Social Egg Freezing for Single Women in China: Legal and Ethical Controversies

References

• Xinjing News. The first case of “egg freezing for single women” was lost in the first instance! Is egg freezing suitable for healthy women?; 2022. Available from: https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_19156458. Accessed June 19, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Xinjing News. Member Peng Jing suggests: empowering single women with access to assisted reproductive technology; 2020. Available from: https://www.chinanews.com.cn/gn/2020/05-20/9189536.shtml. Accessed June 19, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Letter on the Reply to Proposal No.2049 (Social Management No.144) of the Third Session of the 13th National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference; 2021. Available from: http://www.nhc.gov.cn/wjw/tia/202101/b77b161058e44bad9f0c79c0541f4370.shtml. Accessed June 19, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung SY, Ng EYL, Lao TTH, et al. Fertility preservation in Hong Kong Chinese society: awareness, knowledge and acceptance. BMC Womens Health. 2020;20(1):86. doi:10.1186/s12905-020-00953-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Li X, Ou S, et al. Perceptions and attitudes towards elective egg freezing of Chinese college students: a survey from eastern China. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022;39(6):1383–1392. doi:10.1007/s10815-022-02502-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H. Single women’s access to egg freezing in mainland China: an medicolegal analysis. J Med Ethics. 2023. doi:10.1136/jme-2023-108915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C. Egg freezing: what position and response should the law take? Explor Free Views. 2016;11:88–92.
   Google Scholar
• CPC Central Committee and the State Council. Decision on optimizing birth policy and promoting long-term balanced population development; 2021. Available from: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-07/20/content_5626190.htm. Accessed June 19, 2023..
   Google Scholar
• Yu H. Women’s future reproductive rights on egg freezing: supports and limits. Med Philos. 2021;42(21):35–40. doi:10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2021.21.08
   Google Scholar
• Liu R, Li X, Cong Y. Should medical institutions provide frozen eggs for single women?: demonstration of rights and ethical thinking in the frozen eggs case. Chn Med Ethics. 2020;33(3):299–303. doi:10.1136/jme-2023-108915
   Google Scholar
• Guo X. On egg flow in underground commercial egg freezing and donation. Zhejiang Acad J. 2020;6:115–123. doi:10.16235/j.cnki.33-1005/c.2020.06.012
   Google Scholar
• Raymo JM, Park H, Xie Y, et al. Marriage and family in East Asia: continuity and change. Annu Rev Sociol. 2015;41(1):471–492. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain A. Demographic transition in China and its implications. World Dev. 2002;30(10):1823–1834. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00070-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin K, Culley L, Hudson N, Mitchell H. Nicky Hudson & Helene Mitchell: running out of time: exploring women’s motivations for social egg freezing. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;40(2):166–173. doi:10.1080/0167482X.2018.1460352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou X, Yan H. Substantive autonomy: theoretical logic of social egg freezing rights. Jianghan Tribune. 2022;9:128–136.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. Number of students of formal education by type and level; 2021. Available from: http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/moe_560/2021/quanguo/202301/t20230104_1038061.html. Accessed June 19, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Yu J. What makes a family: marriage and fertility in China during the second demographic transition. J Chn Women’s Studies. 2022;173(5):47–69.
   Google Scholar
• Yang P, Chen X. Calm reflections under hot demand: do single women in China have reproductive freedom? Int J Law Policy Family. 2022;36(1):1–23. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebab055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li B. Ethical governance of subterfuge culture. Stud Ethics. 2020;1:114–121. doi:10.15995/j.cnki.llxyj.2020.01.018
   Google Scholar
• Survey on the situation of female job-seekers: “No female recruitment, no romantic relationships and no births”, and the prevalence of unspoken rules. Available from: https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_3112621. Accessed September 20, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin K. ‘I suppose I think to myself, That’s the best way to be a mother’: how ideologies of parenthood shape women’s use for social egg freezing technology. Sociol Res Online. 2017;22(2):1–15. doi:10.5153/sro.4187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu P, Wang HW. Housing prices and fertility postponement: evidence from the CGSS micro data. J Financ Econs. 2020;46(4):79–93. doi:10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2020.04.006
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Xing CB, Zhang Q. House price, fertility rates and reproductive intentions. Chn Econ Rev. 2020;62:101496. doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozzaro C. Is egg freezing a good response to socioeconomic and cultural factors that lead women to postpone motherhood? Rep Biomed. 2018;36(5):594–603. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.01.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber-Guskar E. Debating social egg freezing: arguments from phases of life. Med Health Care Philos. 2017;21(3):325–333. doi:10.1007/s11019-017-9806-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goold I, Savulescu J. In favor of freezing eggs for non-medical reasons. Bioethics. 2009;23(1):47–58. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00679.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Lv Y. The technical rationality and the bioethical dilemma of social egg-freezing technology. Stud Dialectic Nat. 2021;37(8):81–86. doi:10.19484/j.cnki.1000-8934.2021.08.014
   Google Scholar
• Campo-Engelstein L. Reproductive technologies are not the cure for social problems. J Med Ethics. 2020;46(2):85–86. doi:10.1136/medethics-2019-105981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Hui-ting, Qing Y, Sun X-X et al, et al. Association of birth defects with the mode of assisted reproductive technology in a Chinese data-linkage cohort. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(5):849–856. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemoine ME, Ravitsky V. Sleepwalking into infertility: the need for a public health approach toward advanced maternal age. Amer J Bioethics. 2015;15(11):37–48. doi:10.1080/15265161.2015.1088973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen TS. Arguments on thin ice: on non-medical egg freezing and individualization arguments. J Med Ethics. 2021;47(3):164–168. doi:10.1136/medethics-2020-106059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karey H. Egg freezing: a breakthrough for reproductive autonomy? Bioethics. 2009;23(1):39–46. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00680.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu L. Procreative rights denied? Access to assisted reproduction technologies by single women in China. J Law Biosci. 2021;8(1):1–29. doi:10.1093/jlb/lsaa084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song J, Zhou YX. Reproductive cost sharing in two-child policy implementation- From perspectives of the government, family and employers. J Rmb Univ Chn. 2016;6:107–117.
   Google Scholar
• Wang K. Explanation of tort liability for “fertility preservation” of single women. Orient Law. 2023;1:120–132. doi:10.1136/medethics-2019-105981
   Google Scholar
• Robertson JA. Egg freezing and egg banking: empowerment and alienation in assisted reproduction. J Law Biosci. 2014;1(2):113–136. doi:10.1093/jlb/lsu002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Wu P. Ethical governance of oocyte freezing. Med Philos. 2022;43(15):18–22. doi:10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2022.15.05
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen VML. Freeze the biological clock: discrimination, disrespect, and fertility preservation via social freezing. J Appl Philos. 2022;39(3):456–470. doi:10.1111/japp.12572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding C. Surrogacy litigation in China and beyond. J Law Biosci. 2015;2(1):33–55. doi:10.1093/jlb/lsu036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimon-Zarfaty N, Kostenzer J, Sismuth LK, de Bont A. Between “Medical” and “Social” egg freezing: a comparative analysis of regulatory frameworks in Austria, Germany, Israel, and the Netherlands. J Bioeth Inq. 2021;18(4):683–699 doi:10.1007/s11673-021-10133-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y. Legal determination of surrogate child parenthood in China. Afr J Reprod Health. 2022;26(8):134–141. doi:10.29063/ajrh2022/v26i8.13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y. Abandonment of newborns with impairments in surrogacy: rights protection in China and beyond. Disabil Soc. 2023;1–7. doi:10.1080/09687599.2023.2255728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers KC, Martin LJ. Freezing time? The sociology of egg freezing. Sociol Compass. 2021;15(4):e12850. doi:10.1111/soc4.12850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen TS, Hansen R. Company‐sponsored egg freezing: an offer you can’t refuse? Bioethics. 2021;36(1):42–48. doi:10.1111/bioe.12966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertes H, Pennings G. Social egg freezing: for better, not for worse. Reprod Biomed. 2011;23(7):824–829. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.09.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones BP, Saso S, Mania A, Smith JR, Serhal P, Nagi JB. The Dawn of a new Ice Age: social egg freezing. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97(6):641–647. doi:10.1111/aogs.13335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shkedi-Rafid S, Hashiloni-Dolev Y. Egg freezing for non-medical uses: the lack of a relational approach to autonomy in the new Israeli policy and in academic discussion. J Med Ethics. 2012;38(3):154–157. doi:10.1136/medethics-2011-100088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin K. Conceptualizing women’s motivations for social egg freezing and experience of reproductive delay. Sociol Health Illn. 2018;40(5):859–873. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar