Comparative Life Cycle Assessment Between Single-Use and Reprocessed IPC Sleeves

References

• Lenzen M, Malik A, Li M, et al. The environmental footprint of health care: a global assessment. Lancet Planet Health. 2020;4(7):e271–e279. doi:10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30121-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watts N, Amann M, Arnell N, et al. The 2020 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: responding to converging crises. Lancet. 2021;397(10269):129–170. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32290-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Alliance for Transformative Action on Climate and Health (ATACH): country commitments. Available from: https://www.who.int/initiatives/alliance-for-transformative-action-on-climate-and-health/country-commitments. Accessed April 20, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Rizan C, Steinbach I, Nicholson R, Lillywhite R, Reed M, Bhutta MF. The Carbon Footprint of Surgical Operations: a Systematic Review. Ann Surg. 2020;272(6):986–995. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000003951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckelman M, Mosher M, Gonzalez A, Sherman J. Comparative life cycle assessment of disposable and reusable laryngeal mask airways. Anesth Analg. 2012;114(5):1067–1072. doi:10.1213/ANE.0b013e31824f6959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman JD, Raibley LA, Eckelman MJ. Life Cycle Assessment and Costing Methods for Device Procurement: comparing Reusable and Single-Use Disposable Laryngoscopes. Anesth Analg. 2018;127(2):434–443. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000002683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meissner M, Lichtnegger S, Gibson S, Saunders R. Evaluating the Waste Prevention Potential of a Multi- versus Single-Use Surgical Stapler. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021;14:3911–3921. doi:10.2147/RMHP.S325017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry H, Reeves N, Ansell J, et al. Innovations towards achieving environmentally sustainable operating theatres: a systematic review. Surgeon. 2023;21(3):141–151. doi:10.1016/j.surge.2022.04.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freund J, Gast K, Zuegge K, Hicks A. Environmental considerations in the selection of medical staplers: a comparative life cycle assessment. J Cleaner Prod. 2022;371:133490. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGain F, McAlister S, McGavin A, Story D. A life cycle assessment of reusable and single-use central venous catheter insertion kits. Anesth Analg. 2012;114(5):1073–1080. doi:10.1213/ANE.0b013e31824e9b69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho KM, Tan JA. Stratified meta-analysis of intermittent pneumatic compression of the lower limbs to prevent venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients. Circulation. 2013;128(9):1003–1020. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharfman ZT, Campbell JC, Mirocha JM, Spitzer AI. Balancing Thromboprophylaxis and Bleeding in Total Joint Arthroplasty: impact of Eliminating Enoxaparin and Predonation and Implementing Pneumatic Compression and Tranexamic Acid. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(6):1307–1312. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2015.11.046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakkos SK, Szendro G, Griffin M, Daskalopoulou SS, Nicolaides AN. The efficacy of the new SCD response compression system in the prevention of venous stasis. J Vascular Surgery. 2000;32(5):932–940. doi:10.1067/mva.2000.110358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. Environmental Management — Life Cycle Assessment — Requirements and Guidelines (ISO 14044:2006 + Amd 1:2017 + Amd 2:2020) (Consolidated Version); 2021
   Google Scholar
• ecoinvent Centre. Database ecoinvent v3.8 - ecoinvent. Available from: https://ecoinvent.org/the-ecoinvent-database/data-releases/ecoinvent-3-8/#1610466712069-fcebe4bb-f802. Accessed May 4, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Cardinal Health Inc. SCD Process (Internal Document); 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Cardinal Health Inc. Reprocessing Single Use Devices (Suds) – Kendall SCD™ Compression Sleeves (Internal Document); 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Weidema BP, Bauer C, Hischier R, et al. Overview and Methodology. Data Quality Guideline for the Ecoinvent Database Version 3. Ecoinvent Report 1(v3). St. Gallen: The ecoinvent Centre; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Zampori L, Pant R. Suggestions for Updating the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) Method, EUR 29682 EN. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission - Joint Research Centre - Institute for Environment and Sustainability. International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook - General Guide for Life Cycle Assessment - Detailed Guidance. First Edition March 2010. EUR 24708 EN. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Sala S, Crenna E, Secchi M, Pant R. Global Normalisation Factors for the Environmental Footprint and Life Cycle Assessment, EUR (28984). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Sala S, Cerutti AK, Pant R. Development of a Weighting Approach for the Environmental Footprint. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Babu MA, Dalenberg AK, Goodsell G, Holloway AB, Belau MM, Link MJ. Greening the Operating Room: results of a Scalable Initiative to Reduce Waste and Recover Supply Costs. Neurosurgery. 2019;85(3):432–437. doi:10.1093/neuros/nyy275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagoma YK, Stall N, Rubinstein E, Naudie D. People, planet and profits: the case for greening operating rooms. CMAJ. 2012;184(17):1905–1911. doi:10.1503/cmaj.112139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riedel LM. Environmental and financial impact of a hospital recycling program. AANA J. 2011;79(4 Suppl):S8–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sørensen BL, Wenzel H. Life cycle assessment of alternative bedpans – a case of comparing disposable and reusable devices. J Cleaner Prod. 2014;83:70–79. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGain F, Story D, Lim T, McAlister S. Financial and environmental costs of reusable and single-use anaesthetic equipment. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118(6):862–869. doi:10.1093/bja/aex098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte A, Maga D, Thonemann N. Combining Life Cycle Assessment and Circularity Assessment to Analyze Environmental Impacts of the Medical Remanufacturing of Electrophysiology Catheters. Sustainability. 2021;13(2):898. doi:10.3390/su13020898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar