Moral Threshold Model is Universal? Initial Evidence from China’s Collectivist Culture

References

• Monin B, Jordan AH. Dynamic moral identity: a social psychological perspective. In: Narvaez D, Lapsley D, editors. Personality, Identity, and Character: Exploration in Moral Psychology. Cambridge, UK: University Press; 2009:341–354.
   Google Scholar
• Mazar N, Amir O, Ariely D. The dishonesty of honest people: a theory of self-concept maintenance. J Mark Res. 2008;45:633–644. doi:10.1509/jmkr.45.6.633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aquino K, Reed A II. The self-importance of moral identity. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002;83:1423–1440. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aquino K, McFerran B, Laven M. Moral identity and the experience of moral elevation in response to acts of uncommon goodness. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011;100:703–718. doi:10.1037/a0022540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan J, Mullen E, Murnighan JK. Striving for the moral self: the effects of recalling past moral actions on future moral behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011;37:701–713. doi:10.1177/0146167211400208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong CB, Liljenquist K. Washing away your sins: threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science. 2006;313:1451–1452. doi:10.1126/science.1130726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monin B, Sawyer PJ, Marquez MJ. The rejection of moral rebels: resenting those who do the right thing. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008;95:76–93. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DT, Monin B. Moral opportunities versus moral tests. In: van Lange P, Forgas J, Jussim L, editors. The Social Psychology of Morality. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2016:40–55.
   Google Scholar
• Lin SC, Zlatev JJ, Miller DT. Moral traps: when self-serving attributions backfire in prosocial behavior. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2017;70:198–203. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalvi S, Gino F, Barkan R, Ayal S. Self-serving justifications: doing wrong and feeling moral. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2015;24:125–130. doi:10.1177/0963721414553264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ploner M, Regner T. Self-image and moral balancing: an experimental analysis. J Econ Behav Organ. 2013;93:374–383. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2013.03.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalvi S, Dana J, Handgraaf MJ, De Dreu CK. Justified ethicality: observing desired counterfactuals modifies ethical perceptions and behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2011;115:181–190. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alleyne E, Fernandes I, Pritchard E. Denying humanness to victims: how gang members justify violent behavior. Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2014;17:750–762. doi:10.1177/1368430214536064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang JA. Moral rationalization and the integration of situational factors and psychological processes in immoral behavior. Rev Gen Psychol. 2002;6:25–50. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.6.1.25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachdeva S, Iliev R, Medin DL. Sinning saints and saintly sinners: the paradox of moral self-regulation. Psychol Sci. 2009;20:523–528. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02326.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zlatev JJ, Kupor DM, Laurin K, Miller DT. Being “good” or “good enough”: prosocial risk and the structure of moral self-regard. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020;118:242–253. doi:10.1037/pspa0000175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heine SJ, Lehman DR, Markus HR, Kitayama S. Is the rea universal need for positive self-regard? Psychol Rev. 1999;106:766–794. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell JD, Trapnell PD, Heine SJ, Katz IM, Lavallee LF, Lehman DR. Self-concept clarity: measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;70:141–156. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener E, Diener M. Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. In: Culture and Well-Being. Dordrecht: Springer; 2009:71–91.
   Google Scholar
• Masuda T, Nisbett RE. Attending holistically versus analytically: comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001;81(5):922–934. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitayama S, Park H, Sevincer AT, Karasawa M, Uskul AK. A cultural task analysis of implicit independence: comparing North America, Western Europe, and East Asia. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009;97(2):236–255. doi:10.1037/a0015999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitayama S, Park J. Error-related brain activity reveals self-centric motivation: culture matters. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014;143(1):62–70. doi:10.1037/a0031696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitayama S, King A, Yoon C, Tompson S, Huff S, Liberzon I. The dopamine D4 receptor gene (DRD4) moderates cultural difference in independent versus interdependent social orientation. Psychol Sci. 2014;25(6):1169–1177. doi:10.1177/0956797614528338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vives ML, FeldmanHall O. Tolerance to ambiguous uncertainty predicts prosocial behavior. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1–9. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04631-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olschewski S, Dietsch M, Ludvig EA. Anti-social motives explain increased risk aversion for others in decisions from experience. Judgm Decis Mak. 2019;14:58–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabin M. Risk aversion and expected utility: a calibration theorem. Econometrica. 2000;68:1281–1292. doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. J Bus. 1986;59:251–278. doi:10.1086/296365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar