Coaching Leadership and Employees’ Deviant Innovation Behavior: Mediation and Chain Mediation of Interactional Justice and Organizational Identification

References

• Sekowski A. Creativity in context: update to the social psychology of creativity. High Abil Stud. 1999;10(2):233.
   Google Scholar
• Globocnik D, Salomo S. Do formal management practices impact the emergence of bootlegging behavior? J Prod Innov Manage. 2015;32(4):505–521. doi:10.1111/jpim.12215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augsdorfer P. Bootlegging and path dependency. Res Policy. 2005;34(1):1–11. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang HY, Cui ZS, Zou CL, et al. Loyal or rebel? Employee bootleg innovation in Chinese context. Adv Psychol Sci. 2019;27(6):975–989. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.00975
   Google Scholar
• Mainemelis C. Stealing fire: creative deviance in the evolution of new ideas. Acad Manage Rev. 2010;35(4):558–578. doi:10.5465/AMR.2010.53502801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criscuolo P, Salter A, Wal AL. Going underground: bootlegging and individual innovative performance. Organ Sci. 2014;25(5):1287–1305. doi:10.1287/orsc.2013.0856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augsdorfer P. A diagnostic personality test to identify likely corporate bootleg researchers. Int J Innov Manag. 2012;16(1):1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Huang W, Xiang GP, Du YZ, et al. Bootleg and individual innovation performance: the joint effect of status and creativity. Nankai Bus Rev. 2017;20(1):143–154. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2017.01.013
   Google Scholar
• Pan CC, Wang Z. The influence of leader affiliative humor on creative deviance: the multiple mediating effects of superior-subordinate Guanxi and role breadth self-efficacy. J Techno Econ. 2020;39(9):144–152+180.
   Google Scholar
• Wu YM, Pan C, Zhou YZ. The effect of humble leadership on creative deviance——Chain mediating effect of supervisor-subordinate guanxi and psychological entitlement. Soft Sci. 2020;34(4):140–144.
   Google Scholar
• Wu SJ, Du MZ, Zhou ZB. How does inclusive leadership affect employees’ deviant innovation behavior in the context of harmony culture. Sci Technol Progr Pol. 2020;37(17):143–151. doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.2020060234
   Google Scholar
• Liu XQ. Unethical leadership and employees’ creative deviance: an analysis of the multiple mediating effects. Science Res Manage. 2019;40(3):189–198. doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2019.03.020
   Google Scholar
• Luo WH, Sun YQ, Gao F, et al. Study on the influence mechanism of coaching leadership on employees’ subjective career success. Chin J Manage. 2020;17(7):998–1006. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2020.07.006
   Google Scholar
• Mclean GN, Yang B, Kuo M, et al. Development and initial validation of an instrument measuring managerial coaching skill. Hum Resour Dev Q. 2005;16(2):157–178. doi:10.1002/hrdq.1131
   Google Scholar
• Kim S. Assessing the influence of managerial coaching on employee outcomes. Hum Resour Dev Q. 2014;25(1):59–85. doi:10.1002/hrdq.21175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Kuo MH. Examining the relationships among coaching, trustworthiness, and role behaviors: a social exchange perspective.The. JAppl Behav Sci. 2015;51(2):152–176. doi:10.1177/0021886315574884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner JC. Social identification and psychological group formation. In: Tajfel H, editor. The Social Dimension: European Developments in Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Li C, Mao KX. The impact of transformational leadership on engagement of newcomers: a study from the identification perspective. Manage Rev. 2018;30(7):136–147. doi:10.14120/j.cnki.cn11-5057/f.2018.07.013
   Google Scholar
• Foreman P, Whetten DA. Members’ identification with multiple-identity organizations. Organ Sci. 2002;13(6):618–635. doi:10.1287/orsc.13.6.618.493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu SJ, Du MZ, Zhang J. The influence of authentic leadership on employees’ deviant innovation——The chain mediating effect of organization-based self-esteem and felt obligation for constructive change and the moderating effect of error aversion culture. Sci Technol Progr Pol. 2020;37(13):141–150. doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.2020030423
   Google Scholar
• Guan CY. Study on the Impact mechanism of inclusive leadership on employee innovative behavior. Sci Sci Manage ST. 2016;37(6):159–168.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg J. The social side of fairness: interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In: Justice in the Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resource Management. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1993:79–103.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen MS. Managerial coaching: a review of the literature. Perform Improv Q. 2012;24(4):17–39. doi:10.1002/piq.20123
   Google Scholar
• Kandemir H, Kala E, Özdasli K, et al. The effects of leadership style on organizational justice perception: a research on the employees of Pristina international airport. Türkiye Sosyal Arastirmalar Dergisi. 2019;23(2):389–400.
   Google Scholar
• He X. Can interactional justice really cure “silence” disease. J Manage World. 2009;2009(4):128–134. doi:10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2009.04.014
   Google Scholar
• Kim S, Egan TM, Kim W, et al. The impact of managerial coaching behavior on employee work-related reactions. J Bus Psychol. 2013;28(3):315–330. doi:10.1007/s10869-013-9286-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin X, Leung K. What signals does procedural justice climate convey? The roles of group status, and organizational benevolence and integrity. J Organ Behav. 2014;35(4):464–488. doi:10.1002/job.1899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Gong XL. Self -categorization theory summarization. J Shandong nor Univ. 2006;51(3):157–160. doi:10.16456/j.cnki.1001-5973.2006.03.031
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Liu H. A literature review of constructive deviance in organizations and prospects. Foreign economics & management. Front Psychol. 2014;36(8):45–52. doi:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2014.08.008
   Google Scholar
• Canfield J. Coaching for Breakthrough Success, Proven Techniques for Making Impossible Dreams Possible. New York, America: McGraw-Hill; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Li H. A review of the research on the influence of team and organizational identity on employees’ innovative behavior. Chin J Ergon. 2017;23(6):77–82. doi:10.13837/j.issn.1006-8309.2017.06.0013
   Google Scholar
• Zhan XJ, Lu N, Luo WH, et al. Research on the mechanism of coaching leadership on employees’ taking charge from the perspective of self-regulation theory. Manage Rev. 2020;32(8):193–203. doi:10.14120/j.cnki.cn11-5057/f.2020.08.016
   Google Scholar
• Liu X, Batt R. How supervisors influence performance: a multilevel study of coaching and group management in technology-mediated services. Pers Psychol. 2010;63(2):265–298. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01170.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence P. Managerial coaching: a literature review. Int J Evid Based Coach Mentor. 2017;15(2):43–69. doi:10.24384/000250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Ashford SJ. The dynamics of proactivity at work. Res Organ Beh. 2008;28(4):3–34. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson V. A trojan horse? The implications of managerial coaching for leadership theory. Hum Resour Dev Int. 2013;16(3):251–266. doi:10.1080/13678868.2013.771868
   Google Scholar
• Hornsey MJ. Ingroup critics and their influence on groups. In: Postmes T, Jetten J, editors. Individuality and the Group: Advances in Social Identity. London: SAGE; 2006:74–91.
   Google Scholar
• Wang YZ. Research on the relationship between coaching leadership and employee innovative behavior: multilevel role of error management climate. Sci Sci Manage ST. 2018;39(8):115–129.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y. Does ethical leadership contribute to employee creativity behavior? The mediating role of perceived insider status and the moderating role of vertical collectivism. Hum Res Dev China. 2017;(17):32–42. doi:10.16471/j.cnki.11-2822/c.2017.11.004
   Google Scholar
• Mael F, Ashforth BE. Alumni and their alma mater: a partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. J Organ Behav. 1992;13(2):103–123. doi:10.1002/10.1002/job.4030130202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellemers N, Gilder DD, Haslam SA. Motivating individuals and groups at work: a social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Acad Manage Rev. 2004;29(3):459–478. doi:10.2307/20159054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin M, Hewstone M. Social identity theory’s self-esteem hypothesis: a review and some suggestions for clarification. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 1998;2(1):40–62. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0201_3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li ZB, Chen H. The impact of supervisor–subordinate Guanxi on employees’ knowledge sharing behavior: the role of organizational identification and collectivism orientation. J Indust Eng Manage. 2015;29(3):30–38. doi:10.13587/j.cnki.jieem.2015.03.004
   Google Scholar
• Umphress EE, Bingham JB, Mitchell MS. Unethical behavior in the name of the company: the moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. J Appl Psychol. 2010;95(4):769–780. doi:10.1037/a0019214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Zou X, Shu X. The process whereby organizational identification promotes and prohibits employees’ innovative behavior. Adv Psychol Sci. 2019;27(7)::1153–1166. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01153
   Google Scholar
• Blader SL, Patil S, Packer DJ. Organizational identification and workplace behavior: more than meets the eye. Res Organ Beh. 2017;37:19–34. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2017.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilley A, Gilley JW, Kouider E. Characteristics of managerial coaching. Perform Improv Q. 2010;23(1):53–70. doi:10.1002/piq.20075
   Google Scholar
• Hamlin RG, Ellinger AD, Beattie RS. Toward a process of coaching? A definitional examination of “coaching”, “organization development”, and “human resource development”. Int J Evid Based Coach Mentor. 2009;7(1):12–38. doi:10.24384/IJEBCM
   Google Scholar
• Smidts A, Pruyn A, Van Riel CBM. The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification. Acad Manage J. 2001;44(5)::1051–1062. doi:10.5465/3069448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu Y, Meng YC, Yang XH. How does spiritual leadership inspire innovation?—The study on the chain mediating effect of leader-member exchange and organizational identification. East China Econ Manage. 2019;33(4):44–50. doi:10.19629/j.cnki.34-1014/f.180209007
   Google Scholar
• Michael E. Identification and some conditions of organizational involvement. Adm Sci Q. 1969;14(3):346–356. doi:10.2307/2391129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropanzano R, Prehar CA, Chen PY. Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice. Group Organ Manage. 2002;27:324–351. doi:10.1177/1059601102027003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind EA, Greenberg J, Scott KS, et al. The winding road from employee to complainant: situational and psychological determinants of wrongful termination claims. Adm Sci Q. 2000;45(3):557–590. doi:10.2307/2667109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen Y, Jackson T, Ding C, et al. Linking perceived organizational support with employee work outcomes in a Chinese context: organizational identification as a mediator. Eur Manag J. 2014;32(3):406–412. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2013.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heslin PA, Vandewalle D, Latham GP. Keen to help? Managers’ implicit person theories and their subsequent employee coaching. Pers Psychol. 2006;59(4):871–902. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00057.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schminke M, Cropanzano R, Rupp DE. Organization structure and fairness perceptions: the moderating effects of organization level. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2002;89(1):881–905. doi:10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00034-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang HY, Zou CL, Cui ZS. The influence of differential leadership to bootleg innovation: a moderated mediation model. Sci Technol Progr Pol. 2018;35(9):131–137. doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.2018010607
   Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Zyphur MJ, Zhang Z. A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychol Methods. 2010;15(3):209–223. doi:10.1037/a0020141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo M. How to enhance bootlegging——The effect of ambidextrous leadership and felt obligation. Sci Technol Progr Pol. 2020;37(9):49–54. doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.201910040
   Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Lyu Y, Wang YF, Wang LX. Coaching leadership effect on employees’ creativity: multilevel moderated mediator analysis. Acta Psychol Sinica. 2018;50(3):327.
   Google Scholar
• Hooi LW, Tan NN. Agile leadership and bootlegging behavior: does leadership coping dynamics matter? In: Agile Coping in the Digital Workplace. Cham: Springer; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Pan SC. It is Wrong to Listen to the Boss. Beijing: Knowledge Publishing House; 2003.
   Google Scholar