How Does Feedback Valence Improve Team Creativity by Influencing Team Relationship Conflict?

References

• Shalley CE, Gilson LL, Blum TC. Matching creativity requirements and the work environment: effects on satisfaction and intentions to leave. Acad Manag J. 2000;43(2):215–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dokko G, Kane AA, Tortoriello M. One of us or one of my friends: how social identity and tie strength shape the creative generativity of boundary-spanning ties. Organ Stud. 2014;35(5):703–726. doi:10.1177/0170840613508397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J. Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: interactive effects on creative performance. J Appl Psychol. 1998;83(2):261. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison SH, Rouse ED. An inductive study of feedback interactions over the course of creative projects. Acad Manage J. 2015;58(2):375–404. doi:10.5465/amj.2012.0737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoever IJ, Zhou J, van Knippenberg D. Different strokes for different teams: the contingent effects of positive and negative feedback on the creativity of informationally homogeneous and diverse teams. Acad Manage J. 2018;61(6):2159–2181. doi:10.5465/amj.2016.0642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennifer M, George JZ. Dual tuning in a supportive cotext: joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Acad Manage J. 2007;50(3):605–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison SH, Dossinger K. Pliable guidance: a multilevel model of curiosity, feedback seeking, and feedback giving in creative work. Acad Manage J. 2017;60(6):2051–2072. doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu TJ, Xu BR, Duan JY. Team conflict: conceptual conceptions, influences, and outcomes. Psychol Res. 2017;10(2):67–73. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan L, Liu P, Tu YH. A study on the relationship between task conflict and team performance in knowledge teams under the role of information deep processing mediation. Sci Technol Prog Countermeasures. 2016;33(13):135–140. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Huang QF, Tang NY. A meta-analytic study of team conflict and employees’ innovative behavior. Mod Manag Sci. 2015;10(3):19–21. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Liao L, Su T, Chen CH. Knowledge mapping and hot trends in team conflict management research based on bibliometric analysis from 1996 to 2020. J Manage. 2021;18(1):148–158. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Tang CY, Ai S, Gong ZL. The social function of positive emotions and its effect on team creativity: the mediating role of tacit knowledge sharing. Nankai Manag Rev. 2011;14(4):129–137. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou MJ, Pan HB, Ren JF. A study on the relationship between team conflict and team creativity: the mediating effect of team effectiveness. Manage Rev. 2014;26(12):120–130. in Chinese. doi:10.14120/j.cnki.cn11-5057/f.2014.12.013
   Google Scholar
• Tu YH, Yuan L, Wang HF. The relationship between conflict and creativity in knowledge teams: across-level model moderated by leadership political skills. Sci Technol Prog Countermeasures. 2019;36(18):139–146. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Jehn KA. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Adm Sci Q. 1995;40(2):256–282. doi:10.2307/2393638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn KA, Chatman JA. The influence of proportional and perceptual conflict composition on team performance. Int J Confl Manag. 2000;11(1):56–73. doi:10.1108/eb022835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wit FR, Greer LL, Jehn KA. The paradox of intragroup conflict: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2012;97(2):360–390. doi:10.1037/a0024844.supp
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G, Sharma PN, Edinger SK, et al. Motivating and demotivating forces in teams: cross-level influences of empowering leadership and relationship conflict. J Appl Psychol. 2011;96(3):541–557. doi:10.1037/a0021886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu N, Chen Z, Gu J, et al. Conflict and creativity in inter-organizational teams: the moderating role of shared leadership. Int J Confl Manag. 2017;28(1):74–102. doi:10.1108/IJCMA-01-2016-0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou MJ, Shi SS. Leader-member exchange differences and team relationship conflicts: the moderating role of moral leadership. Nankai Manag Rev. 2013;16(2):26–35. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Greer LL, Jehn KA, Mannix EA. A longitudinal investigation of the relationships between different types of introgroup conflict and the moderating role of conflict resolution. Small Group Res. 2008;39(3):278–302. doi:10.1177/1046496408317793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi K, Cho B. Competing hypotheses analyses of the associations between group task conflict and group relationship conflict. J Organ Behav. 2011;32(8):1106–1126. doi:10.1002/job.733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman RA, Tidd ST, Currall SC, Tsai JC. What goes around comes around: the impact of personal conflict style on work conflict and stress. Int J Confl Manag. 2000;11(1):32–55. doi:10.1108/eb022834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeChurch LA, Hamilton KL, Haas C. Effects of conflict management strategies on perceptions of intragroup conflict. Group Dyn. 2007;11(1):6678. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.11.1.66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn KA, Chadwick C, Thatcher SM. To agree or not to agree: the effects of value congruence, individual demographic dissimilarity, and conflict on workgroup outcomes. Int J Confl Manag. 1997;8(4):287–305. doi:10.1108/eb022799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn KA, Northcraft GB, Neale MA. Why differences make a difference: a field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Adm Sci Q. 1999;44(4):741–763. doi:10.2307/2667054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bono JE, Boles TL, Judge TA, Lauver KJ. The role of personality in task and relationship conflict. J Pers. 2002;70(3):311–344. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.05007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson MH. The role of group personality composition in the emergence of task and relationship conflict within groups. J Manag Organ. 2009;15(1):82–96. doi:10.5172/jmo.837.15.1.82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang XA, He H, Gu F. The impact of paternalistic leadership behavior on team performance: the mediating role of team conflict management style. Manage World. 2009;3:121–133. in Chinese. doi:10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2009.03.014
   Google Scholar
• Chen CH. Three characteristics of the digital era. China Entrepreneur. 2017;4(24):104–105. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Wang N, Zhang W, Zhou M, et al. A study on the mechanism of feedback seeking timing on creativity in the perspective of time pressure. Sci Technol Prog Countermeasures. 2020;38(23):141–150. in Chinese. doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.2021060634
   Google Scholar
• Song KT, Zhang ZT, Zhao LJ. Does time pressure promote or inhibit employees’ innovative behavior? A moderated dual path model. Sci Technol Manag. 2022;41(1):114–133. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Baer M, Oldham GR. The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91(4):963–970. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linkedin Corporation. 2014 China Workplace Stress Report [EB/OL]; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews FM, Farris GF. Time pressure and performance of scientists and engineers: a five-year panel study. Organ Behav Hum Perform. 1972;8(2):185–200. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(72)90045-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews J, Smith DC. In search of the marketing imagination: factors affecting the creativity of marketing programs for mature products. J Mark Res. 1996;33(2):174–187. doi:10.1177/002224379603300205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Gryskiewicz ND. The creative environment scales: work environment inventory. Creat Res J. 1989;2(4):231–253. doi:10.1080/10400418909534321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang SY, Wu XJ, Wang XQ. A bibliometric analysis of institutional logic research. Manage Rev. 2017;29(3):90–109. in Chinese. doi:10.14120/j.cnki.cn11-5057/f.2017.03.008
   Google Scholar
• Tierney P, Farmer SM. The Pygmalion process and employee creativity. J Manage. 2004;20:413–432. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2002.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma J, Yan JN. The prestigious syndrome effect of positive feedback: how can positive incentives exacerbate the inhibition of creativity by pay for performance? Manage World. 2020;1(1):105–122. in Chinese. doi:10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2020.0009
   Google Scholar
• George JM, Zhou J. When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: an interactional approach. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86(3):513–524. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuori TO, Huy QN. Distributed attention and shared emotions in the innovation process. Adm Sci Q. 2016;61(1):9–51. 原文2015年. doi:10.1177/0001839215606951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk D, Kluger AN. Task type as a moderator of positive/negative feedback effects on motivation and performance: a regulatory focus perspective. J Organ Behav. 2011;32(8):1084–1105. doi:10.1002/job.725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YJ, Kim J. Does negative feedback benefit (or harm) recipient creativity? The role of the direction of feedback flow. Acad Manage J. 2020;63(2):584–612. doi:10.5465/amj.2016.1196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilies R, Judge TA. Goal regulation across time: the effects of feedback and affect. J Appl Psychol. 2005;90(3):453–467. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostopoulos KC, Bozionelos N. Team exploratory and exploitative learning: psychological safety, task conflict, and team performance. Group Organ Manag. 2011;36(3):385–415. doi:10.1177/1059601111405985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miron-Spektor E, Erez M, Naveh E. The effect of conformist and attentive-to-detail members on team innovation: reconciling the innovation paradox. Acad Manage J. 2011;54(4):740–760. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.64870100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang C, Kim JH, Milliken FJ. When bad news is sugarcoated: information distortion, organizational search and the behavioral theory of the firm. Strategic Managt J. 2014;35(8):1186–1201. doi:10.1002/smj.2146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener E. Deindividuation: the absence of self-awareness and self-regulation in group members. Psychol Group Influence. 1980;7(1):209–242.
   Google Scholar
• Simonton DK. Creativity from a historiometric perspective. In: Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge University Press; 1999:116–133.
   Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB, Bechky BA. When collections of creatives become creative collectives: a field study of problem solving at work. Organ Sci. 2006;17(4):484–500. doi:10.1287/orsc.1060.0200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dreu CK, Gelfand MJ. Conflict in the workplace: sources, functions, and dynamics across multiple levels of analysis. In: The Psychology of Conflict and Conflict Management in Organizations. Taylor & Francis Group/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2008:3–54.
