Psychometric Properties and Factor Structure of the Spanish Version of Technostress Scale (RED/TIC) in Ecuadorian Teachers During the COVID-19 Pandemic

References

• Borle P, Reichel K, Niebuhr F, Voelter-Mahlknecht S. How are techno-stressors associated with mental health and work outcomes? A systematic review of occupational exposure to information and communication technologies within the technostress model. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:8673. doi:10.3390/ijerph18168673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buira J. El teletrabajo. Entre el mito y la realidad. Vol. 44. Editorial UOC; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Rappaccioli R, Hernández F, Zamora A. Repercusiones en la salud a causa del teletrabajo. Rev Méd Sinerg. 2021;6(2):e641. doi:10.31434/rms.v6i2.641
   Google Scholar
• Velandia AMC, Cuervo ZEB, Rojas GYF. Efecto del teletrabajo en la salud de los trabajadores de las PYMES de la ciudad de Bogotá durante la pandemia del COVID-19. Rev Ing Mat Cienc Inf. 2023;10(19):73–82. doi:10.21017/rimci.2023.v10.n19.a130
   Google Scholar
• Instituto de Seguridad y Bienestar Laboral (ISBL). Informe ObservaPRL.org sobre Tecnoestrés. Available from: https://isbl.eu/observatorio-tecnoestres-2020/2020. Accessed December 4, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Aktan O, Toraman Ç. The relationship between technostress levels and job satisfaction of teachers within the COVID-19 period. J Educ Techno Soc. 2022;27(7):10429–10453. doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11027-2
   Google Scholar
• Solís García P, Lago Urbano R, Real Castelao S. Consequences of COVID-19 confinement for teachers: family-work interactions, technostress, and perceived organizational support. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(21):1–9. doi:10.3390/ijerph182111259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortez J. El estrés docente en tiempos de pandemia. Dilemas Contemp. 2021;6(1):1–11. doi:10.46377/dilemas.v8i.2560
   Google Scholar
• Fernández- Batanero JM, Román-Graván P, Reyes-Rebollo MM, Montenegro-Rueda M. Impact of educational technology on teacher stress and anxiety: a literature review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(2):1–13. doi:10.3390/ijerph18020548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia M, Solis L, Unda S. Technostress in university teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic. RevEDU. 2022;10(1):1–14. doi:10.37467/gkarevedu.v10.3036
   Google Scholar
• Estrada C, Vega A, Castillo D, Müller S, Boada J. Technostress of Chilean teachers in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and teleworking. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(10):1–14. doi:10.3390/ijerph18105458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrión N, Castelo W, Guerrero J, Criollo L, Jaramillo M. Factores que influyen en el tecnoestrés docente durante la pandemia por la COVID-19 en Ecuador. Rev Inf Cient. 2022;101(2):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Gañán-Moreno A, Correa-Pérez JJ, Ochoa-Duque SA, Orejuela-Gómez JJ. Tecnoestrés laboral derivado de la virtualidad obligatoria por prevención del COVID-19 en docentes universitarios de Medellín (Colombia). Trabalho (En)Cena. 2021;6(1):1–23. doi:10.20873/2526-1487e021003
   Google Scholar
• Estrada Araoz EG, Gallegos Ramos NA, Huaypar Loayza KH, Paredes Valverde Y, Quispe Herrera R. Tecnoestrés en estudiantes de una universidad pública de la Amazonía peruana durante la pandemia COVID-19. Rev Bras Educ Camp. 2021;6:e12777. doi:10.20873/uft.rbec.e12777
   Google Scholar
• Brod C. Technostress: The Human Cost of the Computer Revolution. USA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Weil M, Rosen L. Technostress: Coping with Technology @work, @home, @play. New York: J. Miley; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Salanova M, Llorens S, Cifre EY, Nogareda C. El tecnoestrés: concepto, medida e intervención psicosocial. Nota Técnica de Prevención 730 Insst Es; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Arenas Moreno A, Sanclemente Ibáñez FJ, Terán Tinedo V, Di Marco D. Spanish validation of the technostress creators scale. Psicothema. 2023;35(1):98–108. doi:10.7334/psicothema2022.198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang K, Shu Q, Tu Q. Technostress under different organizational environments: an empirical investigation. Comput Hum Behav. 2008;24(6):3002–3013. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei CF, Ngai WT. The double-edged nature of technostress on work performance: a research model and research agenda. In: 35th International Conference on Information Systems “Building a Better World Through Information Systems”; December 14–17, 2014; ICIS 2014. Auckland: Association for Information Systems; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Naval C, Sádaba-Chalezquer CY, Bringué X. Impacto de las Tecnologías de la Información y de la Comunicación (TIC) en las Relaciones Sociales de los Jóvenes Navarros. Navarra: Gobierno de Navarra. Instituto Navarro de Deporte y Juventud; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Salanova M, Llorens S, Cifre E. The dark side of technologies: technostress among users of information and communication technologies. Int J Psychol. 2013;48(3):422–436. doi:10.1080/00207594.2012.680460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Gómez M, Adelantado-Renau M, Beltran-Valls M. Tecnoestrés docente: la importancia de las competencias digitales y la edad. In: En Buzón OY, Romero C, editors. Metodologías activas con TIC en la educación del siglo XXI. Madrid: Dykinson; 2021:2171–2190.
   Google Scholar
• Syvänen A, Mäkiniemi JP, Syrjä S, Heikkilä-Tammi K, Viteli J. When does the educational use of ICT become a source of technostress for Finnish teachers? Seminar Net. 2016;12(2):95–109. doi:10.7577/seminar.2281
   Google Scholar
• Alcas Zapata N, Alarcón Diaz HH, Venturo Orbegoso CO, Alarcón Diaz MA, Fuentes Esparrell JA, López Echevarria TI. Tecnoestrés docente y percepción de la calidad de servicio en una universidad privada de Lima. Propós Represent. 2019;7(3):231–247. doi:10.20511/pyr2019.v7n3.388
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz V. Validez factorial de una escala de nivel de percepción de los factores psicosociales del Tecnoestrés en las pymes de Piedras Negras Coahuila. Rev RAITES. 2018;4(7):58–77.
   Google Scholar
• Gabr HM, Soliman SS, Allam HK, Raouf S. Effects of remote virtual work environment during COVID-19 pandemic on technostress among Menoufia University Staff, Egypt: a cross-sectional study. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021;28(38):53746–53753. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-14588-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou H, Chou C. A multigroup analysis of factors underlying teachers’ technostress and their continuance intention toward online teaching. Comput Educ. 2021;175:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohwer E, Flöther JC, Harth V, Mache S. Overcoming the “dark side” of technology-a scoping review on preventing and coping with work-related technostress. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(6):1–30. doi:10.3390/ijerph19063625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen L, Sears DY, Weil M. Computerphobia. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1987;19(2):167–179. doi:10.3758/BF03203781
   Google Scholar
• Rosen LY, Weil M. Measuring technophobia. In: A Manual for the Administration and Scoring of the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale, the Computer Thoughts Survey and the General Attitude Toward Computer Scale. USA: Chapman University; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Hudiburg R. Psychology of computer use: VII. Measuring technostress: computer-related stress. Psychol Rep. 1989a;64(3):767–772. doi:10.2466/pr0.1989.64.3.767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudiburg R. Psychology of computer use: XVII. The computer technology hassles scale: revision, reliability, and some correlates. Psychol Rep. 1989b;65(3_suppl2):1387–1394. doi:10.2466/pr0.1989.65.3f.1387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragu-Nathan T, Tarafdar M, Ragu-Nathan B, Tu Q. The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: conceptual development and empirical validation. Inf Syst R. 2008;19(4):417–433. doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimrod G. Technostress: measuring a new threat to well-being inlater life. Aging Ment Health. 2018;22(8):1080–1087. doi:10.1080/13607863.2017.1334037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlotto MS, Gonçalves SG. Tradução, adaptação e exploração de propriedades psicométricas da Escala de Tecnoestresse (RED/TIC). Psicol Estud. 2010;15(1):157–164. doi:10.1590/S1413-73722010000100018
   Google Scholar
• Penado Abilleira M, Rodicio-García ML, Ríos-de Deus MP, Mosquera-González MJ. Technostress in Spanish university teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Psychol. 2021;12:617650. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.617650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovibond P, Lovibond S. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the Beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995;33(3):335–343. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alagarsamy S, Sugirthan N, Mehrolia S, Elangovan N. Translation and validation of the Tamil version of depression anxiety stress scales-21. Affect Disord Rep. 2022;10:100398. doi:10.1016/j.jadr.2022.100398
   Google Scholar
• Antúnez Z, Vinet EV. Escalas de depresión, ansiedad y estrés (DASS-21): validación de la versión abreviada en estudiantes universitarios chilenos. Ter Psico. 2012;30(3):49–55. doi:10.4067/S0718-48082012000300005
   Google Scholar
• Kakemam E, Navvabi E, Albelbeisi AH, Saeedikia F, Rouhi A, Majidi S. Psychometric properties of the Persian version of Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 Items (DASS-21) in a sample of health professionals: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):1–9. doi:10.1186/s12913-022-07514-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–2194. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dueber DM. Bifactor Indices Calculator: A Microsoft Excel-Based Tool to Calculate Various Indices Relevant to Bifactor CFA Models. Kentucky: University of Kentucky; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington D. Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Lloret-Segura S, Ferreres-Traver A, Hernandez-Baeza A, Tomas-Marco I. Exploratory item factor analysis: a practical guide revised and updated. An de Psicol. 2014;30(3):1151–1169. doi:10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne BM. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. 3rd ed. Routledge; 2016. doi:10.4324/9781315757421
   Google Scholar
• Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6(1):1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez A, Reise SP, Haviland MG. Evaluating bifactor models: calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychol Methods. 2016;21(2):137–150. doi:10.1037/met0000045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehseen S, Ramayah T, Sajilan S. Testing and controlling for common method variance: a review of available methods. J Manag Sci. 2017;4(2):142–168. doi:10.20547/jms.2014.1704202
   Google Scholar
• Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Model Struct Equat. 2002;9:233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne B. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Reise SP, Bonifay WE, Haviland MG. Scoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality. J Pers Assess. 2013;95(2):129–140. doi:10.1080/00223891.2012.725437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnick DL, Bornstein MH. Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: the state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Dev Rev. 2016;41:71–90. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villavicencio EY, Cazares M. Adaptación y validación de la escala de tecnoadicción del cuestionario red-tecnoestrés, en una población laboral mexicana. Rev Iberoam. 2021;29(1):1–17. doi:10.48102/pi.v29i1.176
   Google Scholar
• Eidman L, Basualdo Felleau SE. Adaptación y validación de la escala RED-tecnoestrés en población de estudiantes universitarios argentinos. Academo. 2021;8(2):178–188. doi:10.30545/academo.2021.jul-dic.7
   Google Scholar
• Lambert EG, Altheimer I, Hogan NL. An exploratory examination of a gendered model of the effects of role stressors. Women Crim Justice. 2010;20(3):193–217. doi:10.1080/08974454.2010.490473
   Google Scholar
• Días Pocinho M, Costa García J. Impacto psicosocial de la tecnología de información y comunicación (tic): tecnoestrés, daños físicos y satisfacción laboral. Acta Colomb Psicol. 2008;11(2):127–139.
   Google Scholar
• Villavicencio-Ayub E, Ibarra Aguilar DG, Calleja N. Technostress in the Mexican population and its relationship with sociodemographic and labor variables. Psicogente. 2020;23(44):27–53.
   Google Scholar
• Angelucci L, De Abreu Y. Influencia de la satisfacción con los servicios, las preocupaciones acerca de la COVID-19, la valoración de la COVID-19, el sexo y la edad sobre la salud mental en estudiantes y docentes venezolanos. Analogías del Comportamiento. 2021;18:83–99.
   Google Scholar
• Quesada BC, Muñoz VZ, Tomás MSA. El uso de tecnologías de asistencia sanitaria digital por parte de la población mayor desde una perspectiva de género e intrageneracional. Teknokultura. 2021;18(2):103–113. doi:10.5209/tekn.74199
   Google Scholar
• Cai Z, Fan XY, Du J. Género y actitudes hacia el uso de la tecnología: un metanálisis. Comput Educ. 2017;105:1–13. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grande-de-Prado M, Cañón-Rodríguez R, García-Martín S, Cantón-Mayo I. Competencia digital: docentes en formación y resolución de problemas. Educar. 2021;57(2):381–396. doi:10.5565/rev/educar.1159
   Google Scholar