Effects of Leader-Follower Extraversion Congruence and Sectoral Difference on Leader-Member Exchange: A Cross-Sectional Study

References

• Judge TA, Bono JE, Remus I, Gerhardt MW. Personality and leadership: a qualitative and quantitative review. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87(4):765–780. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spark A, Stansmore T, O’Connor P. The failure of introverts to emerge as leaders: the role of forecasted affect. Pers Individ Dif. 2018;121:84–88. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bono JE, Judge TA. Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2004;89(5):901–910. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Gino F, Hofmann DA. Reversing the extraverted leadership advantage: the role of employee proactivity. Acad Manage J. 2011;54(3):528–550. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.61968043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ployhart RE, Lim BC, Chan KY. Exploring relations between typical and maximum performance ratings and the five factor model of personality. Pers Psychol. 2010;54(4):809–843. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00233.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coté S, Moskowitz DS. On the dynamic covariation between interpersonal behavior and affect: prediction from neuroticism, extraversion, and agreeableness. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;75(4):1032–1046. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.1032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernerth J. Putting Exchange Back into Leader-Member Exchange (LMX): An Empirical Assessment of a Social Exchange (LMSX) Scale and an Investigation of Personality as an Antecedent [Dissertation]. Alabama: Auburn University; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Peng J, Wang Z, Hou N. Do leaders and followers see eye to eye? Leader-follower fit in the workplace. Adv in Psychol Sci. 2019;27(2):370–380. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.00370
   Google Scholar
• Dust S, Wang P, Rode J, Wu Z, Wu X. The effect of leader and follower extraversion on leader-member exchange: an interpersonal perspective incorporating power distance orientation. J Soc Psychol. 2020;1–17. doi:10.1080/00224545.2020.1848774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salminen M, Henttonen P, Ravaja N. The role of personality in dyadic interaction: a psychophysiological study. Int J Psychophysiol. 2016;109:45–50. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.09.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford: Blackwell; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Bernerth JB, Armenakis AA, Feild HS, Giles WF, Walker JH. The influence of personality differences between subordinates and supervisors on perceptions of LMX. Group Organ Manag. 2008;33(2):216–240. doi:10.1177/1059601106293858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss JP, Barrick MR, Connerley ML. An investigation of personality similarity effects (relational and perceived) on peer and supervisor ratings and the role of familiarity and liking. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2011;74(5):637–657. doi:10.1348/096317901167569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon DJ, Bono JE. Hierarchical power and personality in leader-member exchange. J Manag Psychol. 2016;31(7):1198–1213. doi:10.1108/JMP-03-2015-0078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Wang Z, Luo N, Luo Z. Leader-subordinate extraversion fit and subordinate work engagement: based on dominance complementarity theory. Acta Psychol Sin. 2016;48(6):710–721. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00710
   Google Scholar
• Schaubroeck J, Lam SSK. How similarity to peers and supervisor influences organizational advancement in different culture. Acad Manage J. 2002;45(6):1120–1136. doi:10.5465/3069428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristof‐Brown AL, Zimmerman RD, Johnson EC. Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: a meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Pers Psychol. 2005;58(2):281–342. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatman JA. Improving interactional organizational research: a model of person-organization fit. Acad Manage Rev. 1989;14(3):333–349. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earley PC. East meets west meets mideast: further explorations of collectivistic and individualistic work groups. Acad Manage J. 1993;36(2):319–348. doi:10.5465/256525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Z, Jing Y, Yu F, et al. Increasing individualism and decreasing collectivism? Cultural and psychological change around the globe. Adv in Psychol Sci. 2018;26(11):2068–2080. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.02068
   Google Scholar
• Liu BC, Tang LP. Does the love of money moderate the relationship between public service motivation and job satisfaction? The case of Chinese professionals in the public sector. Public Adm Rev. 2011;71(5):718–727. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02411.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baarspul HC, Wilderom CPM. Do employees behave differently in public-vs private-sector organizations? A state-of-the-art review. Public Adm Rev. 2011;13(7):967–1002. doi:10.1080/14719037.2011.589614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buelens M, Van den Broeck H. An analysis of differences in work motivation between public and private sector organizations. Public Adm Rev. 2007;67(1):65–74. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00697.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullock JB, Stritch JM, Rainey HG. International comparison of public and private employees’ work motives, attitudes, and perceived rewards. Public Adm Rev. 2015;75(3):479–489. doi:10.1111/puar.12356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston DJ. Public-service motivation: a multivariate test. J Public Adm Res Theory. 2000;10(4):713–727. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024288
   Google Scholar
• Karl KA, Sutton CL. Job values in today’s workforce: a comparison of public and private sector employees. Public Pers Manage. 1998;27(4):515–527. doi:10.1177/009102609802700406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurkiewicz CL, Massey TK, Brown RG. Motivation in public and private organizations: a comparative study. Publ Prod Manag Rev. 1998;21(3):230–250. doi:10.2307/3380856
   Google Scholar
• Derindag OF, Demirtas O, Bayram A. The leader-member exchange (LMX) influence at organizations: the moderating role of person-organization (PO) fit. Revi Bus. 2021;41(2):32–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui AS, O’Reilly CA. Beyond simple demographic effects: the importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Acad Manage J. 1989;32(2):402–423. doi:10.5465/256368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecchio RP, Bullis RC. Moderators of the influence of supervisor-subordinate similarity on subordinate outcomes. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86(5):884–896. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown ME, Trevino LK. Leader-follower values congruence: are socialized charismatic leaders better able to achieve it? J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(2):478–490. doi:10.1037/a0014069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt LA. Enhancing organizational goal congruence: a solution to organizational politics. J Appl Psychol. 1998;83(4):666–674. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips AS, Bedeian AG. Leader-follower exchange quality: the role of personal and interpersonal attributes. Acad Manage J. 1994;37(4):990–1001. doi:10.5465/256608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson KS, Derue DS, Matta FK, Howe M, Conlon DE. Personality similarity in negotiations: testing the dyadic effects of similarity in interpersonal traits and the use of emotional displays on negotiation outcomes. J Appl Psychol. 2016;101(10):1405–1421. doi:10.1037/apl0000132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Wang M, Shi J. Leader-follower congruence in proactive personality and work outcomes: the mediating role of leader-member exchange. Acad Manage J. 2012;55(1):111–130. doi:10.5465/amj.2009.0865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauducel A, Brocke B, Leue A. Energetical bases of extraversion: effort, arousal, EEG, and performance. Int J Psychophysiol. 2006;62(2):212–223. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson D, Clark LA. Extraversion and its positive emotional core. In: Johnson JA, Briggs SR, Hogan R, editors. Handbook of Personality Psychology. San Diego: Academic Press; 1997:767–793. doi:10.1016/B978-012134645-4/50030-5
   Google Scholar
• Barrick MR, Mount MK. The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta‐analysis. Pers Psychol. 1991;44(1):1–26. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahrgang JD, Morgeson FP, Ilies R. The development of leader–member exchanges: exploring how personality and performance influence leader and member relationships over time. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2009;108(2):256–266. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graen GB, Uhlbien M. Relationship-based approach to leadership: development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadersh Q. 1995;6(2):219–247. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dienesch RM, Liden RC. Leader–member exchange model of leadership: a critique and further development. Acad Manage Rev. 1986;11(3):618–634. doi:10.5465/amr.1986.4306242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg MA, Terry DI. Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Acad Manage Rev. 2000;25(1):121–140. doi:10.2307/259266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry SJ, Dubin DF, Witt LA. The interactive effect of extraversion and extraversion dissimilarity on exhaustion in customer-service employees: a test of the asymmetry hypothesis. Pers Individ Dif. 2010;48(5):634–639. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.12.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronen C, William I. Big Five predictors of behavior and perceptions in initial dyadic interactions: personality similarity helps extraverts and introverts, but hurts “disagreeables”. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009;97(4):667–684. doi:10.1037/a0015741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erez A, Schilpzand P, Leavitt K, Woolum A, Judge T. Inherently Relational: interactions between peers’ and individuals’ personalities impact reward giving and appraisal of individual performance. Acad Manage J. 2015;58(6):1761–1784. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner JS. On perceptual readiness. Psychol Rev. 1957;64(2):123–152. doi:10.1037/h0043805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petsko CD, Bodenhausen GV. Multifarious person perception: how social perceivers manage the complexity of intersectional targets. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2020;14(2):e12518. doi:10.1111/spc3.12518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainey HG, Backoff RW, Levine CH. Comparing public and private organizations. Public Adm Rev. 1976;36(2):233–244. doi:10.2307/975145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon EE. Private and public sector managers. An empirical investigation of job characteristics and organizational climate. J Appl Psychol. 1986;71(2):247–259. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.2.247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao Q, Newman A, Sun Y, Xu L. What factors influence the organizational commitment of public sector employees in China? The role of extrinsic, intrinsic and social rewards. Int J of Hum Resour Manag. 2013;24(17):3262–3280. doi:10.1080/09585192.2013.770783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Kong Y, Niu J, Gao W, Li J, Li M. How leaders’ psychological capital influence their followers’ psychological capital: social exchange or emotional contagion. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1578. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foa EB, Foa UG. Resource theory of social exchange. In: Törnblom K, Kazemi A, editors. Handbook of Social Resource Theory. New York: Springer; 2012:15–32. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-4175-5_2
   Google Scholar
• Wright BE, Pandey SK. Public service motivation and the assumption of person-organization fit: testing the mediating effect of value congruence. Adm Soc. 2008;40(5):502–521. doi:10.1177/0095399708320187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Démurger S, Li S, Yang J. Earnings differentials between the public and private sectors in China: exploring changes for urban local residents in the 2000s. China Econ Rev. 2009;20(3):138–153. doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2011.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrare RR, Costa PT. NEO Inventories for the NEO Personality Inventory-3 (NEO PI-3), NEO Five-Factor Inventory-3 (NEO-FFI-3) and NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO PI-R): Professional Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Liden RC, Maslyn JM. Multidimensionafity of leader-member exchange: an empirical assessment through scale development. J Manage. 1998;24(1):43–72. doi:10.1016/S0149-2063(99)80053-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer TN, Green SG. Development of leader-member exchange: a longitudinal test. Acad Manage J. 1996;39(6):1538–1567. doi:10.5465/257068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen KJ, Kristof-Brown AL. Marching to the beat of a different drummer: examining the impact of pacing congruence. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2005;97(2):93–105. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards JR, Parry ME. On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Acad Manage J. 1993;36(6):1577–1613. doi:10.5465/256822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham KA, Dust SB, Ziegert JC. Supervisor-employee power distance incompatibility, gender similarity, and relationship conflict: a test of interpersonal interaction theory. J Appl Psychol. 2018;103(3):334–346. doi:10.1037/apl0000265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren T. Sectoral differences in value congruence and job attitudes: the case of nursing home employees. J Bus Ethics. 2013;112(2):213–224. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1242-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steijn B. Person-environment fit and public service motivation. Int Public Manag J. 2008;11(1):13–27. doi:10.1080/10967490801887863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa PT, McCrae RR. Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: the NEO Personality Inventory. Psychol Assess. 1992;4(1):5–13. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5
   Google Scholar