Inclusive Leadership and Employee Proactive Behavior: A Cross-Level Moderated Mediation Model

References

• Hirak R, Peng AC, Carmeli A, Schaubroeck JM. Linking leader inclusiveness to work unit performance: the importance of psychological safety and learning from failures. Leadersh Q. 2012;23(1):107–117. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crant JM. Proactive behavior in organizations. J Manage. 2000;26(3):435–462. doi:10.1177/014920630002600304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker SK, Bindl UK, Strauss K. Making things happen: a model of proactive motivation. J Manage. 2010;36(4):827–856. doi:10.1177/0149206310363732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker SK, Collins CG. Taking stock: integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behavior. J Manage. 2010;36(3):633–662. doi:10.1177/0149206308321554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greguras GJ, Diefendorff JM. Why does proactive personality predict employee life satisfaction and work behavior? A field investigation of the mediating role of the self‐concordance model. Pers Psychol. 2010;63(3):539–560. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01180.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anseel F, Beatty AS, Shen W, Lievens F, Sackett PR. How are we doing after 30 years? A meta-analytic review of the antecedents and outcomes of feedback-seeking behavior. J Manage. 2015;41(1):318–348. doi:10.1177/0149206313484521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raub S, Liao H. Doing the right thing without being told: joint effects of initiative climate and general self-efficacy on employee proactive customer service performance. J Appl Psychol. 2012;97(3):651. doi:10.1037/a0026736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frese M, Fay D, Hilburger T, Leng K, Tag A. The concept of personal initiative: operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples. J Occup Organ Psychol. 1997;70(2):139–161. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1997.tb00639.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porath C, Spreitzer G, Gibson C, Garnett FG. Thriving at work: toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. J Organ Behav. 2012;33(2):250–275. doi:10.1002/job.756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer MD, Matta FK, Kim JK, Welsh DT, Garud N. It’s not you, it’s them: social influences on trust propensity and trust dynamics. Pers Psychol. 2018;71(3):423–455. doi:10.1111/peps.12265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai F-Y, Lin -C-C, Lu S-C, Chen H-L. The role of team–member exchange in proactive personality and employees’ proactive behavior: the moderating effect of transformational leadership. J Leadersh Organ Stud. 2021;28(4):429–443. doi:10.1177/15480518211034847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropanzano R, Li A, Benson L. Peer justice and teamwork process. Group Organ Manage. 2011;36(5):567–596. doi:10.1177/1059601111414561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung SY, Choi JN, Kang S-C. Incentive pay and firm performance: moderating roles of procedural justice climate and environmental turbulence. Hum Resour Manage. 2017;56(2):287–305. doi:10.1002/hrm.21765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker SK, Wang Y, Liao J. When is proactivity wise? A review of factors that influence the individual outcomes of proactive behavior. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2019;6(1):221–248. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015302
   Google Scholar
• Den Hartog DN, Belschak FD. When does transformational leadership enhance employee proactive behavior? The role of autonomy and role breadth self-efficacy. J Appl Psychol. 2012;97(1):194–202. doi:10.1037/a0024903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore LM, Randel AE, Chung BG, Dean MA, Holcombe Ehrhart K, Singh G. Inclusion and diversity in work groups: a review and model for future research. J Manage. 2011;37(4):1262–1289. doi:10.1177/0149206310385943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randel AE, Galvin BM, Shore LM, et al. Inclusive leadership: realizing positive outcomes through belongingness and being valued for uniqueness. Hum Resour Manage Rev. 2018;28(2):190–203. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi L, Liu B. Effects of inclusive leadership on employee voice behavior and team performance: the mediating role of caring ethical climate. Front Commu. 2017;2:8. doi:10.3389/fcomm.2017.00008
   Google Scholar
• Halbesleben JR, Wheeler AR. To invest or not? The role of coworker support and trust in daily reciprocal gain spirals of helping behavior. J Manage. 2015;41(6):1628–1650. doi:10.1177/0149206312455246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzafrir SS, Baruch Y, Dolan SL. The consequences of emerging HRM practices for employees’ trust in their managers. Pers Rev. 2004;33(6):628–647. doi:10.1108/00483480410561529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tett RP, Guterman HA. Situation trait relevance, trait expression, and cross-situational consistency: testing a principle of trait activation. J Res Pers. 2000;34(4):397–423. doi:10.1006/jrpe.2000.2292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avolio BJ, Gardner WL, Walumbwa FO, Luthans F, May DR. Unlocking the mask: a look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behavior. Leaders Q. 2004;15(6):801–823. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller JB, Marler LE. Change driven by nature: a meta-analytic review of the proactive personality literature. J Vocat Behav. 2009;75(3):329–345. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2009.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz C, Sonnentag S. Antecedents of day-level proactive behavior: a look at job stressors and positive affect during the workday. J Manage. 2009;35(1):94–111. doi:10.1177/0149206307308911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belschak FD, Den Hartog DN. Pro‐self, prosocial, and pro‐organizational foci of proactive behavior: differential antecedents and consequences. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2010;83(2):475–498. doi:10.1348/096317909X439208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishii LH, Mayer DM. Do inclusive leaders help to reduce turnover in diverse groups? The moderating role of leader-member exchange in the diversity to turnover relationship. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(6):1412–1426. doi:10.1037/a0017190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nembhard IM, Edmondson AC. Making it safe: the effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. J Organ Behav. 2006;27(7):941–966. doi:10.1002/job.413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmeli A, Reiter-Palmon R, Ziv E. Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: the mediating role of psychological safety. Creativ Res J. 2010;22(3):250–260. doi:10.1080/10400419.2010.504654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avery DR, McKay PF, Wilson DC, Volpone S. Attenuating the effect of seniority on intent to remain: the role of perceived inclusiveness. In: Meeting of the Academy of Management; 2008; Anaheim, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Fang Y-C, Chen J-Y, Wang M-J, Chen C-Y. The impact of inclusive leadership on employees’ innovative behavior: the mediation of psychological capital. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1803. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Wang J, Zhou X, Li F, Wang M. How inclusive leadership enhances follower taking charge: the mediating role of affective commitment and the moderating role of traditionality. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2020;13:1103. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S280911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng H, Zhao L, Zhao Y. Inclusive leadership and taking-charge behavior: roles of psychological safety and thriving at work. Front Psychol. 2020;11:62. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He B, He Q, Sarfraz M. Inclusive leadership and subordinates’ pro-social rule breaking in the workplace: mediating role of self-efficacy and moderating role of employee relations climate. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021;14:1691. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S333593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen XP, Eberly MB, Chiang TJ, Farh JL, Cheng BS. Affective trust in Chinese leaders: linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance. J Manage. 2014;40(3):796–819. doi:10.1177/0149206311410604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siyal S, Xin C, Umrani WA, Fatima S, Pal D. How do leaders influence innovation and creativity in employees? The mediating role of intrinsic motivation. Admin Soc. 2021;53(9):1337–1361. doi:10.1177/0095399721997427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer RC, Gavin MB. Trust in management and performance: who minds the shop while the employees watch the boss. Acad Manage J. 2005;48(5):874–888. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2005.18803928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye S, Xiao Y, Wu S, Wu L. Feeling trusted or feeling used? The relationship between perceived leader trust, reciprocation wariness, and proactive behavior. Psychol Res Behav Manage. 2021;14:1461. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S328458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobfoll SE, Halbesleben J, Neveu JP, Westman M. Conservation of resources in the organizational context: the reality of resources and their consequences. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2018;5(1):103–128. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640
   Google Scholar
• He H, Zhu W, Zheng X. Procedural justice and employee engagement: roles of organizational identification and moral identity centrality. J Bus Ethics. 2014;122(4):681–695. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1774-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naumann SE, Bennett N. A case for procedural justice climate: development and test of a multilevel model. Acad Manage J. 2000;43(5):881–889. doi:10.2307/1556416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walumbwa FO, Hartnell CA, Oke A. Servant leadership, procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: a cross-level investigation. J Appl Psychol. 2010;95(3):517. doi:10.1037/a0018867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tangirala S, Ramanujam R. Employee silence on critical work issues: the cross level effects of procedural justice climate. Pers Psychol. 2008;61(1):37–68. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00105.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind EA. Fairness heuristic theory: justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In: Greenberg J, Cropanzano R, editors. Advances in Organizational Justice. Vol. 2001. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2001:56–88.
   Google Scholar
• Sun L-Y, Aryee S, Law KS. High-performance human resource practices, citizenship behavior, and organizational performance: a relational perspective. Acad Manage J. 2007;50(3):558–577. doi:10.5465/amj.2007.25525821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister DJ. Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Acad Manage J. 1995;38(1):24–59. doi:10.2307/256727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquitt JA. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86(3):386–400. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.86.3.386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan D. Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: a typology of composition models. J Appl Psychol. 1998;83(2):234–246. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquitt JA, Noe RA, Jackson CL. Justice in teams: antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate. Pers Psychol. 2002;55(1):83–109. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00104.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James LR, Demaree RG, Wolf G. Rwg: an assessment of within-group interrater agreement. J Appl Psychol. 1993;78(2):306–309. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliese PD. Within-group agreement, non-Independence, and reliability: implications for data for data aggregation and analysis. In: Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ, editors. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2000:349–381.
   Google Scholar
• Frese M, Fay D. Personal initiative (PI): an active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Res Organ Behav. 2001;23:133–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohlmann C, Zacher H. Making things happen (un) expectedly: interactive effects of age, gender, and motives on evaluations of proactive behavior. J Bus Psychol. 2021;36:609–631. doi:10.1007/s10869-020-09691-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo -C-C, Ye Y-C, Chen M-Y, Chen LH. Psychological flexibility at work and employees’ proactive work behavior: cross‐level moderating role of leader need for structure. Appl Psychol. 2018;67(3):454–472. doi:10.1111/apps.12111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt A, Den Hartog DN, Belschak FD. Transformational leadership and proactive work behavior: a moderated mediation model including work engagement and job strain. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2016;89(3):588–610. doi:10.1111/joop.12143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar