429
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Sharing Reward Program Based on Face Consciousness in Social Media

, , , ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 1147-1166 | Published online: 10 May 2022

References

  • Schmitt P, Skiera B, Bulte CVD. Referral programs and customer value. J Mark. 2011;75(1):46–59. doi:10.1509/jm.75.1.46
  • Frey BS, Oberholzer-gee F. The cost of price incentives: an empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out. Am Econ Rev. 1997;87(4):746–755.
  • Goffman E. On face-work; an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Reflections. 2003;18(3):213.
  • Deng SL, Yang LY, Fu SX. Research on SNS self-disclosure behavior based on self-discrepancy theory. Inf Stud. 2021;44(03):122–130.
  • Herzberg F, Mathapo J, Wiener Y, et al. Motivation-hygiene correlates of mental health: an examination of motivational inversion in a clinical population. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1974;42(3):411. doi:10.1037/h0036697
  • Godes D. Product policy in markets with word-of-mouth communication. Manage Sci. 2017;63(1):267–278. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2015.2330
  • Jiang FF, Shu EM, Zhong WJ. Threshold reward mechanism based on consumer sharing behavior in social marketing. J Syst Manag. 2020;29(04):742–751.
  • Jung J, Bapna R, Gupta A, et al. Impact of incentive mechanism in online referral programs: evidence from randomized field experiments. J Manag Inf Syst. 2021;38(1):59–81. doi:10.1080/07421222.2021.1870384
  • Wolters HM,;, Schulze C;, Gedenk K. Referral reward size and new customer profitability. Mark Sci. 2020;39(6):1166–1180. doi:10.1287/mksc.2020.1242
  • Hu HH, Zhang XM. Reward design for customer referral programs: reward–product congruence effect and gender difference. Front Psychol. 2021;12:644412. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.644412
  • Zhang D, Zhang F, Liu S, et al. Impact of referral reward program on innovative customers’ follow-up e-referral. Inf Technol People. 2019;32(3):559–578. doi:10.1108/ITP-06-2017-0188
  • Dose DB, Walsh G, Beatty SE, et al. Unintended reward costs: the effectiveness of customer referral reward programs for innovative products and services. J Acad Mark Sci. 2019;47(3):438–459. doi:10.1007/s11747-019-00635-z
  • Jiang F, Mei S, Zhong W. Impact of Customer’s Social value on optimizing referral reward programs. J Org Comp Elect Com. 2020;30(4):1–17.
  • Jin L, Huang Y. When giving money does not work: the differential effects of monetary versus in-kind rewards in referral reward programs. Int J Res Mark. 2014;31(1):107–116. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2013.08.005
  • Wirtz J, Orsingher C, Chew P, et al. The role of metaperception on the effectiveness of referral reward programs. J Serv Res. 2013;16(1):82–98. doi:10.1177/1094670512462138
  • Iyengar R, Bulte CVD, Valente TW. Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Mark Sci. 2011;30(2):195–212. doi:10.1287/mksc.1100.0566
  • Kozinets RV. The field behind the screen: using netnography for marketing research in online communities. J Mark Res. 2002;39(1):61–72. doi:10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935
  • Brown P, Levinson SC, Gumperz JJ. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press; 1987:63–83.
  • Brown P, Levinson SC, Goody E. Universal in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena. Cambridge University Press; 1978:56–311.
  • Chen ZY. The concept of face and its confucian roots. J Chin Philos. 1986;13(3):329–348. doi:10.1163/15406253-01303007
  • Bao Y, Zhou KZ, Su C. Face consciousness and risk aversion: do they affect consumer decision-making? Psychol Mark. 2003;20(8):733–755. doi:10.1002/mar.10094
  • Chan H, Wan LC, Sin LYM. The contrasting effects of culture on consumer tolerance: interpersonal face and impersonal fate. J Consum Res. 2009;36(3):292–304. doi:10.1086/597329
  • Deci EL, Koestner R, Ryan RM. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychol Bull. 1999;125(6):692–700. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.692
  • Cupach WR, Carson CL. Characteristics and consequences of interpersonal complaints associated with perceived face threat. J Soc Pers Relat. 2002;19(4):443–462. doi:10.1177/0265407502019004047
  • Qiang Y, jiang Y-S, Xue Z, Jiaji Z. How long will e-business content stay in wechat moments: a Study on the Impact of Identity and Economic Rewards on social media users’ sharing willingness and sharing time. Nankai Bus Rev. 2021;24(03):16–29.
  • Boerman SC, Willemsen LM, Van DEP. “This post is sponsored” effects of sponsorship disclosure on persuasion knowledge and electronic word of mouth in the context of facebook. J Interact Mark. 2017;38:82–92. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2016.12.002
  • Swann WB Jr, Pelham BW, Krull DS. Agreeable fancy or disagreeable truth? Reconciling self-enhancement and self-verification. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989;57(5):782–791. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.782
  • Belk RW. Possessions and the extended self. J Consum Res. 1988;15(2):139–168. doi:10.1086/209154
  • Americus Reed II, Forehand MR, Puntoni S, Warlop L. Identity-based consumer behavior. Int J Res Mark. 2012;29(4):310–321. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2012.08.002
  • Toubia O, Stephen AT. Intrinsic vs. image-related utility in social media: why do people contribute content to twitter? Mark Sci. 2013;32(3):368–392. doi:10.1287/mksc.2013.0773
  • Goffman E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday Anchor Books; 1959.
  • Piwinger M, Ebert H. Impression management: wie aus niemand jemand wird. In: Bentele G, editor. Kommunikationsmanagement: Strategien, Wissen, Lösungen. Neuwied: Luchterhand; 2001.
  • Schlenker BR. Self-presentation: managing the impression of consistency when reality interferes with self-enhancement. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1975;32(6):1030–1037. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.32.6.1030
  • Brown JD, Dutton KA, Cook KE. From the top down: self-esteem and self-evaluation. Cogn Emot. 2001;15(5):615–631. doi:10.1080/02699930126063
  • Baumeister RF. A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychol Bull. 1982;91(1):3–26. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.91.1.3
  • Hollenbeck CR, Kaikati AM. Consumers’use of brands to reflect their actual and ideal selves on Facebook. Int J Res Mark. 2012;29:395–405. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2012.06.002
  • Vilnai-Yavetz I, Levina O. Motivating social sharing of e-business content: intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, or crowding-out effect? Comput Human Behav. 2018;79:181–191. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.034
  • Deci EL, Ryan RM. The general causality orientations scale: self-determination in personality. J Res Pers. 1985;19(2):109–134. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
  • Vilnai-Yavetz I, Levina O, Zhang K. Motivating social sharing of e-business content: intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, or crowding-out effect? Computers in human behavior. J Inequal Appl. 2018;2018(79):181–191. doi:10.1186/s13660-018-1773-0
  • Rehnen LM, Bartsch S, Kull M, et al. Exploring the impact of rewarded social media engagement in loyalty programs. J Serv Manag. 2017;28(2):305–328. doi:10.1108/JOSM-10-2015-0338
  • Chen AH, Lu YB. Users’ active behavior in SNSs: integrating commitment, social support, sunk cost and social influence perspective. Nankai Bus Rev. 2014;17(03):30–39.
  • Lang C, Barton H. Just untag it: exploring the management of undesirable facebook photos. Comput Human Behav. 2015;43:147–155. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.051
  • Desai CPS, Desai PS. Channel coordination mechanisms for customer satisfaction. Mark Sci. 1995;14(4):343–359. doi:10.1287/mksc.14.4.343
  • Hennig T, Gwinner K, Walsh G, Gremler D. Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: what motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? J Interact Mark. 2004;18:38–52. doi:10.1002/dir.10073
  • Hopkins R, Powers TL. The theory of altruism and consumer behavior: literature review and model development. Academy of Marketing Science (AMS); 1996:339–344.
  • Zaki J, Mitchell J. Current directions in psychological science intuitive prosociality. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2013;22(6):466–470. doi:10.1177/0963721413492764
  • Stukas AA, Clary EG. Altruism and helping behavior; 2012.
  • Luyi Y, Laurens D. Referral priority program: leveraging social ties via operational incentives. Manag Sci. 2019;65(5):2231–2248.
  • Ping X, Tang CS, Wirtz J. Optimizing referral reward programs under impression management considerations. Eur J Oper Res. 2011;215(3):730–739.
  • Tanaka Y. Profitability of price and quantity strategies in an oligopoly. J Math Econ. 2001;35(3):409–418. doi:10.1016/S0304-4068(00)00072-0
  • Lisjak M, Bonezzi A, Rucker DD. How marketing perks influence word-of-mouth. J Mark. 2021;85(5):128–144. doi:10.1177/0022242921991798
  • Xu C. A novel recommendation method based on social network using matrix factorization technique. Inf Process Manag. 2018;54(3):463–474. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2018.02.005
  • Xu C, Ding AS, Liao SS. A privacy-preserving recommendation method based on multi-objective optimisation for mobile users. Int J Bio-Inspired Comput. 2020;16(1):23–32. doi:10.1504/IJBIC.2020.108995
  • Xu C, Ding AS, Zhao K. A novel POI recommendation method based on trust relationship and spatial-temporal factors. Electron Commer Res Appl. 2021;48:101060. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2021.101060
  • Xu C, Liu D, Mei X. Exploring an efficient POI recommendation model based on user characteristics and spatial-temporal factors. Mathematics. 2021;9(21):2673. doi:10.3390/math9212673
  • Bao F, Y. W, Z. L, et al. Effect Improved for high-dimensional and unbalanced data anomaly detection model based on KNN-SMOTE-LSTM. Complexity. 2020;2020:20. doi:10.1155/2020/9084704
  • Bao F, Mao L, Zhu Y, Xiao C, Xu C. An improved evaluation methodology for mining association rules. Axioms. 2022;11(1):17. doi:10.3390/axioms11010017
  • C. J, Bao F, C. X, et al. A novel method of interestingness measures for association rules mining based on profit. Discrete Dyn Nat Soc. 2015. doi:10.1155/2015/868634
  • Ju C, Jiang Y, Bao F, Zou B, Xu C. Online rumor diffusion model based on variation and silence phenomenon in the context of COVID-19. Front Public Health. 2022;9:788475. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.788475
  • Xiang K, Xu C, Wang J. Understanding the relationship between tourists’ consumption behavior and their consumption substitution willingness under unusual environment. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021;14:483–500. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S303239
  • Wang J, Xu C, Liu W. Understanding the adoption of mobile social payment? From the cognitive behavioral perspective. Int J Mobile Commun. 2022. doi:10.1504/IJMC.2022.10036150