Development and Validation of the Youth Purpose Orientation Scale Among Chinese Sample

References

• Frankl VE. Man’s Search for Meaning. New York: Simon and Schuster; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Damon W. The Path to Purpose: Helping Our Children Find Their Calling in Life. New York: Simon and Schuster; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Malin H, Liauw I, Damon W. Purpose and character development in early adolescence. J Youth Adolesc. 2017;46(6):1200–1215. doi:10.1007/s10964-017-0642-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronk KC. A grounded theory of the development of noble youth purpose. J Adolescent Res. 2012;27(1):78–109. doi:10.1177/0743558411412958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran S. Purpose: giftedness in intrapersonal intelligence. High Abil Stud. 2009;20(2):143–159. doi:10.1080/13598130903358501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson EH. Identity: Youth and Crisis. New York: WW Norton & Company; 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson EH. Identity and the Life Cycle. New York: WW Norton & Company; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Hill PL, Burrow AL. Viewing purpose through an Eriksonian lens. Identity. 2012;12(1):74–91. doi:10.1080/15283488.2012.632394
   Google Scholar
• Bronk KC. Portraits of purpose: the role of purpose in identity formation. New Dir Youth Dev. 2011;132:31–44. doi:10.1002/yd.426
   Google Scholar
• Damon W, Menon J, Bronk KC. The development of purpose during adolescence. Appl Dev Sci. 2003;7(3):119–128. doi:10.1207/S1532480XADS0703_2
   Google Scholar
• Hill PL, Edmonds GW, Peterson M, Luyckx K, Andrews JA. Purpose in life in emerging adulthood: development and validation of a new brief measure. J Posit Psychol. 2016;11(3):237–245. doi:10.1080/17439760.2015.1048817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koshy SI, Mariano JM. Promoting youth purpose: a review of the literature. New Dir Youth Dev. 2011;132:13–29. doi:10.1002/yd.425
   Google Scholar
• Yeager DS, Henderson MD, Paunesku D, Walton GM, D’Mello S, Spitzer BJ. Boring but important: a self-transcendent purpose for learning fosters academic self-regulation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014;107(4):559–580. doi:10.1037/a0037637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeager DS, Bundick MJ. The role of purposeful work goals in promoting meaning in life and in schoolwork during adolescence. J Adolesc Res. 2009;24(4):423–452. doi:10.1177/0743558409336749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronk KC, Hill PL, Lapsley DK, Talib TL, Finch H. Purpose, hope, and life satisfaction in three age groups. J Posit Psychol. 2009;4(6):500–510. doi:10.1080/17439760903271439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrow AL, O’Dell AC, Hill PL. Profiles of a developmental asset: youth purpose as a context for hope and well-being. J Youth Adolesc. 2010;39(11):1265–1273. doi:10.1007/s10964-009-9481-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill PL, Sin NL, Turiano NA, Burrow AL, Almeida DM. Sense of purpose moderates the associations between daily stressors and daily well-being. Ann Behav Med. 2018;52(8):724–729. doi:10.1093/abm/kax039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiang L. Deriving daily purpose through daily events and role fulfillment among Asian American youth. J Res Adolesc. 2012;22(1):185–198. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00767.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill PL, Burrow AL, O’Dell AC, Thornton MA. Classifying adolescents’ conceptions of purpose in life. J Posit Psychol. 2010;5(6):466–473. doi:10.1080/17439760.2010.534488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasser T, Ryan RM. Further examining the American dream: differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Pers Soc Psychol B. 1996;22(3):280–287. doi:10.1177/0146167296223006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronk KC, Finch WH. Adolescent characteristics by type of long-term AIM in life. Appl Dev Sci. 2010;14(1):35–44. doi:10.1080/10888690903510331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill PL, Burrow AL, Brandenberger JW, Lapsley DK, Quaranto JC. Collegiate purpose orientations and well-being in early and middle adulthood. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2010;31(2):173–179. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2009.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson SK, Tirrell JM, Schmid Callina K, Weiner MB. Configurations of young peoples’ important life goals and their associations with thriving. Res Hum Dev. 2018;15(2):139–166. doi:10.1080/15427609.2018.1441576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang T, You XQ, Huang XT. Chinese life purpose orientation questionnaire: assessing purpose orientations among Chinese college students. Appl Dev Sci. 2022;26(2):362–374. doi:10.1080/10888691.2020.1815535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves SL, Henderson MD, Cohen GL, Steingut RR, Hirschi Q, Yeager DS. Psychological affordances help explain where a self-transcendent purpose intervention improves performance. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021;120(1):1–15. doi:10.1037/pspa0000246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrow AL, Agans JP, Jeon HJ, Creim M. Are all purposes worth having? Integrating content and strength in purpose research. Hum Dev. 2021;65(2):100–112. doi:10.1159/000515176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronk KC, Riches BR, Mangan SA. Claremont purpose scale: a measure that assesses the three dimensions of purpose among adolescents. Res Hum Dev. 2018;15(2):101–117. doi:10.1080/15427609.2018.1441577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers JJ, Falco LD. The development and validation of a new measure of adolescent purpose. J Exp Educ. 2020;88(1):47–71. doi:10.1080/00220973.2019.1575178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma G, Yukhymenko-Lescroart M, Kang ZY. Sense of purpose scale: development and initial validation. Appl Dev Sci. 2018;22(3):188–199. doi:10.1080/10888691.2016.1262262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma G, Kim J, Bryan J. The effects of purpose orientations on recent high school graduates’ college application decisions. J Coll Access. 2017;3(2):98–117.
   Google Scholar
• Yukhymenko-Lescroart MA, Sharma G. Measuring specific purpose orientations in working adults. Appl Res Qual Life. 2022;17(3):1615–1633. doi:10.1007/s11482-021-09980-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundick M, Andrews M, Jones A, Mariano JM, Bronk KC, Damon W. Revised Youth Purpose Survey. Unpublished Instrument. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center on Adolescence; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu HZ. Quantitative Research and Statistical Analysis. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Costello AB, Osborne J. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract Asses Res Eval. 2005;10(1):7. doi:10.7275/jyj1-4868
   Google Scholar
• Lautenschlager GJ. A comparison of alternatives to conducting Monte Carlo analyses for determining parallel analysis criteria. Multivariate Behav Res. 1989;24(3):365–395. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2403_6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan KA, Aigerim D, Xueqing Z, et al. Construction and piloting of attitude towards research participation scale for university students. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021;14:2071–2079. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S333450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng L, Xie T. Making similarity versus difference comparison affects perceptions after bicultural exposure and consumer reactions to culturally mixed products. J Cross Cult Psychol. 2016;47(10):1380–1394. doi:10.1177/0022022116668409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong PTP. The Human Quest for Meaning: Theories, Research, and Applications. London: Routledge; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Steger MF, Frazier P, Oishi S, Kaler M. The meaning in life questionnaire: assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. J Couns Psychol. 2006;53(1):80–93. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess. 1985;49(1):71–75. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baraldi AN, Enders CK. An introduction to modern missing data analyses. J Sch Psychol. 2010;48(1):5–37. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2009.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariely G, Davidov E. Assessment of measurement equivalence with cross-national and longitudinal surveys in political science. Eur Polit Sci. 2011;11(3):363–377. doi:10.1057/eps.2011.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6(1):1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Equ Modeling. 2002;9(2):233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–163. doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen M, Lo LH. Examining test-retest reliability: an intra-class correlation approach. Nurse Res. 2002;51(1):59–62. doi:10.1097/00006199-200201000-00009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindeman M, Verkasalo M. Measuring values with the short Schwartz’s value survey. J Pers Assess. 2005;85(2):170–178. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8502_09
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staudinger UM, Bluck S. A view on midlife development from life-span theory. In: Handbook of Midlife Development. New York: Wiley; 2001:3–39.
   Google Scholar
• Heckhausen J, Dixon RA, Baltes PB. Gains and losses in development throughout adulthood as perceived by different adult age groups. Dev Psychol. 1989;25(1):109–121. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.25.1.109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebner NC, Freund AM, Baltes PB. Developmental changes in personal goal orientation from young to late adulthood: from striving for gains to maintenance and prevention of losses. Psychol Aging. 2006;21(4):664–678. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.4.664
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu L. Chinese well-being. In: The Oxford Handbook of Chinese Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010:327–342.
   Google Scholar
• Chen L. The Core Values of Chinese Civilization. Berlin: Springer; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Oishi S, Diener EF, Lucas RE, Suh EM. Cross-cultural variations in predictors of life satisfaction: perspectives from needs and values. Pers Soc Psychol B. 1999;25(8):980–990. doi:10.1177/01461672992511006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight PE, Kashdan TB. Purpose in life as a system that creates and sustains health and well-being: an integrative, testable theory. Rev Gen Psychol. 2009;13(3):242–251. doi:10.1037/a0017152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan FR. A comparison of Zhuangzi and Liezi’s views on life. Philos Res. 2005;2005(3):43–47.
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon KM, Corcoran M, Prentice M. Pursuing eudaimonic functioning versus pursuing hedonic well-being: the first goal succeeds in its AIM, whereas the second does not. J Happiness Stud. 2019;20(3):919–933. doi:10.1007/s10902-018-9980-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang T, Jia Y, You XQ, Huang XT. Exploring well-being among individuals with different life purposes in a Chinese context. J Posit Psychol. 2021;16(1):60–72. doi:10.1080/17439760.2019.1663253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar