The Relationship of Parent-Child Technoference and Child Problematic Smartphone Use: The Roles of Parent-Child Relationship, Negative Parenting Styles, and Children’s Gender

References

• McDaniel BT. “Technoference”: everyday intrusions and interruptions of technology in couple and family relationships. In: Bruess CJ, editor. Family Communication in the Age of Digital and Social Media. New York, NY: Peter Lang; 2015. doi:10.1037/ppm0000065
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel BT, Coyne SM. “Technoference”: the interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well-being. Psychol Popul Med Cult. 2016;5:85–98. doi:10.1037/ppm0000065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tammisalo K, Rotkirch A. Effects of information and communication technology on the quality of family relationships: a systematic review. J Soc Pers Relat. 2022;39(9):2724–2765. doi:10.1177/02654075221087942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth MA, Coyne SM, Yorgason JB, Dew JP. Domestic bliss, or technological diss? Problematic media use, partner responsiveness, and relationship outcomes. J Soc Pers Relat. 2021;38(12):3610–3632. doi:10.1177/02654075211031000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapierre MA, Zhao P. Problematic smartphone use versus “technoference”: examining their unique predictive power on relational and life satisfaction. Psychol Popul Med. 2022. doi:10.1037/ppm0000438
   Google Scholar
• Zoppolat G, Righetti F, Balzarini RN, et al. Relationship difficulties and “technoference” during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Soc Pers Relat. 2022;39(11):3204–3227. doi:10.1177/02654075221093611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modecki KL, Low‐Choy S, Vasco D, Vernon L, Uink B. Commentary response: smartphone use and parenting: re‐stratifying the multiverse for families of young children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2021;62(12):1497–1500. doi:10.1111/jcpp.13433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terras MM, Ramsay J. Family digital literacy practices and children’s mobile phone use. Frontiers in Psychology. 2016;7:213065. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr R. Growing up in the digital age: early learning and family media ecology. Curr Direct Psychol Sci. 2019;28(4):341–346. doi:10.1177/0963721419838245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu QX, Qi D, Zhou ZK. The relationship between technoference and smartphone addiction of adolescents: the roles of emotional symptoms and environmental sensitivity. J Phychol Sci. 2021;2021:583–590.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Jiang YR, Zhu CW, Li M, Quan X, Chen FM. Parent-child relationship and problematic smartphone use among Chinese adolescents: a moderated mediation model. Curr Psychol. 2022;8:1–15. doi:10.1007/s12144-022-03556-3
   Google Scholar
• Huang SM, Hu YQ, Ni Q, Qin Y, W L. Parent-children relationship and internet addiction of adolescents: the mediating role of self-concept. Curr Psychol. 2021;40:2510–2517. doi:10.1007/s12144-019-00199-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu SI. The relationship between life stress and smartphone addiction on Taiwanese university student: a mediation model of learning self-efficacy and social self-efficacy. Comput Human Behav. 2014;34:49–57. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lăzăroiu G, Kovacova M, Siekelova A, Vrbka J. Addictive behavior of problematic smartphone users: the relationship between depression, anxiety, and stress. Rev Contemp Philosop. 2020;19:50–56. doi:10.22381/RCP1920204
   Google Scholar
• Green M, Kovacova M, Valaskova K. Smartphone addiction risk, depression psychopathology, and social anxiety. Anal Metaph. 2020;19:52–58. doi:10.22381/AM1920205
   Google Scholar
• Kliestik T, Scott J, Musa H, Suler P. Addictive smartphone behavior, anxiety symptom severity, and depressive stress. Anal Metaph. 2020;19:45–51. doi:10.22381/AM1920204
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A, Grusec JE, Menlove FL. Observational learning as a function of symbolization and in centive set. Child Development. 1996;37(3):499–506. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1966.tb04302.x
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon JK, Lepoire BA. Effects of communication expectancies, actual communication, and expectancy disconfirmation on evaluations of communicators and their communication behavior. Human Communication Research. 1993;20(1):67–96. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1993.tb00316.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kildare CA, Middlemiss W. Impact of parents mobile device use on parent-child interaction: a literature review. Comput Human Behav. 2017;75:579–593. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel BT, Radesky JS. Technoference: longitudinal associations between parent technology use, parenting stress, and child behavior problems. Pediatr Res. 2018;84(2):210–218. doi:10.1038/s41390-018-0052-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu QX, Hu Q, Qi D. Parent-child technology interference and cyber-relationship addiction among adolescents: moderated mediation model. J Phychol Sci. 2021;2021(02):316–323.
   Google Scholar
• Liu QX, Wu JY, Zhou ZK, Wang WJ. Parental technoference and smartphone addiction in Chinese adolescents: the mediating role of social sensitivity and loneliness. Child Youth Services Rev. 2020;118:10–15. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grusec Joan E. Social learning theory and developmental psychology: the legacies of Robert Sears and Albert Bandura. Developmental Psychology. 1992;28:776–786. doi:10.1037/10155-016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dykstra VW, Willoughby T, Evans AD. A longitudinal examination of the relation between lie-telling, secrecy, parent–child relationship quality, and depressive symptoms in late-childhood and adolescence. J Youth Adolesc. 2020;49:438–448. doi:10.1007/s10964-019-01183-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeus A, Coenen L, Eggermont S, Beullens K. Family technoference: exploring parent mobile device distraction from children’s perspectives. Mob Med Communic. 2021;9(3):584–604. doi:10.1177/2050157921991602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockdale LA, Coyne SM, Padilla-Walker LM. Parent and Child Technoference and socioemotional behavioral outcomes: a nationally representative study of 10- to 20-year-Old adolescents. Comput Human Behav. 2018;88:219–226. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kardefelt-Winther D. A conceptual and methodological critique of internet addiction research: towards a model of compensatory internet use. Comput Human Behav. 2014;31:351–354. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrante L, Venuleo C. Problematic Internet Use among adolescents and young adults: a systematic review of scholars’ conceptualisations after the publication of DSM5. Mediterr J Clin Psychol. 2021;9(2). doi:10.13129/2282-1619/mjcp-3016
   Google Scholar
• Lee KJ, Choi YJ, Kim R. mobile phone overuse among elementary school students in Korea. J Addict Nurs. 2015;26(2):81–85. doi:10.1097/JAN.0000000000000074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu C, Li R, Luo H, Li S, Nie Y. Parent-child relationship and smartphone addiction among Chinese adolescents: a longitudinal moderated mediation model. Addict Behav. 2022;130:107304. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee EJ, Kim HS. Gender differences in smartphone addiction behaviors associated with parent-child bonding, parent–child communication, and parental mediation among Korean elementary school students. J Addict Nurs. 2018;29(4):244–254. doi:10.1097/JAN.0000000000000254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beato A, Pereira AI, Barros L, Muris P. The relationship between different parenting typologies in fathers and mother’s and children’s anxiety. J Child Family Stud. 2016;25(5):1691–1701. doi:10.1007/s10826-015-0337-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel BT, Galovan AM, Cravens JD, Drouin M. “Technoference” and implications for mothers’ and fathers’ couple and coparenting relationship quality. Comput Human Behav. 2018;80:303–313. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebre SB, Pakalniškiene V, Jusiene R, et al. Children’s problematic use of the internet in biological and social context: a one-year longitudinal study. J Child Family Stud. 2023;1–13. doi:10.1007/s10826-022-02527-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae S. The relationships between perceived parenting style, learning motivation, friendship satisfaction, and the addictive use of smartphones with elementary school students of South Korea: using multivariate latent growth modeling. School Psychol Int. 2015;36(5):513–531. doi:10.1177/0143034315604017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung SA, Bae S, Kim HJ, Lee JW, Hwang H, Han DH. Mediating effects of attention problems on the link between parenting style and internet gaming disorder in adolescents. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2023;14. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1211889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung J, Kwon O, Kim S. A study on the effects of parenting style and school life adaptation on mobile phone dependency among adolescents: focusing on the moderating effect of leisure activities satisfaction. Health Soc Welf Rev. 2018;38(1):596–629. doi:10.15709/hswr.2018.38.1.596
   Google Scholar
• Portes JRM, Vieira ML, Souza CDD, Kaszubowski E. Parental styles and coparenting in families with children with autism: cluster analysis of children’s behavior. Estud De Psicol. 2020;37. doi:10.1590/1982-0275202037e190143
   Google Scholar
• De Bérail P, Guillon M, Bungener C. The relations between YouTube addiction, social anxiety and parasocial relationships with YouTubers: a moderated-mediation model based on a cognitive-behavioral framework. Comput Human Behav. 2019;99:190–204. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegmann E, Brand M. A narrative overview about psychosocial characteristics as risk factors of a problematic social networks use. Current Addict Rep. 2019;6(4):402–409. doi:10.1007/s40429-019-00286-8
   Google Scholar
• Coleman PK, Karraker KH. Parenting self‐efficacy among mothers of school‐age children: conceptualization, measurement, and correlates. Family Relat. 2000;49(1):13–24. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2000.00013.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushlev K, Dunn EW. Smartphones distract parents from cultivating feelings of connection when spending time with their children. J Soc Pers Relat. 2019;36(6):1619–1639. doi:10.1177/0265407518769387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui M, Janhonen-Abruquah H, Darling CA. Parent-child communication, relationship quality, and female young adult children’s well-being in US and Finland. J Comp Family Stud. 2022;52(4):648–667. doi:10.3138/jcfs.52.4.06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofield TJ, Conger RD, Neppl TK. Positive parenting, beliefs about parental efficacy, and active coping: three sources of intergenerational resilience. J Family Psychol. 2014;28(6):973. doi:10.1037/fam0000024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teti DM, Gelfand DM. Behavioral competence among mothers of infants in the first year: the mediational role of maternal self‐efficacy. Child Development. 1991;62(5):918–929. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01580.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Yang SM. Differential effects of parenting styles, psychological traits, and purpose of smartphone use upon Korean adolescents’ smartphone dependence. Korean J Communicat Stud. 2018;62(5):175–214. doi:10.20879/kjjcs.2018.62.5.006
   Google Scholar
• Karadağ E, Tosuntaş ŞB, Erzen E, et al. Determinants of phubbing, which is the sum of many virtual addictions: a structural equation model. Journal of Behavioral Addictions. 2015;(2):60–74. doi:10.1556/2006.4.2015.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Y, Liu QX, Yu S, Zhou ZK. The relationship between parents neglect and online gaming addiction among adolescents: the mediating role of hope and gender difference. Psychol Develop Educ. 2021;37(01):109–119. doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.01.14
   Google Scholar
• Shan MX, Gao Y, Li WF, Xu FF, Li GY. Relationship between parenting style and creativity thinking: the moderation role of gender. China J Health Psychol. 2019;27(09):1430–1435. doi:10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2019.09.037
   Google Scholar
• Yang BF, Hou YB. The relationship between children and parental rearing styles. J Weinan Norm Univ. 2014;29(03):58–61. doi:10.15924/j.cnki.1009-5128.2014.03.009
   Google Scholar
• Huang CY, Hsieh YP, Shen ACT, et al. Relationships between parent-reported parenting, child-perceived parenting, and children’s mental health in Taiwanese children. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(6):1049. doi:10.3390/ijerph16061049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGue M, Elkins I, Walden B, Iacono WG. Perceptions of the parent-adolescent relationship: a longitudinal investigation. Developmental Psychology. 2005;41:971. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.41.6.971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Goede IH, Branje SJ, Meeus WH. Developmental changes in adolescents’ perceptions of relationships with their parents. J Youth Adoles. 2009;38(1):75–88. doi:10.1007/s10964-008-9286-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Deci EL. On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology. 2001;52:14–166. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandstrom GM, Dunn EW. Social interactions and well-being: the surprising power of weak ties. Personality Social Psychology Bulletin. 2014;40(7):910–922. doi:10.1177/0146167214529799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nezlek JB. The motivational and cognitive dynamics of day-to-day social life. In: Forgas JP, Williams KD, Wheeler L, editors. The Social Mind: Cognitive and Motivational Aspects of Interpersonal Behavior. Cambridge University Press; 2001:92–111.
   Google Scholar
• Katsantonis I, McLellan R. The role of parent–child interactions in the association between mental health and prosocial behavior: evidence from early childhood to late adolescence. Int J Behavioral Develop. 2024;48(1):59–70. doi:10.1177/01650254231202444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel BT. Parent distraction with phones, reasons for use, and impacts on parenting and child outcomes: a review of the emerging research. Human Beh Emerg Technol. 2019;1(2):72–80. doi:10.1002/hbe2.139
   Google Scholar
• Ding Q, Wang ZQ, Zhang YX. Why parental phubbing is at risk for adolescent mobile phone addiction: a serial mediating model. Child Youth Services Rev. 2021;121:105873. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel BT, Coyne SM. The interference of technology in the coparenting of young children: implications for mothers’ perceptions of coparenting. Social Sci J. 2016;53:435–443. doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2016.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furman W, Buhrmester D. Children’s perceptions of the personal relationships in their social networks. Developmental Psychology. 1985;21(6):1016–1024. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.21.6.1016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim B, Teti DM. Maternal emotional availability during infant bedtime: an ecological framework. J Family Psychol. 2014;28(1):1–11. doi:10.1037/a0035157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foerster M, Roser K, Schoeni A, Röösli M. Problematic mobile phone use in adolescents: derivation of a short scale MPPUS-10. Internat J Public Health. 2015;60(2):277–286. doi:10.1007/s00038-015-0660-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren CR. Measurement methodology on social economic status index of students. J Educ Stud. 2010;6(05):77–82. doi:10.14082/j.cnki.1673-1298.2010.05.010
   Google Scholar
• Jin SH, Yu QL, Guo YF, et al. The effect of juvenile use of online social interaction on internet addiction: the moderating effect of the family social economic status. J Psycholog Sci. 2017;2017(04):885–891.
   Google Scholar
• Wu Z, Hu BY, Wu H, Winsler A, Chen L. Family socioeconomic status and Chinese preschoolers’ social skills: examining underlying family processes. J Family Psychol. 2020;34(8):969. doi:10.1037/fam0000674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twenge JM, Campbell WK, Foster CA. Parenthood and marital satisfaction: a meta‐analytic review. J Marr Family. 2003;65(3):574–583. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00574.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Ngoubene-Atioky AJ. Does number of children moderate the link between intimate partner violence and marital instability among Chinese female migrant workers? Sex Roles. 2019;80(11–12):745–757. doi:10.1007/s11199-019-1017-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade AW, Watson AM, Kroustalis CM Assessing common methods bias in organizational research. In 22nd annual meeting of the society for industrial and organizational psychology, New York; 2007. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Erceg-Hurn DM, Mirosevich VM. Modern robust statistical methods: an easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research. Am Psychologist. 2008;63(7):591. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6(1):1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou D, Liu J, Liu J. The effect of problematic Internet use on mathematics achievement: the mediating role of self-efficacy and the moderating role of teacher-student relationships. Child Youth Services Rev. 2020;118:105372. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen ZL, Hou JT, Zhang L. A comparison of moderator and mediator and their applications. Acta Phychologica Sinica. 2005;37(2):218–274.
   Google Scholar
• Ding Q, Kong L, Zhang Y, Zhou Z, Hu W. Parents phubbing and mobile phone addiction in junior high school students: a cross-lagged analysis. Chin J Clin Psychol. 2018;26(05):952–955. doi:10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2018.05.025
   Google Scholar
• Ding Q, Zhang YX, Zhou ZK. The relationship between parents phubbing and high school students’ mobile phone addiction: the moderating effect of parental monitoring. Chin J Spec Educ. 2019;1:66–71.
   Google Scholar
• Davis RA. A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use. Comput Human Behav. 2001;17(2):187–195. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00041-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie X, Chen W, Zhu X, He D. Parents’ phubbing increases Adolescents’ Mobile phone addiction: roles of parent-child attachment, deviant peers, and gender. Child Youth Services Rev. 2019;105:104426. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somerville T. Parent Perceptions of Adolescent Technology Use: implications for the Parent-Child Relationship [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Missouri-Saint Louis; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou JH, Li X, Gong X. Parental phubbing and internet gaming addiction in children: mediating roles of parent–child relationships and depressive symptoms. CyberPsychol Behav. 2022;25(8):512–517. doi:10.1089/cyber.2022.0021
   Google Scholar
• Clark KE, Ladd GW. Connectedness and autonomy support in parent–child relationships: links to children’s socioemotional orientation and peer relationships. Developmental Psychology. 2000;36(4):485. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.36.4.485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustaffa CS. Family communication on Facebook: a comparative analysis from parent-child perspective. Adv Sci Lett. 2017;23(1):295–299. doi:10.1166/asl.2017.7163
   Google Scholar
• Guo HY, Zhu WL, Zhu Q, Zhu ML, Zuo PY, Lin DH. Parent-child communication and perceived well-being: the mediating effects of basic psychological needs satisfaction among Rural Children in China. Psychol Develop Educ. 2014;30(02):129–136.
   Google Scholar
• Hu Z, Xiang Y. Who is the chief culprit, loneliness, or smartphone addiction? Evidence from longitudinal study and weekly diary method. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022;1–16. doi:10.1007/s11469-022-00892-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu QX, Fang XY, Wan JJ, Zhou ZK. Need satisfaction and adolescent pathological internet use: comparison of satisfaction perceived online and offline. Comput Human Behav. 2016;55:695–700. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahu M, Gandhi S, Sharma MK. Mobile phone addiction among children and adolescents: a systematic review. J Addict Nurs. 2019;30(4):261–268. doi:10.1097/JAN.0000000000000309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraut R, Patterson M, Lundmark V, Kiesler S, Mukophadhyay T, Scherlis W. Internet paradox: a social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? Am Psychologist. 1998;53(9):1017–1034. doi:10.1097/JAN.0000000000000309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou H, Messing K, Sultan-Taïeb H, et al. Negative parenting style and perceived non-physical bullying at school: the mediating role of negative affect experiences and coping styles. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;20(10):19. doi:10.3390/ijerph19106206
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Starr LR, Shaw ZA, Hershenberg R. Negative emotion differentiation through a developmental lens: associations with parental factors and age in adolescence. Pers Individ Dif. 2020;152. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.109597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hefner D, Knop K, Schmitt S, Vorderer P. Rules? Role Model? Relationship? The impact of parents on their children’s problematic mobile phone involvement. Media Psychology. 2019;22(1):82–108. doi:10.1080/15213269.2018.1433544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folkman S, Lazarus RS. Stress processes and depressive symptomatology. J Abnormal Psychol. 1986;95(2):107–113. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.95.2.107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abidin R. The determinants of parenting behavior. J Clin Child Psychol. 1992;21(4):407–412. doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp2104_12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mak MCK, Yin L, Li M, Cheung RY, Oon PT. The relation between parenting stress and child behavior problems: negative parenting styles as mediator. J Child Family Stud. 2020;29(11):2993–3003. doi:10.1007/s10826-020-01785-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guajardo NR, Snyder G, Petersen R. Relationships among parenting practices, parental stress, child behaviour, and children’s social‐cognitive development. Infant Child Develop. 2009;18(1):37–60. doi:10.1002/icd.578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender PK, Reinholdt-Dunne ML, Esbjørn BH, Pons F. Emotion dysregulation and anxiety in children and adolescents: gender differences. Pers Individ Dif. 2012;53(3):284–288. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.03.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRae K, Ochsner KN, Mauss IB, Gabrieli JJ, Gross JJ. Gender differences in emotion regulation: an fMRI study of cognitive reappraisal. Group Process Interg Rel. 2008;11(2):143–162. doi:10.1177/1368430207088035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand M, Laier C, Young KS. Internet addiction: coping styles, expectancies, and treatment implications. Frontiers in Psychology. 2014;5:1256–1270. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhitomirsky-Geffet M, Blau M. Cross-generational analysis of predictive factors of addictive behavior in smartphone usage. Comput Human Behav. 2016;64:682–693. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Deursen AJ, Bolle CL, Hegner SM, Kommers PA. Modeling habitual and addictive smartphone behavior: the role of smartphone usage types, emotional intelligence, social stress, self-regulation, age, and gender. Comput Human Behav. 2015;45:411–420. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu G, Yao L, Wu L, Tian Y, Xu L, Sun X. Parental phubbing and adolescent problematic mobile phone use: the role of parent-child relationship and self-control. Child Youth Services Rev. 2020;116:105247. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett MA, Scaramella LV. Child fear reactivity and sex as moderators of links between parenting and preschool behavior problems. Develop Psychopath. 2015;27(4pt1):1179–11900. doi:10.1017/S0954579415000759
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bem SL. Gender schema theory: a cognitive account of sex typing. Psychol Rev. 1981;88:354–364. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milfont TL, Sibley CG. Empathic and social dominance orientations help explain gender differences in environmentalism: a one-year Bayesian mediation analysis. Pers Individ Dif. 2016;90:85–88. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis AJ, Kremer P, Douglas K, et al. Gender differences in adolescent depression: differential female susceptibility to stressors affecting family functioning. Aust J Psych. 2015;67(3):131–139. doi:10.1111/ajpy.12086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu XS. Relationships between maternal educational attainment and adolescents’ academic self-esteem: the mediating role of parenting style and the moderation role of gender. Stud Psychol Behav. 2021;2011:(01):59–65.
   Google Scholar