Evaluation of Employee Empowerment on Taking Charge Behaviour: An Application of Perceived Organizational Support as a Moderator

References

• Kaplan RS, Norton DP. Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: part I. Account Horizons. 2001. doi:10.2308/acch.2001.15.1.87
   Google Scholar
• Morrison EW, Phelps CC. Taking charge at work: extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Acad Manag J. 1999;42(4):403–419. doi:10.2307/257011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detert JR, Burris ER. Leadership behavior and employee voice: is the door really open? Acad Manag J. 2007;50(4):869–884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baik SJ, Song HD, Hong AJ. Craft your job and get engaged: sustainable change-oriented behavior at work. Sustain. 2018. doi:10.3390/su10124404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Ashford SJ. The dynamics of proactivity at work. Res Organ Behav. 2008;28:3–34. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Zhiqiang L, Hossain MY. Examining the relationship between self-actualization and job performance via taking charge. Int J Res Bus Soc Sci. 2020;9:43–49. doi:10.20525/ijrbs.v9i5.858
   Google Scholar
• Kim T-Y, Liu Z, Diefendorff JM. Leader–member exchange and job performance: the effects of taking charge and organizational tenure. J Organ Behav. 2015;36(2):216–231. doi:10.1002/job.1971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li SL, Sun F, Li M. Sustainable human resource management nurtures change-oriented employees: relationship between high-commitment work systems and employees’ taking charge behaviors. Sustain. 2019;11(13):45. doi:10.3390/su11133550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai Z, Huo Y, Lan J, Chen Z, Lam W. When Do Frontline Hospitality Employees Take Charge? Prosocial Motivation, Taking Charge, and Job Performance: the Moderating Role of Job Autonomy. Cornell Hosp Q. 2019;60(3):237–248. doi:10.1177/1938965518797081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huselid MA. The Impact Of Human Resource Management Practices On Turnover, Productivity, And Corporate Financial Performance. Acad Manag J. 1995. doi:10.5465/256741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noe RA, Hollenbeck JR, Gerhart B, Wright PM. Human Resource Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage. McGraw-Hill Education New York, NY; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen E, Taylor S, Muller-Camen M. HRM’s Role in Corporate Social and Environmental Sustainability; SHRM Foundation. Alexandria. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Manzoor F, Wei L, Bányai T, Nurunnabi M, Subhan QA. An examination of sustainable HRM practices on job performance: an application of training as a moderator. Sustain. 2019;11(8):1–19. doi:10.3390/su11082263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez S, Moldogaziev T. Employee Empowerment, Employee Attitudes, and Performance: testing a Causal Model. Public Adm Rev. 2013;73(3):490–506. doi:10.1111/puar.12049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conger JA, Kanungo RN. The empowerment process: integrating theory and practice. Acad Manag Rev. 1988;13(3):471–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tett RP, Burnett DD. A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(3):500–517. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tett RP, Toich MJ, Ozkum SB. Trait Activation Theory: a Review of the Literature and Applications to Five Lines of Personality Dynamics Research. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2021;8:199–233. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-062228
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R, Rhoades Shanock L, Wen X. Perceived Organizational Support: why Caring about Employees Counts. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2020;7:101–124. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-044917
   Google Scholar
• Luoh H-F, Tsaur S-H, Tang -Y-Y. Empowering employees: job standardization and innovative behavior. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag. 2014;26(7):1100–1117. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-03-2013-0153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R, Huntington R, Hutchison S, Sowa D. Perceived organizational support. J Appl Psychol. 1986;71(3):500–507. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R, Stinglhamber F. Perceived Organizational Support: Fostering Enthusiastic and Productive Employees. American Psychological Association; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtessis JN, Eisenberger R, Ford MT, Buffardi LC, Stewart KA, Adis CS. Perceived Organizational Support: a Meta-Analytic Evaluation of Organizational Support Theory. J Manage. 2017;43(6):1854–1884. doi:10.1177/0149206315575554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehnert I. Sustainable human resource management: a conceptual and exploratory analysis from a paradox perspective. Contributions Management Sci. 2009. doi:10.1007/978-3-7908-2188-8_1
   Google Scholar
• Ehnert I, Harry W, Zink KJ. Sustainability and HRM; Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg. 2014. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37524-8_1
   Google Scholar
• Di Fabio A, Rosen MA. Opening the Black Box of Psychological Processes in the Science of Sustainable Development: a New Frontier. Eur J Sustain Dev Res. 2018;2(4):2–6. doi:10.20897/ejosdr/3933
   Google Scholar
• Ficapal-Cusí P, Enache-Zegheru M, Torrent-Sellens J. Linking perceived organizational support, affective commitment, and knowledge sharing with prosocial organizational behavior of altruism and civic virtue. Sustain. 2020;12(24):1–20. doi:10.3390/su122410289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aselage J, Eisenberger R. Perceived organizational support and psychological contracts: a theoretical integration. J Organ Behav. 2003;24(SPEC.ISS):491–509. doi:10.1002/job.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Fabio A. The Psychology of Sustainability and Sustainable Development for Well-Being in Organizations. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney J. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. J Manage. 1991;17(1):99–120. doi:10.1177/014920639101700108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney JB, Wright PM. On becoming a strategic partner: the role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage. Hum Resour Manage. 1998;37(1):31–46. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-050X(199821)37:1<31::
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright PM, Dunford BB, Snell SA. Human resources and the resource based view of the firm. J Manage. 2001;27(6):701–721. doi:10.1177/014920630102700607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potnuru RKG, Sahoo CK, Sharma R. Team building, employee empowerment and employee competencies: moderating role of organizational learning culture. Eur J Train Dev. 2019;43(1–2):39–60. doi:10.1108/EJTD-08-2018-0086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Zhang Y, Dallas M, Xu S, Hu J. How perceived empowerment HR practices influence work engagement in social enterprises–a moderated mediation model. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2018;29(20):2971–2999. doi:10.1080/09585192.2018.1479874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin Y, Wang Y, Lu Y. Antecedents and outcomes of employee empowerment practices: a theoretical extension with empirical evidence. Hum Resour Manag J. 2019;29(4):564–584. doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daft RL. Essentials of Organization Theory & Design. South Western Educational Publishing; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Spreitzer GM. Psychological empowerment in the workplace: dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad Manag J. 1995;38(5):1442–1465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas KW, Velthouse BA. Cognitive elements of empowerment: an “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Acad Manag Rev. 1990;15(4):666–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison EW. Organizational citizenship behavior as a critical link between HRM practices and service quality. Hum Resour Manage. 1996;35(4):493–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Long L. Idiosyncratic deals and taking charge: the roles of psychological empowerment and organizational tenure. Soc Behav Pers. 2018;46(9):1437–1448. doi:10.2224/sbp.7084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CC, Zhang AY, Wang H. Enhancing the Effects of Power Sharing on Psychological Empowerment: the Roles of Management Control and Power Distance Orientation. Manag Organ Rev. 2014;10(1):135–156. doi:10.1111/more.12032
   Google Scholar
• Dust SB, Resick CJ, Mawritz MB. Transformational leadership, psychological empowerment, and the moderating role of mechanistic–organic contexts. J Organ Behav. 2014;35(3):413–433. doi:10.1002/job.1904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornung S, Rousseau DM, Weigl M, Müller A, Glaser J. Redesigning work through idiosyncratic deals. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2014;23(4):608–626. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2012.740171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S-L, He W, Yam KC, Long L-R. When and why empowering leadership increases followers’ taking charge: a multilevel examination in China. Asia Pacific J Manag. 2015;32(3):645–670. doi:10.1007/s10490-015-9424-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coun M, Peters P. ‘To empower or not to empower, that’s the question’. Using an empowerment process approach to explain employees’ workplace proactivity. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2021;2:1–27. doi:10.1080/09585192.2021.1879204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X. The Preliminary Literature Review of Proactive Behavior. Am J Ind Bus Manag. 2020;10(05):915–919. doi:10.4236/ajibm.2020.105061
   Google Scholar
• Burnett MF, Chiaburu DS, Shapiro DL, Revisiting How LN. When Perceived Organizational Support Enhances Taking Charge: an Inverted U-Shaped Perspective. J Manage. 2015;41(7):1805–1826. doi:10.1177/0149206313493324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav Res Methods Instruments Comput. 2004;36(4):717–731.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behav Res. 2007;42(1):185–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford publications; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Men LR, Stacks DW. The impact of leadership style and employee empowerment on perceived organizational reputation. J Commun Manag. 2013;17(2):171–192. doi:10.1108/13632541311318765
   Google Scholar
• Menon S. Employee Empowerment: an Integrative Psychological Approach. Appl Psychol. 2001;50(1):153–180. doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Matthews LM, Matthews RL, Sarstedt M. PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. Int J Multivar Data Anal. 2017;1(2):107–123.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert SJ. Added benefits: the link between work-life benefits and organizational citizenship behavior. Acad Manag J. 2000;43(5):801–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Zhang J, Thomas CL, Yu J, Spitzmueller C. Explaining benefits of employee proactive personality: the role of engagement, team proactivity composition and perceived organizational support. J Vocat Behav. 2017;101(April):90–103. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2017.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilies R, Wilson KS, Wagner DT. The spillover of daily job satisfaction onto employees’ family lives: the facilitating role of work-family integration. Acad Manag J. 2009;52(1):87–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kossek EE, Pichler S, Bodner T, Hammer LB. Workplace social support and work–family conflict: a meta‐analysis clarifying the influence of general and work–family‐specific supervisor and organizational support. Pers Psychol. 2011;64(2):289–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlow LA. Boundary control: the social ordering of work and family time in a high-tech corporation. Adm Sci Q. 1998;1:328–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caesens G, Stinglhamber F, Demoulin S, De Wilde M, Mierop A. Perceived organizational support and workplace conflict: the mediating role of failure-related trust. Front Psychol. 2019;9(JAN):1–13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher JD, Nadler A, Whitcher-Alagna S. Recipient reactions to aid. Psychol Bull. 1982;91(1):27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee F. The social costs of seeking help. J Appl Behav Sci. 2002;38(1):17–35.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert DT, Silvera DH. Overhelping. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;70(4):678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain MDY, Liu Z, Kumar N. How does self-performance expectation foster breakthrough creativity in the employee’s cognitive level? An application of self-fulfilling prophecy. Int J Res Bus Soc Sci. 2020;9:5SE. doi:10.20525/ijrbs.v9i5.818
   Google Scholar
• Baeshen Y, Soomro YA, Bhutto MY. Determinants of Green Innovation to Achieve Sustainable Business Performance: evidence From SMEs. Front Psychol. 2021;12:5052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irangani BKS, Zhiqiang L, Kumar N, Khanal S. Effect of competitive psychological climate on unethical pro-team behavior: the role of perceived insider status and transformational leadership. Management. 2021;25(1):1–27. doi:10.2478/manment-2019-0057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El BS, Fleisher C, Khapova SN, et al. Ambition at work and career satisfaction The mediating role of taking charge behavior. J Med. 2017. doi:10.1108/CDI-07-2016-0124
   Google Scholar
• Miao C, Humphrey RH, Qian S. A meta-analysis of emotional intelligence and work attitudes. Int J Res Sci. 2017;177–202. doi:10.1111/joop.12167
   Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Hossain MY, Jin Y, Safeer AA, Chen T. Impact of Performance Lower Than Expectations on Work Behaviors: The Moderating Effect of Status Mutability and Mediating Role of Regulatory Focus. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021;Volume 14(December):2257-2270. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S342562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar