1,230
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

The Severity of Cyberbullying Affects Bystander Intervention Among College Students: The Roles of Feelings of Responsibility and Empathy

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 893-903 | Received 24 Nov 2022, Accepted 09 Mar 2023, Published online: 21 Mar 2023

References

  • Zhong J, Zheng Y, Huang X, et al. Study of the influencing factors of cyberbullying among Chinese college students incorporated with digital citizenship: from the perspective of individual students. Front Psychol. 2021;12:621418. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.621418
  • Giumetti GW, Kowalski RM. Cyberbullying via social media and well-being. Curr Opin Psychol. 2022;45:101314. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101314
  • Chan TKH, Cheung CMK, Wong RYM. Cyberbullying on social networking sites: the crime opportunity and affordance perspectives. J Manage Inform Syst. 2019;36(2):574–609. doi:10.1080/07421222.2019.1599500
  • Ditch the Label. The annual bullying survey 2018; 2018. Available from: https://www.ditchthelabel.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/The-Annual-Bullying-Survey-2018-2.pdf. Accessed March 15, 2023.
  • Huang J, Zhong Z, Zhang H, Li L. Cyberbullying in social media and online games among Chinese college students and its associated factors. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(9):4819.
  • Patchin JW, Hinduja S. Cyberbullying: an update and synthesis on the research. In: Patchin JW, Hinduja S, editors. Cyberbullying Prevention and Response: Expert Perspectives. New York: Routledge; 2012:13–36.
  • Landoll RR, La Greca AM, Lai BS, Chan SF, Herge WM. Cyber victimization by peers: prospective associations with adolescent social anxiety and depressive symptoms. J Adolesc. 2015;42:77–86. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.04.002
  • Gahagan K, Vaterlaus JM, Frost LR. College student cyberbullying on social networking sites: conceptualization, prevalence, and perceived bystander responsibility. Comput Human Behav. 2016;55:1097–1105. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.019
  • Popovac M, Gill AS, Austin LH, Maposa R. Adults’ perceived severity and likelihood of intervening in cyberbullying. Int J Bullying Prevent. 2021. doi:10.1007/s42380-021-00112-8
  • Brody N, Vangelisti AL. Bystander intervention in cyberbullying. Commun Monogr. 2016;83(1):94–119. doi:10.1080/03637751.2015.1044256
  • Machackova H. Bystander reactions to cyberbullying and cyberaggression: individual, contextual, and social factors. Curr Opin Psychol. 2020;36:130–134. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.06.003
  • Wang S. Standing up or standing by: bystander intervention in cyberbullying on social media. New Media Soc. 2021;23(6):1379–1397. doi:10.1177/1461444820902541
  • Slonje R, Smith PK, Frisén A. The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Comput Human Behav. 2013;29(1):26–32. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.024
  • Jones LM, Mitchell KJ, Turner HA. Victim reports of bystander reactions to in-person and online peer harassment: a national survey of adolescents. J Youth Adolesc. 2015;44(12):2308–2320. doi:10.1007/s10964-015-0342-9
  • Luo A, Bussey K. The selectivity of moral disengagement in defenders of cyberbullying: contextual moral disengagement. Comput Human Behav. 2019;93:318–325. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.038
  • Machackova H, Pfetsch J. Bystanders’ responses to offline bullying and cyberbullying: the role of empathy and normative beliefs about aggression. Scand J Psychol. 2016;57(2):169–176. doi:10.1111/sjop.12277
  • Lenhart A, Madden M, Smith A, Purcell K, Zickuhr K. Teens, Kindness and Cruelty on Social Network Sites. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project; 2011:86.
  • Kazerooni F, Taylor SH, Bazarova NN, Whitlock J. Cyberbullying bystander intervention: the number of offenders and retweeting predict likelihood of helping a cyberbullying victim. J Comput-Mediat Comm. 2018;23(3):146–162. doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmy005
  • Rudnicki K, Vandebosch H, Voué P, Poels K. Systematic review of determinants and consequences of bystander interventions in online hate and cyberbullying among adults. Behav Inform Technol. 2022;1–18. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2022.2027013
  • Leonhard L, Rueß C, Obermaier M, Reinemann C. Perceiving threat and feeling responsible. How severity of hate speech, number of bystanders, and prior reactions of others affect bystanders’ intention to counterargue against hate speech on Facebook. SCM. 2018;7(4):555–579. doi:10.5771/2192-4007-2018-4-555
  • Obermaier M, Fawzi N, Koch T. Bystanding or standing by? How the number of bystanders affects the intention to intervene in cyberbullying. New Media Soc. 2016;18(8):1491–1507. doi:10.1177/1461444814563519
  • Bastiaensens S, Vandebosch H, Poels K, van Cleemput K, DeSmet A, de Bourdeaudhuij I; Cyberbullying on social network sites. An experimental study into bystanders’ behavioural intentions to help the victim or reinforce the bully. Comput Human Behav. 2014;31:259–271. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.036
  • Patterson LJ, Allan A, Cross D. Adolescent bystander behavior in the school and online environments and the implications for interventions targeting cyberbullying. J Sch Violence. 2017;16(4):361–375. doi:10.1080/15388220.2016.1143835
  • Latan B, Darley JM. The unresponsive bystander: why doesn’t he help? In: The Unresponsive Bystander. Appleton-Century Crofts; 1970:1–67.
  • Barlińska J, Szuster A, Winiewski M. Cyberbullying among adolescent bystanders: role of the communication medium, form of violence, and empathy. J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2013;23(1):37–51. doi:10.1002/casp.2137
  • Brewer G, Kerslake J. Cyberbullying, self-esteem, empathy and loneliness. Comput Human Behav. 2015;48:255–260. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.073
  • Feddes AR, Mann L, Doosje B. Increasing self-esteem and empathy to prevent violent radicalization: a longitudinal quantitative evaluation of a resilience training focused on adolescents with a dual identity. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2015;45(7):400–411. doi:10.1111/jasp.12307
  • Özkan Y, Gökçearslan-çiftçi E. The effect of empathy level on peer bullying in schools. Hum Soc Sci J. 2009;4(1):31–38.
  • Schacter HL, Greenberg S, Juvonen J. Who’s to blame?: the effects of victim disclosure on bystander reactions to cyberbullying. Comput Human Behav. 2016;57:115–121. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.018
  • Taylor SH, DiFranzo D, Choi YH, Sannon S, Bazarova NN. Accountability and empathy by design. Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact. 2019;3(CSCW):1–26. doi:10.1145/3359216
  • Barlińska J, Szuster A, Winiewski M. The role of short- and long-term cognitive empathy activation in preventing cyberbystander reinforcing cyberbullying behavior. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2015;18(4):241–244. doi:10.1089/cyber.2014.0412
  • Li W. The language of bullying: social issues on Chinese websites. Aggress Violent Beh. 2020;53:101453. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2020.101453
  • Hayes AF. PROCESS: a versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]; 2012. Available from: http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf. Accessed March 15, 2023.
  • Davis M. A Multidimensional Approach to Individual Differences in Empathy [Doctoral dissertation]. Retrieved from ProQuest Information & Learning, US. (UMI No. AAT 1981050664–001); 1980.
  • Zhan Z. The Relationship Between Grade, Gender Role, Human Orientation and Empathy. Taiwan Wan: Institute of Education, National Chengchi University; 1987.
  • Langos C. Cyberbullying: the shades of harm. Psychiat Psychol Law. 2015;22(1):106–123. doi:10.1080/13218719.2014.919643
  • Pfetsch J. Who is who in cyberbullying? Conceptual and empirical perspectives on bystanders in cyberbullying. In: Wright MF, editor. A Social-Ecological Approach to Cyberbullying. Hauppauge: Nova Publishing; 2016:121–149.
  • Notar CE, Padgett S, Roden J. Cyberbullying: a review of the literature. UJER. 2013;1(1):1–9. doi:10.13189/ujer.2013.010101