Mediation Effects of Premarital Sexual Permissiveness on the Relationship Between Expectations for Marriage and Marital Intention of Vietnamese Undergraduate Students

References

• Jackson C. Introduction: marriage, gender relations and social change. J Dev Stud. 2012;48(1):1–9. doi:10.1080/00220388.2011.629653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallahchai R, Fallahi M. Gender differences in expectations, purposes and attitudes to marriage in university students. Iranian Evolut Educ Psychol Jo. 2019;1(1):42–50. doi:10.29252/IEEPJ.1.1.42
   Google Scholar
• Minh NH. Age at first marriage in Vietnam: patterns and determinants. Asia Pac Popul J. 1997;12(2):49–74. doi:10.18356/dddccf6e-en
   Google Scholar
• Willoughby BJ, Hall SS, Goff S. Marriage matters but how much? Marital centrality among young adults. J Psychol. 2015;149(8):796–817. doi:10.1080/00223980.2014.979128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asian JY. Families at the crossroads: a meeting of east, west, tradition, modernity, and gender. J Marriage Fam. 2015;77(5):1031–1038. doi:10.1111/jomf.12223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones GW, Gubhaju B. Factors influencing changes in mean age at first marriage and proportions never marrying in the low-fertility countries of East and Southeast Asia. Asian Popul Stud. 2009;5(3):237–265. doi:10.1080/17441730903351487
   Google Scholar
• Yoo SH. Convergence Towards Diversity?: Cohort Analysis of Fertility and Family Formation in South Korea. Arizona State University; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Jones GW, Hull TH, Mohamad M. Changing Marriage Patterns in Southeast Asia. Routledge; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Arnett JJ. Emerging adulthood: a theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. Ame Psychol. 2000;55(5):469–480. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan MJ. Pathways to adulthood in changing societies: variability and mechanisms in life course perspective. Annu Rev Sociol. 2000;26:667–692. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quadrio C. The Peter Pan and Wendy syndrome: a marital dynamic. Austr N Z J Psychiatry. 1982;16(2):23–28. doi:10.3109/00048678209161187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalkan M, Batık MV, Kaya L, Turan M. Peter Pan syndrome “Men Who Don’t Grow”: developing a scale. Men Masc. 2021;24(2):245–257. doi:10.1177/1097184X19874854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson JH, Benson MJ, Wilson SM, Medora NJ. Family of origin influences on marital attitudes and readiness for marriage in late adolescents. J Fam Issues. 1998;19(6):750–768. doi:10.1177/019251398019006005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kithuka Y. Gender Differences in Marital Attitudes, Expectations and Intentions to Marry in Two Universities in Nairobi, Kenya. Clinical Psychology, United States International University-Africa; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Riggio HR, Weiser DA. Attitudes toward marriage: embeddedness and outcomes in personal relationships. Pers Relatsh. 2008;15(1):123–140. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00188.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen EJ. Young adults’ marital attitudes and intentions: the role of parental conflict, divorce and gender. Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Sigalow E, Shain M, Bergey MR. Religion and decisions about marriage, residence, occupation, and children. J Sci Study Relig. 2012;51(2):304–323. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2012.01641.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drigotas SM, Safstrom CA, Gentilia T. An investment model prediction of dating infidelity. J Person Soc Psychol. 1999;77(3):509–524. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin JZ, Kim SH, Peretz NM. Expectancy effects and negotiation. J Soc Issues. 1990;46(2):125–139. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb01926.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rios CM. The relationship between premarital advice, expectations and marital satisfaction, Utah State.; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Park SS, Rosén LA. The marital scales: measurement of intent, attitudes, and aspects regarding marital relationships. J Divor Remar. 2013;54(4):295–312. doi:10.1080/10502556.2013.780491
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Philos Rhetor. 1977;10(2):177–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. EBOOK: Attitudes, Personality and Behaviour. McGraw-hill education (UK); 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Wu B, Huang X-T. Be satisfied and happy: review and prospect of marital expectation. Adv Psychol Sci. 2012;20(7):1098–1109. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2012.01098
   Google Scholar
• An D, Lee S-L, Woo H. Marriage intention among Korean young adults: trends and influencing factors. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(14):1–14. doi:10.3390/ijerph19148557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlak H, Gemalmaz A, Gurel F, Dereboy C, Ertekin K. Communication skills training: effects on attitudes toward communication skills and empathic tendency. Educ Health. 2008;21(2):62–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paul A. Is online better than offline for meeting partners? Depends: are you looking to marry or to date? Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Network. 2014;17(10):664–667. doi:10.1089/cyber.2014.0302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll JS, Willoughby B, Badger S, Nelson LJ, McNamara Barry C, Madsen SD. So close, yet so far away: the impact of varying marital horizons on emerging adulthood. J Adolesc Res. 2007;22(3):219–247. doi:10.1177/0743558407299697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willoughby BJ, Carroll JS. Sexual experience and couple formation attitudes among emerging adults. J Adult Dev. 2010;17(1):1–11. doi:10.1007/s10804-009-9073-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willoughby BJ, Dworkin J. The relationships between emerging adults’ expressed desire to marry and frequency of participation in risk-taking behaviors. Youth & Society. 2009;40(3):426–450. doi:10.1177/0044118X08318116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edin K, England P, Linnenberg K Love and distrust among unmarried parents. Paper presented at: The National Poverty Center Conference; 2003; Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Zuo X, Lou C, Gao E, Cheng Y, Niu H, Zabin LS. Gender differences in adolescent premarital sexual permissiveness in three asian cities: effects of gender-role attitudes. J Adolesc Health. 2012;50(3):18–25. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiao C, Yi -C-C. Adolescent premarital sex and health outcomes among Taiwanese youth: perception of best friends’ sexual behavior and the contextual effect. AIDS Care. 2011;23(9):1083–1092. doi:10.1080/09540121.2011.555737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boostani KAA, Khodabakhshi KA, Davoodi H, Heidari H. The effect of narrative therapy on communication skills, emotional expression and empathy among couples intending to marry. Common Health. 2021;8(2):232–235.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley HH, Thibaut JW, Radloff R, Mundy D. The development of cooperation in The” minimal social situation”. Psychol Monogr. 1962;76(19):1–19. doi:10.1037/h0093819
   Google Scholar
• Laumann EO, Gagnon JH, Michael RT, Michaels S. The Social Organization of Sxuality: Sexual Practices in the United States. University of Chicago Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Christopher FS, Sprecher S. Sexuality in marriage, dating, and other relationships: a decade review. J Marriage Fam. 2000;62(4):999–1017. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00999.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein J, Santo RM, Guillemin FJ. A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(4):435–441. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyle RH. Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Sage; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Kline T. Psychological Testing: A Practical Approach to Design and Evaluation. Sage; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne JW. Best Practices in Quantitative Methods. Sage; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss IL. The Scaling of Premarital Sexual Permissiveness. J Marriage Fam. 1964;26(2):188–198. doi:10.2307/349726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz IM, Reiss IL. The scaling of premarital sexual reiss’s new short form version permissiveness revisited: test results of reiss’s new short form version. J Sex Marital Ther. 1995;21(2):78–86. doi:10.1080/00926239508404387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leguina A. A primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Int J Res Method Educ. 2015;32(2):220–221. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2015.1005806
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, Danks NP, Ray S. Evaluation of reflective measurement models. In: Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. Springer Cham; 2021:75–90.
   Google Scholar
• Wold H. Soft modelling: the basic design and some extensions; Syst Under Indirect Obs. 1982;8:36–37.
   Google Scholar
• Ciavolino E, Nitti M. Using the hybrid two-step estimation approach for the identification of second-order latent variable models. J Appl Stat. 2013;40(3):508–526. doi:10.1080/02664763.2012.745837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte P, Amaro S. Methods for modelling reflective-formative second order constructs in PLS: an application to online travel shopping. J Hospital Tour Technol. 2018;9(3):295–313. doi:10.1108/JHTT-09-2017-0092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarstedt M, Hair JJF, Cheah J-H, Becker J-M, Ringle CM. How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Austral Market J. 2019;27(3):197–211. doi:10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Gudergan SP. Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. SAGE Publications; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Rigdon EE, Schumacker RE, Wothke W. A comparative review of interaction and nonlinear modeling. In: Interaction Nonlinear Effects in Structural Equation Modeling. Routledge; 2017:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Lilliefors HW. On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown. J Am Stat Assoc. 1967;62(318):399–402. doi:10.1080/01621459.1967.10482916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostertagova E, Ostertag O, Kováč J. Methodology and application of the Kruskal-Wallis test. Applied Mech Mater. 2014;611:115–120. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.611.115
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra TK, Henseler J. Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Quarter. 2015;39(2):297–316. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.2.02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitzl C, Roldan JL, Cepeda G. Mediation analysis in partial least squares path modeling: helping researchers discuss more sophisticated models. Ind Manag Data Syst. 2016;116(9):1849–1864. doi:10.1108/IMDS-07-2015-0302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hippen KA. Attitudes Toward Marriage and Long-Term Relationships Across Emerging Adulthood. Sociology, Georgia State University; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Smock PJ, Manning WD, Porter M. “Everything’s there except money”: how money shapes decisions to marry among cohabitors. J Marriage Fam. 2005;67(3):680–696. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00162.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney MM. Two decades of family change: the shifting economic foundations of marriage. Am Sociol Rev. 2002;67(1):132–147. doi:10.2307/3088937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie Y, Raymo JM, Goyette K, Thornton A. Economic potential and entry into marriage and cohabitation. Demography. 2003;40(2):351–367. doi:10.1353/dem.2003.0019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatima M, Ajmal MA. Happy marriage: a qualitative study. Pak J Clin Psychol. 2012;9(2):37–42.
   Google Scholar
• Gowen LK, Catania JA, Dolcini MM, Harper GW. The meaning of respect in romantic relationships among low-income African American adolescents. J Adolesc Res. 2014;29(5):639–662. doi:10.1177/0743558414528978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day MV, Kay AC, Holmes JG, Napier JL. System justification and the defense of committed relationship ideology. J Person Soc Psychol. 2011;101(2):291–306. doi:10.1037/a0023197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudmunson CG, Beutler IF, Israelsen CL, McCoy JK, Hill EJ. Linking financial strain to marital instability: examining the roles of emotional distress and marital interaction. J Fam Econ Issues. 2007;28(3):357–376. doi:10.1007/s10834-007-9074-7
   Google Scholar
• Pavot W, Diener E. Review of the satisfaction with life scale. In: Assessing Well-Being. Vol. 39. Springer; 2009:101–117.
   Google Scholar
• Stack S, Eshleman JR. Marital status and happiness: a 17-nation study. J Marriage Fam. 1998;60(2):527–536. doi:10.2307/353867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll JS, Badger S, Willoughby BJ, Nelson LJ, Madsen SD, McNamara Barry C. Ready or not? Criteria for marriage readiness among emerging adults. J Adolesc Res. 2009;24(3):349–375. doi:10.1177/0743558409334253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bélanger D, Hong KT. Single women’s experiences of sexual relationships and abortion in Hanoi, Vietnam. Reprod Health Matters. 1999;7(14):71–82. doi:10.1016/S0968-8080(99)90008-3
   Google Scholar
• Gammeltoft T. Being special for somebody: urban sexualities in contemporary Vietnam. Asian J Soc Sci. 2002;30(3):476–492. doi:10.1163/156853102320945367
   Google Scholar
• Pham -NH-NT. Vietnam’s urban sex culture: is it fueling the HIV/AIDS epidemic? Pac News. 2004;22:6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Mensch BS, Clark WH, Anh DN. Adolescents in Vietnam: looking beyond reproductive health. Stud Fam Plann. 2003;34(4):249–262. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2003.00249.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghuman S, Loi VM, Huy VT, Knodel J. Continuity and change in premarital sex in Vietnam. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2006;32(4):166–174. doi:10.1363/3216606
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ogolsky BG, Monk JK, Rice TM, Theisen JC, Maniotes CR. Relationship maintenance: a review of research on romantic relationships. J Fam Theory Rev. 2017;9(3):275–306. doi:10.1111/jftr.12205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprecher S, Hendrick SS. Self-disclosure in intimate relationships: associations with individual and relationship characteristics over time. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2004;23(6):857–877. doi:10.1521/jscp.23.6.857.54803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng Z, Smyth R. Sex and happiness. J Econ Behav Organ. 2015;112:26–32. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magon N, Kalra S. The orgasmic history of oxytocin: love, lust, and labor. Indian J Endocrinol Metabol. 2011;15(3):156–161. doi:10.4103/2230-8210.84851
   Google Scholar
• Sprecher S. Sexual satisfaction in premarital relationships: associations with satisfaction, love, commitment, and stability. J Sex Res. 2002;39(3):190–196. doi:10.1080/00224490209552141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards JN, Booth AJ. Sexuality, marriage, and well-being: the middle years. In: Sexuality Across the Life Course . University of Chicago Press; 1994:233–259.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney A, Pargament KI, Murray-Swank A, Murray-Swank N. Religion and the sanctification of family relationships. Rev Relig Res. 2003;44(3):220–236. doi:10.2307/3512384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherkat DE. Religious Intermarriage in The United States: trends, Patterns, and Predictors. Soc Sci Res. 2004;33(4):606–625. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2003.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer EL. The role of religion in union formation: an economic perspective. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2004;23(2):161–185. doi:10.1023/B:POPU.0000019917.00860.ba
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• du Toit T. Marriage in the 21st Century: Attitudes and Perceptions of University Students [Masters Dissertation]. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Express; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer-Pennington ME, Pennington J, Spink C. Students’ expectations and optimism toward marriage as a function of parental divorce. In: Divorce and the Next Generation: Perspectives for Young Adults in the New Millennium. Routledge; 2018:71–87.
   Google Scholar
• Wright CL. Family structure variations and intimate relationships of the children involved. New School Psychol Bull. 2010;8(1):15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Fagan PF, Churchill A. The effects of divorce on children. Marri Res. 2012;1:1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Manning WD, Longmore MA, Giordano PC. The changing institution of marriage: adolescents’ expectations to cohabit and to marry. J Marriage Fam. 2007;69(3):559–575. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00392.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherlin AJ. The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. J Marriage Fam. 2004;66(4):848–861. doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00058.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson VI. Adult children of divorce and relationship education: implications for counselors and counselor educators. Fam J. 2011;19(1):22–29. doi:10.1177/1066480710387494
   Google Scholar