   Google Scholar
• Lang CG, Xi YM, Guo SY. An empirical study of the impact of intra-team conflict on team decision quality and satisfaction. Manage Rev. 2007;19(7):10–15. in Chinese. doi:10.14120/j.cnki.cn11-5057/f.2007.07.002
   Google Scholar
• Zhao KH, Jia LD, Cai YH, et al. Suppressing the negative effects of team relationship conflict: a study in a Chinese context. Manage World. 2014;12(3):119–130. in Chinese. doi:10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2014.03.011
   Google Scholar
• Pinkley RL. Dimensions of conflict frame: disputant interpretations of conflict. J Appl Psychol. 1990;75(2):117–126. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.2.117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilke O, Lumineau F. The double-edged effect of contracts on alliance performance. J Manage. 2018;44(7):2827–2858. doi:10.1177/0149206316655872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons TL, Peterson RS. Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: the pivotal role of intragroup trust. J Appl Psychol. 2000;85(1):102–111. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rispens S, Greer LL, Jehn KA. It could be worse. Int J Confl Manag. 2007;18(4):325–344. doi:10.1108/10444060710833450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung EJ, Lee S. The combined effects of relationship conflict and the relational self on creativity. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2015;130:44–57. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Chen CC. Integrating knowledge activities for team innovation: effects of transformational leadership. J Manage. 2018;44(5):1819–1847. doi:10.1177/0149206316628641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigel DJ, Shrout MR. Relationship conflict, appraisals, and disillusionment: the moderating role of depression-sciencedirect. Pers Individ Dif. 2020;171:110494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YL, Shi K. The effect of supervisor feedback on employee behavior. J Psychol. 2003;35:255–260. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Liu SW, Xiao YC. Positive or negative feedback, which potency is more beneficial for enhancing team creativity? Curiosity and emotional. The role of curiosity and affective presence. Sci Technol Prog Response. 2022;16(2):26–35. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Prem R, Ohly S, Kubicek B, Korunka C. Thriving on challenge stressors? Exploring time pressure and learning demands as antecedents of thriving at work. J Organ Behav. 2017;38(1):108–123. doi:10.1002/job.2115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan XQ, Yu B, Cao Q. Research on the mechanism of time pressure on employees’ creativity, 35 (3):13. J Guangdong Univ Finance Econ. 2020;35(3):44–56. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Liu XM, Zhang XX, Cui TH. A study on the relationship between time pressure and creativity-The cross-level moderating role of time leadership. Res Dev Manag. 2017;29(5):13–21. in Chinese. doi:10.13581/j.cnki.rdm.2017.05.002
   Google Scholar
• Bunce D, West M. Changing work environments: innovative coping responses to occupational stress. Work Stress. 1994;8(4):319–331. doi:10.1080/02678379408256539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Conti R, Coon H, et al. Assessing the work environment for creativity. Acad Manage J. 1996;39(5):1154–1184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruping LM, Venkatesh V, Thatcher SM, Patel PC. Folding under pressure or rising to the occasion? Perceived time pressure and the moderating role of team temporal leadership. Acad Manage J. 2015;58(5):1313–1333. doi:10.5465/amj.2012.0468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasulzada F, Dackert I. Organizational creativity and innovation in relation to psychological well-being and organizational factors. Creat Res J. 2009;21(2–3):191–198. doi:10.1080/10400410902855283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile TM. The social psychology of creativity: a componential conceptualization. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983;45(2):357–376. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecchio RP. Theoretical and empirical examination of cognitive resource theory. J Appl Psychol. 1990;75(2):141–147. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.2.141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sijbom RB, Anseel F, Crommelinck M, De Beuckelaer A, De Stobbeleir KE. Why seeking feedback from diverse sources may not be sufficient for stimulating creativity: the role of performance dynamism and creative time pressure. J Organ Behav. 2018;39(3):355–368. doi:10.1002/job.2235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Mueller JS, Simpson WB, et al. Time pressure and creativity in organizations: a longitudinal field study. Harvard Business School Working Paper; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• De Dreu CK, Baas M, Nijstad BA. Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: toward a dual pathway to creativity model. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008;94(5):739–756. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danneels E. The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Managt J. 2002;23(12):1095–1121. doi:10.1002/smj.275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anseel F, Lievens F, Schollaert E. Reflection as a strategy to enhance task performance after feedback. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2009;110(1):23–35. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seifert CF, Yukl G, McDonald RA. Effects of multisource feedback and a feedback facilitator on the influence behavior of managers toward subordinates. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(3):561–569. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleiner S, Wallace JE. Oncologist burnout and compassion fatigue: investigating time pressure at work as a predictor and the mediating role of work-family conflict. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):1–8. doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2581-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang WL, Wang L, Wang WJ. A study on the mechanism of negotiation strategy’s influence on firm cooperation performance: the mediating role of relationship conflict. Sci Technol Manag. 2020;41(9):10. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Wang L, Yu M, et al. Transformational leadership and project team members’ silence: the mediating role of feeling trusted. Int J Manag Proj Bus. 2019;12(4):845–868. in Chinese. doi:10.1108/IJMPB-04-2018-0090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoever IJ, Van Knippenberg D, Van Ginkel WP, Barkema HG. Fostering team creativity: perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity’s potential. J Appl Psychol. 2012;97(5):982–996. doi:10.1037/a0029159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar