Toxic Leadership and Empowering Leadership: Relations with Work Motivation

References

• Cummings GG, Tate K, Lee S, et al. Leadership styles and outcome patterns for the nursing workforce and work environment: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;85:19–60. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.04.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunst CJ, Bruder MB, Hamby DH, Howse R, Wilkie H. Meta-analysis of the relationships between different leadership practices and organizational, teaming, leader, and employee outcomes. J Int Educ Leadersh. 2018;8(2):1–45.
   Google Scholar
• Eva N, Robin M, Sendjaya S, van Dierendonck D, Liden RC. Servant leadership: a systematic review and call for future research. Leadersh Q. 2019;30(1):111–132. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes DJ, Lee A, Tian AW, Newman A, Legood A. Leadership, creativity, and innovation: a critical review and practical recommendations. Leadersh Q. 2018;29(5):549–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mónico L, Salvador A, Dos Santos NR, Pais L, Semedo C. Lideranças tóxica e empoderadora: estudo de validação de medidas em amostra Portuguesa [Toxic and empowering leadership: measures validation study in a portuguese sample]. Rev Iberoam Diagn Eval. 2019;53(4):129–140.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt A. Development and validation of the toxic leadership scale [dissertation]. Maryland: University of Maryland; 2008. Available from: https://drum.lib.umd.edu/handle/1903/8176. Accessed September 28, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Pelletier K. Leader toxicity: an empirical investigation of toxic behavior and rhetoric. Leadersh. 2010;6(4):373–389. doi:10.1177/1742715010379308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vansteenkiste M, Ryan RM, Soenens B. Basic psychological need theory: advancements, critical themes, and future directions. Motiv Emot. 2020;44(1):1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slemp GR, Kern ML, Patrick KJ, Ryan RM. Leader autonomy support in the workplace: a meta-analytic review. Motiv Emot. 2018;42:706–724. doi:10.1007/s11031-018-9698-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheong M, Yammarino FJ, Dionne SD, Spain SM, Tsai CY. A review of effectiveness of empowering leadership. Leadersh Q. 2019;30:34–58. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma PN, Kirkman BL. Leveraging leaders: a literature review and future lines of inquiry for empowering leadership research. Group Organ Manag. 2015;40(2):193–237. doi:10.1177/1059601115574906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim M, Beehr TA. Organization-based self-esteem and meaningful work mediate effects of empowering leadership on employee behaviors and well-being. J Leadersh Organ Stud. 2018;25(4):385–398. doi:10.1177/1548051818762337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MCC, Idris MA, Delfabbro PH. The linkages between hierarchical culture and empowering leadership and their effects on employees’ work engagement: work meaningfulness as a mediator. Int J Stress Manage. 2017;24(4):392–415. doi:10.1037/str0000043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JG, Kim JS, Yoon SW, Joo YB-K. The effects of empowering leadership on psychological well-being and job engagement. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2017;38(3):350–367. doi:10.1108/LODJ-08-2015-0182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckey MR, Bakker AB, Dollard MF. Empowering leaders optimize working conditions for engagement: a multilevel study. J Occup Health Psychol. 2012;17(1):15–27. doi:10.1037/a0025942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Bartol KM. Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: the influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Acad Manage J. 2010;53(1):107–128. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.48037118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin SL, Liao H, Campbell EM. Directive versus empowering leadership: a field experiment comparing impacts on task proficiency and proactivity. Acad Manage J. 2012;56(5):1372–1395. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim M, Beehr TA, Prewett MS. Employee responses to empowering leadership: a meta-analysis. J Leadersh Organ Stud. 2018;25(3):257–276. doi:10.1177/1548051817750538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu S, Kumar S, Gahlawat N. Empowering leadership and job performance: mediating role of psychological empowerment. Manage Res Rev. 2019;42(5):605–624. doi:10.1108/MRR-04-2018-0183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee A, Willis S, Tian AW. Empowering leadership: a meta‐analytic examination of incremental contribution, mediation, and moderation. J Organ Behav. 2017;39(3):249–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Ke X, Wang X-HF, Liu J. Empowering leadership and employee creativity: a dual-mechanism perspective. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2018;91(4):896–917. doi:10.1111/joop.12219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim D, Moon CW, Shin J. Linkages between empowering leadership and subjective well-being and work performance via perceived organizational and co-worker support. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2018;39(7):844–858. doi:10.1108/LODJ-06-2017-0173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansbrough T, Jones G. Inside the minds of narcissists: how narcissistic leaders’ cognitive processes contribute to abusive supervision. Z Psychol. 2014;222(4):214–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May D, Wesche J, Heinitz K, Kerschreiter R. Coping with destructive leadership: putting forward an integrated theoretical framework for the interaction process between leaders and followers. Z Psychol. 2014;222(4):203–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele JP. Antecedents and consequences of toxic leadership in the U.S. Army: a two-year review and recommended solutions (Technical Report 2011-3). UK: Center for Army Leadership; 2011. Available from: https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a545383.pdf. Accessed September 28, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Green JE. Toxic leadership in educational organizations. Educ Leadersh Rev. 2014;15(1):18–33.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman A, Goldman A. High toxicity leadership: borderline personality disorder and the dysfunctional organization. J Manage Psychol. 2006;21(8):733–746. doi:10.1108/02683940610713262
   Google Scholar
• Lipman-Blumen J. The allure of toxic leaders: why followers rarely escape their clutches. Ivey Bus J. 2005;69(3):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Whicker ML. Toxic Leaders: When Organizations Go Bad. Westport, Conn.: Quorum Books; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Reed G. Toxic leadership. Military Review; 2004:67–71. Available from: http://www.george-reed.com/uploads/3/4/4/5/34450740/toxic_leadership.pdf. Accessed September 23, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega A. Academic Libraries and Toxic Leadership. Cambridge MA: Chandos Publishing; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Lipman-Blumen J. Toxic leadership: when grand illusions masquerade as noble visions. Leader to Leader. 2005;2005(36):29–36. doi:10.1002/ltl.125
   Google Scholar
• Walton M. Leadership toxicity – an inevitable affliction of organizations? Organ People. 2007;14(1):19–27.
   Google Scholar
• Milosevic I, Maric S, Lončar D. Defeating the toxic boss: the nature of toxic leadership and the role of followers. J Leadersh Organ Stud. 2020;27(2):117–137. doi:10.1177/1548051819833374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua SMY, Murray DW. How toxic leaders are perceived: gender and information-processing. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2015;36(3):292–307. doi:10.1108/LODJ-06-2013-0076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandarker A, Rai S. Toxic leadership: emotional distress and coping strategy. Int J Organ Theory Behav. 2019;22(1):65–78. doi:10.1108/IJOTB-03-2018-0027
   Google Scholar
• Williams KR. Toxic leadership in defense and federal workplaces: sabotaging the mission and innovation. Int J Public Leadersh. 2018;14(3):179–198. doi:10.1108/IJPL-04-2018-0023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster V, Brough P, Daly K. Fight, flight or freeze: common responses for follower coping with toxic leadership. Stress Health. 2014;32(4):346–354. doi:10.1002/smi.2626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta S, Maheshwari GC. Consequence of toxic leadership on employee job satisfaction and organizational commitment. J Contemp Manage Res. 2013;8(2):1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Omar AT, Robinson S, Dudau A. Leaders behaving badly: constructing a toxic leadership for public university leaders. Int J Manage Appl Sci. 2017;3(6):75–80.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson-Starks KY. Toxic leadership. Transleadership, Inc.; 2003. Available from: https://transleadership.com/wp-content/uploads/ToxicLeadership.pdf. Accessed September 28, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Baron RA. Motivation in work settings: reflections on the core of organizational research. Motiv Emot. 1991;15(1):1–8. doi:10.1007/BF00991472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam CF, Gurland ST. Self-determined work motivation predicts job outcomes, but what predicts self-determined work motivation? J Res Pers. 2008;42(4):1109–1115. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay MA, Blanchard CM, Taylor S, Pelletier LG, Villeneuve M. Work extrinsic and intrinsic motivation scale: its value for organizational psychology research. Can J Behav Science. 2009;41(4):213–226. doi:10.1037/a0015167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci EL. The history of motivation in psychology and its relevance for management. In: Vroom VH, Deci EL, editors. Management and Motivation. 2nd ed. London: Penguin; 1992:9–29.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and wellbeing. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vroom VH. Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley; 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné M, Forest J, Vansteenkiste M, et al. The Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale: validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2015;24(2):178–196. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2013.877892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Broeck A, Schreurs B, De Witte H, Vansteenkiste M, Germeys F, Schaufeli W. Understanding workaholics’ motivations: a self-determination perspective. Appl Psychol. 2001;60(4):600–621. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00449.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné M, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and work motivation. J Organ Behav. 2005;26:331–362. doi:10.1002/job.322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Berry JW. The necessity of others is the mother of invention: intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective-taking, and creativity. Acad Manage J. 2011;54(1):73–96. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.59215085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetland H, Hetland J, Andreassen CS, Pallesen S, Notelaers G. Leadership and fulfillment of the three basic psychological needs at work. Career Dev Int. 2011;16(5):507–523. doi:10.1108/13620431111168903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovjanic S, Schuh SC, Jonas K, Van Quaquebeke N, Van Dick R. How do transformational leaders foster positive employee outcomes? A self-determination-based analysis of employees’ needs as mediating links. J Organ Behav. 2012;33(8):1031–1052. doi:10.1002/job.1771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva MN, Marques MM, Teixeira PJ. Testing theory in practice: the example of self-determination theory-based interventions. Eur Health Psychol. 2014;16(5):171–180.
   Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Olafsen AH, Ryan RM. Self-determination theory in work organizations: the state of a science. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2017;4:19–43. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108
   Google Scholar
• Olafsen AH, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and its relation to organizations. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2020. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.112
   Google Scholar
• Gagné M, Koestner R. Self-determination theory as a framework for understanding organizational commitment. Paper presented at: Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology; 2002; Toronto, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Richer SF, Blanchard C, Vallerand RJ. A motivational model of work turnover. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2002;32(10):2089–2113. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb02065.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otis N, Pelletier LG. A motivational model of daily hassles, physical symptoms, and future work intentions among police officers. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2005;35(10):2193–2214. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02215.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné M, Senécal CB, Koestner R. Proximal job characteristics, feelings of empowerment, and intrinsic motivation: a multidimensional model. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1997;27(14):1222–1240. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01803.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miniotaitė A, Bučiūnienė I. Explaining authentic leadership work outcomes from the perspective of self determination theory. Organizaciju vadyba. 2013;65(11):63–75.
   Google Scholar
• Syahrul K. The effect of empowering leadership on intrinsic motivation: the role of psychological empowerment as a mediation. J Leadersh Organ. 2020;2(2):108–120.
   Google Scholar
• Chen G, Sharma PN, Edinger SK, Shapiro DL, Farh JL. Motivating and demotivating forces in teams: cross-level influences of empowering leadership and relationship conflict. J Appl Psychol. 2011;96(3):541–557. doi:10.1037/a0021886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold JA, Arad S, Rhoades JA, Drasgow F. The Empowering Leadership Questionnaire: the construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. J Organ Behav. 2000;21:249–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dos Santos NR, Mónico L, Pais L, et al. Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale: psychometric studies in Portugal and Brazil. Manage Res. 2022;20:89–110. doi:10.1108/MRJIAM-07-2021-1206
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Prentice-Hall; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Bagozzi R, Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. JAMS. 1988;16(1):74–94. doi:10.1007/BF02723327
   Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker D. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res. 1981;18(1):39–50. doi:10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. 6th ed. New York: Pearson Education; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Urbina S. Essentials of Psychological Testing. 2nd ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Routledge Academic; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Bacher J, Wenzig K, Vogler M. SPSS two cluster: a first evaluation. Universität Erlangen-Nurnberg; 2004. Available from: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-327153. Accessed September 28, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Goleman D. Working with Emotional Intelligence. New York: Bantam Books; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Goleman D. Leadership that gets results. Harv Bus Rev. 2000;78(2):78–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling J, Schyns B. The causes and consequences of bad leadership [Editorial]. Z Psychol. 2014;222(4):187–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadadian Z, Zarei J. Relation between toxic leadership and job stress of knowledge workers. Stud Bus Econ. 2016;11(3):84–89. doi:10.1515/sbe-2016-0037
   Google Scholar
• Kohut H. The Analysis of the Self: A Systematic Approach to the Psychoanalytic Treatment of Narcissistic Personality Disorders. New York: International Universities Press; 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Kets de Vries MFR. Leaders, Fools and Imposters: Essays on the Psychology of Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Maslow AH. Eupsychian Management. Homewood, Ill.: Irwin-Dorsey Press; 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Padilla A, Hogan R, Kaiser RB. The toxic triangle: destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments. Leadersh Q. 2007;18(3):176–194. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar