When Does Abusive Supervision Affect Job Performance Positively?

References

• Tepper BJ. Consequences of abusive supervision. Acad Manage J. 2000;43(2):178–190. doi:10.5465/1556375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tepper BJ. Abusive supervision in work organizations: review, synthesis, and research agenda. J Manage. 2007;33(3):261–289. doi:10.1177/0149206307300812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam T, Ahmad S, Kaleem A, Mahmood K. Abusive supervision and knowledge sharing: moderating roles of Islamic work ethic and learning goal orientation. Manage Decis. 2020;59(2):205–222. doi:10.1108/MD-08-2019-1069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh JK, Farh C. An emotional process theory of how subordinates appraise, experience, and respond to abusive supervision over time. Acad Manage Rev. 2017;42(2):207–232. doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao Z, Peng AC, Li W, Schaubroeck J. Is abuse always bad? A latent change score approach to examine consequences of abusive supervision. Acad Manag Proc. 2016;2016(1):11621. doi:10.5465/ambpp.2016.235
   Google Scholar
• Wang R, Jiang J. How abusive supervisors influence employees’ voice and silence: the effects of interactional justice and organizational attribution. J Soc Psychol. 2016;155(3):204–220. doi:10.1080/00224545.2014.990410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Yun S, Srivastava A. Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between abusive supervision and creativity in South Korea. Leadersh Q. 2013;24(5):724–731. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam T, Asad M. Enhancing employees’ creativity through entrepreneurial leadership: can knowledge sharing and creative self-efficacy matter? VINE J Inf Knowl Manag Syst. 2021;ahead-of-print(ahead–of–print). doi:10.1108/VJIKMS-07-2021-0121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Liu J. Is abusive supervision an absolute devil? Literature review and research agenda. Asia Pac J Manag. 2018;35(3):719–744. doi:10.1007/s10490-017-9551-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker AB, Demerouti E. The job demands‐resources model: state of the art. J Manage Psychol. 2007;22(3):309–328. doi:10.1108/02683940710733115
   Google Scholar
• Crawford ER, LePine JA, Rich BL. Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: a theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. J Appl Psychol. 2010;95(5):834–848. doi:10.1037/a0019364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal Q, Ahmad NH, Ahmad B. Enhancing sustainable performance through job characteristics via workplace spirituality: a study on SMEs. J Sci Technol Policy Manag. 2021;12(3):463–490. doi:10.1108/JSTPM-02-2018-0022
   Google Scholar
• Iqbal Q, Ahmad NH, Nasim A, Khan SAR. A moderated-mediation analysis of psychological empowerment: sustainable leadership and sustainable performance. J Clean Prod. 2020;262:121429. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh MA, Boswell WR, Roehling MV, Boudreau JW. An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. managers. J Appl Psychol. 2000;85(1):65–74. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott SG, Bruce RA. Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Acad Manage J. 1994;37(3):580–607. doi:10.5465/256701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasper K, Bramesfeld KD. Imparting wisdom: Magda Arnold’s contribution to research on emotion and motivation. Cognition Emotion. 2006;20(7):1001–1026. doi:10.1080/02699930600616122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker AB, Demerouti E, Taris TW, Schaufeli WB, Schreurs PJG. A multigroup analysis of the job demands-resources model in four home care organizations. Int J Stress Manage. 2003;10(1):16–38. doi:10.1037/1072-5245.10.1.16
   Google Scholar
• Yu L, Duffy MK. The whiplash effect: the (moderating) role of attributed motives in emotional and behavioral reactions to abusive supervision. J Appl Psychol. 2021;106(5):754–773. doi:10.1037/apl0000810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan Y. Guanxi’s consequences: personal gains at social cost. J Bus Ethics. 2002;38(4):371–380. doi:10.2307/25074806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graen GB, Uhl-Bien M. Relationship-based approach to leadership: development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadersh Q. 1995;6(2):219–247. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang JY, Law KS, Sun AJJM. Leader – member relationship and burnout: the moderating role of leader integrity. Manage Organ Rev. 2014;10(2):223–247. doi:10.1111/more.12022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Eberly MB, Chiang T, Farh J, Cheng B. Affective trust in Chinese leaders: linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance. J Manage. 2014;40(3):796–819. doi:10.1177/0149206311410604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellegrini EK, Scandura TA. Paternalistic leadership: a review and agenda for future research. J Manage. 2008;34(3):566–593. doi:10.1177/0149206308316063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim KY, Atwater L, Latheef Z, Zheng D. Three motives for abusive supervision: the mitigating effect of subordinates attributed motives on abusive supervision’s negative outcomes. J Leadersh Org Stud. 2018;26(4):476–494. doi:10.1177/1548051818781816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu AJ, Loi R, Lam LW. The bad boss takes it all: how abusive supervision and leader–member exchange interact to influence employee silence. Leadersh Q. 2015;26(5):763–774. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao P, Li A, Mawritz M. Self-protective reactions to peer abusive supervision: the moderating role of prevention focus and the mediating role of performance instrumentality. J Organ Behav. 2018;39(1):12–25. doi:10.1002/job.2206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoroughgood CN, Tate BW, Sawyer KB, Jacobs R. Bad to the Bone. J Leadersh Org Stud. 2012;19(2):230–255. doi:10.1177/1548051811436327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu D, Liao H, Loi R. The dark side of leadership: a three-level investigation of the cascading effect of abusive supervision on employee creativity. Acad Manage J. 2012;55(5):1187–1212. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan ME, McAllister DJ. Abusive supervision through the lens of employee state paranoia. Acad Manage Rev. 2014;39(1):44–66. doi:10.5465/amr.2011.0419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treadway DC, Yang J, Bentley JR, Williams LV, Reeves M. The impact of follower narcissism and LMX perceptions on feeling envied and job performance. Int J Hum Resour Man. 2019;30(7):1181–1202. doi:10.1080/09585192.2017.1288151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LePine JA, LePine MA, Jackson CL. Challenge and hindrance stress: relationships with exhaustion, motivation to learn, and learning performance. J Appl Psychol. 2004;89(5):883–891. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halbesleben JRB, Neveu J, Paustian-Underdahl SC, Westman M. Getting to the “COR”: understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. J Manage. 2014;40(5):1334–1364. doi:10.1177/0149206314527130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell WR, Olson-Buchanan JB, LePine MA. Relations between stress and work outcomes: the role of felt challenge, job control, and psychological strain. J Vocat Behav. 2004;64(1):165–181. doi:10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00049-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Finkenauer C, Vohs KD. Bad is stronger than good. Rev Gen Psychol. 2001;5(4):323–370. doi:10.1037//1089-2680.5.4.323
   Google Scholar
• Lyu Y, Zhou X, Li W, et al. The impact of abusive supervision on service employees’ proactive customer service performance in the hotel industry. Int J Contemp Hosp M. 2016;28(9):1992–2012. doi:10.1108/ijchm-03-2015-0128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Hadley CN, Kramer SJ. Creativity under the gun. Harvard Bus Rev. 2002;80(8):52–61, 147. doi:10.1016/S0957-4174(02)00034-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui AS, Farh J. Where guanxi matters. Work Occup. 1997;24(1):56–79. doi:10.1177/0730888497024001005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afsar B, Badir Y, Khan MM. Person–job fit, person–organization fit and innovative work behavior: the mediating role of innovation trust. J High Technol Manag Res. 2015;26(2):105–116. doi:10.1016/j.hitech.2015.09.001
   Google Scholar
• Sacramento CA, Fay D, West MA. Workplace duties or opportunities? Challenge stressors, regulatory focus, and creativity. Organ Behav Hum Dec. 2013;121(2):141–157. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnentag S, Spychala A. Job control and job stressors as predictors of proactive work behavior: is role breadth self-efficacy the link? Hum Perform. 2012;25(5):412–431. doi:10.1080/08959285.2012.721830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byron K, Khazanchi S, Nazarian D. The relationship between stressors and creativity: a meta-analysis examining competing theoretical models. J Appl Psychol. 2010;95(1):201–212. doi:10.1037/a0017868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, LePine JA, Buckman BR, Wei F. It’s not fair … or is it? The role of justice and leadership in explaining work stressor–job performance relationships. Acad Manage J. 2014;57(3):675–697. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.1110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker AB, Hakanen JJ, Demerouti E, Xanthopoulou D. Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. J Educ Psychol. 2007;99(2):274–284. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mischel W, Shoda Y. A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychol Rev. 1995;102(2):246–268. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.2.246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilies R, Nahrgang JD, Morgeson FP. Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2007;92(1):269–277. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lian H, Lance Ferris D, Brown DJ. Does taking the good with the bad make things worse? How abusive supervision and leader–member exchange interact to impact need satisfaction and organizational deviance. Organ Behav Hum Dec. 2012;117(1):41–52. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aryee S, Sun L, Chen ZXG, Debrah YA. Abusive supervision and contextual performance: the mediating role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating role of work unit structure. Manage Organ Rev. 2008;4(3):393–411. doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2008.00118.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen ZX, Tsui AS, Farh J. Loyalty to supervisor vs. organizational commitment: relationships to employee performance in China. J Occup Organ Psych. 2002;75(3):339–356. doi:10.1348/096317902320369749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petter S, Straub D, Rai A. Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. Mis Quart. 2007;31(4):623–656. doi:10.2307/25148814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Lin C. Understanding the effect of social media marketing activities: the mediation of social identification, perceived value, and satisfaction. Technol Forecast Soc. 2019;140:22–32. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Marketing Res. 1981;18(1):39–50. doi:10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin WW. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In Modern Methods for Business Research; 1998: 295–336. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311766005. Accessed February 16, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Thatcher JB, Perrewe PL. An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. Mis Quart. 2002;26(4):381–396. doi:10.2307/4132314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sinkovics RR. The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Adv Int Mark. 2009;20:277–320. doi:10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer MD, Dhensa-Kahlon RK, Colquitt JA, et al. Uneasy lies the head that bears the trust: the effects of feeling trusted on emotional exhaustion. Acad Manage J. 2015;58(6):1637–1657. doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar