 2014;27(4):642–657. doi:10.1590/1678-7153.201427405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallasmaa T, Allik J, Realo A, McCrae RR. The Estonian version of the NEO‐PI‐R: an examination of universal and culture‐specific aspects of the five‐factor model. Eur J Pers. 2000;14(3):265–278. doi:10.1002/1099-0984(200005/06)14:3<265::AID-PER376>3.0.CO;2-B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolland JP, Parker WD, Stumpf H. A psychometric examination of the French translations of the NEO PI-R and NEO-FFI. J Pers Assess. 1998;71(2):269–291. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa7102_13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae RR, Zonderman AB, Costa PT, Bond MH, Paunonen SV. Evaluating replicability of factors in the revised NEO personality inventory: confirmatory factor analysis versus procrustes rotation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;70(3):552–566. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline R. Convergence of structural equation modeling and multilevel modeling. In: Williams M, Vogt WP editors. The SAGE Handbook of Innovation in Social Research Methods. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2011:562–589. doi:10.4135/9781446268261.
   Google Scholar
• MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psycho Meth. 1996;1(2):130–149. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar