660
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Assessing the Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) Among Medical College Students

, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1247-1258 | Published online: 16 May 2022

References

  • Cervone D, Pervin L. Personallity Psychology. 12th ed. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
  • Woods SA, Hampson SE. Measuring the Big Five with single items using a bipolar response scale. Eur J Personality. 2005;19(5):373–390. doi:10.1002/per.542
  • Muck PM, Hell B, Gosling SD. Construct validation of a short five-factor model instrument: A self-peer study on the German adaptation of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI-G). Eur J Psychol Assess. 2007;23(3):166–175. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.23.3.166
  • Costa JP, McCrae R. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor (NEO-FFI) Inventory Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: PAR; 1992.
  • Gosling SD, Rentfrow PJ, Swann WB. A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. J Res Pers. 2003;37(6):504–528. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
  • Goldberg LR. The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychol Assess. 1992;4:26–42. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26
  • John OP, Srivastava S. The Big Five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In: Pervin LA, John OP, editors. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. New York: Guilford Press; 1999:102–138.
  • Iwasa H, Yoshida Y, Walla P, Walla P. Psychometric evaluation of the Japanese version of Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI-J) among middle-aged, and elderly adults: concurrent validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Cogent Psychol. 2018;5(1):1426256. doi:10.1080/23311908.2018.1426256
  • Ten Item Personality Measure (TIPI). Available from: https://gosling.psy.utexas.edu/scales-weve-developed/ten-item-personality-measure-tipi/. Accessed May 10, 2022.
  • Nunes A, Limpo T, Lima CF, et al. Short scales for the assessment of personality traits: development and validation of the Portuguese Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI). Front Psychol. 2018;9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00461
  • Oshio A, Abe S, Cutrone P, et al. Further Validity of the Japanese version of the Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI-J) cross-language evidence for content validity. J Individ Differ. 2014;35(4):236–244. doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000145
  • Lu JG, Liu XL, Liao H, et al. Disentangling stereotypes from social reality: astrological stereotypes and discrimination in China. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020;119(6):1359–1379. doi:10.1037/pspi0000237
  • Li J. Reliability and validity test of the Chinese version of the 10th Five-person Personality Scale (TIPI-C) (in Chinese). Chin J Health Psychol. 2013;21(11):1688–1692.
  • Lulu LI, Zhang M, Zhao W, et al. Reliability and validity analysis of application of Ten-Item Personality Inventory-Chinese version for breast cancer patients (in Chinese). Chin Nurs Res. 2019;33(6):970–973. doi:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2019.06.013
  • Shi M, Liu L, Wang ZY, et al. The mediating role of resilience in the relationship between Big Five personality and anxiety among Chinese medical students: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0119916. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0119916
  • Doherty EM, Nugent E. Personality factors and medical training: a review of the literature. Med Educ. 2011;45(2):132–140. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03760.x
  • Lievens F, Ones DS, Dilchert S. Personality scale validities increase throughout medical school. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(6):1514–1535. doi:10.1037/a0016137
  • Haight SJ, Chibnall JT, Schindler DL, et al. Associations of medical student personality and health/wellness characteristics with their medical school performance across the curriculum. Acad Med. 2012;87(4):476–485. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e318248e9d0
  • Hojat M, Erdmann JB, Gonnella JS. Personality assessments and outcomes in medical education and the practice of medicine: AMEE Guide No. 79. Med Teach. 2013;35(7):E1267–E1301. doi:10.3109/0142159x.2013.785654
  • Walton HJ. Personality assessment of future doctors: discussion paper. J Roy Soc Med. 1987;80(1):27–30. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820140083010
  • Lievens F, Coetsier P, De Fruyt F, et al. Medical students’ personality characteristics and academic performance: a five-factor model perspective. Med Educ. 2002;36(11):1050–1056. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01328.x
  • Lo C-L, Tseng H-T, Chen C-H. Does medical students’ personality traits influence their attitudes toward medical errors? Healthcare. 2018;6(3):101. doi:10.3390/healthcare6030101
  • Liu S, Li S, Yang R, et al. Job preferences for medical students in China A discrete choice experiment. Medicine. 2018;97:38. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000012358
  • Liu S, Li S, Li Y, et al. Job preferences for healthcare administration students in China: a discrete choice experiment. PLoS One. 2019;14(1). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0211345
  • Liu T, Li S, Yang R, et al. Job preferences of undergraduate nursing students in eastern China: a discrete choice experiment. Hum Resour Health. 2019;17(1). doi:10.1186/s12960-018-0335-3
  • Liu P, Liu S, Gong T, et al. Job preferences of undergraduate pharmacy students in China: a discrete choice experiment. Hum Resour Health. 2021;19(1). doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-247195/v1
  • Romero E, Villar P, Gómez-Fraguela JA, et al. Measuring personality traits with ultra-short scales: a study of the Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) in a Spanish sample. Pers Indiv Differ. 2012;53(3):289–293. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.03.035
  • Matthew F, Mukuria C, Mulhern B, et al. Measuring the burden of schizophrenia using clinician and patient-reported measures: an exploratory analysis of construct validity. Patient. 2019;12(4):405–417. doi:10.1007/s40271-019-00358-x
  • Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clinical Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
  • Reuvers SHM, Korfage IJ, Scheepe JR, et al. The urinary-specific quality of life of multiple sclerosis patients: Dutch translation and validation of the SF-Qualiveen. Neurourol Urodynam. 2017;36(6):1629–1635. doi:10.1002/nau.23168
  • Eisinga R, Grotenhuis M, Pelzer B. The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, cronbach, or spearman-brown? Int J Public Health. 2013;58(4):637–642. doi:10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3
  • Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297–334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555
  • Ratner B. The correlation coefficient: its values range between +1/1, or do they? J Target Meas Anal Mark. 2009;17(2):139–142. doi:10.1057/jt.2009.5
  • Lee SC, Moy FM, Hairi NN. Validity and reliability of the Malay version multidimensional scale of perceived social support (MSPSS-M) among teachers. Qual Life Res. 2017;26(1):221–227. doi:10.1007/s11136-016-1348-9
  • Gustafsson JE, Martenson R. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Contemp Psychol. 2002;47(4):478–480. doi:10.4324/9780203726532
  • Kaiser H. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika. 1974;39(1):31–36. doi:10.1007/BF02291575
  • Bartlett MS. A note on the multiplying factors for various χ2 approximations. J R Stat Soc. 1954;16(2):296–298. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1954.tb00174.x
  • Akhtar H. Translation and validation of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) into Bahasa Indonesia. Int J Psychol. 2018;7(2):59–69. doi:10.5861/ijrsp.2018.3009
  • Widaman KF. Common factor analysis versus principal component analysis: differential bias in representing model parameters? Multivar Behav Res. 1993;28(3):263–311. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2803_1
  • Morales LS, Edwards TC, Flores Y, et al. Measurement properties of a multicultural weight-specific quality-of-life instrument for children and adolescents. Qual Life Res. 2011;20(2):215–224. doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9735-0
  • Floyd FJ, Widaman KF. Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychol Assess. 1995;7(3):286–299. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286
  • Cattel R, Cattell RB, Cattell RB, et al. The scree test of the number of factors. Multivar Behav Res. 1996;1:245–276. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
  • Luo J, Dai X. Meta-analysis of Big-five factor personality tests in China (in Chinese). Chin J Clin Psychol. 2011;19(6):740–742, 752. doi:10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2011.06.008
  • John OP, Benet-Martinez V. Measurement, scale construction, and reliability. In: Reis HT, Judd CM, editors. Handbook of Research Methods in Social Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000:339–369.
  • Thørrisen MM, Sadeghi T, Wiers-Jenssen J. Internal consistency and structural validity of the Norwegian translation of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory. Front Psychol. 2021;12:723852. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.723852
  • Sainfort F, Booske BC. Measuring post-decision satisfaction. Med Decis Making. 2000;20(1):51–61. doi:10.1177/0272989X0002000107
  • O’Brien M, Buikstra E, Hegney D. The influence of psychological factors on breastfeeding duration. J Adv Nurs. 2008;63(4):397–408. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04722.x
  • Hulin C. Can a reliability coefficient be too high? J Consum Psychol. 2001;10(1–2):55–56.
  • Bond MH, Nakazato H, Shiraishi D. Universality and distinctiveness in dimensions of Japanese person perception. J Cross Cult Psychol. 1975;6(3):346–357. doi:10.1177/002202217563007
  • Piedmont RL, Chae JH. Cross-cultural generalizability of the five-factor model of personality - Development and validation of the NEO PI-R for Koreans. J Cross Cult Psychol. 1997;28(2):131–155. doi:10.1177/0022022197282001
  • Chen MC, Piedmont RL. Development and validation of the NEO-PI-R for a Taiwanese sample. Symposiumon Five-Fact or Personality Structure in Asia at the 2nd Conference of the Asian Association of Social Psychology. Kyoto, Japan; 1997.
  • Kline P. Handbook of Psychological Testing. Routledge; 2013.
  • Burisch M. You don’t always get what you pay for: measuring depression with short and simple versus long and sophisticated scales. J Res Pers. 1984;18(1):81–98. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(84)90040-0
  • Cronbach LJ, Gleser GC. Psychological Tests and Personnel Decisions. Urbana: University of Illinois Press; 1965.
  • Schmitt DP, Allik J, McCrae RR, et al. The geographic distribution of Big Five personality traits- Patterns and profiles of human self-description across 56 nations. J Cross Cult Psychol. 2007;38(2):173–212. doi:10.1177/0022022106297299
  • Melchers MC, Li M, Haas BW, et al. Similar personality patterns are associated with empathy in four different countries. Front Psychol. 2016;7. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00290
  • Fu X. Study on the relationship between undergraduate career efficacy and Big Five personality traits in Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (in Chinese). (Master degree). Beijing University of Chinese Medicine; 2011.
  • Zhou M, Zhang J. Social development and the changes of Chinese people’s personalities (in Chinese). Adv Psychol Sci. 2007;15(2):203–210. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.001
  • Gu S, Xi X, Cheng Z, et al. Relationship between Big Five personality and mental health in college students (in Chinese). Chin J Clin Psychol. 2014;22:354–356. doi:10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2014.02.043
  • Zhang Y, Kohnstamm GA, Cheung PC, et al. A new look at the old “little emperor”: developmental changes in the personality of only children in China. Soc Behav Personal. 2001;29(7):725–731. doi:10.2224/sbp.2001.29.7.725