The Relationship Between Study Engagement and Critical Thinking Among Higher Vocational College Students in China: A Longitudinal Study

References

• Trilling B, Fadel C. 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. John Wiley & Sons; 2009:50–53.
   Google Scholar
• Ermis RH. Critical thinking: a streamlined conception. Teach Philos. 1991;14(1):5–25. doi:10.5840/teachphil19911412
   Google Scholar
• Hart Research Associates. Recent trends in general education design, learning outcomes, and teaching approaches: key findings from a survey among administrators at AAC&U member institutions; 2016. Available from: https://dgmg81phhvh63.cloudfront.net/content/user-photos/Research/PDFs/2015_Survey_Report2_GEtrends.pdf. Accessed October 6, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Whorton R, Casillas A, Oswald FL, Shaw A. Critical skills for the 21st century workforce. In: Burrus J, Mattern KD, Naemi B, Roberts RD, editors. Building Better Students: Preparation for the Workforce. NY: Oxford University Press; 2017:47–72.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern DF. Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking. Psychology Press; 2013:23–24.
   Google Scholar
• Yang SA. Critical thinking disposition and problem solving ability in nursing students. J Korean Acad Nurs Admin. 2010;16(4):389–398. doi:10.11111/jkana.2010.16.4.389
   Google Scholar
• Ku KY, Ho IT. Metacognitive strategies that enhance critical thinking. Metacognition Learn. 2010;5(3):251–267. doi:10.1007/s11409-010-9060-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pithers RT, Soden R. Critical thinking in education: a review. Educ Res. 2000;42(3):237–249. doi:10.1080/001318800440579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan ZH, Wan SL, Zhan Y. For harmony and democracy: secondary students’ views on the value of developing critical thinking in a Confucian heritage context Thinking Skills and Creativity; 2022. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1871187122000347. Accessed October 6, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Aktoprak A, Hursen C. A bibliometric and content analysis of critical thinking in primary education. Thinking skills and creativity; 2022. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1871187122000323. Accessed October 6, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Giacomazzi M, Fontana M, Trujillo CC. Contextualization of critical thinking in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic integrative review. Thinking skills and creativity; 2022. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/sdfe/arp/cite?pii=S1871187121001930&format=text%2Fx-bibtex&withabstract=true. Accessed October 6, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Shcheglova I, Koreshnikova Y, Parshina O. The role of engagement in the development of critical thinking in undergraduates. Educ Stud. 2019;2019(1):264–289.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn D. A developmental model of critical thinking. Educ Res. 1999;28(2):16–46. doi:10.3102/0013189X028002016
   Google Scholar
• Wylie C, Hodgen E. Trajectories and patterns of student engagement: evidence from a longitudinal study. In: Christenson S, Reschly A, Wylie C, editors. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. Boston, MA: Springer; 2012:585–599.
   Google Scholar
• Lu ZY, Chen JW. College students’ critical thinking tendency and learning engagement: the mediating role of achievement goal orientation and academic self-efficacy. High Educ Res. 2017;38(7):69–77. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Phan HP. Relations between goals, self‐efficacy, critical thinking and deep processing strategies: a path analysis. Educ Psychol. 2009;29(7):777–799. doi:10.1080/01443410903289423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu ZK, He J, Li B. Critical and creative thinking as learning processes at top-ranking Chinese middle schools: possibilities and required improvements. High Ability Stud. 2015;26(1):139–152. doi:10.1080/13598139.2015.1015501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates H. The value of student engagement for higher education quality assurance. Qual High Educ. 2005;11(1):25–36. doi:10.1080/13538320500074915
   Google Scholar
• Alfonso M, Bailey TR, Scott M. The educational outcomes of occupational sub-baccalaureate students: evidence from the 1990s. Econom Educ Rev. 2005;24(2):197. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez JR, Laanan FS. Economic benefits of a community college education: issues of accountability and performance measures. New Directions Commun Coll. 1998;1998(104):5–15. doi:10.1002/cc.10401
   Google Scholar
• Wonacott ME. Benefits of vocational education. myths and realities No. 8; 2000. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED441179.pdf. Accessed October 6, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Norris SP, Ennis RH. Evaluating Critical Thinking. Pacific Growe. CA: Midwest Publications; 1989:3.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett R. Higher education: a critical business. Int J Educ Manage. 1998;12(3):141.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. A test of leadership: charting the future of U.S. higher education; 2006. Available from: https://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv:56421. Accessed October 6, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• AAC&U (Association of American Colleges and Universities). Fulfilling the American dream: liberal education and the future of work Hart Research Associates; 2018. Available from: https://dgmg81phhvh63.cloudfront.net/content/user-photos/Research/PDFs/2018EmployerResearchReport.pdf. Accessed October 6, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern DF. Teaching for critical thinking: helping college students develop the skills and dispositions of a critical thinker. New Directions Teach Learn. 1999;(80):69–74. doi:10.1002/tl.8005
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn D. The Skills of Argument. Cambridge. England: Cambridge University Press; 1991:8.
   Google Scholar
• Bezanilla MJ, Fernández-Nogueira D, Poblete M, Galindo-Domínguez H. Methodologies for teaching-learning critical thinking in higher education: the teacher’s view. Thinking skills and creativity; 2019. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1871187119300380. Accessed October 6, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Behar-Horenstein LS, Niu L. Teaching critical thinking skills in higher education: a review of the literature. J Coll Teach Learn. 2011;8(2):25–41.
   Google Scholar
• Coates H. Development of the Australasian survey of student engagement (AUSSE). High Educ. 2010;60(1):1–17. doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9281-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung DYP, Kember D. The relationship between approaches to learning and reflection upon practice. Educ Psychol. 2003;23:61–71. doi:10.1080/01443410303221
   Google Scholar
• Kahu ER. Framing student engagement in higher education. Stud High Educ. 2013;38:758–773. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zepke N. Student engagement research in higher education: questioning an academic orthodoxy. Teach High Educ. 2014;19:697–708. doi:10.1080/13562517.2014.901956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks JA, Blumenfeld PC, Paris AH. School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev Educ Res. 2004;74:59–109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archambault I, Janosz M, Morizot J, Pagani L. Adolescent behavioral, affective, and cognitive engagement in school: relationship to dropout. J School Health. 2009;79:408–415. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00428.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Ruolan L. Research on the influence of college students’ professional identity on learning engagement: the mediating role of school belonging. Heilongjiang Res High Educ. 2018;2018(03):94–99. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang YH, Wang CH. Characteristics of professional identity of free normal students in special education in Xinjiang and its relationship with rlearning engagement: understanding the mediating role of social support. Chin J Special Educ. 2018;2018(03):58–64. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Pascarella ET, Terenzini PT. How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research. Jossey-Bass; 2005:10.
   Google Scholar
• Pascarella ET, Salisbury MH, Blaich C. Exposure to effective instruction and college student persistence: a multi-institutional replication and extension. J Coll Stud Dev. 2011;52(1):4–19. doi:10.1353/csd.2011.0005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman NA. Can 1st-year college students accurately report their learning and development? Am Educ Res J. 2010;47(2):466–496. doi:10.3102/0002831209353595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roohr KC, Liu H, Liu OL. Investigating student learning gains in college: a longitudinal study. Stud High Educ. 2017;42(12):2284–2300. doi:10.1080/03075079.2016.1143925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najafi M, Motlagh MK, Najafi M, Kashani AS, Zarghi N, Shirazi M. Trend of tendency to critical thinking among medical students in Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2010–2015: a longitudinal study. J Educ Health Promot. 2022;11:29. doi:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1373_20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang QG, Shen H. Re-examination of the value-added ability of Chinese undergraduates’ critical thinking: also on the practical dilemma of value-added evaluation of higher education. China High Educ Res. 2022;2022(01):69–75. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Loyalka P, Liu OL, Li G, et al. Skill levels and gains in university STEM education in China, India, Russia and the United States. Nat Human Behav. 2021;5(7):892–904. doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01062-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia HH, Zhong BL. Research on influencing factors and training strategies of college students’ critical thinking. Educ Res. 2017;38(5):67–76. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Astin AW. Student involvement: a developmental theory for higher education. J Coll Student Personnel. 1984;25(4):297–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumner WG. Folkways: A Study of the Sociological Importance of Usages, Manners, Customs, Mores, and Morals. Good Press; 2019:57–62.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond-Seniuk C, Profetto-McGrath J. Can one learn to think critically?–a philosophical exploration. Open Nurs J. 2011;5:45. doi:10.2174/1874434601105010045
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iranfar K, Iranfar S, Mohammadi G. Developing critical thinking disposition in the students of nursing and midwifery through collaborative and individual methods of learning. HealthMED. 2012;6(12):4047–4052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs JB. From theory to practice: a cognitive systems approach. High Educ Res Dev. 1993;12(1):73–85. doi:10.1080/0729436930120107
   Google Scholar
• Biggs J, Kember D, Leung DY. The revised two‐factor study process questionnaire: r‐SPQ‐2F. Br J Educ Psychol. 2001;71(1):133–149. doi:10.1348/000709901158433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llorens S, Schaufeli W, Bakker A, Salanova M. Does a positive gain spiral of resources, efficacy beliefs and engagement exist? Comput Human Behav. 2007;23:825–841. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YS. An Empirical Study on College Students’ Learning Engagement: Based on the Data Analysis of “National College Students’ Learning Survey”. Xiamen University; 2014:187–188. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegel ER, Hatcher L, Stepanski E. A stepby-step approach to using the SAS system for univariate and multivariate statistics. Technometrics. 2005;37(4):471.
   Google Scholar
• Peng MC, Wang GC, Chen JL, et al. Validity and reliability of the Chinese critical thinking disposition inventory. Chin J Nurs. 2004;2004(09):7–10. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén LK, Muthén B. Growth modeling with latent variables using Mplus: introductory and intermediate growth models. 2012:170–182. Available from: http://www.statmodel.com/download/Topic3-v.pdf. Accessed October 6, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne BM. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. 3nd ed. Routledge; 2016:266–267.
   Google Scholar
• Asparouhov T, Muthén B, Muthén BO. Robust chi square difference testing with mean and variance adjusted test statistics. Matrix. 2006;1(5):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens MP, Haase RF. Advanced applications of structural equation modeling in counseling psychology research. Counsel Psychol. 2006;34(6):878–911. doi:10.1177/0011000005283395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Glasersfeld E. Learning as a constructive activity, problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics. Proceedings of the 5th annual meeting of the North American group of psychology in mathematics education. 1983:41–101.
   Google Scholar
• Mezirow J. How critical reflection triggers transformative learning. Foster Crit Reflect Adulthood. 1990;1(20):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Kish CK, Sheehan JK, Cole KB, et al. Portfolio in the classroom: a vehicle for developing reflective thinking. High School J. 1997;80:254–260.
   Google Scholar
• Fenollar P, Roman S, Cuestas PJ. University students’ academic performance: an integrative conceptual framework and empirical analysis. Br J Educ Psychol. 2007;77:873–891. doi:10.1348/000709907X189118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene BA, Miller RB. Influences on achievement: goals, perceived ability, cognitive engagement. Contemp Educ Psychol. 1996;21:181–192. doi:10.1006/ceps.1996.0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar