Excess and Defect: How Job-Family Responsibilities Congruence Effect the Employee Procrastination Behavior

References

• Klingsieck KB. Procrastination when good things don’t come to those who wait. Eur Psychol. 2013;18(1):24–34. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hen M, Goroshit M, Viengarten S. How decisional and general procrastination relate to procrastination at work: an investigation of office and non-office workers. Pers Indiv Differ. 2021;172:1–6. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uysal HT, Yilmaz F. Procrastination in the workplace: the role of hierarchical career plateau. Upravlenets. 2020;11(3):82–101. doi:10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-3-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metin UB, Taris TW, Peeters MCW. Measuring procrastination at work and its associated workplace aspects. Pers Indiv Differ. 2016;101(6):254–263. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blunt AK, Pychyl TA. Task aversiveness and procrastination: a multi-dimensional approach to task aversiveness across stages of persona1 projects. Pers Indiv Differ. 2000;28(1):0–167. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00091-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson DC. Procrastination and the five-factor model: a facet level analysis. Pers Indivi Differ. 2001;30(1):149–158. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00019-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel P. The nature of procrastination: a meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychol Bull. 2007;133(1):65–94. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khattak AN, Ilyas M. Task procrastination: overcoming through re-establishment of psychological association. J Bus Strategy. 2017;11(2):73–88.
   Google Scholar
• Kastiya S, Sharma A. Impact of internet addiction on workplace procrastination: an empirical study on millennial employees. Prabandhan Indian J Manag. 2020;13(1):45–58. doi:10.17010/pijom/2020/v13i1/149947
   Google Scholar
• Zabelina E, Chestyunina Y, Trushina I, Vedeneyeva E. Time perspective as a predictor of procrastination. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2018;238(3):87–93. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2018.03.011
   Google Scholar
• Lewis S, Cooper LC. Work-Life Integration: CaseStudies of Organization Change. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Pelledl H, Eisenhardt KM, Xin KR. Exporing the black box: an analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Adm Sci Q. 1999;44(1):1–28. doi:10.2307/2667029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhaus JH, Beutell NJ. Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Acad Manage Rev. 1985;10(1):76–88. doi:10.2307/258214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobfoll SE, Halbesleben J, Neveu JP, Westman M. Conservation of resources in the organizational context: the reality of resources and their consequences. Annu Rev Organ Psychol. 2018;5(1):103–128. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demerouti E, Bakker AB, Bulters A. The loss spiral of work pressure, work-home interference and exhaustion: reciprocal relations in a three-wave study. J Vocat Behav. 2004;64(1):131–149. doi:10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00030-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langfred CW. The downside of self-management: a longitudinal study of the effects of conflict on trust, autonomy, and task interdependence in self-managing teams. Acad Manage J. 2007;50(4):885–900. doi:10.5465/amj.2007.26279196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge TA, Woolf EF, Hurst C. Is emotional labor more difficult for some than others? A multilevel, experience-sampling study. Pers Psychol. 2009;62(1):57–88. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.01129.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tepper BJ, Duffy MK, Shaw JD. Personality moderators of the relationship between abusive supervision and subordinates’Resistance. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86(5):974–983. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeb S, Akbar A, Gul A, Haider SA, Poulova P, Yasmin F. Work-family conflict, emotional intelligence, and general self-efficacy among medical practitioners during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021;14:1867–1876. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S333070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick MR, Mount MK. The big personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Pers Psychol. 1991;44(1):1–26. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenbaum RL, Mawritz MB, Eissa G. Bottom-line mentality as an antecedent of social undermining and the moderating roles of core self-evaluations and conscientiousness. J Appl Psychol. 2012;97(2):343–359. doi:10.1037/a0025217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFerran B, Aquino K, Duffy M. How personality and moral identity relate to individuals’ethical ideology. Bus Ethics Q. 2010;20(1):35–56. doi:10.5840/beq20102014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa PT, McCrae RR. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five Factor (NEO-FFI) Inventory Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman DS. Be a better leader, have a richer life. Harv Bus Rev. 2008;86(4):112–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuramman S, Simmers CA. Type of employment, work-family conflict and well-being a comparative study. J Organ Behav. 2001;22(5):551–568. doi:10.1002/job.102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayrhofer W, Meyer M, Schiffinger M, Schmidt A. The influence of family responsibilities, career fields and gender on career success. J Manag Psychol. 2008;23(3):292–323. doi:10.1108/02683940810861392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhaus JH, Powell GN. When work and family are allies: a theory of work-family enrichment. Acad Manage Rev. 2006;31(1):72–92. doi:10.5465/amr.2006.19379625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson JL, Bloom AM. An analysis of the contribution of thr five factors of personality to variance in academic procrastination. Pers Indivi Differ. 1995;18(1):127–133. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(94)00109-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MAS, Jianguo D, Mann A, et al. Rejuvenating the concept of work alienation through job demands-resources model and examining its relationship with emotional exhaustion and explorative And exploitative learning. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2019;12:931–941. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S204193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslach C, Leiter MP. Early predictors of job burnout and engagement. J Appl Psychol. 2008;93(3):498–512. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobfoll SE. The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: advancing conservation of resources theory. Appl Psychol. 2001;50(3):337–421. doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari JR, Tice DM. Procrastination as a self-handicap for men and women: a task-avoidance strategy in a laboratory setting. J Res Pers. 2000;34(1):73–83. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1999.2261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta R, Hershey DA, Gaur J. Time perspective and procrastination in the workplace: an empirical investigation. Cur Psychol. 2012;31(2):195–211. doi:10.1007/s12144-012-9136-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritzsche BA, Young BR, Hickson KC. Individual differences in academic procrastination tendency and writing success. Pers Indiv Differ. 2003;35(7):1549–1557. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00369-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bluedorn AC, Kalliath TJ, Strube MJ, Martin GD. Polychronicity and the inventory of polychronic values (IPV): the development of an instrument to measure a fundamental dimension of organizational culture. J Manag Psychol. 1999;14(3/4):205–231. doi:10.1108/02683949910263747
   Google Scholar
• Slocombe TE, Bluedorn AC. Organizational behavior implications of the congruence between preferred polychronicity and experienced work-unit polychronicity. J Organ Behav. 1999;20(1):75–99. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199901)20:1<75::AID-JOB872>3.0.CO;2-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalid A, Zhang Q, Wang W, Ghaffari AS, Pan F. The relationship between procrastination, perceived stress, saliva alpha-amylase level and parenting styles in Chinese first year medical students. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2019;12:489–498. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S207430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead R, Shanahan MJ, Neufeld RWJ. “I’ll go to therapy, eventually”: procrastination, stress and mental health. Pers Indiv Differ. 2010;49(3):175–180. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xanthopouloud D, Bakker AB, Oerlemans WGM, Koszucka M. Need for Recovery after emotional labor: differential effects of daily deep and surface acting. J Organ Behav. 2018;39(4):481–494. doi:10.1002/job.2245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humberg S, Nestler S, Back MD. Response surface analysis in personality and social psychology: checklist and clarifications for the case of congruence hypotheses. Soc Psychol Pers Sci. 2019;10(3):409–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik MI, Sajjad M, Hyde RS, Ahmad MS, Ahmed J, Hussain S. Role overload: a cause of diminishing employee retention and productivity. Mid East J Sci Res. 2013;18(11):1573–1577.
   Google Scholar
• Judge TA, Ilies R. Relationship of personality to performance motivation: a meta-analytic review. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87(4):797–807. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks-Leduc L, Feldman G, Bardi A. Personality traits and personal values: a meta-analysis. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2015;19(1):3–29. doi:10.1177/1088868314538548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn RL, Wolfe DM, Quinn RP, Snoek JD, Rosenthal RA. Organizational stress: studies in role conflict and ambiguity. Am J Sociol. 1964;10(1):103–104.
   Google Scholar
• Barkley RA. Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychol Bull. 1997;121(1):65–94. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver CS, Scheier MF. On the Self-Regulation of Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Appelbaum SH, Marchionni A, Fernandez A. The multi-tasking paradox: perceptions, problems and strategies. Manag Decis. 2008;46(9):1313–1325. doi:10.1108/00251740810911966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casper WJ, Vaziri H, Wayne JH, DeHauw S, Greenhaus J. The jingle-jangle of work-nonwork balance: a comprehensive and meta-analytic review of its meaning and measurement. J Appl Psychol. 2018;103(2):182–214. doi:10.1037/apl0000259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grawitch MJ, Barber LK. In search of the relationship between polychronicity and multitasking performance: the importance of trait self-control. J Indivi Differ. 2013;34(4):222–229. doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherniss C. Staff Burnout: Job Stress in the Human Services. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Lee R, Ashforth B. A meta-analytic examination of the correlates of the three dimensions of job burnout. J Appl Psychol. 1996;81(2):123–133. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.2.123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang I, Chuang C, Lin H. The role of burnout in the relationship between perceptions of organizational politics and turn-over intentions. Public Pers Manage. 2003;32(4):519–532. doi:10.1177/009102600303200404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebetez M, Rochat L, Gay P, Linden MV. Validation of a French version of the pure procrastination scale (pps). Compr Psychiatry. 2014;55(6):1442–1447. doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.04.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song YH, Shao R, Skarlicki D, Park J, The role of conscientiousness and LMX in the customer mistreatment and employee sabotage linkage. Acad Manag Proc. 2016;1:13337. doi:10.5465/ambpp.2016.13337abstract
   Google Scholar
• Bakker AB. An evidence-based model of work engagement. Curr Direct Psychol Sci. 2011;20(5):265–269. doi:10.1177/0963721411414534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang B, Zhang D. A theoretical comparison of US and Chinese culture and implications for human resource theory and practice. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2003;3(4):338–358.
   Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Shin KH, Swanger N. Burnout and engagement: a comparative analysis using the big five personality dimensions. Int J Hosp Manag. 2009;28(1):96–104. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2008.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoobler JM, Wayne SJ, Lemmon G. Bosses’ perceptions of family-work conflict and women’s promotability: glass ceiling effects. Acad Manag J. 2009;52(5):939–957. doi:10.5465/amj.2009.44633700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li A, Bagger J, Cropanzano R. The impact of stereotypes and supervisor perceptions of employee work-family conflict on job performance ratings. Hum Relat. 2017;70(1):119–145. doi:10.1177/0018726716645660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pines AM, Maslach C. Characteristics of staff burnout in mental health setting. Hosp Com Psychiat. 1978;29(4):233–237.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wetzels M, Odekerken-Schröder G, Oppen V. Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Q. 2009;31(1):177–179. doi:10.2307/20650284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke EA, Latham GP. A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards JR, Cable DM. The value of value congruence. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(3):654–677. doi:10.1037/a0014891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreft I, Leeuw JD, Aiken LS. Taylor & Francis online: the effect of different forms of centering in hierarchical linear models. Multivariate Behav Res. 1995;30(1):1–21. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3001_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oluwafemi TB, Mitchelmore S, Nikolopoulos K. Leading innovation: empirical evidence for ambidextrous leadership from UK high-tech SMEs. J Bus Res. 2020;119(1):195–208. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li GQ, Jing RT, Wu JH. Research on the measurement and impact of work-life multi-role responsibility. Chi Ind Econ. 2010;265(4):130–140.
   Google Scholar
• Ruderman MN, Ohlott PJ, Panzer K, King SN. Benefits of multiple roles for managerial women. Acad Manag J. 2002;45(2):369–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li CP, Shi K. The impact of distributive and procedural equity on job burnout. Acta Psychol Sin. 2003;35(5):677–684.
   Google Scholar
• Brislin RW. The Wording and Translation of Research Instruments. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, Mackenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Eq Modell Multidiscip J. 2009;6(1):1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh HW, Hau K, Wen Z. In search of golden rules: comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Struct Eq Modell Multidiscip J. 2004;11(3):320–341. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalos MH, Whitlock PA. Copyright-Statistical Data Analysis. Wiley, NY: Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang AY, Tsui AS, Wang DX. Leadership behaviors and group creativity in Chinese organizations: the role of group processes. Leadersh Q. 2011;22(5):851–862. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopman J, Matta FK, Scott BA, Conlon DE. Ingratiation and popularity as antecedents of justice: a social exchange and social capital perspective. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2015;131(c):132–148. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel P. Arousal, avoidant and decisional procrastinators: do they exist? Pers Indiv Differ. 2010;48(8):926–934. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar