Soft Economic Incentives and Soft Behavioral Interventions on the Public’s Green Purchasing Behaviour - The Evidence from China

References

• Dong H, Geng Y, Fujita T, et al. Uncovering regional disparity of China’s water footprint and inter-provincial virtual water flows[J]. Sci Total Environ. 2014;500–501:120–130. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharifi A. Co-benefits and synergies between urban climate change mitigation and adaptation measures: a literature review[J]. Sci Total Environ. 2020;750:141642. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jian Y, Yu IY, Yang MX, Zeng KJ. The impacts of fear and uncertainty of covid-19 on environmental concerns, brand trust, and behavioral intentions toward green hotels. Sustainability. 2020;12:1–14. doi:10.3390/SU12208688
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun X, Su W, Guo X, Tian Z. The impact of awe induced by COVID-19 pandemic on green consumption behavior in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18. doi:10.3390/ijerph18020543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhtar R, Sultana S, Masud MM, Jafrin N, Al-Mamun A. Consumers’ environmental ethics, willingness, and green consumerism between lower and higher income groups. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2021;168:105274. doi:10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2020.105274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue T, Long R, Chen H. Factors influencing energy-saving behavior of urban households in Jiangsu Province. Energy Policy. 2013;62(9):665e675. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohnmacht T, Schaffner D, Weibel C, et al. Rethinking social psychology and intervention design: a model of energy savings and human behavior. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2017;26:40–53. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Sun Y. The influence of tailored information on household energy conservation decision-making process: a longitudinal study. Adv Psychol Sci. 2018;26:571.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois G, Sovacool B, Aall C, et al. It starts at home? Climate policies targeting household consumption and behavioral decisions are key to low-carbon futures. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2019;52:144–158. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han S, Yao R, Li N. The development of energy conservation policy of buildings in China: a Comprehensive Review and Analysis. J Build Eng. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.eng.2020.10.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfister R, Wirth R, Schwarz KA, et al. Burdens of non-conformity: motor execution reveals cognitive conflict during deliberate rule violations. Cognition. 2016;147:93–99. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.11.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney CK, Gardner J, Ban NC, et al. Imprecise and weakly assessed: evaluating voluntary measures for management of marine protected areas. Mar Pol. 2016;69:92–101. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2016.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Bor YJ, Chien YL, Hsu E. The market-incentive recycling system for waste packaging containers in Taiwan. Environ Sci Policy. 2004;7(6):509–523. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2004.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito K, Ida T, Tanaka M. Moral suasion and economic incentives: field experimental evidence from energy demand. Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2018;10:240–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpp KG, John LK, Troxel AB, Norton L, Fassbender J, Loewenstein G.Applying behavioral economics to a weight loss intervention.Meeting of Society for Medical Decision Making. 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Charness G, Gneezy U. Incentives to exercise. University of California at Santa Barbara. Economics Working Paper Series; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Lazear EP. Performance pay and productivity. Am Econ Rev. 2000;90(5):1346–1361. doi:10.1257/aer.90.5.1346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timlett RE, Williams ID. Public participation and recycling performance in England: a comparison of tools for behaviour change. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2008;52(4):622–634. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gneezy U. The W effect of incentives. Levine’s Bibliography. 2003;2:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres I. Carrots and sticks: unlock the power of incentives to get things done. Libr J. 2011;4:56.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Wang Z, Zhou G. Determinants of employee electricity saving: the role of social benefits, personal benefits and organizational electricity saving climate[J]. J Clean Prod. 2014;66(mar.1):280–287. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leygue C, Ferguson E, Spence A. Saving energy in the workplace: why, and for whom?. J Environ Psychol. 2017;53:50–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler RH. Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioral Economics. W. W. Norton & Company; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Rajapaksa D, Gifford R, Torgler B, et al. Do monetary and non-monetary incentives influence environmental attitudes and behavior? Evidence from an experimental analysis. Resources Conserv Recycl. 2019;149:168–176. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.05.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagmann D, Ho EH, Loewenstein G. Nudging out support for a carbon tax. Nat Clim Chang. 2019;9(6):484–489. doi:10.1038/s41558019-0474-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osman M, Fenton N, Pilditch T, Lagnado D, Neil M. Whom do we trust on social policy interventions? Basic Appl Soc Psych. 2018;40(5):249–268. doi:10.1080/01973533.2018.1469986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coskun A, Zimmerman J, Erbug C. Promoting sustainability through behavior change: a review. Design Studies. 2015;41:183–204. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2015.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeir I, Weijters B, De Houwer J, et al. Environmentally sustainable food consumption: a review and research agenda from a goal-directed perspective. Front Psychol. 2020;11:1603. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern D, Halpern D. Inside the Nudge Unit: How Small Changes Can Make a Big Difference. Random House; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Lehner M, Mont O, Heiskanen E. Nudging –A promising tool for sustainable consumption behaviour? J Clean Prod. 2016;134:166–177. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagman W, Andersson D, V€astfj€all D, Tingh€og G. Public views on policies involving nudges. Rev Philos Psychol. 2015;6(3):439–453. doi:10.1007/s13164-015-0263-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrescu DC, Hollands GJ, Couturier DL, Ng YL, Marteau TM. Public acceptability in the UK and USA of nudging to reduce obesity: the example of reducing sugar-sweetened beverages consumption. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0155995. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisch LA, Sunstein CR, Gwozdz W. Beyond carrots and sticks: europeans support health nudges. Food Policy. 2017;69:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyserman D. Identity-based motivation: implications for action-readiness, procedural-readiness, and consumer behaviour. J Consumer Psychol. 2009;19(3):250–260. doi:10.1016/j.jcps
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern PC. Information, incentives, and proenvironmental consumer behavior. J Consumer Policy. 1999;22(4):461–478. doi:10.1023/A:1006211709570
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):248–287. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa Pinto D, Herter MM, Rossi P, Borges A. Going green for self or for others? Gender and identity salience effects on sustainable consumption. Int J Consum Stud. 2014;38(5):540–549. doi:10.1111/ijcs.12114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griskevicius V, Tybur JM, Van den Bergh B. Going green to be seen: status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010;98(3):392–404. doi:10.1037/a0017346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ek K, Söderholm P. The devil is in the details: household electricity saving behavior and the role of information. Energy Policy. 2010;38(3):1578–1587. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wokje Abrahamse W, Steg L. Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: a meta-analysis. Global Environ Change. 2013;23(6):1773–1785. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feucht Y, Zander K. Consumers’ attitudes on carbon footprint labelling: results of the SUSDIET project. Thünen Working Papers; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Wellesley L, Happer C, Froggatt A, et al. Changing Climate, Changing Diets: Pathways to Lower Meat Consumption. Chatham House Report; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hanley N, Shogren JF, White B. Introduction to Environmental Economics. Oxford University Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Gravert C, Olsson Collentine L. When nudges aren’t enough: norms, incentives and habit formation in public transport usage. J Econ Behav Organ. 2021;190:1–14. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2021.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colasante A, D’Adamo I. The circular economy and bioeconomy in the fashion sector: emergence of a “sustainability bias”. J Cleaner Prod. 2021;329:129774. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Meier S, Rey-Biel P. When and why incentives (Don’t) work to modify behavior. J Econ Perspect. 2011;25(4):191–209. doi:10.1257/jep.25.4.191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte R, Feng K, Hubacek K, et al. Modeling the carbon consequences of pro-environmental consumer behavior[J]. Appl Energy. 2016;184(DEC.15):1207–1216. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solarin SA. Towards sustainable development in developing countries: aggregate and disaggregate analysis of energy intensity and the role of fossil fuel subsidies[J]. Sustainable Prod Consump. 2020;24:254–265. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2020.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal S, Gangopadhyay S. Tax/subsidy policies in the presence of environmentally aware consumers. J Environ Econ Manage. 2003;45(2):333–355. doi:10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00061-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen U, Schrader U, Modern A. Model of consumption for a sustainable society. J Consumer Policy. 1997;20(4):443–468. doi:10.1023/A:1006842517219
   Google Scholar
• Slovic P. The construction of preference[J]. Am Psychologist. 1995;50(5):364. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.50.5.364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Layard LR. Thinking fast and slow - Daniel Kahneman in conversation with Richard Layard. Public Events. 2011;43:54.
   Google Scholar
• Kreps DM. Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives. Am Econ Rev. 1997;87(2):359–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorrell S, Gatersleben B, Druckman A. The limits of energy sufficiency: a review of the evidence for rebound effects and negative spillovers from behavioural change. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2020;64:101439. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101439.101439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisa CF, Bélanger JJ, Schumpe BM, et al. Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials testing behavioural interventions to promote household action on climate change. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benartzi S, Beshears J, Milkman KL, et al. Should Governments Invest More in Nudging? Social Science Electronic Publishing; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Bird S, Legault L. Feedback and behavioral intervention in residential energy and resource use: a review. Curr Sustain Energy Rep. 2018;5:116–126. doi:10.1007/s40518-018-0106-8
   Google Scholar
• Yan Q, Zhou S, Wu S. The influences of tourists’ emotions on the selection of electronic word of mouth platforms. Tourism Manage. 2018;66:348–363. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2017.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YJ, Njite D, Hancer M. Anticipated emotion in consumers’ intentions to select eco-friendly restaurants: augmenting the theory of planned behavior. Int J Hosp Manage. 2013;34:255–262. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi Y, Rahman Z. Investigating the determinants of consumers’ sustainable purchase behaviour. Sustain Prod Consump. 2017;10:110–120. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2017.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig-Lewis N, Palmer A, Dermody J, Urbye A. Consumers’ evaluations of ecological packaging-rational and emotional approaches. J Environ Psychol. 2014;37:94–105. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berki-Kiss D, Menrad K. The role emotions play in consumer intentions to make pro-social purchases in Germany – an augmented theory of planned behavior model - ScienceDirect[J]. Sust Prod Consump. 2022;29:79–89. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2021.09.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein F, Emberger-Klein A, Menrad K, Möhring W, Blesin J-M. Influencing factors for the purchase intention of consumers choosing bioplastic products in Germany. Sustain. Prod Consum. 2019;19:33–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacasse K. Don’t be satisfied, identify!Strengthening positive spillover by connecting pro-environmental behaviors to an “environmentalist” label. J Environ Psychol. 2016;48:149–158. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller A, Köhler JK, Eisen C, Kleihauer S, Hanss D. Why consumers shift from single-use to reusable drink cups: an empirical application of the stage model of self-regulated behavioural change. Sustain Prod Consump. 2021;27:1672–1687. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann P, Apaolaza-Ibanez V. Consumer attitude and purchase intention toward green energy brands: the roles of psychological benefits and environmental concern[J]. J Bus Res. 2012;65(9):1254–1263. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delmas MA, Fischlein M, Asensio OI. Information strategies and energy conservation behavior: a meta-analysis of experimental studies from 1975 to 2012[J]. Energy Policy. 2013;61:729–739. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andor MA, Fels KM. Behavioral economics and energy conservation–a systematic review of non-price interventions and their causal effects. Ecol Econ. 2018;148:178–210. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz PW, Nolan JM, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V. The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychol Sci. 2007;18(5):429–434. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein NJ, Cialdini RB, Griskevicius V. A room with a viewpoint: using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. J Consumer Res. 2008;35(3):472–482. doi:10.1086/586910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao T, Bell L, Horner MW, et al. Consumer responses towards home energy financial incentives: a survey-based study[J]. Energy Policy. 2012;47:291–297. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amstalden RW, Kost M, Nathani C, et al. Economic potential of energy-efficient retrofitting in the Swiss residential building sector: the effects of policy instruments and energy price expectations[J]. Energy Policy. 2007;35(3):1819–1829. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.05.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egmond C, Jonkers R, Kok G. A strategy to encourage housing associations to invest in energy conservation[J]. Energy Policy. 2005;33(18):2374–2384. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2004.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng X, Long R, Zhang L, et al. Unpacking the experienced utility of sustainable lifestyle guiding policies: a new structure and model. Sustainable Prod Consump. 2021;27(10):486–495. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2021.01.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorillo D, Sapio A. Energy saving in Italy in the late 1990s: which role for non-monetary motivations?. Ecolog Econ. 2019;165:106386. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizobuchi K, Takeuchi K. The influences of financial and non-financial factors on energy-saving behaviour: a field experiment in Japan. Energy Policy. 2013;63:775–787. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emberger-Klein A, Menrad K. The effect of information provision on supermarket consumers‘ use of and preferences for carbon labels in Germany. J Clean Prod. 2018;172:253–263. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mi L, Zhu H, Yang J, et al. A new perspective to promote low-carbon consumption: the influence of reference groups. Ecolog Econ. 2019;161:100–108. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.03.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederiks ER, Stenner K, Hobman EV. Household energy use: applying behavioural economics to understand consumer decision-making and behaviour. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;41:1385–1394. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mi L, Gan X, Sun Y, et al. Effects of monetary and nonmonetary interventions on energy conservation: a meta-analysis of experimental studies[J]. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2021;149(5):111342. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer ES, Kashyap RK. Consumer recycling: role of incentives, information, and social class. J Consumer Behav. 2010;6:e34.
   Google Scholar
• Handgraaf MJJ, Jeude M, Appelt KC. Public praise vs. private pay: effects of rewards on energy conservation in the workplace. Ecol Econ. 2013;86(2):86e92. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan P, Metcalfe R. Neighbors, knowledge, and nuggets: two natural field experiments on the role of incentives on energy conservation (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2589269). Rochester, NY:Social Science Research Network; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Polania-Reyes S, Bowles S. Economic incentives and social preferences: substitutes or complements?. Dep Econ Univ Siena. 2012;50(2):368–425.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB, Trost MR. Social influence: socialnorms, conformity, and compliance. In: The Handbook of Social Psychology. 5th ed. Wiley; 2022:151–192.
   Google Scholar
• Bertoldi P, Rezessy S, Oikonomou V. Rewarding energy savings rather than energy efficiency: exploring the concept of a feed-in tariff for energy savings. Energy Policy. 2013;56:526–535. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenstein S. To what electricity price do consumers respond? Residential demand elasticity under increasing-block pricing. Berkeley, US: University of California; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Allcott H. Social norms and energy conservation. J Public Econ. 2011;95(9–10):1082–1095. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraro PJ, Miranda JJ, Price MK. The persistence of treatment effects with norm-based policy instruments: evidence from a randomized environmental policy experiment. Am Econ Rev. 2011;101(3):318–322. doi:10.1257/aer.101.3.318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiefenbeck V, Goette L, Degen K, et al. Overcoming salience bias: how real-time feedback fosters resource conservation. Manage Sci. 2016;64(3):1458–1476. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2016.2646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravert C, Kurz V. Nudging à la carte: a field experiment on climate-friendly food choice. Behav Public Policy. 2019;4:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Kallbekken S, Sælen H. “Nudging” hotel guests to reduce food waste as a win–win environmental measure. Econ Lett. 2013;119(3):325–327. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2013.03.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold N, Lin Y, Ashcroft R, Osman M. Better off, as judged by themselves’: do people support nudges as a method to change their own behavior? Behav Public Policy. 2020;1–30. doi:10.1017/bpp.2020.6
   Google Scholar
• Chen C-F, Wang YU, Adua L, Bai H. Reducing fossil fuel consumption in the household sector by enabling technology and behavior. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2020;60:101402. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.101402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong J, She Y, Wang S, Dora M. Impact of psychological factors on energy-saving behavior: moderating role of government subsidy policy. J Clean Prod. 2019;232:154–162. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenbergh MP, Dietz T, Stern PC. Erratum: time to try carbon labelling (Nature Clim). Change. 2011;1(4–6):43.
   Google Scholar
• Mi L, Ding C, Yang J, et al. Using goal and contrast feedback to motivate Chinese urban families to save electricity actively—a randomized controlled field trial. J Clean Prod. 2019;226:443–453. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelletier MC, Sullivan CA, Wilson PJ, Webb G, Egger G. Informing food consumption choices: innovations in measuring and labelling. Food Nutr Sci. 2016;7(12):1149. doi:10.4236/fns.2016.712108
   Google Scholar
• Slapo HB. Effect of Environmental Food Labelling on Customers Food Purchase [Master Thesis]. Nowegian School Economics; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Murcott A. Introducing the Sociology of Food and Eating. London: Bloomsbury Publishing; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Stroebele N, Castro JMD. Effect of ambience on food intake and food choice. Nutrition. 2004;20(9):821–838. doi:10.1016/j.nut.2004.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar