515
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Intervention on Mathematics Self-Efficacy: Solution-Focused Brief Therapy

, &
Pages 129-145 | Received 21 Aug 2023, Accepted 21 Oct 2023, Published online: 08 Jan 2024

References

  • Komarraju M, Nadler D. Self-efficacy and academic achievement: why do implicit beliefs, goals, and effort regulation matter? Learn Individ Differ. 2013;25:67–72. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.005
  • Strand cary MG, Clarke B, Doabler CT, Smolkowski K, Fien H, Baker SK. A practitioner implementation of a tier 2 first-grade mathematics intervention. Learn Disability Q. 2017;40(4):211–224. doi:10.1177/0731948717714715
  • Pajares F, Miller MD. Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: a path analysis. J Educ Psychol. 1994;86(2):193–203. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.2.193
  • Newsome WS. The impact of solution-focused brief therapy with at-risk junior high school students. Child Sch. 2005;27(2):83–90. doi:10.1093/cs/27.2.83
  • Zatloukal L, Žákovský D, Bezdíčková E. Utilizing metaphors in solution-focused therapy. Contemp Fam Ther. 2019;41(1):24–36. doi:10.1007/s10591-018-9468-8
  • Franklin C, Reddy SM. Solution-focused couple and family therapy. In: Lebow J, Chambers A, Breunlin D, editors. Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy. Switzerland: Springer, Cham; 2017:1–8.
  • de Shazer S, Dolan Y, Korman H, Trepper T, McCollum E, Insoo IK. More Than Miracles-the State of the Art of Solution Focused Brief Therapy. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2021.
  • Iveson C. Solution-focused brief therapy. Adv Psychiatric Treat. 2002;8(2):149–156. doi:10.1192/apt.8.2.149
  • Szlyk HS. Fostering Independence through an academic culture of social responsibility: a grounded theory for engaging at-risk students. Learn Environ Res. 2018;21(2):195–209. doi:10.1007/s10984-017-9245-x
  • Bond C, Woods K, Humphrey N, Symes W, Green L. Practitioner review: the effectiveness of solution focused brief therapy with children and families: a systematic and critical evaluation of the literature from 1990–2010. J Child Psychol Psyc. 2013;54(7):707–723. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12058
  • Bannink FP. Solution-focused brief therapy. J Contemp Psychother. 2007;37(2):87–94. doi:10.1007/s10879-006-9040-y
  • BoVee-Akyurek A, Erolin K, Chenail R. Ericksonian hypnotherapy resemblances in solution focused brief therapy. Contemp Fam Ther. 2020;42(4):408–421. doi:10.1007/s10591-020-09539-5
  • Kelly MS, Kim JS, Franklin C. Solution-Focused Brief Therapy in Schools: A 360-Degree View of the Research and Practice Principles. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
  • Kim JS, Franklin C. Solution-focused brief therapy in schools: a review of the outcome literature. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2009;31(4):464–470. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.10.002
  • Franklin C, Streeter CL, Kim JS, Tripodi SJ. The effectiveness of a solution-focused, public alternative school for dropout prevention and retrieval. Child Sch. 2007;29(3):133–144. doi:10.1093/cs/29.3.133
  • Froeschle JG, Smith RL, Ricard R. The efficacy of a systematic substance abuse program for adolescent females. Profess School Counsel. 2007;10(5):498–505. doi:10.1177/2156759X0701000507
  • Franklin C, Moore K, Hopson L. Effectiveness of solution-focused brief therapy in a school setting. Child Sch. 2008;30(1):15–26. doi:10.1093/cs/30.1.15
  • Sarvi Z, Ghazi M. Effectiveness of group counseling with Solution Focused (Brief) Therapy (SFBT) on increasing self-efficacy of fifth grade primary school female students. Mod Appl Sci. 2016;10(12):1–6. doi:10.5539/mas.v10n12p1
  • Neipp MC, Beyebach M, Sanchez‐Prada A, Delgado Álvarez MDC. Solution‐focused versus problem‐focused questions: differential effects of miracles, exceptions and scales. J Fam Ther. 2021;43(4):728–747. doi:10.1111/1467-6427.12345
  • Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191
  • Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1986.
  • Prat-Sala M, Redford P. Writing essays: does self-efficacy matter? The relationship between self-efficacy in reading and in writing and undergraduate students’ performance in essay writing. Educ Psychol-Uk. 2012;32(1):9–20. doi:10.1080/01443410.2011.621411
  • Sun X, Zhong F, Xin T, Kang C. Item response theory analysis of general self-efficacy scale for senior elementary school students in China. Curr Psychol. 2021;40(2):601–610. doi:10.1007/s12144-018-9982-8
  • Honicke T, Broadbent J. The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: a systematic review. Educ Res Rev Neth. 2016;17:63–84. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.11.002
  • Rozgonjuk D, Kraav T, Mikkor K, Orav-Puurand K, Täht K. Mathematics anxiety among STEM and social sciences students: the roles of mathematics self-efficacy, and deep and surface approach to learning. Ij Stem Ed. 2020;7(1):1–11. doi:10.1186/s40594-020-00246-z
  • Betz NE, Hackett G. The relationship of mathematics self-efficacy expectations to the selection of science-based college majors. J Vocat Behav. 1983;23(3):329–345. doi:10.1016/0001-8791(83)90046-5
  • Fast LA, Lewis JL, Bryant MJ, et al. Does math self-efficacy mediate the effect of the perceived classroom environment on standardized math test performance? J Educ Psychol. 2010;102(3):729–740. doi:10.1037/a0018863
  • You S, Kim EK, Lim SA, Dang M. Student and teacher characteristics on student math achievement. J Pac Rim Psychol. 2021;15:1834490921991428. doi:10.1177/1834490921991428
  • Peters ML. Examining the relationships among classroom climate, self-efficacy, and achievement in undergraduate mathematics: a multi-level analysis. Int J Sci Math Educ. 2013;11(2):459–480. doi:10.1007/s10763-012-9347-y
  • Hattie J, Jaeger RM, Bond L. Persistent methodological questions in educational testing. Rev Res Educ. 1999;24(1):393–446. doi:10.3102/0091732x024001393
  • Hung SP. Validating the creative self-efficacy student scale with a Taiwanese sample: an item response theory-based investigation. Think Skills Creat. 2018;27:190–203. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2018.02.006
  • Scherbaum CA, Cohen-Charash Y, Kern MJ. Measuring general self-efficacy: a comparison of three measures using item response theory. Educ Psychol Meas. 2006;66(6):1047–1063. doi:10.1177/0013164406288171
  • Park JY, Dedja K, Pliakos K, et al. Comparing the prediction performance of item response theory and machine learning methods on item responses for educational assessments. Behav Res Methods. 2023;55(4):2109–2124. doi:10.3758/s13428-022-01910-8
  • Yan Z. Objective measurement in psychological science: an overview of Rasch model. Adv Psychol Sci. 2010;18(08):1298. Chinese.
  • Boone WJ. Rasch analysis for instrument development: why, when, and how? CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016;15(4):rm4. doi:10.1187/cbe.16-04-0148
  • Fan CW, Yazdani F, Carstensen T, Bonsaksen T. Rasch analysis of the self-efficacy for therapeutic use of self questionnaire in Norwegian occupational therapy students. Scand J Occup Ther. 2020;28(4):274–284. doi:10.1080/11038128.2020.1726453
  • Nielsen T, Makransky G, Vang ML, Dammeyer J. How specific is specific self-efficacy? A construct validity study using Rasch measurement models. Stud Educ Eval. 2017;53:87–97. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.04.003
  • Wright BD, Stone MH. Best Test Design. Chicago, IL: MESA Press; 1979.
  • Lee JCK, Zhang Z, Yin H. Using multidimensional rasch analysis to validate the Chinese version of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ-CV). Eur J Psychol Educ. 2010;25(1):141–155. doi:10.1007/s10212-009-0009-6
  • Bong M, Hocevar D. Measuring self-efficacy: multitrait-multimethod comparison of scaling procedures. Appl Meas Educ. 2002;15(2):143–171. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1502_02
  • Bagaka’s JG. The role of teacher characteristics and practices on upper secondary school students’ mathematics self-efficacy in Nyanza Province of Kenya: a multilevel analysis. Int J Sci Math Educ. 2011;9(4):817–842. doi:10.1007/s10763-010-9226-3
  • Ministry of Education of China. 义务教育数学课程标准 (2022年版) [Mathematics curriculum standards for compulsory education(2022 Edition)]. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press; 2022. Chinese.
  • Yu W, Zhou S, Zhou Y. Measuring mathematics self-efficacy: multitrait-multimethod comparison. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1108536. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1108536
  • Newsome WS. Solution-focused brief therapy groupwork with at-risk junior high school students: enhancing the bottom line. Res Social Work Prac. 2004;14(5):336–343. doi:10.1177/1049731503262134
  • Dolan YM Living a wonderful life: a solution-focused approach to help clients move beyond a survivor identity. In: Workshop sponsored by the Brief Therapy Training Center of Canada, Toronto; 1995.
  • Chan M, Subramaniam R. Validation of a science concept inventory by Rasch analysis. In: Khine M, editor. Rasch Measurement: Applications in Quantitative Educational Research. Singapore: Springer; 2020:159–178.
  • Lamb RL, Vallett D, Annetta L. Development of a short-form measure of science and technology self-efficacy using Rasch analysis. J Sci Educ Technol. 2014;23(5):641–657. doi:10.1007/s10956-014-9491-y
  • Hendar K, Awalya A, Sunawan S. Solution-focused brief therapy group counseling to increase academic resilience and self-efficacy. J Bimbing Konsel. 2019;8(3):1–7.
  • Doyumgaç I, Tanhan A, Kiymaz MS. Understanding the most important facilitators and barriers for online education during COVID-19 through online photovoice methodology. Int J High Educ. 2021;10(1):166–190. doi:10.5430/ijhe.v10n1p166
  • Dari T, Fox C, Laux JM, et al. The development and validation of the Community-Based Participatory Research Knowledge Self-Assessment Scale (CBPR-KSAS): a Rasch Analysis. Meas Eval Couns Dev. 2023;56(1):64–79. doi:10.1080/07481756.2022.2034478
  • Dari T, Chan CD, Del Re J. Integrating culturally responsive group work in schools to foster the development of career aspirations among marginalized youth. J Special Group Work. 2021;46(1):75–89. doi:10.1080/01933922.2020.1856255
  • Tanhan A, Strack RW. Online photovoice to explore and advocate for Muslim biopsychosocial spiritual wellbeing and issues: ecological systems theory and ally development. Curr Psychol. 2020;39(6):2010–2025. doi:10.1007/s12144-020-00692-6