Paradoxical Leader Behaviors and Followers Overall Justice and Citizenship Behaviors: The Role of Renqing Perception and Trait Agreeableness

References

• Kim SL, Kim M, Yun S. What do we need for creativity? The interaction of perfectionism and overall justice on creativity. Pers Rev. 2017;46(1):154–167. doi:10.1108/PR-06-2015-0187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim T, Leung K. Forming and reacting to overall fairness: a cross-cultural comparison. Organ Behav Hum Dec. 2007;104(1):83–95. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrose ML, Schminke M. The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research: a test of mediation. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(2):491–500. doi:10.1037/a0013203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnéguy E, Ohana M, Stinglhamber F. Overall justice, perceived organizational support and readiness for change: the moderating role of perceived organizational competence. J Organ Change Manag. 2020;33(5):765–777. doi:10.1108/JOCM-12-2019-0373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soenen G, Eib C, Torrès O. The cost of injustice: overall justice, emotional exhaustion, and performance among entrepreneurs: do founders fare better? Small Bus Econ. 2019;53(2):355–368. doi:10.1007/s11187-018-0052-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteside DB, Barclay LJ. Echoes of silence: employee silence as a mediator between overall justice and employee outcomes. J Bus Ethics. 2013;2(2):251–266. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1467-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquitt JA, Zipay KP, Lynch JW, Ryan O. Bringing “The Beholder” center stage: on the propensity to perceive overall fairness. Organ Behav Hum. 2018;148:159–177. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynie JJ, Svyantek DJ, Mazzei MJ, Varma V. Job insecurity and compensation evaluations: the role of overall justice. Manag Decis. 2016;54(3):630–645. doi:10.1108/MD-04-2015-0134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind EA. Fairness heuristic theory: justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In: Greenberg J, Cropanzano R, editors. Advances in Organizational Justice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 2001:56–88.
   Google Scholar
• Rodell JB, Colquitt JA, Baer MD. Is adhering to justice rules enough? The role of charismatic qualities in perceptions of supervisors’ overall fairness. Organ Behav Hum Dec. 2017;140:14–28. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtz BC, Harold CM. Fair today, fair tomorrow? A longitudinal investigation of overall justice perceptions. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(5):1185–1199. doi:10.1037/a0015900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roeck KD, Marique G, Stinglhamber F, Swaen V. Understanding employees’ responses to corporate social responsibility: mediating roles of overall justice and organizational identification. Int J Hum Resour Man. 2014;25(1):91–112. doi:10.1080/09585192.2013.781528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loi R, Yang J, Diefendorff JM. Four-factor justice and daily job satisfaction: a multilevel investigation. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(3):770–781. doi:10.1037/a0015714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konovsky MA, Pugh DS. Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Acad Manage J. 1994;37:656–669. doi:10.2307/256704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren H, Zhong Z, Chen CW, Brewster C. Two-way in-/congruence in three components of paternalistic leadership and subordinate justice: the mediating role of perceptions of renqing. Asian Bus Manag. 2021:1–26. doi:10.1057/s41291-021-00149-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khattak SI, Jiang Q, Li H, Zhang X. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and leadership: validation of a multi-factor framework in the United Kingdom (UK). J Bus Econ Manag. 2019;20(4):754–776. doi:10.3846/jbem.2019.9852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Waldman DA, Han YL, Li XB. Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: antecedents and consequences. Acad Manage J. 2015;58(2):538–566. doi:10.5465/amj.2012.0995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishaq E, Bashir S, Khan AK. Paradoxical leader behaviors: leader personality and follower outcomes. Appl Psychol Int Rev. 2021;70(1):342–357. doi:10.1111/apps.12233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Li Z, Liang L, Zhang X. Why and when paradoxical leader behavior impact employee creativity: thriving at work and psychological safety. Curr Psychol. 2019;40(4):1911. doi:10.1007/s12144-018-0095-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi N, Miron-Spektor E, Lewis MW. Mixed blessings: dynamic impact of paradoxical leader behavior on subordinate’ engagement and CWB. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings; 2018:10654.
   Google Scholar
• Bos K, Lind EA. Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 2002;34:1–60. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(02)80003-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos KVD, Poortvliet PM, Maas M, Miedema J, Ham EJVD. An enquiry concerning the principles of cultural norms and values: the impact of uncertainty and mortality salience on reactions to violations and bolstering of cultural worldviews. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2005;41(2):91–113. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos KVD, Lind EA. The social psychology of fairness and the regulation of personal uncertainty. In: Arkin RM, Oleson KC, Carroll PJ, editors. Handbook of the Uncertain Self. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2010:122–141.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang KK. Face and favor: the Chinese power game. Am J Sociol. 1987;92(4):944–974. doi:10.1086/228588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung K, Chen Z, Zhou F, Kai L. The role of relational orientation as measured by face and renqing in innovative behavior in China: an indigenous analysis. Asia Pac J Manag. 2014;31(1):105–126. doi:10.1007/s10490-011-9277-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Yang CF. Beyond distributive justice: the reasonableness norm in Chinese reward allocation. Asian J Soc Psychol. 1998;1(3):253–269. doi:10.1111/1467-839X.00017
   Google Scholar
• Zhu J, Xu S, Ouyang K, Herst D, Farndale E. Ethical leadership and employee pro-social rule-breaking behavior in China. Asian Bus Manag. 2018;17(1):59–81. doi:10.1057/s41291-018-0031-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang T. Yin yang: a new perspective on culture. Manage Organ Rev. 2012;8(1):25–50. doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00221.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Törnroos M, Elovainio M, Hintsa T, et al. Personality traits and perceptions of organisational justice. Int J Psychol. 2019;54(3):414–422. doi:10.1002/ijop.12472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick MR, Mount MK. The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Pers Psychol. 1991;44(1):1–26. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiaburu DS, Oh IS, Berry CM, Li N, Gardner RG. The five-factor model of personality traits and organizational citizenship behaviors: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2011;96(6):1140–1166. doi:10.1037/a0024004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen ZJ, Davison RM, Mao JY, Wang ZH. When and how authoritarian leadership and leader renqing orientation influence tacit knowledge sharing intentions. Inf Manag. 2018;55(7):840–849. doi:10.1016/j.im.2018.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huertas-Valdivia I, Gallego-Burín AR, Lloréns-Montes FJ. Effects of different leadership styles on hospitality workers. Tourism Manage. 2019;71:402–420. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2018.10.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• She Z, Li Q, Yang B, Yang B. Paradoxical leadership and hospitality employees’ service performance: the role of leader identification and need for cognitive closure. Int J Hosp Manag. 2020;89:102524. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao Y, Nijstad BA, Täuber S. Creativity under workload pressure and integrative complexity: the double-edged sword of paradoxical leadership. Organ Behav Hum Dec. 2019;155:7–19. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen DA, Abosag I, Huang YA, Nguyen B. Guanxi GRX (ganqing, renqing, xinren) and conflict management in sino-US business relationships. Ind Market Manag. 2017;66:103–114. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organ DW. Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Lee K, Allen NJ. Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: the role of affect and cognitions. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87(1):131–142. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, Mackenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Eberly MB, Chiang T, Farh J, Cheng B. Affective trust in Chinese leaders: linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance. J Manage. 2014;40(3):796–819. doi:10.1177/0149206311410604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brislin RW. The wording and translation of research instrument. In: Lonner W, Berry J, editors. Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1986:137–164.
   Google Scholar
• Donnellan MB, Oswald FL, Baird BM, Lucas RE. The mini-ipip scales: tiny-yet-effective measures of the big five factors of personality. Psychol Assess. 2006;18(2):192–203. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg LR. A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In: Mervielde I, Deary IJ, De Fruyt F, Ostendorf F, editors. Personality Psychology in Europe. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press; 1999:7–28.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally J. Psychometric Methods. New York: McGraw Hill; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Ren H, Chen CW, Chen Y. Between culture and satisfaction: mediating roles of perceptions of renqing and rules. Asia Pac J Hum Resour. 2020. doi:10.1111/1744-7941.12256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Yin X, Li S, Zhou X, Zhu R, Zhang F. The relationship between employee’s status perception and organizational citizenship behaviors: a psychological path of work vitality. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021;14:743–757. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S307664
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson KD, Wu J. The illusion of statistical control: control variable practice in management research. Organ Res Methods. 2012;15(3):413–435. doi:10.1177/1094428111428817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasser-Abu Alhija F, Wisenbaker J, Monte A. Carlo study investigating the impact of item parceling strategies on parameter estimates and their standard errors in CFA. Struct Equ Modeling. 2006;13(2):204–228. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1302_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding H, Yu E. Followers’ strengths-based leadership and strengths use of followers: the roles of trait emotional intelligence and role overload. Pers Indiv Differ. 2020;168:110300. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Eval Pract. 1991;14(2):167–168. doi:10.1057/jors.1994.16
   Google Scholar
• Duan J. Uncertainty management theory. In: Li C, Xu S, editors. Management and Organization Theories. Peking: Peking University Press; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Horak S, Taube M. Same but different? Similarities and fundamental differences of informal social networks in China (guanxi) and Korea (yongo). Asia Pac J Manag. 2016;33(3):595–616. doi:10.1007/s10490-015-9452-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar