189
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Efficacy of Brodalumab and Guselkumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis Who are Inadequate Responders to Ustekinumab: A Matching Adjusted Indirect Comparison

, , &
Pages 123-131 | Published online: 03 Nov 2021

References

  • Lebwohl M, Strober B, Menter A, et al. Phase 3 studies comparing brodalumab with ustekinumab in psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(14):1318–1328. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1503824
  • Thaçi D, Blauvelt A, Reich K, et al. Secukinumab is superior to ustekinumab in clearing skin of subjects with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: CLEAR, a randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;73(3):400–409. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2015.05.013
  • Blauvelt A, Papp KA, Griffiths CE, et al. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab, an anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, compared with adalimumab for the continuous treatment of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: results from the phase III, double-blinded, placebo- and active comparator-controlled VOYAGE 1 trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(3):405–417. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2016.11.041
  • Papp KA, Blauvelt A, Bukhalo M, et al. Risankizumab versus ustekinumab for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(16):1551–1560. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1607017
  • Papp KA, Yang M, Sundaram M, et al. Comparison of adalimumab and etanercept for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: an indirect comparison using individual patient data from randomized trials. Value Health. 2018;21(1):1–8. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2017.05.025
  • Langley RG, Tsai TF, Flavin S, et al. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with psoriasis who have an inadequate response to ustekinumab: results of the randomized, double-blind, phase III NAVIGATE trial. Br J Dermatol. 2018;178(1):114–123. doi:10.1111/bjd.15750
  • Paul C, Griffiths CEM, van de Kerkhof PCM, et al. Ixekizumab provides superior efficacy compared with ustekinumab over 52 weeks of treatment: results from IXORA-S, a phase 3 study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80(1):70–79.e3. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2018.06.039
  • Reich K, Gooderham M, Thaçi D, et al. Risankizumab compared with adalimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (IMMvent): a randomised, double-blind, active-comparator-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10198):576–586. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30952-3
  • Signorovitch JE, Wu EQ, Yu AP, et al. Comparative effectiveness without head-to-head trials: a method for matching-adjusted indirect comparisons applied to psoriasis treatment with adalimumab or etanercept. PharmacoEconomics. 2010;28(10):935–945. doi:10.2165/11538370-000000000-00000
  • Signorovitch JE, Sikirica V, Haim Erder MH, et al. Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons: a new tool for timely comparative effectiveness research. Value Health. 2012;15:940–947. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.05.004
  • Phillippo DM, Dias S, Elsada A, Ades AE, Welton NJ. Population adjustment methods for indirect comparisons: a review of national institute for health and care excellence technology appraisals. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019;35(3):221–228. doi:10.1017/S0266462319000333
  • Warren RB, Brnabic A, Saure D, et al. Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis treated with ixekizumab vs. secukinumab. Br J Dermatol. 2018;178(5):1064–1071. doi:10.1111/bjd.16140
  • Bewley AP, Shear NH, Calzavara-Pinton PG, Hansen JB, Nyeland ME, Signorovitch J. Calcipotriol plus betamethasone dipropionate aerosol foam vs. apremilast, methotrexate, acitretin or fumaric acid esters for the treatment of plaque psoriasis: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019;33(6):1107–1115. doi:10.1111/jdv.15369
  • Langley RG, Armstrong AW, Lebwohl MG, et al. Efficacy and safety of brodalumab in patients with psoriasis who had inadequate responses to ustekinumab: subgroup analysis of two randomized phase III trials. Br J Dermatol. 2019;180(2):306–314. doi:10.1111/bjd.17318
  • Reich K, Armstrong AW, Langley RG, et al. Guselkumab versus secukinumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis (ECLIPSE): results from a phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10201):831–839. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31773-8
  • Reich K, Armstrong AW, Foley P, et al. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab, an anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, compared with adalimumab for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis with randomized withdrawal and retreatment: results from the phase III, double-blind, placebo- and active comparator-controlled VOYAGE 2 trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(3):418–431. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2016.11.042
  • Papp KA, Gordon KB, Langley RG, et al. Impact of previous biologic use on the efficacy and safety of brodalumab and ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: integrated analysis of the randomized controlled trials AMAGINE-2 and AMAGINE-3. Br J Dermatol. 2018;179(2):320–328. doi:10.1111/bjd.16464
  • Kimmel G, Chima M, Kim HJ, et al. Brodalumab in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis in patients when previous anti-interleukin 17A therapies have failed. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;81(3):857–859. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.05.007
  • Roman M, Chiu MW. Spotlight on brodalumab in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: design, development, and potential place in therapy. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017;11:2065–2075. doi:10.2147/DDDT.S113683
  • Kyntheum. Summary of product characteristics. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/kyntheum-epar-product-information_en.pdf. Accessed December 02, 2021.
  • Cosentyx. Summary of product characteristics. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/cosentyx-epar-product-information_en.pdf. Accessed December 02, 2021.
  • Taltz. Summary of product characteristics. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/taltz-epar-product-information_en.pdf. Accessed December 02, 2021.
  • Galluzzo M, Caldarola G, De Simone C, et al. Use of brodalumab for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis: a one-year real-life study in the Lazio region, Italy. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2021;21(9):1299–1310. doi:10.1080/14712598.2021.1941862
  • Fargnoli MC, Esposito M, Dapavo P, et al. Brodalumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis: a real-life, retrospective 24-week experience. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021;35(3):693–700. doi:10.1111/jdv.16931
  • Megna M, Fabbrocini G, Cinelli E, Camela E, Ruggiero A. Guselkumab in moderate to severe psoriasis in routine clinical care: an Italian 44-week real-life experience. J Dermatolog Treat. 2020;4:1–5. doi:10.1080/09546634.2020.1800577
  • Ruggiero A, Fabbrocini G, Cinelli E, Megna M. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in psoriasis patients who failed ustekinumab and/or anti-interleukin-17 treatment: a real-life 52-week retrospective study. Dermatol Ther. 2021;34(1):e14673. doi:10.1111/dth.14673
  • Sawyer LM, Malottki K, Sabry-Grant C, et al. Assessing the relative efficacy of interleukin-17 and interleukin-23 targeted treatments for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of PASI response. PLoS One. 2019;14(8):e0220868. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220868
  • Cameron C, Druchok C, Hutton B, et al. Guselkumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis during induction phase: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Psoriasis Psoriatic Arthritis. 2018;4(2):81–92. doi:10.1177/2475530318818816
  • Armstrong AW, Puig L, Joshi A, et al. Comparison of biologics and oral treatments for plaque psoriasis: a meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2020:156258–156269. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.4029
  • Yasmeen N, Sawyer LM, Malottki K, Levin L, Didriksen Apol E, Jemec GB. Targeted therapies for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of PASI response at 1 year. J Dermatolog Treat. 2020;2:1–15. doi:10.1080/09546634.2020.1743811
  • Warren RB, Gooderham M, Burge R, et al. Comparison of cumulative clinical benefits of biologics for the treatment of psoriasis over 16 weeks: results from a network meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019:pii: S0190-9622(19) 33315–8. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.12.038
  • Strand V, McInnes I, Mease P, et al. Matching-adjusted indirect comparison: secukinumab versus infliximab in biologic-naive patients with psoriatic arthritis. J Comp Eff Res. 2019;8(7):497–510. doi:10.2217/cer-2018-0141
  • Korman NJ, Malatestinic W, Goldblum OM, et al. Assessment of the benefit of achieving complete versus almost complete skin clearance in psoriasis: a patient’s perspective. J Dermatolog Treat. 2020;1:1–7. doi:10.1080/09546634.2020.1772454
  • Bilal J, Berlinberg A, Bhattacharjee S, Trost J, Bin Riaz I, Kurtzman DJB. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of the interleukin (IL)-12/23 and IL-17 inhibitors ustekinumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, guselkumab and tildrakizumab for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. J Dermatolog Treat. 2018;29(6):569–578. doi:10.1080/09546634.2017.1422591