239
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Drivers of Individual and Regional Variation in CMS Hierarchical Condition Categories Among Florida Beneficiaries

, , , ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 1011-1022 | Received 04 Jan 2023, Accepted 31 May 2023, Published online: 10 Jun 2023

References

  • CMS. 2011 report: evaluation of the CMS-HCC risk adjustment model. CMS. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Health-Plans/MedicareAdvtgSpecRateStats/Risk-Adjustors-Items/Evaluation2011. Accessed September 28, 2022..
  • HHS. Risk adjustment methodology an overview of risk adjustment. in: module 1: risk adjustment introduction and overview. HHS. Available from: https://www.hhs.gov/guidance/sites/default/files/hhs-guidance-documents/prep-act-guidance.pdf. Accessed March 23, 2023.
  • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. Medicare program; medicare shared savings program; accountable care organizations—revised benchmark rebasing methodology, facilitating transition to performance-based risk, and administrative finality of financial calculations. final rule. Fed Regist. 2016;81(112):37949–38017.
  • Sorace J, Wong HH, Worrall C, Kelman J, Saneinejad S, MaCurdy T. The complexity of disease combinations in the Medicare population. Popul Health Manag. 2011;14(4):161–166. doi:10.1089/pop.2010.0044
  • Chernew ME, Carichner J, Impreso J, et al. Coding-driven changes in measured risk in accountable care organizations. Health Aff. 2021;40(12):1909–1917. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00361
  • Hayford TB, Burns AL. Medicare advantage enrollment and beneficiary risk scores: difference-in-differences analyses show increases for all enrollees on account of market-wide changes. Inquiry. 2018;55. doi:10.1177/0046958018788640
  • Kronick R, Welch P. Measuring coding intensity in the medicare advantage program. Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2014;4(2). doi:10.5600/mmrr.004.02.sa06
  • Lissenden B, Amin K, Drury K, et al. A comparison of health risk and costs across private insurance markets. RTI; 2022. Available from: https://www.rti.org/publication/comparison-health-risk-and-costs-across-private-insurance-markets. Accessed September 28, 2022.
  • Markovitz AA, Hollingsworth JM, Ayanian JZ, et al. Risk adjustment in the medicare ACO program deters coding increases but may lead ACOs to drop high-risk beneficiaries. Health Aff. 2019;38(2):253–261. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05407
  • Dorr DA, Ross RL, Cohen D, et al. Primary care practices’ ability to predict future risk of expenditures and hospitalization using risk stratification and segmentation. Johns Hopkins University; 2021. Available from: https://jhu.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/primary-care-practices-ability-to-predict-future-risk-of-expendit. Accessed September 28, 2022.
  • Hyer MJ, White S, Cloyd J, et al. Can we improve the prediction of adverse surgical outcomes? Development of a surgical complexity score using a novel machine learning technique. J Am Coll Surg. 2020;230(1):43–52e1. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.09.015
  • Johnston KJ, Wen H, Joynt Maddox KE. Relationship of a claims-based frailty index to annualized medicare costs. Ann Intern Med. 2020;172(8):533. doi:10.7326/m19-3261
  • Park S, Basu A. Improving risk adjustment with machine learning: accounting for service-level propensity scores to reduce service-level selection. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2021;21(3):363–388. doi:10.1007/s10742-020-00239-z
  • Rose S. A machine learning framework for plan payment risk adjustment. Health Serv Res. 2016;51(6):2358–2374. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12464
  • Chen J, Ellis RP, Toro KH, Ash AS. Mispricing in the medicare advantage risk adjustment model. Inquiry. 2015;52:004695801558308. doi:10.1177/0046958015583089
  • McWilliams JM, Najafzadeh M, Shrank WH, Polinski JM. Association of changes in medication use and adherence with accountable care organization exposure in patients with cardiovascular disease or diabetes. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(9):1019. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2172
  • Morrisey MA, Kilgore ML, Becker DJ, Smith W, Delzell E. Favorable selection, risk adjustment, and the medicare advantage program. Health Serv Res. 2012;48(3):1039–1056. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12006
  • Bianco C, Jamialahmadi O, Pelusi S, et al. Non-invasive stratification of hepatocellular carcinoma risk in non-alcoholic fatty liver using polygenic risk scores. J Hepatol. 2021;74(4):775–782. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2020.11.024
  • Song Y, Skinner J, Bynum J, Sutherland J, Wennberg JE, Fisher ES. Regional variations in diagnostic practices. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(1):45–53. doi:10.1056/nejmsa0910881
  • Sorace J, Millman M, Bounds M, et al. Temporal variation in patterns of comorbidities in the medicare population. Popul Health Manag. 2013;16(2):120–124. doi:10.1089/pop.2012.0045
  • Mu Y, Chin AI, Kshirsagar AV, Zhang Y, Bang H. Regional and temporal variations in comorbidity among US dialysis patients: a longitudinal study of medicare claims data. Inquiry. 2018;55. doi:10.1177/0046958018771163
  • Han A, Carayannopoulos AG. Comprehensive analysis of trends in medicare utilization and reimbursement in physical medicine & rehabilitation: 2012 to 2017. PMR. 2022;14(10):1188–1197. doi:10.1002/pmrj.12692
  • Bleser WK, Saunders RS, Muhlestein DB, McClellan M. Why do accountable care organizations leave the medicare shared savings program? Health Aff. 2019;38(5):794–803. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05097
  • Jacobs PD, Kronick R. The effects of coding intensity in medicare advantage on plan benefits and finances. Health Serv Res. 2020;56(2):178–187. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.13591
  • Inaccuracies in Medicare’s race and ethnicity data hinder the ability to assess health disparities. In: OEI-02-21-00100 06- 15-2022; 2022. Available from: https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/OEI-02-21-00100.asp. Accessed March 12, 2023.
  • Lochner KA, Shoff CM. County-level variation in prevalence of multiple chronic conditions among medicare beneficiaries, 2012. Prev Chronic Dis. 2015;12(E07). doi:10.5888/pcd12.140442
  • Li Q, Rahman M, Gozalo P, Keohane LM, Gold MR, Trivedi AN. Regional variations: the use of hospitals, home health, and skilled nursing in traditional medicare and medicare advantage. Health Aff. 2018;37(8):1274–1281. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0147
  • Sun F. Rurality and opioid prescribing rates in US counties from 2006 to 2018: a spatiotemporal investigation. Soc Sci Med. 2022;296:114788. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114788
  • Paro A, Hyer JM, Diaz A, Tsilimigras DI, Pawlik TM. Profiles in social vulnerability: the association of social determinants of health with postoperative surgical outcomes. Surgery. 2021;170(6):1777–1784. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2021.06.001
  • SAS Institute Inc. SAS® 9.4 Statements: Reference. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.; 2013.
  • Reschovsky JD, Hadley J, Romano PS. Geographic variation in fee-for-service medicare beneficiaries’ medical costs is largely explained by disease burden. Med Care Res Rev. 2013;70(5):542–563. doi:10.1177/1077558713487771
  • Schuldt RF, Lallier ALM, Chen HF, Tilford JM. Geographic variation in medicare home health expenditures. Am J Manag Care. 2022;28(7):322–328. doi:10.37765/ajmc.2022.89179