Do Smartphone Addiction and Self-Regulation Failures Affect Students’ Academic Life Satisfaction? The Role of Students’ Mind Wandering and Cognitive Failures

References

• Kao PC. The interrelationship of loneliness, smartphone addiction, sleep quality, and students’ attention in English as a Foreign Language Class. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(4):3460. doi:10.3390/ijerph20043460
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sánchez-Cardona I, Ortega-Maldonado A, Salanova M, Martínez IM. Learning goal orientation and psychological capital among students: a pathway to academic satisfaction and performance. Psychol Schools. 2021;58(7):1432–1445. doi:10.1002/pits.22505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elshaer A, Huang R. Perceived value within an international hospitality learning environment: antecedents and outcomes. J Hospit Leis Sport Tour Educ. 2023;32(C):100429. doi:10.1016/j.jhlste.2023.100429
   Google Scholar
• Samaha M, Hawi NS. Relationships among smartphone addiction, stress, academic performance, and satisfaction with life. Comput Human Behav. 2016;57:321–325. doi:10.1016/J.CHB.2015.12.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko JH, Kim SM. The Influence of smartphone dependency on the life satisfaction of adolescents—With a focus on the mediating effect of aggression. J Commun Welf. 2020;75(4):139–164. doi:10.15300/jcw.2020.75.4.139
   Google Scholar
• Lim SA. Relationship Between Korean adolescents’ dependence on smartphones, peer relationships, and life satisfaction. Child Youth Care Forum. 2023;52:603–618. doi:10.1007/s10566-022-09703-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twenge JM, Martin GN, Campbell WK. Decreases in psychological well-being among American adolescents after 2012 and links to screen time during the rise of smartphone technology. Emotion. 2018;18(6):765–780. doi:10.1037/emo0000403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollis RB, Was CA. Mind wandering, control failures, and social media distractions in online learning. Learn Instruction. 2016;42:104–112. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killingsworth MA, Gilbert DT. A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science. 2010;330(6006):932. doi:10.1126/science.1192439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McVay JC, Kane MJ. Why does working memory capacity predict variation in reading comprehension? On the influence of mind wandering and executive attention. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012;141(2):302–320. doi:10.1037/a0025250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kum BH, Main EA, Cheung RY. Cross-lagged relations between delayed actions and the wandering mind. Pers Individ Dif. 2024;217:112448. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2023.112448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fell J, Chaieb L, Hoppe C. Mind wandering in anxiety disorders: a status report. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023;155:105432. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smallwood J, Schooler JW. The science of mind wandering: empirically navigating the stream of consciousness. Annual Rev Psychol. 2015;66:487–518. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall JG, Oswald FL, Beier ME. Mind-wandering, cognition, and performance: a theory-driven meta-analysis of attention regulation. Psychol Bull. 2014;140(6):1411. doi:10.1037/a0037428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dane E. Where is my mind? Theorizing mind wandering and its performance-related consequences in organizations. Acad Manage Rev. 2018;43(2):179–197. doi:10.5465/amr.2015.0196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McVay JC, Kane MJ. Conducting the train of thought: working memory capacity, goal neglect, and mind wandering in an executive-control task. J Exper Psychol. 2009;35(1):196–204. doi:10.1037/a0014104
   Google Scholar
• Smallwood J, McSpadden M, Schooler JW. When attention matters: the curious incident of the wandering mind. Mem Cognit. 2008;36:1144–1150. doi:10.3758/MC.36.6.1144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smallwood J. Why the global availability of mind wandering necessitates resource competition.2011: reply to McVay and Kane. Psychol Bull. 2010;136(2):202–207. doi:10.1037/a0018673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox KCR, Christoff K. Metacognitive facilitation of spontaneous thought processes: when metacognition helps the wandering mind find its way. In: The Cognitive Neuroscience of Metacognition. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2014:293–319.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang MX, Wu AM. Effects of smartphone addiction on sleep quality among Chinese university students: the mediating role of self-regulation and bedtime procrastination. Addict Behav. 2020;111:106552. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malaeb D, Akel M, Salameh P, Hallit S, Obeid S. Boredom proneness, loneliness, and smartphone addiction among Lebanese young adults: the mediating role of depression, anxiety, and stress. Prim Care Comp CNS Disord. 2022;24(6):43747. doi:10.4088/PCC.21m03092
   Google Scholar
• Robertson IH, Manlya T, Andradea J, Baddeleya BT, Yienda J. `Oops!’: performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia. 1997;35(6):747–758. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00015-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susmitha TS, Rao SJ, Doshi D. Influence of smartphone addiction on sleep and mental wellbeing among dental students. Clin Epidemiol Global Health. 2024;25:101447. doi:10.1016/j.cegh.2023.101447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens MJE. Is the smartphone a performance killer?: The effect of the frequency and intrusiveness of smartphone alerts on the task performance of University students. [Master’s thesis]. University of Twente;. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• van Vugt M, Taatgen N, Sackur J, Bastian M. Modeling mind-wandering: a tool to better understand distraction. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling. Groningen: University of Groningen; 2015:252.
   Google Scholar
• Nurgitz R. Mind Wandering and Academic Success: Insight into Student Learning and Engagement. [Electronic theses and dissertations]. University of Windsor; 2019. Available from: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/7828. Accessed March 11, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth N, McMillan BD, Brewer GA, Spillers GJ. Everyday attention failures: an individual differences investigation. J Exp Psychol. 2012;38(6):1765–1772. doi:10.1037/a0028075
   Google Scholar
• Marzouk A. Egypt’s image as a tourist destination: an exploratory analysis of DMO’s social media platforms. Leisure/Loisir. 2022;46(2):255–291. doi:10.1080/14927713.2021.1971554
   Google Scholar
• Junco R. The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement. Comput Educ. 2012;58:162–171. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood E, Zivcakova L, Gentile P, Archer K, De Pasquale D, Nosko A. Examining the impact of off-task multi-tasking with technology on real-time classroom learning. Comput Educ. 2012;58(1):365–374. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris B, Regan T, Schueler J, Fields SA. Problematic mobile phone and smartphone use scales: a systematic review. Front Psychol. 2020;11:672. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00672
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam NL, Alzahri FB, Cik Soh S, Abu Bakar N, Mohamad Kamal NA. Self-Regulated Learning and Online Learning: a Systematic Review. In: Badioze Zaman H, Smeaton AF, Shih TK, et al. editors. Advances in Visual Informatics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Castonguay A, Miquelon P, Boudreau F. Self-regulation resources and physical activity participation among adults with type 2 diabetes. Health Psychol Open. 2018;5(1):2055102917750331. doi:10.1177/2055102917750331
   Google Scholar
• Balkis M, Duru E. Procrastination, self-regulation failure, academic life satisfaction, and affective well-being: underregulation or misregulation form. Eur J Psychol Educ. 2016;31(3):439–459. doi:10.1007/S10212-015-0266-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annette L, Barbara M. Motivational regulation strategies, academic self-concept, and cognitive learning strategies of university students: does academic self-concept play an interactive role? Eur J Psychol Educ. 2021;2021:1–20. doi:10.1007/S10212-021-00583-9
   Google Scholar
• Vanessa R, Frederic G, Ursula O, Xavier C. Internet and Mobile Phone Addiction. IGI Global; 2015. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-8239-9.CH066
   Google Scholar
• Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD, Binder JF. Internet addiction in students: prevalence and risk factors. Computers in Human Behavior. 2013;29(3):959–966. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Peng Y, Luo XS, et al. Mobile phone addiction and cognitive failures in Chinese adolescents: the role of rumination and mindfulness. J Psychol Afr. 2021;31(1):49–55. doi:10.1080/14330237.2020.1871239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow MA, Wrosch C, Mcgrath JJ. Goal adjustment capacities and quality of life: a meta-analytic review. J Person. 2020;88(2):307–323. doi:10.1111/jopy.12492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Schmeichel BJ, Vohs KD. Self-regulation and the executive function: the self as controlling agent. In: Kruglanski A, Higgins E, editors. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford; 2007:516–539.
   Google Scholar
• Duru E, Duru S, Balkis M. Analysis of relationship among burnout, academic achievement and self-regulation. Educ Sci. 2014;14(2):1274–1284. doi:10.12738/estp.2014.4.2050
   Google Scholar
• Kuang-Tsan C, Fu-Yuan H. Study on relationship among university students’ life stress, smart mobile phone addiction, and life satisfaction. J Adult Dev. 2017;24:109–118. doi:10.1007/s10804-016-9250-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paricio J. Students as customers: a paradigm shift in higher education. Deb J Cult Power Soc. 2017;131(3):137–149. doi:10.28939/iam.debats-en.2017-11
   Google Scholar
• Cavallone M, Ciasullo MV, Douglas J, Palumbo R. Framing higher education quality from a business perspective: setting the conditions for value co- creation. Stud Higher Educ. 2021;46(6):1099–1111. doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1672644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presti AL, Capone V, Aversano A, Akkermans J. Career competencies and career success: on the roles of employability activities and academic satisfaction during the school-to-work transition. J Car Develop. 2022;49(1):107–125. doi:10.1177/0894845321992536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tessema M, Ready K, Yu W. Factors affecting college students’ satisfaction with major curriculum: evidence from nine years of data. Int J Humanities Social Sci. 2012;2:2.
   Google Scholar
• Lent R, Singley D, Sheu H, Schmidt JA, Schmidt L. Relation of Social-Cognitive Factors to Academic Satisfaction in Engineering Student. J Career Assess. 2007;15(1):87–97. doi:10.1177/1069072706294518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlain SR, Lochner C, Stein DJ, et al. Behavioural addiction—a rising tide? Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016;26(5):841–855. doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.08.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayak JK. Relationship among smartphone usage, addiction, academic performance and the moderating role of gender: a study of higher education students in India. Comput Educ. 2018;123:164–173. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford M, Håkansson A. Problem gambling, associations with comorbid health conditions, substance use, and behavioural addictions: opportunities for pathways to treatment. PLoS One. 2020;15(1):e0227644. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0227644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisen SS, Deshpande YM. Understanding internet addiction: a comprehensive review. Mental Health Rev J. 2018;23(3):165–184. doi:10.1108/MHRJ-07-2017-0023
   Google Scholar
• Chancellor S, Nitzburg G, Hu A, Zampieri F, De choudhury M. Discovering alternative treatments for opioid use recovery using social media. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems; 2019:1–15.‏
   Google Scholar
• Yau YH, Potenza MN. Gambling disorder and other behavioral addictions: recognition and treatment. Harv Rev Psych. 2015;23(2):134–146. doi:10.1097/HRP.0000000000000051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumitrescu M, Dumitrescu N, Turliuc Ş. The social media addiction: what have we learned so far?–A review. BRAIN Br Res Artif Intellig Neurosci. 2023;14(1):117–137. doi:10.18662/brain/14.1/410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panova T, Carbonell X. Is smartphone addiction really an addiction? J Behav Addic. 2018;7(2):252–259. doi:10.1556/2006.7.2018.49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumuer E, Kaşıkcı DN. The role of smartphones in college students’ mind-wandering during learning. Comput Educ. 2022;190:104616. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunday OJ, Adesope OO, Maarhuis PL. The effects of smartphone addiction on learning: a meta-analysis. Comput Hum Behav Rep. 2021;4:100114. doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100114
   Google Scholar
• Billieux J, Maurage P, Lopez-Fernandez O, et al. Can disordered mobile phone use be considered a behavioral addiction? An update on current evidence and a comprehensive model for future research. Curr Addict Rep. 2015;2:156–162. doi:10.1007/s40429-015-0054-y
   Google Scholar
• Lin Y-H, Chiang C-L, Lin P-H, et al. Proposed diagnostic criteria for smartphone addiction. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e0163010. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang LJ. An empirical study on the construction of school motto culture in china’s universities. J Part Sch Fujian Provin Committ Commu Part Chin. 2018;2:116–120.
   Google Scholar
• Norville GA. Smartphone Addiction, Use Purpose, and The Wandering Mind. [Master Thesis]. Wayne State University; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Barashdi H, Bouazza A, Jabur N. Smartphone addiction among university undergraduates: a literature review. J Sci Res Rep. 2015;4(3):210–225. doi:10.9734/JSRR/2015/12245
   Google Scholar
• Elshaer A, Huang R, Marzouk A. Tourists’ selfies storytelling: preferences, intentions, and concerns for practice in the tourism and hospitality industry. J Vacat Mark. 2022;2022:1–20. doi:10.1177/13567667221145712
   Google Scholar
• Stothart C, Mitchum A, Yehnert C. The attentional cost of receiving a cell phone notification. J Exp Psychol. 2015;41(4):893–897. doi:10.1037/xhp0000100
   Google Scholar
• Sparrow B, Liu J, Wegner DM. Google effects on memory: cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science. 2011;333(6043):476–478. doi:10.1126/science.1207745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilmer HH, Chein JM. Mobile technology habits: patterns of association among device usage, intertemporal preference, impulse control, and reward sensitivity. Psychonomic Bull Rev. 2016;23(5):1607–1614. doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1011-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr N, Pennycook G, Stolz JA, Fugelsang JA. The brain in your pocket: evidence that Smartphones are used to supplant thinking. Computers in Human Behavior. 2015;48:473–480. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huey M, Giguere D. The impact of smartphone use on course comprehension and psychological well-being in the college classroom. Innov High Educ. 2022;48:527–537. doi:10.1007/s10755-022-09638-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Džubur A, Koso-Drljević M, Lisica D. Understanding cognitive failures through psychosocial variables in daily life of students. J Evol Med Den Sci. 2020;9(45):3382–3386. doi:10.14260/jemds/2020/743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizat Beha Human Dec Proc. 1991;50(2):248–287. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L. The role of students’ self-regulated learning, grit, and resilience in second language learning. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021;12:800488. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.800488
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Montroy JJ, Bowles RP, Skibbe LE. The effect of peers’ self-regulation on preschooler’s self-regulation and literacy growth. J App Develop Psycholo. 2016;46:73–83. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2016.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tangney JP, Baumeister RF, Boone AL. High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. J Person. 2004;72:271–324. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muraven M. Autonomous self-control is less depleting. J Res Personality. 2008;42(3):763–770. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2007.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman BJ. Attaining self-regulation: a social cognitive perspective. In: Boekaerts M, Pintrich PR, Zeidner M, editors. Handbook of Self-Regulation. San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press; 2000:13–39. doi:10.1016/B978012109890-2/50031-7
   Google Scholar
• Hassan AM, Bala MM, Mannir MS, Kareem WB. Self-regulatory learning and active learning approaches on students of technical college psychomotor achievement in furniture craft. Indian J Vocat Educ. 2020;2020:26–28.
   Google Scholar
• Krönke KM, Wolff M, Mohr H, et al. Monitor yourself! Deficient error-related brain activity predicts real-life self-control failures. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018;18:622–637. doi:10.3758/s13415-018-0593-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuh Y, Eralp B. A structural equation modeling analysis of relationships among university students’ readiness for e-learning, self-regulation skills, satisfaction, and academic achievement. Res Pract Technol Enhanc Learn. 2021;2021:1. doi:10.1186/S41039-021-00162-Y
   Google Scholar
• Teng MF, Ying Z. Assessing self-regulated writing strategies, self-efficacy, task complexity, and performance in English academic writing. Assess Writ. 2023;57:100728. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasyilah W, Yusrizal Y, Suhrawardi I. Application of self-directed learning model to improve student’s independence and critical thinking skills. J Penel Pend IPA. 2021;7(4):651–659. doi:10.29303/JPPIPA.V7I4.784
   Google Scholar
• Sun JC-Y, Rueda R. Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: their impact on student engagement in distance education. Brit J Educ Technol. 2012;43(2):191–204. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park S, Kim NH. University students’ self-regulation, engagement and performance in flipped learning. Europ J Train Dev. 2022;46(1/2):22–40. doi:10.1108/EJTD-08-2020-0129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotoman V, Davies A, Kawagoe N, et al. Un (COIL) ing the pandemic: active and affective learning in times of Covid-19. Polit Sci Politics. 2022;55(1):188–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen B, Hutchinson A, Lowe G, et al. The impact of covid-19 on psychosocial well-being and learning for Australian nursing and midwifery undergraduate students: a cross-sectional survey. Nurse Educ Prac. 2022;58:103275. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews-Hanna J, Smallwood R, Spreng RN, et al. The default network and self-generated thought: component processes, dynamic control, and clinical relevance. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2014;1316(1):29–52. doi:10.1111/nyas.12360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khayretdinova M. Mind Wandering in a Smartphone World: the Impact of Pervasive Smartphone Usage on Mind Wandering and Attentional Restoration. [Master’s thesis]. Harvard University Division of Continuing Education; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Markowitz DM, Hancock JT, Bailenson JN, Reeves B. Psychological and physiological effects of applying self-control to the mobile phone. PLoS One. 2019;14(11):e0224464. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0224464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloitte. Global mobile consumer survey, US edition: overview of results; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Mendoza JS, Pody BC, Lee SK, McDonough IM. The effect of cellphones on attention and learning: the influences of time, distraction, and nomophobia. Computers in Human Behavior. 2018;86:52–60. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward AF, Duke K, Gneezy A, Bos MW. Brain drain: the mere presence of one’s own smartphone reduces available cognitive capacity. J Assoc Cons Res. 2017;2(2):140–154. doi:10.1086/691462
   Google Scholar
• Junco R, Cotten SR. A 4 U: the relationship between multitasking and academic performance. Comput Educ. 2012;59(2):505–514. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton JT, Elliott EM, Eaves SD, Exner AL. The distracting effects of a ringing cell phone: an investigation of the laboratory and the classroom setting. J Environ Psychol. 2009;29(4):513–521. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billore S, Anisimova T, Vrontis D. Self-regulation and goal-directed behavior: a systematic literature review, public policy recommendations, and research agenda. J Busin Res. 2023;156:113435. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majid AS. Cognitive failure among students of the mathematics department in college of basic education. J Pedag Invent Pract. 2022;8:80–89.
   Google Scholar
• van der Linden D, Frese M, Sonnentag S. The impact of mental fatigue on exploration in a complex computer task: rigidity and loss of systematic strategies. Human Factors. 2003;45(3):483–494. doi:10.1518/hfes.45.3.483.27256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent DE, Cooper PF, FitzGerald P, Parkes KR. The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. Br J Clin Psychol. 1982;21(1):1–16. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1982.tb01421.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farah H, Zatmeh S, Toledo T, Wagner P. Impact of distracting activities and drivers’ cognitive failures on driving performance. Adv Transp Stud. 2016;1:71–82.
   Google Scholar
• Koechlin H, Coakley R, Schechter N, Werner C, Kossowsky J. The role of emotion regulation in chronic pain: a systematic literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2018;107:38–45. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2018.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong J-C, Hwang M-Y, Szeto E, Tsai CR, Kuo Y-C, Hsu W-Y. Internet cognitive failure relevant to self-efficacy, learning interest, and satisfaction with social media learning. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016;55(A):214–222. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong J-C, Tai K-H, Hwang M-Y, Kuo Y-C, Chen J-S. Internet cognitive failure relevant to users’ satisfaction with content and interface design to reflect continuance intention to use a government e-learning system. Computers in Human Behavior. 2017;66:353–362. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang SHH, Smith RA. Effectiveness of personal interaction in a learner-centered paradigm distance education class based on student satisfaction. J Res Technol Educ. 2008;40(4):407–426. doi:10.1080/15391523.2008.10782514
   Google Scholar
• Mittner M, Hawkins GE, Boekel W, Forstmann BU. A neural model of mind wandering. Trend Cognit Sci. 2016;20(8):570–578. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christoff K, Irving ZC, Fox KC, Spreng RN, Andrews-Hanna JR. Mind-wandering as spontaneous thought: a dynamic framework. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016;17:718–731. doi:10.1038/nrn.2016.113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carriere JSA, Seli P, Smilek D. Wandering in both mind and body: individual differences in mind wandering and inattention predict fidgeting. Canad J Experim Psychol. 2013;67(1):19–31. doi:10.1037/a0031438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schooler JW, Mrazek MD, Franklin MS, et al. The middle way: finding the balance between mindfulness and mind-wandering. In: Ross BH, editor. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. Vol. 60. Burlington: Academic Press; 2014:1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Mooneyham BW, Schooler JW. The costs and benefits of mind-wandering: a review. Canad J Experim Psychol. 2013;67(1):11–18. doi:10.1037/a0031569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schad DJ, Nuthmann A, Engbert R. Your mind wanders weakly, your mind wanders deeply: objective measures reveal mindless reading at different levels. Cognition. 2012;125:179–194. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosnefroy L, Fenouillet F, Maze C, Bonnefoy B. On the relationship between the forethought phase of self-regulated learning and self-regulation failure. Issu Educat Res. 2018;28(2):329–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon M, Kim DJ, Cho H, Yang S. The smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e83558. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez A, Caffò AO, Tinella L, Bosco A. The four factors of mind wandering questionnaire: content, construct, and clinical validity. Assessment. 2023;30(2):433–447. doi:10.1177/10731911211058688
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Paula JJ, Costa DS, Miranda DMD, Romano-Silva MA. Brazilian version of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ): cross-cultural adaptation and evidence of validity and reliability. Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry. 2017;40:312–315. doi:10.1590/1516-4446-2017-2227
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmitt N, Oswald FL, Friede A, Imus A, Merritt S. Perceived fit with an academic environment: attitudinal and behavioral outcomes. J Vocational Behav. 2008;72(3):317–335. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2007.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsetoohy O, Ayoun B, Abou-Kamar M. COVID-19 pandemic is a wake-up call for sustainable local food supply chains: evidence from green restaurants in the USA. Sustainability. 2021;13(16):9234. doi:10.3390/su13169234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Pieper TM, Ringle CM. The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: a review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long Ran Plann. 2012;45(5–6):320–340. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. Los Angeles, CA: Sage publications Sage CA; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur Bus Rev. 2019;31(1):2–24. doi:10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Academy Marketing Sci. 2015;43:115–135. doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, Mitchell R, Gudergan SP. Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research. Int J Human Resour Manage. 2020;31(12):1617–1643. doi:10.1080/09585192.2017.1416655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul F, Erdfelder E. GPOWER: A Priori, Post-Hoc, and Compromise Power Analyses for MS-DOS Computer Program. Bonn, FRG: Bonn University, Department of Psychology; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Abou Kamar M, Albadry OM, Sheikhelsouk S, Ali Al-Abyadh MH, Alsetoohy O. Dynamic capabilities influence on the operational performance of hotel food supply chains: a mediation-moderation model. Sustainability. 2023;15(18):13562. doi:10.3390/su151813562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin WW. How to write up and report PLS Analyses. Handbook of partial least squares: concepts, methods, and applications. Sprin Hand Comput Stat. 2010;2010:1.
   Google Scholar
• Kock N. WarpPLS User Manual: Version 7.0. Laredo, TX, USA: ScriptWarp Systems; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Kock N. Advanced mediating effects tests, multi-group analyses, and measurement model assessments in PLS-based SEM. International J E-Collab. 2014;10(1):1–13. doi:10.4018/ijec.2014010101
   Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004;36(4):717–731. doi:10.3758/BF03206553
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hayes AF, Preacher KJ. Quantifying and testing indirect effects in simple mediation models when the constituent paths are nonlinear. Multivar Behav Res. 2010;45(4):627–660. doi:10.1080/00273171.2010.498290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock N. WarpPLS User Manual: Version 7.0. ScriptWarp Systems; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Hale K, Cihan A, Fikret S, Zülbiye K. The Relationship Between Smartphone Addiction and Life Satisfaction: faculty of Sport Sciences Students. Intern J Psychol Educ Stud. 2020;7(1):86–95. doi:10.17220/IJPES.2020.01.008
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Fernandez O. Internet and Mobile Phone Addiction. Health and Educational Effects; 2019; doi:10.3390/BOOKS978-3-03897-605-9
   Google Scholar
• Nam M, Kim H, Kwon Y. Factors influencing subjective happiness index of health behavior, smartphone addiction, suicidal ideation among college students. J Digital Convergence. 2013;11(10):557–569.
   Google Scholar
• Billieux J. Problematic use of the mobile phone: a literature review and a pathways model. Curr Psychiatry Rev. 2012;8:299–307. doi:10.2174/157340012803520522
   Google Scholar
• Scott DA, Valley B, Simecka BA. Mental health concerns in the digital age. J Men Health. 2016;15:604–613. doi:10.1007/s11469-016-9684-0
   Google Scholar
• Laramie D. Emotional and behavioral aspects of mobile phone use. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Los Angeles, CA: Alliant International University; 2007. Available from http://gradworks.umi.com/32/68/3268867.html. Accessed March 11, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Hong F, Chiu SS, Huang DA. model of the relationship between psychological characteristics, mobile phone addiction and use of mobile phones by Taiwanese university female students. Computers in Human Behavior. 2012;28:2152–2159. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atiri SO, Ipietegha VL, Popoola O. Understanding the Relationship Between Self-Regulation and Smartphone Addiction Among Undergraduates of the University of Lagos, Nigeria. University of lagos; 2020; doi:10.26772/CJSMS2020050204
   Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Meng G, Sun Y, Xu Y, Geng J, Han L. The relationship between self-control and procrastination based on the self-regulation theory perspective: the moderated mediation model. Curr Psychol. 2021;40:5076–5086. doi:10.1007/s12144-019-00442-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan Y, Davis F. Self-regulation, mind wandering, and cognitive absorption during technology use. Comput Educ. 2022;176:104363. doi:10.24251/HICSS.2020.548
   Google Scholar
• Boshoff-Knoetze A, Duminy L, Du Toit Y. Examining the effect of self-regulation failure on academic achievement in emergency remote teaching and learning versus face-to-face. J Appl Res High Educ. 2023;15(2):342–354. doi:10.1108/JARHE-08-2021-0305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schooler JW, Smallwood J, Christoff K, Handy TC, Reichle ED, Sayette MA. Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind. Trend Cognit Sci. 2011;15(7):319–326. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace JC, Vodanovich SJ, Restino BM. Predicting cognitive failures from boredom proneness and daytime sleepiness scores: an investigation within military and undergraduate samples. Pers Individ Dif. 2003;34:635–644. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00050-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kass SJ, Vodanovich S, Callender A. State-trait boredom: relationship to absenteeism, tenure, and job satisfaction. J Busin Psychol. 2001;16(2):317–327. doi:10.1023/A:1011121503118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar