Testing the Factorial Validity of the Classroom Engagement Inventory with Spanish Students

References

• Son B, Simonian M. An integrated multimedia learning model vs. the traditional face-to-face learning model: An examination of college economics classes. J Educ Multimedia Hypermedia. 2016;25(4):305–321.
   Google Scholar
• Ter Vrugte J, de Jong T, Vandercruysse S, et al. How competition and heterogeneous collaboration interact in prevocational game-based mathematics education. Comput Educ. 2015;89:42–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipowsky F, Rakoczy K, Pauli C, Drollinger-Vetter B, Klieme E, Reusser K. Quality ofgeometry instruction and its short-term impact on students’ understanding of the PythagoreanTheorem. Learning Instruction. 2009;19:527–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow: optimaloplevelsens psykologi. Dansk psykologisk forlag; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Baumert J, Kunter M, Blum W, et al. Teachers’mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. Am Educ Res J. 2010;47:133–180. doi:10.3102/0002831209345157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunter M, Klusmann U, Baumert J, Richter D, Voss T, Hachfeld A. Professionalcompetence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. J Educ Psychol. 2013;105:805–820. doi:10.1037/a0032583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidel T, Shavelson RJ. Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role oftheory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Revi Educ Res. 2007;77:454–499. doi:10.3102/0034654307310317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feyen J. ¿Logrará la COVID-19 acelerar la transición del aprendizaje pasivo a la educación activa? Maskana. 2020;11(1):4.
   Google Scholar
• Clynes M, Sheridan A, Kate F. Student engagement in higher education: A cross-sectional study of nursing students’ particpation in college-based education in the republic of Ireland. Nurse Educ Today. 2020;93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown A, Lawrence J, Basson M. et al. A conceptual framework to enhance student online learning and engagement in higher education. Higher Educ Res Develop;2020. 1–16. doi:10.1080/07294360.2020.1860912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahu ER, Nelson K. Student engagement in the educational interface: understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher Educ Res Develop. 2018;37(1):58–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigueros R, Aguilar-Parra JM, Lopez-Liria R, Cangas AJ, González JJ, Álvarez JF. The role of perception of support in the classroom on the students’ motivation and emotions: the impact on metacognition strategies and academic performance in math and english classes. Front Psychol. 2020;10:2794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi E, Traficante D, Bettoni R, Offredi I, Giorgetti M, Vernice M. The impact of school climate on well-being experience and school engagement: a study with high-school students. Front Psychol. 2019;10:2482. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve J, Tseng CM. Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2011;36:257–267. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner EA, Kindermann TA, Furrer CJ. A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection. Educ Psychol Meas. 2009;69:493–525. doi:10.1177/0013164408323233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang MT, Willett JB, Eccles JS. The assessment of school engagement: Examining dimensionality and measurement invariance by gender and race/ethnicity. J Sch Psychol. 2011;49(4):465–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeed S, Zyngier D. How motivation influences student engagement: a qualitative case study. J Educ Learning. 2012;1:2. doi:10.5539/jel.v1n2p252
   Google Scholar
• Extremera PN, Durán A, Rey L. Inteligencia Emocional y su relación con los niveles de burnout, engagement y estrés en estudiantes universitarios. Revista de Educación. 2007;342:239–256.
   Google Scholar
• Benevides-Pereira AM, Fraiz D, Porto-Martins PC. Utrecht work engagement scale, manual en español. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Ardiles R, Alfaro P, Moya M, Leyton C, Rojas P, Videla J. La inteligencia emocional como factor amortiguador del burnout académico y potenciador del engagement académico. Revista Electrónica de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria. 2019;1:109–128.
   Google Scholar
• Assunção H, Lin SW, Sit PS, et al. University Student Engagement Inventory (USEI): transcultural validity evidence across four continents. Front Psychol. 2020;10:2796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Ros R, et al. The schoolwork engagement inventory: factorial structure, measurement invariance by gender and educational level, and convergent validity in secondary education (12-18 Years). J Psychoeduc Assess. 2017;36(6):588–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Bergin C, Bergin D. Measuring engagement in fourth to twelfth grade classrooms: the classroom engagement inventory. School psychol quarterly. 2014;29:517–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayçiçek B, Yanpar T. The effect of flipped classroom model on students’ classroom engagement in teaching english. Int J Instruction. 2018;11(2):385–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sever M. Adapting classroom engagement inventory into Turkish culture. Educ Sci. 2014;39(176):171–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambleton R, Muñiz J, Directrices para la traduccion y adaptacion de los tests. Papeles del psicólogo: revista del Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos, ISSN 0214-7823, Nº. 66, 1996, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn MR. Determination and Quantification Of Content Validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35(6):382–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2001:xiv, 338–xiv, 338.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strijbos JW, Pat-El R, Narciss S. Structural validity and invariance of the feedback perceptions questionnaire. Studies Educ Eval. 2021;68:100980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Equation Modeling. 2002;9:233–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler PM. On tests and indices for evaluating structural models. Pers Individ Dif. 2007;42(5):825–829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu P-H, Wu H-K. Constructing a model of engagement in scientific inquiry: investigating relationships between inquiry-related curiosity, dimensions of engagement, and inquiry abilities. Instructional Sci. 2020;48(1):79–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks JA, Blumenfeld PC, Paris AH. School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev Educ Res. 2004;74(1):59–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villar A, Gambau-Suelves B. El problema de la brecha educativa entre buenos y malos alumnos. Son los programas de refuerzo la solución? 2018.
   Google Scholar