Role of Environmental Sustainability, Psychological and Managerial Supports for Determining Bankers’ Green Banking Usage Behavior: An Integrated Framework

References

• Rehman A, Ullah I, Afridi F-A, et al. Adoption of green banking practices and environmental performance in Pakistan: a demonstration of structural equation modelling. Environ Dev Sustainability. 2021;23(9):13200–13220. doi:10.1007/s10668-020-01206-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y-S. The Drivers of Green Brand Equity: green Brand Image, Green Satisfaction, and Green Trust. J Business Ethics. 2010;93(2):307–319. doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0223-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Siddik AB, Zheng G-W, Masukujjaman M, Bekhzod S. The Effect of Green Banking Practices on Banks’ Environmental Performance and Green Financing: an Empirical Study. Energies. 2022;15(4):1292. doi:10.3390/en15041292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding X, Li W, Huang D, Qin X. Does Innovation Climate Help to Effectiveness of Green Finance Product R&D Team? The Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing and Moderating Effect of Knowledge Heterogeneity. Sustainability. 2022;14(7):3926. doi:10.3390/su14073926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang H, Yoo Y. It’s all about attitude: revisiting the technology acceptance model. Decis Support Syst. 2004;38(1):19–31. doi:10.1016/S0167-9236(03)00062-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Wang Z, Zhong X, Yang S, Siddik AB. Do Green Banking Activities Improve the Banks’ Environmental Performance? The Mediating Effect of Green Financing. Sustainability. 2022;14(2):989. doi:10.3390/su14020989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang Y, Shao Z. Whether green finance can effectively moderate the green technology innovation effect of heterogeneous environmental regulation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(6):3646. doi:10.3390/ijerph19063646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban MA, Wójcik D. Dirty banking: probing the gap in sustainable finance. Sustainability. 2019;11(6):1745. doi:10.3390/su11061745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruwer PJS. A descriptive model of success for computer-based information systems. Information Manage. 1984;7(2):63–67. doi:10.1016/0378-7206(84)90010-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bukhari SAA, Hashim F, Amran A. Pathways towards Green Banking adoption: moderating role of top management commitment. Int J Ethics Sys. 2022;38(2):286–315. doi:10.1108/IJOES-05-2021-0110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun H, Rabbani MR, Ahmad N, et al. CSR, Co-Creation and Green Consumer Loyalty: are Green Banking Initiatives Important? A Moderated Mediation Approach from an Emerging Economy. Sustainability. 2020;12(24):10688. doi:10.3390/su122410688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan C, Siddik AB, Yong L, Dong Q, Zheng G-W, Rahman MN. A Two-Staged SEM-Artificial Neural Network Approach to Analyze the Impact of FinTech Adoption on the Sustainability Performance of Banking Firms: the Mediating Effect of Green Finance and Innovation. Systems. 2022;10(5):148. doi:10.3390/systems10050148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guang-Wen Z, Siddik AB. Do corporate social responsibility practices and green finance dimensions determine environmental performance? An Empirical Study on Bangladeshi Banking Institutions. Front Environ Sci. 2022;10. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.890096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziolo M, Filipiak BZ, Bak I, Cheba K. How to design more sustainable financial systems: the roles of environmental, social, and governance factors in the decision-making process. Sustainability. 2019;11(20):5604. doi:10.3390/su11205604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma M, Choubey A. Green banking initiatives: a qualitative study on Indian banking sector. Environ Dev Sustain. 2021;1:654.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Zhang Z and Managi S. 2019. A bibliometric analysis on green finance: Current status, development, and future directions. Finance Research Letters. 2019; 29: 425–430. doi:10.1016/j.frl.2019.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desalegn G, Fekete-Farkas M, Tangl A. The effect of monetary policy and private investment on green finance: evidence from Hungary. J Risk Financial Manage. 2022;15(3):117. doi:10.3390/jrfm15030117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Yang Y. Does green finance contribute to corporate technological innovation? The moderating role of corporate social responsibility. Sustainability. 2022;14(9):5648. doi:10.3390/su14095648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye T, Xiang X, Ge X, Yang K. Research on green finance and green development based eco-efficiency and spatial econometric analysis. Sustainability. 2022;14(5):2825. doi:10.3390/su14052825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibe-Enwo I, Garanti, Popoola. Assessing the relevance of green banking practice on bank loyalty: the mediating effect of green image and bank trust. Sustainability. 2019;11(17):4651. doi:10.3390/su11174651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burhanuddin B, Ronny R, Sihotang ET. Consumer guilt and green banking services. Int J Consum Stud. 2020;45(3):396–408. doi:10.1111/ijcs.12602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taneja S, Ali L. Determinants of customers’ intentions towards environmentally sustainable banking: testing the structural model. J Retailing Consumer Services. 2020;102418. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose S, Khan HZ, Rashid A, Islam S. What drives green banking disclosure? An institutional and corporate governance perspective. Asia Pacific J Manage. 2017;35(2):501–527. doi:10.1007/s10490-017-9528-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunawan J, Permatasari P, Sharma U. Exploring sustainability and green banking disclosures: a study of banking sector. Environ Dev Sustain. 2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khairunnessa F, Vazquez-Brust DA, Yakovleva N. A review of the recent developments of green banking in Bangladesh. Sustainability. 2021;13(4):1904. doi:10.3390/su13041904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasiljeva T, Kreituss I, Lulle I. Artificial intelligence: the attitude of the public and representatives of various industries. J Risk Financial Manage. 2021;14(8):339. doi:10.3390/jrfm14080339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo RK, Gold J. Knowledge sharing attitude and behaviour in Saudi Arabian organisations: why trust matters. Int J Human Resources Dev Manage. 2014;14(1/2/3):97. doi:10.1504/IJHRDM.2014.068082
   Google Scholar
• Lymperopoulos C, Chaniotakis IE, Soureli M. A model of green bank marketing. J Financial Services Marketing. 2012;17:177–186. doi:10.1057/fsm.2012.10
   Google Scholar
• Park H, Kim JD. Transition towards green banking: role of financial regulators and financial institutions. Asian J Sustain Soc Responsibility. 2020;5(1). doi:10.1186/s41180-020-00034-3
   Google Scholar
• Julia T, Rahman MP, Kassim S. Shariah compliance of green banking policy in Bangladesh. Humanomics. 2016;32(4):390–404. doi:10.1108/H-022016-0015
   Google Scholar
• Bryson D, Atwal G, Chaudhuri A, Dave K. Antecedents of intention to use green banking services in India. Strategic Change. 2016;25:551–567. doi:10.1002/jsc.2080
   Google Scholar
• Dialysa F. Green Banking: One Effort to Achieve the Principle of Good Corporate Governance (GCG). Atlantis Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Julia T, Kassim S. Exploring green banking performance of Islamic banks vs conventional banks in Bangladesh based on Maqasid Shariah framework. J Islamic Marketing. 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamshad M, Sarim M, Akhtar A, Tabash MI. Identifying critical success factors for sustainable growth of Indian banking sector using interpretive structural modeling (ISM). Int J Soc Econ. 2018;45(8):1189–1204. doi:10.1108/IJSE-10-2017-0436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein MA. Attitude and the prediction of behaviour. In: Fishbein MA, editor. Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement. New York: Wiley; 1967:477–492.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Sainaghi R. (2020). The current state of academic research into peer-to-peer accommodation platforms. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 89 102555. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhelyazkova V, Kitanov Y. Green banking – definition, scope, and proposed business model. Ecol Safety. 2015;9:309–315.
   Google Scholar
• Gill C. Top 5 Sustainable Banks. World Finance; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Bukhari SAA, Hashim F, Amran AB, Hyder K. Green Banking and Islam: two sides of the same coin. J Islamic Marketing. 2019;11(4):977–1000. doi:10.1108/JIMA-09-2018-0154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar K, Prakash A. Developing a framework for assessing sustainable banking performance of the Indian banking sector. Soc Respons J. 2018;2:86.
   Google Scholar
• Nosratabadi S, Pinter G, Mosavi A, Semperger S. Sustainable Banking; Evaluation of the European Business Models. Sustainability. 2020;12(6):2314. doi:10.3390/su12062314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharmeen K, Hasan R, Miah MD. Underpinning the benefits of green banking: a comparative study between Islamic and conventional banks in Bangladesh. Thunderbird Int Business Rev. 2018;61(5):735–744. doi:10.1002/tie.22031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Effendi I, Murad M, Rafiki A, Lubis MM. The application of the theory of reasoned action on services of Islamic rural banks in Indonesia. J Islamic Marketing. 2020;12(5):951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janah N, Medias F, Pratiwi EK. The intention of religious leaders to use Islamic banking services: the case of Indonesia. J Islamic Marketing. 2020;12(9):1786–1800. doi:10.1108/JIMA-01-2020-0012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lujja S, Omar Mohammad M, Hassan R. Modelling public behavioral intention to adopt Islamic banking in Uganda. Int J Islamic Middle Eastern Finance Manage. 2016;9(4):583–600. doi:10.1108/IMEFM-08-2015-0092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra D, Akman I, Mishra A. Theory of Reasoned Action application for Green Information Technology acceptance. Comput Human Behav. 2014;36:29–40. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hostler RE, Yoon VY, Guimaraes T. Assessing the impact of internet agent on end users’ performance. Decis Support Syst. 2005;41(1):313–323. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2004.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maes P. Agents that Reduce Work and Information Overload. Association for Computing Machinery. Commun ACM. 1994;37:31–40. doi:10.1145/176789.176792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo JE, Dosher BA. Strategies for multiattribute binary choice. J Exp Psychol. 1983;9(4):676. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.9.4.676
   Google Scholar
• Obiora SC, Bamisile O, Opoku-Mensah E, Kofi Frimpong AN. Impact of Banking and Financial Systems on Environmental Sustainability: an Overarching Study of Developing, Emerging, and Developed Economies. Sustainability. 2020;12(19):8074. doi:10.3390/su12198074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdullah F, Ward R. Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors. Comput Human Behav. 2016;56:238–256. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Swidi A, Mohammed Rafiul Huque S, Haroon Hafeez M, Noor Mohd Shariff M. The role of subjective norms in the theory of planned behavior in the context of organic food consumption. Br Food J. 2014;116(10):1561–1580. doi:10.1108/BFJ-05-2013-0105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trongmateerut P, Sweeney JT. The Influence of Subjective Norms on Whistle-Blowing: a Cross-Cultural Investigation. J Business Ethics. 2012;112(3):437–451. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1270-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakoly Sany SB, Aman N, Jangi F, Lael-Monfared E, Tehrani H, Jafari A. Quality of life and life satisfaction among university students: exploring, subjective norms, general health, optimism, and attitude as potential mediators. J Am Coll Health. 2021;1–8. doi:10.1080/07448481.2021.1920597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarkiainen A, Sundqvist S. Subjective norms, attitudes and intentions of Finnish consumers in buying organic food. Br Food J. 2005;107(11):808–822. doi:10.1108/00070700510629760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H, Kim T, Shin SW. Modeling roles of subjective norms and eTrust in customers’ acceptance of airline B2C eCommerce websites. Tour Management. 2009;30(2):266–277. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2008.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Thong JY, Xu X. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly. 2012:157–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu X, Wu N, Chen N. Young People’s Behavioral Intentions towards Low-Carbon Travel: extending the Theory of Planned Behavior. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(5):2327. doi:10.3390/ijerph18052327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashif M, Zarkada A, Ramayah T. The impact of attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control on managers’ intentions to behave ethically. Total Quality Manage Business Excellence. 2016;29(5–6):481–501. doi:10.1080/14783363.2016.1209970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liabsuetrakul T, Chongsuvivatwong V, Lumbiganon P, Lindmark G. Obstetricians’ attitudes, subjective norms, perceived controls, and intentions on antibiotic prophylaxis in caesarean section. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(9):1665–1674. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00550-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Si H, Shi J, Tang D, Wen S, Miao W, Duan K. Application of the theory of planned behavior in environmental science: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(15):2788. doi:10.3390/ijerph16152788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaim JA, Maloni MJ, Napshin SA, Henley AB. Influences on student intention and behavior toward environmental sustainability. J Business Ethics. 2013;124(3):465–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd P, Benbasat I. Inducing compensatory information processing through decision aids that facilitate effort reduction: an experimental assessment. J Behav Decis Mak. 2000;13(1):91–106. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1<91::AID-BDM345>3.0.CO;2-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caniato F, Caridi M, Crippa L, Moretto A. Environmental sustainability in fashion supply chains: an exploratory case based research. Int J Production Economics. 2012;135(2):659–670. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peattie K, Belz F-M. Sustainability marketing — an innovative conception of marketing. Gallen. 2010;27(5):8–15. doi:10.1007/s11621-010-0085-7
   Google Scholar
• Kong L, Liu Z, Wu J. A systematic review of big data-based urban sustainability research: state-of-The-science and future directions. J Clean Prod. 2020;273:123142. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuang L-M, Chen P-C, Chen -Y-Y. The Determinant Factors of Travelers’ Choices for Pro-Environment Behavioral Intention-Integration Theory of Planned Behavior, Unified Theory of Acceptance, and Use of Technology 2 and Sustainability Values. Sustainability. 2018;10(6):1869. doi:10.3390/su10061869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha AK, Dikshit S. Employee satisfaction: a comparative study between tata steel and central coalfield limited, Ranchi. Anusandhanika. 2015;7:111–119.
   Google Scholar
• Bushra A, Masood M. The impact of organizational capabilities on organizational performance: empirical evidence from banking industry of Pakistan. Pakistan J Commerce Soc Sci. 2017;11:408–438.
   Google Scholar
• Leflot G, van Lier PAC, Onghena P, Colpin H. The role of teacher behavior management in the development of disruptive behaviors: an intervention study with the good behavior game. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2010;38(6):869–882. doi:10.1007/s10802-010-9411-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Wei Y, Zhou G. Promoting firms’ energy-saving behavior: the role of institutional pressures, top management support and financial slack. Energy Policy. 2018;115:230–238. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alagoz SM, Hekimoglu H. A study on tam: analysis of customer attitudes in online food ordering system. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2012;62:1138–1143. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.195
   Google Scholar
• Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 1989;13(3):319–340. doi:10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Amin M, Arefin MS, Sultana N, Islam MR, Jahan I, Akhtar A. Evaluating the customers’ dining attitudes, e-satisfaction and continuance intention toward mobile food ordering apps (MFOAs): evidence from Bangladesh. Eur J Manage Business Economics. 2021a;30(2):211–229. doi:10.1108/ejmbe-04-2020-0066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Amin M, Arefin MS, Alam MR, Ahammad T, Hoque MR. Using Mobile Food Delivery Applications during COVID-19 Pandemic: an Extended Model of Planned Behavior. J Food Products Marketing. 2021b;27(2):105–126. doi:10.1080/10454446.2021.1906817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Amin M, Arefin MS, Hossain I, Islam MR, Hossain M, Sultana N. Evaluating the Determinants of Customers’ Mobile Grocery Shopping Application (MGSA) Adoption during COVID-19 Pandemic. J Global Marketing. 2021c;35(3):228–247. doi:10.1080/08911762.2021.1980640
   Google Scholar
• Al Amin M, Arefin MS, Rasul. TF, Alam. MS. Understanding the Determinants of Mobile Banking Services Continuance Intention in Rural Bangladesh during the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Global Marketing. 2022c;35(4):324–347. doi:10.1080/08911762.2021.2018750
   Google Scholar
• Al Amin M. The Influence of Psychological, Situational and the Interactive Technological Feedback-Related Variables on Customers’ Technology Adoption Behavior to Use Online Shopping Applications. J Global Marketing. 2022b;35(4):384–407. doi:10.1080/08911762.2022.2051157
   Google Scholar
• Saunders M, Lewis P, Thornhill A, Bristow A. Research methods for business students’ chapter 4: understanding research philosophy and approaches to theory development. In: Saunders MNK, Philip L, Adrian T, Alex B, editors. Research Methods for Business Students. Pearson Education; 2019:128–171.
   Google Scholar
• Battaglia MP. Nonprobability sampling. In: Lavrakas PJ, editor. Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. SAGE Publications; 2008:523–526.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). 2 ed. Sage; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Brislin RW. Comparative research methodology: cross-cultural studies. Int J Psychol. 1976;11(3):215–229. doi:10.1080/00207597608247359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman DA. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 2nd ed. Wiley: New York; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Dabholkar PA, Bagozzi RP. An attitudinal model of technology-based self-service: moderating effects of consumer traits and situational factors. J Academy Marketing Sci. 2002;30(3):184–201. doi:10.1177/0092070302303001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleijnen M, de Ruyter K, Wetzels M. An assessment of value creation in mobile service delivery and the moderating role of time consciousness. J Retailing. 2007;83(1):33–46. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2006.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thong JYL, Yap C-S, Raman KS. Top Management Support, External Expertise and Information Systems Implementation in Small Businesses. Information Sys Res. 1996;7(2):248–267. doi:10.1287/isre.7.2.248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho M, Bonn MA, Li JJ. Differences in perceptions about food delivery apps between single-person and multi-person households. Int J Hospitality Manage. 2019;77:108–116. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.06.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Amin M, Alam MR, Alam MZ. Antecedents of students’ e-learning continuance intention during COVID-19: an empirical study. E Learn Digital Media. 2022a;204275302211039. doi:10.1177/20427530221103915
   Google Scholar
• Farah MF, Hasni MJS, Abbas AK. Mobile-banking adoption: empirical evidence from the banking sector in Pakistan. Int J Bank Marketing. 2018;36(7):1386–1413. doi:10.1108/IJBM-10-2017-0215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling. J Acad Marketing Sci. 2015;43(1):115–135. doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobel ME. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociol Methodol. 1982;13:290–312. doi:10.2307/270723
   Google Scholar
• Chen C-W. Five-star or thumbs-up? The influence of rating system types on users’ perceptions of information quality, cognitive effort, enjoyment and continuance intention. Internet Res. 2017;27(3):478–494. doi:10.1108/IntR-08-2016-0243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishal A, Dubey R, Gupta OK, Luo Z. Dynamics of environmental consciousness and green purchase behaviour: an empirical study. Int J Climate Change Strategies Management. 2017;9(5):682–706. doi:10.1108/IJCCSM-11-2016-0168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng Y, Wang F, Wu J. The Impact of Green Finance on Urban Haze Pollution in China: a Technological Innovation Perspective. Energies. 2022;15(3):801. doi:10.3390/en15030801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Zhao N, Lei X, Long R. Green Finance Innovation and Regional Green Development. Sustainability. 2021;13(15):8230. doi:10.3390/su13158230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng G-W, Siddik AB, Masukujjaman M, Fatema N. Factors affecting the sustainability performance of financial institutions in Bangladesh: the role of green finance. Sustainability. 2021a;13(18):10165. doi:10.3390/su131810165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng G-W, Siddik AB, Masukujjaman M, Fatema N, Alam SS. Green Finance Development in Bangladesh: the Role of Private Commercial Banks (PCBs). Sustainability. 2021b;13(2):795. doi:10.3390/su13020795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu H, Mei Q, Shahzad F, Liu S, Long X, Zhang J. Untangling the impact of green finance on the enterprise green performance: a meta-analytic approach. Sustainability. 2020;12(21):9085. doi:10.3390/su12219085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee D, Grewal R and Sambamurthy V. (2002). Shaping up for E-Commerce: Institutional Enablers of the Organizational Assimilation of Web Technologies. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), 65. doi:10.2307/4132321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall R (2008). Applied Social Research: Planning, Designing and Conducting Realworld Research. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kianpour K, Jusoh A and Asghari M. (2014). Environmentally friendly as a new dimension of product quality. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 31(5), 547–565. doi:10.1108/IJQRM-06-2012-0079
   Google Scholar
• Kim J, Taylor CR, Kim KH, Lee KH Measures of perceived sustainability. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science. 2015;25(2):182–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap CS, Thong JY, Raman KS Effect of government incentives on computerisation in small business. Eur J Inf Syst. 1994;3(3):191–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K (2018). Research Methods in Education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lindell MK and Whitney DJ. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J Appl Psychol, 86(1), 114–121. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J and Podsakoff NP. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol, 88(5), 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M and Ringle CM. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. EBR, 31(1), 2–24. doi:10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu L and Bentler PM. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. 10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin WW Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly. 1998;22(1):vii–xvi.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar