Students’ Isolation Challenges in Blended EFL Learning During COVID-19: How Can Social Presence and Interaction Help Develop Sense of Community?

References

• Pelletier K, Brown M, Brooks DC, et al. 2021 EDUCAUSE horizon report. Teaching and learning edition; 2021. Available from: https://www.educause.edu/horizon-report-teaching-and-learning-2021. Accessed October 19, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Ramalingam S, Yunus M, Spigel D, Ramalingam SS. Blended learning strategies for sustainable English as a second language education: a systematic review. American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting. 2022;42:1–17. doi:10.1200/EDBK_360253
   Google Scholar
• Gacs A, Goertler S, Spasova S. Planned online language education versus crisis-prompted online language teaching: lessons for the future. Foreign Lang Ann. 2020;53(2):380–392. doi:10.1111/flan.12460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Wang Y, Yang L, Wang C. Suspending classes without stopping learning: China’s education emergency management policy in the COVID-19 outbreak. J Risk Financ Manag. 2020;13(3):55. doi:10.3390/jrfm13030055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsegay SM, Ashraf MA, Perveen S, Zegergish MZ. Online teaching during COVID-19 pandemic: teachers’ experiences from a Chinese University. Sustain. 2022;14(1):1–13. doi:10.3390/su14010568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasheed RA, Kamsin A, Abdullah NA. Challenges in the online component of blended learning: a systematic review. Comput Educ. 2020;144:103701. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlain L, Lacina J, Bintz WP, Jimerson JB, Payne K, Zingale R. Literacy in lockdown: learning and teaching during COVID-19 school closures. Read Teach. 2020;74(3):243–253. doi:10.1002/trtr.1961
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham CR. Blended learning systems: definition, current trends, and future directions. Handb Blended Learn Glob Perspect Local Des. 2006;2006:3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Satar HM, Akcan S. Pre-service EFL teachers’ online participation, interaction, and social presence. Lang Learn Technol. 2018;22(1):157–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlQhtani A, AlSwedan N, Almulhim A, et al. Online versus classroom teaching for medical students during COVID-19: measuring effectiveness and satisfaction. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):1–7. doi:10.1186/s12909-021-02888-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taghizadeh M, Hajhosseini F. Investigating a blended learning environment: contribution of attitude, interaction, and quality of teaching to satisfaction of graduate students of TEFL. Asia-Pacific Educ Res. 2020;30(5):459–469. doi:10.1007/s40299-020-00531-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amro DK. The impact of COVID-19 lockdown on design students’ performance case study in the UAE. Int J Art Des Educ. 2022;41(1):108–124. doi:10.1111/jade.12378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nami F, Marandi SS, Sotoudehnama E. Interaction in a discussion list: an exploration of cognitive, social, and teaching presence in teachers’ online collaborations. ReCALL. 2018;30(3):375–398. doi:10.1017/S0958344017000349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurucova Z, Medová J, Tirpakova A. The effect of different online education modes on the English language learning of media studies students. Cogent Educ. 2018;5(1):1–13. doi:10.1080/2331186X.2018.1523514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo N, Zhang M, Qi D. Effects of different interactions on students’ sense of community in e-learning environment. Comput Educ. 2017;115:153–160. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Tseng WT, Chen YL, Cheng HF. Classroom interactions in the target language: learners’ perceptions, willingness to communicate, and communication behavior. Asia-Pacific Educ Res. 2020;29(5):393–404. doi:10.1007/s40299-019-00492-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteside AL. Introducing the social presence model to explore online and blended learning experiences. J Asynchronous Learn Netw. 2015;19(2):4–5. doi:10.24059/olj.v19i2.453
   Google Scholar
• Carlson ER. COVID-19 and educational engagement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;78(7):1049–1051. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2020.04.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters T, Simkiss NJ, Snowden RJ, Gray NS. Secondary school students’ perception of the online teaching experience during COVID-19: the impact on mental wellbeing and specific learning difficulties. Br J Educ Psychol. 2021;92:843–860. doi:10.1111/bjep.12475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel Latif MMM. Coping with COVID-19-related online English teaching challenges: teacher educators’ suggestions. ELT J. 2022;76(1):20–33. doi:10.1093/elt/ccab074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basri S, Hawaldar IT, Nayak R, Rahiman HU. Do academic stress, burnout and problematic internet use affect perceived learning? Evidence from India during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustain. 2022;14(3). doi:10.3390/su14031409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomicka L. Creating and sustaining virtual language communities. Foreign Lang Ann. 2020;53(2):306–313. doi:10.1111/flan.12456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiock HS. Designing a community of inquiry in online courses. Int Rev Res Open Distance Learn. 2020;21(1):112–133. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer S, MacIntyre P, Gregersen T, Talbot K. Positive language education: combining positive education and language education. Theory Pract Second Lang Acquis. 2018;4(2):11–31.
   Google Scholar
• Wang DC, Jeng YL, Chiang CM, Huang YM. Exploring the cohesion of classroom community from the perspectives of social presence and social capital. J Comput High Educ. 2021;34(1):39–59. doi:10.1007/s12528-021-09277-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewaele JM, Chen X, Padilla AM, Lake J. The flowering of positive psychology in foreign language teaching and acquisition research. Front Psychol. 2019;10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joe HK, Hiver P, Al-Hoorie AH. Classroom social climate, self-determined motivation, willingness to communicate, and achievement: a study of structural relationships in instructed second language settings. Learn Individ Differ. 2017;53:133–144. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phirangee K, Malec A. Othering in online learning: an examination of social presence, identity, and sense of community. Distance Educ. 2017;38(2):160–172. doi:10.1080/01587919.2017.1322457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haar M. Increasing sense of community in higher education nutrition courses using technology. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2018;50(1):96–99.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2017.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidlich J, Bastiaens TJ. Explaining social presence and the quality of online learning with the SIPS model. Comput Human Behav. 2017;72:479–487. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Douglas Fir Group. A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. Mod Lang J. 2016;100:19–47. doi:10.1111/modl.12301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baisley-Nodine E, Ritzhaupt AD, Antonenko PD. Exploring social presence within an online course using Twitter. E-Learning Digit Media. 2018;15(5):235–253. doi:10.1177/2042753018786004
   Google Scholar
• Lowenthal PR, Snelson C. In search of a better understanding of social presence: an investigation into how researchers define social presence. Distance Educ. 2017;38(2):141–159. doi:10.1080/01587919.2017.1324727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paquette P. Instructing the instructors: training instructors to use social presence cues in online courses. J Educ Online. 2016;13(1):80–108. doi:10.9743/JEO.2016.1.4
   Google Scholar
• Garrison DR. E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice. Second ed. Routledge; 2011. doi:10.4324/9780203838761
   Google Scholar
• Garrison DR, Anderson T, Archer W. The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: a retrospective. Internet High Educ. 2010;13(1–2):5–9. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swan K. Building learning communities in online courses: the importance of interaction. Educ Commun Inf. 2002;2(1):23–49. doi:10.1080/1463631022000005016
   Google Scholar
• Shackelford JL, Maxwell M. Sense of community in graduate online education: contribution of learner to learner interaction. Int Rev Res Open Distance Learn. 2012;13(4):228–249. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pishghadam R, Derakhshan A, Zhaleh K, Al-Obaydi LH. Students’ willingness to attend EFL classes with respect to teachers’ credibility, stroke, and success: a cross-cultural study of Iranian and Iraqi students’ perceptions. Curr Psychol. 2021. doi:10.1007/s12144-021-01738-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer S, Dörnyei Z. Engaging Language Learners in Contemporary Classrooms. Cambridge University Press; 2020. doi:10.1093/elt/ccab004
   Google Scholar
• Mercer S, Gkonou C. Relationships and good language teachers. In: Lessons from Good Language Teachers. Cambridge University Press; 2020:164–174. doi:10.1017/9781108774390.016
   Google Scholar
• Li C, Jiang G, Dewaele JM. Understanding Chinese high school students’ Foreign Language Enjoyment: validation of the Chinese version of the Foreign Language Enjoyment scale. System. 2018;76:183–196. doi:10.1016/j.system.2018.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie F, Derakhshan A, Conceptual A. Review of positive teacher interpersonal communication behaviors in the instructional context. Front Psychol. 2021;12:1–10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen BH, Chiou HH. Learning style, sense of community and learning effectiveness in hybrid learning environment. Interact Learn Environ. 2014;22(4):485–496. doi:10.1080/10494820.2012.680971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naidoo L, D’warte J, Gannon S, Jacobs R. Sociality, resilience and agency: how did young Australians experience online learning during COVID-19? Aust Educ Res. 2022;49(1):81–96. doi:10.1007/s13384-021-00500-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biocca F, Harms C, Burgoon JK. Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: review and suggested criteria. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 2003;12(5):456–480. doi:10.1162/105474603322761270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu CH, McIsaac M. The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. Int J Phytoremediation. 2002;21(1):131–150. doi:10.1207/S15389286AJDE1603_2
   Google Scholar
• Rettie R. Connectedness, awareness and social presence. Proc Presence. 2003;8:474–484.
   Google Scholar
• d’Alessio MA, Lundquist LL, Schwartz JJ, Pedone V, Pavia J, Fleck J. Social presence enhances student performance in an online geology course but depends on instructor facilitation. J Geosci Educ. 2019;67(3):222–236. doi:10.1080/10899995.2019.1580179
   Google Scholar
• Stranach M. Social Presence in Two Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): A Multiple Case Study. University of Calgary; 2017. doi:10.11575/PRISM/27816
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan ND, Cleveland-innes M, Garrison DR. Teaching in blended learning environments. Athabasca University Press; 2013. Available from: https://www.aupress.ca/books/120229-teaching-in-blended-learning-environments/. Accessed October 19, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan DW, Chavis DM. Sense of community: a definition and theory. J Community Psychol. 1986;14(1):6–23. doi:10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1<6::AID-JCOP2290140103>3.0.CO;2-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovai AP. Development of an instrument to measure classroom community. Internet High Educ. 2002;5(3):197–211. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00102-1
   Google Scholar
• Lomicka L, Lord G. Social presence in virtual communities of foreign language (FL) teachers. System. 2007;35(2):208–228. doi:10.1016/j.system.2006.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Yim SY, Hwang K. Expatriate elt teachers in Korea: participation and sense of belonging. ELT J. 2019;73(1):72–81. doi:10.1093/elt/ccy036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remesal A, Colomina R. Social presence and online collaborative small group work: a socioconstructivist account. Comput Educ. 2013;60(1):357–367. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore MG. Editorial: three types of interaction. Am J Distance Educ. 1989;3(2):1–7. doi:10.1080/08923648909526659
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Sellés N, Muñoz-Carril P-C, González-Sanmamed M, et al. Computer-supported collaborative learning: an analysis of the relationship between interaction, emotional support and online collaborative tools. Comput Educ. 2019;138:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Liu Q. Effects of online teaching presence on students’ interactions and collaborative knowledge construction. J Comput Assist Learn. 2020;36(3):370–382. doi:10.1111/jcal.12408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zydney JM, Denoyelles A, Kyeong-Ju Seo K. Creating a community of inquiry in online environments: an exploratory study on the effect of a protocol on interactions within asynchronous discussions. Comput Educ. 2012;58(1):77–87. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akcaoglu M, Lee E. Increasing social presence in online learning through small group discussions. Int Rev Res Open Distance Learn. 2016;17(3):1–17. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilliard LP, Stewart MK. Time well spent: creating a community of inquiry in blended first-year writing courses. Internet High Educ. 2019;41:11–24. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo YC, Walker AE, Belland BR, Schroder KEE, Kuo YT. A case study of integrating interwise: interaction, internet self-efficacy, and satisfaction in synchronous online learning environments. Int Rev Res Open Distance Learn. 2014;15(1):161–181. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao H, Sullivan KPH, Mellenius I. Participation, interaction and social presence: an exploratory study of collaboration in online peer review groups. Br J Educ Technol. 2014;45(5):807–819. doi:10.1111/bjet.12094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SJ, Huang K. Online interactions and social presence in online learning. J Interact Learn Res. 2018;29(1):113–128.
   Google Scholar
• YIlmaz R. Knowledge sharing behaviors in e-learning community: exploring the role of academic self-efficacy and sense of community. Comput Human Behav. 2016;63:373–382. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliphant T, Branch-Mueller J. Developing a sense of community and the online student experience. Educ Inf. 2016;32(4):307–321. doi:10.3233/EFI-160979
   Google Scholar
• Trespalacios J, Perkins R. Sense of community, perceived learning, and achievement relationships in an online graduate course. Turkish Online J Distance Educ. 2016;17(3):31–49. doi:10.17718/tojde.12984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang H, Su J, Construct A. Revalidation of the community of inquiry survey: empirical evidence for a general factor under a bifactor structure. Int Rev Res Open Distance Learn. 2021;22(4):22–40. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v22i4.5587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills J, Yates K, Harrison H, et al. Using a community of inquiry framework to teach a nursing and midwifery research subject: an evaluative study. Nurse Educ Today. 2016;43:34–39. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2016.04.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olpak YZ, Kiliç Çakmak E. Examining the reliability and validity of a Turkish version of the community of inquiry survey. Online Learn J. 2018;22(1):147–161. doi:10.24059/olj.v22i1.990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Z, Wang J, Wang Q, Kong L, Wu Y, Yang H. Verifying causal relationships among the presences of the Community of Inquiry framework in the Chinese context. Int Rev Res Open Distance Learn. 2017;18(6):213–230. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.3197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plonsky L, Oswald FL. How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Lang Learn. 2014;64(4):878–912. doi:10.1111/lang.12079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. 1999;6:1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Türel YK. Relationships between student perceived team learning experiences, team performance, and social abilities in a blended course setting. Internet High Educ. 2016;31:79–86. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law KMY, Geng S, Li T. Student enrollment, motivation and learning performance in a blended learning environment: the mediating effects of social, teaching, and cognitive presence. Comput Educ. 2019;136:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyei-Blankson L, Ntuli E, Donnelly H. Establishing the importance of interaction and presence to student learning in online environments. World J Educ Res. 2016;3(1):48. doi:10.22158/wjer.v3n1p48
   Google Scholar
• Wei R, Liu H, Wang S. Exploring L2 grit in the Chinese EFL context. System. 2020;93:102295. doi:10.1016/j.system.2020.102295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea P, Bidjerano T. Understanding distinctions in learning in hybrid, and online environments: an empirical investigation of the community of inquiry framework. Interact Learn Environ. 2013;21(4):355–370. doi:10.1080/10494820.2011.584320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar