Effect of Organizational Socialization of New Employees on Team Innovation Performance: A Cross-Level Model

References

• Nifadkar SS, Bauer TN. Breach of belongingness: newcomer relationship conflict, information, and task-related outcomes during organizational socialization. J Appl Psychol. 2016;101(1):1–13. doi:10.1037/apl0000035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu SC, Tjosvold D. Socialization tactics: antecedents for goal interdependence and newcomer adjustment and retention. J Vocat Behav. 2013;83(3):245–254. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2013.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart J. Global political economy: understanding the international economic order global political economy: understanding the international economic order. J Polit. 2003;65(1):264–265. doi:10.1111/1468-2508.00006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vazifehdust H, Khosrozadeh S. The effect of the organizational socialization on organizational commitment and turnover intention with regard to moderate effect of career aspirations intention. Manag Sci Lett. 2014;277–286. doi:10.5267/j.msl.2013.12.027
   Google Scholar
• Cooper-Thomas H, Anderson N. Newcomer adjustment: the relationship between organizational socialization tactics, information acquisition and attitudes. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2002;75(4):423–437. doi:10.1348/096317902321119583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang RL, Duffy MK, Shaw JB. The organizational socialization process: review and development of a social capital model. J Manag. 2011;37(1):127. doi:10.1177/0149206310384630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Z, Chathoth PK. Intern newcomers’ global self-esteem, overall job satisfaction, and choice intention: person-organization fit as a mediator. Int J Hosp Manag. 2011;30(1):119–128. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coldwell DAL, Williamson M, Talbot D. Organizational socialization and ethical fit: a conceptual development by serendipity. Pers Rev. 2019;48(2):511–527. doi:10.1108/PR-11-2017-0347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasr MI, El Akremi EA, Coyleshapiro J. Synergy or substitution? The interactive effects of insiders‘ fairness and support and organizational socialization tactics on newcomer role clarity and social integration. J Organ Behav. 2019;40(6):758–778. doi:10.1002/job.2369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vos A, Buyens D, Schalk R. Psychological contract development during organizational socialization: adaptation to reality and the role of reciprocity. J Organ Behav. 2010;24(5):537–559. doi:10.1002/job.205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Yongzhou LI, Zhou Y, Zou Q. The mechanism of newcomer organizational socialization process from perspective of relationship resource. Adv Psychol Sci. 2018;26(4):584–598. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.00584
   Google Scholar
• Moura G, Abrams D, Retter C, Gunnarsdottir S, Ando K. Identification as an organizational anchor: how identification and job satisfaction combine to predict turnover intention. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2010;39(4):540–557. doi:10.1002/ejsp.553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautam T, Dick RV, Wagner U. Organizational identification and organizational commitment: distinct aspects of two related concepts. Asian J Soc Psychol. 2004;7(3):301–315. doi:10.1111/j.1467-839X.2004.00150.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge J, Su X, Yan Z. Organizational socialization, organizational identification and organizational citizenship behavior:an empirical research of Chinese high-tech manufacturing enterprises. Nankai Bus Rev. 2010;1(2):166–179. doi:10.1108/20408741011052573
   Google Scholar
• Adil A, Kausar S, Ameer S, Ghayas S, Shujja S. Impact of organizational socialization on organizational citizenship behavior: mediating role of knowledge sharing and role clarity. Curr Psychol. 2021;1:1–9. doi:10.1007/s12144-021-01899-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slattery JP, Selvarajan TT, Anderson JE. Influences of new employee development practices on temporary employee work-related attitudes. Hum Resour Dev Q. 2006;17(3):279–303. doi:10.1002/hrdq.1175
   Google Scholar
• Kelley SW. Developing customer orientation among service employees. J Acad Market Sci. 1992;20(1):27–36. doi:10.1007/BF02723473
   Google Scholar
• Bauer TN, Bodner T, Erdogan B, Truxillo DM, Tucker JS. Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: a meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods. J Appl Psychol. 2007;92(3):707–721. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Liu P. The information seeking behavior and organizational socialization among “Porcelain Bowl” staff: a moderated mediation model. J Forecast. 2019;38:31–37. doi:10.11847/fj.38.2.31
   Google Scholar
• He H, Huang Y. How organizational socialization tactics affects millennial newcomer adjustment: a moderating effect of proactive behavior and newcomer identity. Chin J Manag. 2015;12:1457–1464. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2015.10.007
   Google Scholar
• Kim TY, Cable DM, Kim SP. Socialization tactics, employee proactivity, and person-organization fit. J Appl Psychol. 2005;90(2):232–241. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X, Huang Y, Wu Z. The influence of organizational socialization strategy on new employee individual-organization matching-Mediating effect of active socialization behavior. J S China Normal U S. 2018;3:65–73.
   Google Scholar
• Yang C, Wang Y, Guo N, Zhang H. A study on the mechanism of the impact of organizational socialization tactics on knowledge sharing in employees’ adaptation period: the mediating effect of organizational fit. Hum Resour Dev C. 2018;25:19–26. doi:10.16471/j.cnki.11-2822/c.2018.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Luo J, Hu W, Zhong J. The dual path influence mechanism of ambidextrous leadership on newcomer socialization and innovative behavior. Sci Sci Manag S. 2016;37:161–173.
   Google Scholar
• Ali A, Bahadur W, Wang N, Luqman A, Khan AN. Improving team innovation performance: role of social media and team knowledge management capabilities. Technol Soc. 2020;61:101259. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng X, Wang Y. Theoretical discussion about the influence of dynamic team environment on venture team innovation and the mechanism. Sci Manag Res. 2019;37:21–23. doi:10.19445/j.cnki.15-1103/g3.2019.02.005
   Google Scholar
• Sun H, Teh P-L, Ho K, Lin B. Team diversity, learning, and innovation: a mediation model. J Comput Inform Syst. 2016;57(1):22–30. doi:10.1080/08874417.2016.1181490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei S, Qin C, Ali M, Freeman S, Shi-Jie Z. The impact of authentic leadership on individual and team creativity: a multilevel perspective. Leadersh Org Dev J. 2021;42:644–662. doi:10.1108/LODJ-12-2019-0519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maanen JV, Schein EH. Toward a theory of organizational socialization. Working papers. 1, 163–185. In: Staw BM, editor. Res Organ Behav. Vol. 1. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1979:209–264. doi:10.1108/S2046-410X(2013)0000001006
   Google Scholar
• Salancik GR, Pfeffer J. A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Admin Sci Q. 1978;23(2):224. doi:10.2307/2392563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim K, Moon HK. How do socialization tactics and supervisor behaviors influence newcomers’ psychological contract formation? The mediating role of information acquisition. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2019;1–27. doi:10.1080/09585192.2018.1521460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen B. The role of social networks in open innovation: an empirical analysis. Mod Inform. 2017;37:68–74. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-0821.2017.09.010
   Google Scholar
• Atan JB, Mahmood NHN. The role of transformational leadership style in enhancing employees’ competency for organization performance. Manag Sci Lett. 2019;2191–2200. doi:10.5267/j.msl.2019.7.033
   Google Scholar
• Shafait Z, Yuming Z, Sahibzada UF. Emotional intelligence and conflict management: an execution of organizational learning, psychological empowerment and innovative work behavior in Chinese higher education. Middle East J Manag. 2021;8(1):1–22. doi:10.1504/MEJM.2021.111988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lan Y, Qu X, Xia N. The influence of servant leadership on employee creativity: the mediating role of knowledge sharing behavior and the moderating role of leader-follower value congruence. Hum Resour Dev C. 2020;37:37–49. doi:10.16471/j.cnki.11-2822/c.2020.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Vancouver JB, Tamanini KB, Yoder RJ. Using dynamic computational models to reconnect theory and research: socialization by the proactive newcomer as example. J Manag. 2010;36(3):764–793. doi:10.1177/0149206308321550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saks AM, Gruman JA. Manage employee engagement to manage performance. Ind Organ Psychol. 2011;4(2):204–207. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01328.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones GR. Psychological orientation and the process of organizational socialization: an interactionist perspective. Acad Manage Rev. 1983;8(3):464–474. doi:10.5465/amr.1983.4284600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruman JA, Saks AM, Zweig DI. Organizational socialization tactics and newcomer proactive behaviors: an integrative study. J Vocat Behav. 2006;69(1):90–104. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2006.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang S, Chen J, Mei L, Mo W. The effect of heterogeneity and leadership on innovation performance: evidence from university research teams in China. Sustainability. 2019;11(6):4441. doi:10.3390/su11164441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Sluss DM, Saks AM. Socialization tactics, proactive behavior, and newcomer learning: integrating socialization models. J Vocat Behav. 2007;70(3):447–462. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2007.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afshan G, Kashif M, Khanum F, Khuhro MA, Akram U. High involvement work practices often lead to burnout, but thanks to humble leadership. J Manag Dev. 2021;40(6):503–525. doi:10.1108/jmd-10-2020-0311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkins SG. Mere effort as the mediator of the evaluation-performance relationship. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006;91(3):436–455. doi:10.1111/1468-2508.00006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave J, Wenger E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge U Press; 1991. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511815355
   Google Scholar
• Choi Y. New employee socialization: the roles of social networks. Acad Manag Ann. 2014;1:12218. doi:10.5465/AMBPP.2014.12218abstract
   Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Conti R, Coon H, et al. Assessing the work environment for creativity. Acad Manag J. 1996;39(5):1154–1184. doi:10.2307/256995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarros JC, Woodman DS. Leadership in Australia and its organizational outcomes. Leadersh Org Dev J. 1993;14(4):3–9. doi:10.1108/01437739310039424
   Google Scholar
• Khazanchi S, Lewis MW, Boyer KK. Innovation-supportive culture: the impact of organizational values on process innovation. J Oper Manag. 2007;25(4):871–884. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2006.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyne LV, Ang S, Botero IC. Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. J Manag Stud. 2003;40(6):1359–1392. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang J, Farh CIC, Farh JL. Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: a two-wave examination. Acad Manag J. 2012;55(1):71–92. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detert JR, Burris ER. Leadership behavior and employee voice: is the door really open? Acad Manag J. 2007;50(4):869–884. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutton JE, Ashford SJ, Lawrence KA, Miner-Rubino K. Red light, green light: making sense of the organizational context for issue selling. Organ Sci. 2001;13(4):355–369. doi:10.1287/orsc.13.4.355.2949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu W, Tang F, Dong X, Liu C. Different identifications cause different types of voice: a role identity approach to the relations between organizational socialization and voice. Asia Pac J Manag. 2014;32(1):251–287. doi:10.1007/s10490-014-9384-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan H, Tu H, Li J. The definition, dimensionality and content of newcomer’s organizational socialization: a perspective from identity theory. Adv Psychol Sci. 2011;19(5):624–632. doi:10.1111/j.1759-6831.2010.00112.x
   Google Scholar
• Xu G, Huang Y, Tan L. Interactional justice and employee sharing hiding behavior: the mediating role of organizational identification and the moderating role of justice sensitivity. China Soft Sci. 2015;1:125–132. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2020.z1.016
   Google Scholar
• Ashford SJ, Rothbard NP, Piderit SK, Dutton JE. Out on a limb: the role of context and impression management in selling gender-equity issues. Admin Sci Q. 1998;43(1):23. doi:10.2307/2393590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LePine JA, Van Dyne L. Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: evidence of differential relationships with Big Five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86(2):326–336. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.2.326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burris ER, Detert JR, Chiaburu DS. Quitting before leaving: the mediating effects of psychological attachment and detachment on voice. J Appl Psychol. 2008;93(4):912–922. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.912
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savino T, Messeni Petruzzelli A, Albino V. Teams and lead creators in cultural and creative industries: evidence from the Italian haute cuisine. J Knowl Manag. 2017;21(3):607–622. doi:10.1108/jkm-09-2016-0381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison EW. Employee voice behavior: integration and directions for future research. Acad Manag Ann. 2011;5(1):373–412. doi:10.1080/19416520.2011.574506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC. Speaking up in the operating room: how team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. J Manag Stud. 2003;40(6):1419–1452. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, George JM. When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: encouraging the expression of voice. Acad Manag J. 2001;44(4):682–696. doi:10.2307/3069410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie XY, Ling CD, Mo S-J, Luan K. Linking colleague support to employees’ promotive voice: a moderated mediation model. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0132123. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Chen C. The effect of team motivational climates on team creativity: from a perspective of the motivated information processing in groups model. Sci Sci Manag S. 2017;38:170–180.
   Google Scholar
• Vegt GSVD, Bunderson JS. Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: the importance of collective team identification. Acad Manag J. 2005;48(3):532–547. doi:10.2307/20159674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo A, Ye C. Research on the influence of team learning on innovation performance under regulation of motivation. Sci Technol Manag. 2018;38:224–231. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7695.2018.12.031
   Google Scholar
• Cheng J, Lu K, Chang Y, Johnstone S. Voice behavior and work engagement: the moderating role of supervisor-attributed motives. Asia Pac J Hum Resou. 2013;51(1):81–102. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7941.2012.00030.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu L. Boundary spanning behavior, team trust and Team innovation performance: mediation effect of resource depletion. Sci Technol Prog. 2019;36:11–18. doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.2018100115
   Google Scholar
• Agrell A, Gustafson R. The Team Climate Inventory (TCI) and group innovation: a psychometric test on a Swedish sample of work groups. J Occup Organ Psychol. 1994;67(2):143–151. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1994.tb00557.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin SHJ, Johnson RE. A suggestion to improve a day keeps your depletion away: examining promotive and prohibitive voice behaviors within a regulatory focus and ego depletion framework. J Appl Psychol. 2015;100(5):1381–1397. doi:10.1037/apl0000018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li AN, Liao H, Tangirala S, Firth BM. The content of the message matters: the differential effects of promotive and prohibitive team voice on team productivity and safety performance gains. J Appl Psychol. 2017;102:1259–1270. doi:10.1037/apl0000215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avery DR, Quiñones MA. Disentangling the effects of voice: the incremental roles of opportunity, behavior, and instrumentality in predicting procedural fairness. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87(1):81–86. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dierendonck VD, Nuijten I. The servant leadership survey: development and validation of a multidimensional measure. J Bus Psychol. 2011;26(3):249–267. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9194-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu J, Zhang Z, Jia M. Does servant leadership affect employees’ emotional labor? A social information-processing perspective. J Bus Ethics. 2019;159:507–518. doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3816-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers DP. Crucial decisions: leadership in policymaking and crisis management. Acad Manag Rev. 1989;15(3):542. doi:10.2307/258025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volmer J, Spurk D, Niessen C. Leader–member exchange (LMX), job autonomy, and creative work involvement. Leadersh Q. 2012;23(3):456–465. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan X, Liu B. Servant leadership, psychological ownership, and voice behavior in public sectors: moderating effect of power distance orientation. J Shanghai Jiaotong. 2017;25:49–58. doi:10.13806/j.cnki.issn1008-7095.2017.05.006
   Google Scholar
• Duan J, Zeng K, Yan H. Dual mechanism of servant leadership affecting employee voice behavior. Chin J Appl Psychol. 2017;23:210–220.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, Mackenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Meuser JD, Hu J, Wu J, Liao C. Servant leadership: validation of a short form of the sl-28. Leadersh Q. 2015;26(2):254–269. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen O. Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behavior. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2000;73:290–293. doi:10.1348/096317900167038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes A. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. J Educ Meas. 2013;51(3):335–337. doi:10.1111/jedm.12050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiken LS, West SG, Reno RR. Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions-institute for social and economic research. Eval Pract. 1991;14(2):167–168. doi:10.2307/2583960
   Google Scholar
• Perrot S, Bauer TN, Abonneau D, Campoy E, Erdogan B, Liden RC. Organizational socialization tactics and newcomer adjustment. Group Organ Manag. 2014;39(3):247–273. doi:10.1177/1059601114535469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasheed MA, Shahzad K, Conroy C, Nadeem S, Siddique MU. Exploring the role of employee voice between high–performance work system and organizational innovation in small and medium enterprises. J Small Bus Enterp D. 2017;24(4):670–688. doi:10.1108/jsbed-11-2016-0185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Y. A study on the influence of new employees’ organizational socialization on voice behavior: the mediating role of organization identification. Cont Ec Manag. 2017;39(2):73–77. doi:10.13253/j.cnki.ddjjgl.2017.02.013
   Google Scholar
• Song C, Lee CH. The effect of service workers’ proactive personality on their psychological withdrawal behaviors: a moderating effect of servant leadership. Leadersh Org Dev J. 2020;41(5):653–667. doi:10.1108/LODJ-04-2019-0149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Lin G, Yang Y. Organizational socialization and employee job performance: an examination on the role of the job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Int C Serv Syst Serv. IEEE; 2011. doi:10.1109/icsssm.2011.5959413.
   Google Scholar
• Hong G, Wang J. A study on Effects of organizational socialization on organizational identification and voice behavior—the moderating effect of traditionality. Proceedings of 2014 International Conference on Information Management and Management Engineering. WIT PRESS; 2014:171–177. doi:10.2495/IMME140201.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social learning theory. Scotts Valley Califo. 1977;1(1):33–52. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5614-7_3246
   Google Scholar
• Hobfoll SE. Conservation of resources: a new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Am Psychol. 1989;44:513–524. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.44.3.513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang C, Zhang W, Wu S, Kee DMH, Liu P, Deng H. Influence of chief executive officer servant leadership on middle managers’ voice behavior. Soc Behav Pers. 2021;49(5):1–13. doi:10.16471/j.cnki.11-2822/c.2018.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutton JE, Dukerich JM, Harquail CV. Organizational images and member identification. Admin Sci Q. 1994;39(2):239–263. doi:10.2307/2393235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker GS. A theory of social interactions. J Polit Econ. 1974;82(6):1063–1093. doi:10.1086/260265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt RS. Social contagion and innovation: cohesion versus structural equivalence. Am J Sociol. 1987;92(6):1287–1335. doi:10.1086/228667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao D, Tian F, Sun X, Zhang D. The effects of entrepreneurship on the enterprises’ sustainable innovation capability in the digital era: the role of organizational commitment, person–organization value fit, and perceived organizational support. Sustainability. 2021;13:6156. doi:10.3390/su13116156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miguel LAP, Popadiuk S. The semiotics of tacit knowledge sharing: a study from the perspective of symbolic interactionism. Cad EBAPE BR. 2019;17(3):460–473. doi:10.1590/1679-395172519x
   Google Scholar