Academic Cyberslacking: Why Do Students Engage in Non-Academic Internet Access During Lectures?

References

• Weaver BE, Nilson LB. Laptops in class: What are they good for? What can you do with them? New Dir Teach Learn. 2005;2005(101):3–13. doi:10.1002/tl.181
   Google Scholar
• Moskal P, Dziuban C, Hartman J. Blended learning: a dangerous idea? Internet High Educ. 2013;18:15–23. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turel YK, Ozer Sanal S. The effects of an ARCS based e-book on student’s achievement, motivation and anxiety. Comput Educ. 2018;127:130–140. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whillans AV, Chen FS. Facebook undermines the social belonging of first year students. Pers Individ Dif. 2016. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.03.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Zhou J, Sun L, Wu Q, Lu H, Tian J. A new approach for laboratory exercise of pathophysiology in China based on student-centered learning. Adv Physiol Educ. 2015;39(2):116–119. doi:10.1152/advan.00143.2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talbert E, Hofkens T, Wang M-T. Does student-centered instruction engage students differently? The moderation effect of student ethnicity. J Educ Res. 2019;112(3):327–341. doi:10.1080/00220671.2018.1519690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright GB. Student-centered learning in higher education. Int J Teach Learn High Educ. 2011;23(3):92–97.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz KFG, Yilmaz R, Ozturk HT, Sezer B, Karademir T. Cyberloafing as a barrier to the successful integration of information and communication technologies into teaching and learning environments. Comput Human Behav. 2015;45:290–298. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gökçearslan Ş, Mumcu FK, Haşlaman T, Çevik YD. Modelling smartphone addiction: the role of smartphone usage, self-regulation, general self-efficacy and cyberloafing in university students. Comput Human Behav. 2016;63:639–649. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabaci I. Investigation faculty of education students’ cyberloafing behaviors. Turkish Online J Educ Technol. 2017:72–82. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1124916.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Yasar S, Yurdugul H. The investigation of relation between cyberloafing activities and cyberloafing behaviors in higher education. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2013;83:600–604. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.114
   Google Scholar
• Akbulut Y, Dursun ÖÖ, Dönmez O, Şahin YL. In search of a measure to investigate cyberloafing in educational settings. Comput Human Behav. 2016;55:616–625. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried CB. In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning. Comput Educ. 2008;50(3):906–914. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junco R, Cotten SR. No A 4 U: the relationship between multitasking and academic performance. Comput Educ. 2012;59(2):505–514. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepp A, Barkley JE, Karpinski AC. The relationship between cell phone use and academic performance in a sample of U.S. college students. SAGE Open. 2015;5(1):215824401557316. doi:10.1177/2158244015573169
   Google Scholar
• Barry S, Murphy K, Drew S. From deconstructive misalignment to constructive alignment: exploring student uses of mobile technologies in university classrooms. Comput Educ. 2015;81:202–210. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerow JE, Galluch PS, Thatcher JB. To slack or not to slack: internet usage in the classroom. J Inf Technol Theory Appl. 2010;11(3):5–23.
   Google Scholar
• Taneja A, Fiore V, Fischer B. Cyber-slacking in the classroom: potential for digital distraction in the new age. Comput Educ. 2015;82:141–151. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim VKG. The IT way of loafing on the job: cyberloafing, neutralizing and organizational justice. J Organ Behav. 2002;23(5):675–694. doi:10.1002/job.161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitty MT, Carr AN. New rules in the workplace: applying object-relations theory to explain problem Internet and email behaviour in the workplace. Comput Human Behav. 2006;22(2):235–250. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ugrin JC, Pearson JM, Odom MD. Cyber-slacking: self-control, prior behavior and the impact of deterrence measures. Rev Bus Inf Syst. 2008;12(1):75. doi:10.19030/rbis.v12i1.4399
   Google Scholar
• Akcayir M, Dundar H, Akcayir G. What makes you a digital native? Is it enough to be born after 1980? Comput Human Behav. 2016;60:435–440. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varol F, Yildirim E. An examination of cyberloafing behaviors in classrooms from students’ perspectives. Turkish Online J Qual Inq. 2018;26–46. doi:10.17569/tojqi.349800
   Google Scholar
• Simanjuntak E, Nawangsari NAF, Ardi R. Cyber slacking among university students: the role of internet habit strength, media multitasking efficacy and self regulated learning. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Psychology in Health, Educational, Social, and Organizational Settings. Surabaya: SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications; 2018:239–247. doi:10.5220/0008587702390247.
   Google Scholar
• Simanjuntak E, Nawangsari NAF, Ardi R. Do students really use internet access for learning in the classroom?: Exploring students’ cyberslacking in an Indonesian university. Behav Sci. 2019;9(12):123. doi:10.3390/bs9120123
   Google Scholar
• Askew K, Buckner JE, Taing MU, Ilie A, Bauer JA, Coovert MD. Explaining cyberloafing: the role of the theory of planned behavior. Comput Human Behav. 2014;36:510–519. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikh A, Atashgah MS, Adibzadegan M. The antecedents of cyberloafing: a case study in an Iranian copper industry. Comput Human Behav. 2015;51(PA):172–179. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alt D. College students’ academic motivation, media engagement and fear of missing out. Comput Human Behav. 2015;49:111–119. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad S, Lim VKG, Chen DJQ. Self-regulation, individual characteristics and cyberloafing. PACIS 2010 Proc. 2010: 1641–1648. Available from: http://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2010/159/%5Cnpapers2://publication/uuid/E032F959-4DAE-4539-B188-4E8E828858F4.
   Google Scholar
• Wu JY. The indirect relationship of media multitasking self-efficacy on learning performance within the personal learning environment: implications from the mechanism of perceived attention problems and self-regulation strategies. Comput Educ. 2017;106:56–72. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W. Learning variables, in-class laptop multitasking and academic performance: a path analysis. Comput Educ. 2015;81:82–88. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaRose R, Eastin MS. A social cognitive theory of internet uses and gratifications: toward a new model of media attendance. J Broadcast Electron Media. 2004;48(3):358–377. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4803_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastin MS, LaRose R. Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. J Comput Commun. 2006;6(1):. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2000.tb00110.x
   Google Scholar
• Lin H-C, Chang C-M. What motivates health information exchange in social media? The roles of the social cognitive theory and perceived interactivity. Inf Manag. 2018;55(6):771–780. doi:10.1016/j.im.2018.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercado BK, Giordano C, Dilchert S. A meta-analytic investigation of cyberloafing. Career Dev Int. 2017;22(5):546–564. doi:10.1108/CDI-08-2017-0142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanbonmatsu DM, Strayer DL, Medeiros-Ward N, Watson JM. Who multi-tasks and why? multi-tasking ability, perceived multi-tasking ability, impulsivity, and sensation seeking. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54402. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaudreau P, Miranda D, Gareau A. Canadian university students in wireless classrooms: what do they do on their laptops and does it really matter? Comput Educ. 2014;70:245–255. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varol F, Yıldırım E. Cyberloafing in higher education: reasons and suggestions from students’ perspectives. Technol Knowl Learn. 2017;24(1):129–142. doi:10.1007/s10758-017-9340-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alt D. Students’ social media engagement and fear of missing out (FoMO) in a diverse classroom. J Comput High Educ. 2017;29(2):388–410. doi:10.1007/s12528-017-9149-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller JM. Motivational Design for Learning and Performance: The ARCS Model Approach. New York: Springer; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Li K, Keller JM. Use of the ARCS model in education: a literature review. Comput Educ. 2018;122:54–62. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh JL, Fielder RL, Carey KB, Carey MP. Female college students’ media use and academic outcomes: results from a longitudinal cohort study. Emerg Adulthood. 2013;1(3):219–232. doi:10.1177/2167696813479780
   Google Scholar
• Özcan S, Gökçearslan Ş, Okan Yüksel A. An investigation of the relationship between cyberloafing and academic motivation among university students. In: Demirel Ö, Dinçer S editors. Küreselleşen Dünyada Eğitim. Pegem Akademi; 2017:733–742. doi:10.14527/9786053188407.52.
   Google Scholar
• Wei F-YF, Wang YK, Klausner M. Rethinking college students‘Self-regulation and sustained attention: Does text messaging during class influence cognitive learning? Commun Educ. 2012;61(3):185–204. doi:10.1080/03634523.2012.672755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dursun OO, Donmez O, Akbulut Y. Predictors of cyberloafing among preservice information technology teachers. Contemp Educ Technol. 2018;9(1):22–41.
   Google Scholar
• Flanigan AE, Kiewra KA. What college instructors can do about student cyber-slacking. Educ Psychol Rev. 2018;30(2):585–597. doi:10.1007/s10648-017-9418-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu J, Hao Q, Jing M. Consuming, sharing, and creating content: how young students use new social media in and outside school. Comput Human Behav. 2016;64:55–64. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanigan AE, Babchuk WA. Social media as academic quicksand: a phenomenological study of student experiences in and out of the classroom. Learn Individ Differ. 2015;44:40–45. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepp A, Barkley JE, Karpinski AC. The relationship between cell phone use, academic performance, anxiety, and Satisfaction with Life in college students. Comput Human Behav. 2014;31(1):343–350. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sana F, Weston T, Cepeda NJ. Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Comput Educ. 2013;62:24–31. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson MH, Hergenhahn BR. An Introduction to Theories of Learning. 9th ed. London: Routledge-Taylor & Francis; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Santrock JW. Educational Psychology. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Alt D, Boniel-Nissim M. Links between adolescents’ deep and surface learning approaches, problematic internet use, and Fear of Missing Out (FoMO). Internet Interv. 2018;13:30–39. doi:10.1016/j.invent.2018.05.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ling R. New Tech, New Ties: How Mobile Communication is Reshaping Social Cohesion. London: MIT Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Kononova A, Chiang Y-H. Why do we multitask with media? Predictors of media multitasking among Internet users in the United States and Taiwan. Comput Human Behav. 2015;50:31–41. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu JY. University students’ Motivated Attention and use of regulation strategies on social media. Comput Educ. 2015;89:75–90. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzun AM, Kilis S. Does persistent involvement in media and technology lead to lower academic performance? Evaluating media and technology use in relation to multitasking, self-regulation and academic performance. Comput Human Behav. 2019;90:196–203. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Mei W, Ugrin JC. Student cyberloafing in and out of the classroom in China and the relationship with student performance. Cyberpsychology Behav Soc Netw. 2018;21(3):199–204. doi:10.1089/cyber.2017.0397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson P. The digital natives as learners: technology use patterns and approaches to learning. Comput Educ Educ. 2013;65(2013):12–33. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. Horiz. 2001;9(5):1–6. doi:10.1108/10748120110424816
   Google Scholar
• Margaryan A, Littlejohn A, Vojt G. Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Comput Educ. 2011;56(2):429–440. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver CS, Scheier MF. Self Regulation of Action and Affect. In: Vohs KD, Baumeister RF, editors. Handbook of Self-Regulation: Research, Theory, and Applications. 3rd ed. New York: The Guilford Pres; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Khang H, Han E-K, Ki E-J. Exploring influential social cognitive determinants of social media use. Comput Human Behav. 2014;36:48–55. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan ML. Social media engagement: what motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube? Comput Human Behav. 2017;66:236–247. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberst U, Wegmann E, Stodt B, Brand M, Chamarro A. Negative consequences from heavy social networking in adolescents: the mediating role of fear of missing out. J Adolesc. 2017;55:51–60. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.12.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng L, Ku KYL, Kong Q. Examining predictive factors and effects of in-class multitasking with mobile phones. Interact Technol Smart Educ. 2019;16(1):49–58. doi:10.1108/ITSE-08-2018-0056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen LD, Mark Carrier L, Cheever NA. Facebook and texting made me do it: media-induced task-switching while studying. Comput Human Behav. 2013;29(3):948–958. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen LD, Whaling K, Carrier LM, Cheever NA, Rokkum J. The media and technology usage and attitudes scale: an empirical investigation. Comput Human Behav. 2013;29(6):2501–2511. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta N, Irwin JD. In-class distractions: the role of Facebook and the primary learning task. Comput Human Behav. 2016;55:1165–1178. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmis S. Constant companions: instant messaging conversations as sustainable supportive study structures amongst undergraduate peers. Comput Educ. 2012;59(1):3–18. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simanjuntak E. Guiding questions method and extrinsic learning motivation of first year university students. ANIMA Indones Psychol J. 2015;30(3):148. doi:10.24123/aipj.v30i3.544
   Google Scholar
• Sumargi AM, Christanti F, Simanjuntak E. Analisis Motivasi Belajar Ekstrinsik dan Pengaruhnya Pada Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa. Insa Media Psikol. 2007;9(3):199–214.
   Google Scholar
• Rozgonjuk D, Kattago M, Täht K. Social media use in lectures mediates the relationship between procrastination and problematic smartphone use. Comput Human Behav. 2018;89:191–198. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wammes JD, Ralph BCW, Mills C, Bosch N, Duncan TL, Smilek D. Disengagement during lectures: media multitasking and mind wandering in university classrooms. Comput Educ. 2019;132:76–89. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarzer R, Diehl M, Schmitz GS. Self Regulation; 1999. Available from: http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/health/selfreg_e.htm. Accessed June 2, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate Data Analysis. Edinburgh: Pearson; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• van der Schuur WA, Baumgartner SE, Sumter SR, Valkenburg PM. The consequences of media multitasking for youth: a review. Comput Human Behav. 2015;53:204–215. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junco R. Student class standing, Facebook use, and academic performance. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2015;36:18–29. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judd T. Making sense of multitasking: key behaviours. Comput Educ. 2013;63:358–367. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy BR. Digital distractions in the classroom phase II: student classroom use of digital devices for non-class related purposes. J Media Educ. 2016;7(1):5–32.
   Google Scholar
• Ragan ED, Jennings SR, Massey JD, Doolittle PE. Unregulated use of laptops over time in large lecture classes. Comput Educ. 2014;78:78–86. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutcheon TG, Lian A, Richard A. The impact of a technology ban on students’ perceptions and performance in introduction to psychology. Teach Psychol. 2019;46(1):47–54. doi:10.1177/0098628318816141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesharwani A. Do (how) digital natives adopt a new technology differently than digital immigrants? A longitudinal study. Inf Manag. 2020;57(2):103170. doi:10.1016/j.im.2019.103170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gökçearslan Ş, Uluyol Ç, Şahin S. Smartphone addiction, cyberloafing, stress and social support among university students: a path analysis. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2018;91:47–54. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.05.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang C-T, Tu C-S, Hajiyev J. Integrating academic type of social media activity with perceived academic performance: a role of task-related and non-task-related compulsive Internet use. Comput Educ. 2019;139:157–172. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyle RH. Personality and Self Regulation. In: Hoyle RH, editor. Handbook of Personality and Self Regulation. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2010.
   Google Scholar