60
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Calibration and validation of an item bank for measuring general physical function of patients in medical rehabilitation settings

, , , , , & show all
Pages 11-16 | Published online: 28 Dec 2017

References

  • Institute of MedicineRewarding Provider Performance: Aligning Incentives in MedicareWashington, DCNational Academies Press2006
  • GrassleyCMedicare Value Purchasing Act of 2005USSenateS.13562005 Available from: https://www.congress.gov/bill/109th-congress/senate-bill/1356Accessed December 1, 2017
  • JohnsonNMedicare Value-Based Purchasing for Physicians’ Services Act of 2005. U.S. House of RepresentativesH.R.36172005 Available from: https://www.congress.gov/bill/109th-congress/house-bill/3617Accessed December 1, 2017
  • WilsonNMedicare Outpatient Therapy Value-Based Purchasing Act of 2006U.S. House of RepresentativesUSHoH.R.60482006 Available from: https://www.congress.gov/bill/109th-congress/house-bill/6048Accessed December 1, 2017
  • HartDLDeutscherDWernekeMWHolderJWangYCImplementing computerized adaptive tests in routine clinical practice: experience implementing CATsJ Appl Meas201011328830320847476
  • JetteAMHaleySMContemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessmentJ Rehabil Med200537633934516287664
  • KisalaPATulskyDSPaceNVictorsonDChoiSWHeinemannAWMeasuring stigma after spinal cord injury: development and psychometric characteristics of the SCI-QOL Stigma item bank and short formJ Spinal Cord Med201538338639626010973
  • SungVWGriffithJWRogersRGRakerCAClarkMAItem bank development, calibration and validation for patient-reported outcomes in female urinary incontinenceQual Life Res20162571645165426732514
  • AmtmannDCookKFJohnsonKLCellaDThe PROMIS initiative: involvement of rehabilitation stakeholders in development and examples of applications in rehabilitation researchArch Phys Med Rehabil20119210 SupplS12S1921958918
  • JetteAMHaleySMTaoWNiPMoedRMeyersDZurekMProspective evaluation of the AM-PAC-CAT in outpatient rehabilitation settingsPhys Ther200787438539817311888
  • CookKFBuckenmaierC3rdGershonRCPASTOR/PROMIS (R) pain outcomes system: what does it mean to pain specialists?Pain Manag20144427728325300385
  • WagnerLISchinkJBassMBringing PROMIS to practice: brief and precise symptom screening in ambulatory cancer careCancer2015121692793425376427
  • ChienTWLinWSImproving inpatient surveys: web-based computer adaptive testing accessed via mobile phone QR codesJMIR Med Inform201641e826935793
  • GamperEMPetersenMAAaronsonNDevelopment of an item bank for the EORTC Role Functioning Computer Adaptive Test (EORTC RF-CAT)Health Qual Life Outcomes20161472
  • SwinkelsICHartDLDeutscherDvan den BoschWJDekkerJde BakkerDHvan den EndeCHComparing patient characteristics and treatment processes in patients receiving physical therapy in the United States, Israel and the Netherlands: cross sectional analyses of data from three clinical databasesBMC Health Serv Res20088163
  • SwinkelsICvan den EndeCHde BakkerDClinical databases in physical therapyPhysiother Theory Pract200723315316717558879
  • HaysRDMoralesLSReiseSPItem response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st centuryMed Care2000389 SupplII28II4210982088
  • DeutscherDHartDLStratfordPWDicksteinRConstruct validation of a knee-specific functional status measure: a comparative study between the United States and IsraelPhys Ther20119171072108421596960
  • HartDLCookKFMioduskiJETealCRCranePKSimulated computerized adaptive test for patients with shoulder impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of functionJ Clin Epidemiol200659329029816488360
  • HartDLWangYCStratfordPWMioduskiJEComputerized adaptive test for patients with knee impairments produced valid and responsive measures of functionJ Clin Epidemiol200861111113112418619788
  • HartDLWangYCStratfordPWMioduskiJEComputerized adaptive test for patients with foot or ankle impairments produced valid and responsive measures of functionQual Life Res20081781081109118709546
  • HartDLWangYCStratfordPWMioduskiJEA computerized adaptive test for patients with hip impairments produced valid and responsive measures of functionArch Phys Med Rehabil200889112129213918996242
  • HartDLWernekeMWWangYCStratfordPWMioduskiJEComputerized adaptive test for patients with lumbar spine impairments produced valid and responsive measures of functionSpine (Phila Pa 1976)201035242157216420595928
  • HaysRDSherbourneCDMazelRMThe RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0Health Econ1993232172278275167
  • LordFMApplications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing ProblemsHillsdale, NJLawrence Erlbaum Associates1980
  • ReiseSPBonifayWEHavilandMGScoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionalityJ Pers Assess201395212914023030794
  • R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [R version 325] [computer program]Vienna, AustriaR Foundation for Statistical Computing2016
  • ReiseSPScheinesRWidamanKFHavilandMGMultidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modeling: a bifactor perspectiveEdu Psychol Meas2012731526
  • Mplus User’s GuideSeventh Edition, version 7.4 [computer program]Los Angeles, CAMuthén & Muthén;19982015
  • ReeveBBHaysRDBjornerJBPsychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)Med Care2007455 Suppl 1S22S3117443115
  • SamejimaFEstimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scoresETS Res Bull Ser1968i169
  • PARSCALE: IRT item analysis and test scoring for rating-scale data, version 41 [computer program]Chicago, ILScientific Software International2003
  • KosinskiMBjornerJBWareJEJrSullivanEStrausWLAn evaluation of a patient-reported outcomes found computerized adaptive testing was efficient in assessing osteoarthritis impactJ Clin Epidemiol200659771572316765275
  • McHorneyCACohenASEquating health status measures with item response theory: illustrations with functional status itemsMed Care2000389 SupplII435910982089
  • DunnettCWA multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a controlJ Am Stat Assoc19555027210961121