Optimization of Diagnosis-Related Groups for 14,246 Patients with Uterine Leiomyoma in a Single Center in Western China Using a Machine Learning Model

References

• Bulletins-Gynecology ACo P. ACOG practice bulletin. Surgical alternatives to hysterectomy in the management of leiomyomas. Number 16, May 2000 (replaces educational bulletin number 192, May 1994). Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001;73(3):285–293. doi:10.1016/s0020-7292(01)00414-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart EA. Uterine fibroids. Lancet. 2001;357(9252):293–298. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03622-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankaran S, Manyonda IT. Medical management of fibroids. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;22(4):655–676. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2008.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker WH. Etiology, symptomatology, and diagnosis of uterine myomas. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(4):725–736. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang XB, Liu XK, Han L. Analysis of influencing factors of hospitalization expenses in patients with uterine leiomyoma. Mod Preventive Med. 2020;47(12):2202–2205+2232.
   Google Scholar
• Sabry M, Al-Hendy A. Medical treatment of uterine leiomyoma. Reprod Sci. 2012;19(4):339–353. doi:10.1177/1933719111432867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunkara SK, Khairy M, El-Toukhy T, et al. The effect of intramural fibroids without uterine cavity involvement on the outcome of IVF treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(2):418–429. doi:10.1093/humrep/dep396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashani BN, Centini G, Morelli SS, et al. Role of medical management for uterine leiomyomas. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;34:85–103. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.11.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannini A, Golia D’Augè T, Bogani G, et al. Uterine sarcomas: a critical review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023;287:166–170. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.06.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Angelo E, Prat J. Uterine sarcomas: a review. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;116(1):131–139. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.09.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallmann P. Uterine sarcoma - difficult to diagnose, hard to treat. Oncol Res Treat. 2018;41(11):674. doi:10.1159/000494393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson C, Miah AB. Uterine sarcoma - current perspectives. Int J Womens Health. 2017;9:597–606. doi:10.2147/IJWH.S117754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Institute for Health Information, Statistics Canada. Health indicators. Ottawa: CIHI; 2010. Available from: https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/Healthindicators2010_en.pdf. Accessed July 10, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteman MK, Hillis SD, Jamieson DJ, et al. Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000–2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(1):e1–7. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.05.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, et al. Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(5):1091–1095. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000285997.38553.4b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd LR, Novetsky AP, Curtin JP. Effect of surgical volume on route of hysterectomy and short-term morbidity. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(4):909–915. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f395d9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn M, Jamison M, Datta S, et al. Health care resource use for uterine fibroid tumors in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(4):955–964. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2006.02.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Wang YL. Comparison of clinical efficacy between laparoscopic myomectomy and laparotomy. Chin J Clin Oncol Rehabil. 2012;19(4):363–364.
   Google Scholar
• Gu Y, Zhu L, Liu A, et al. Analysis of hysterectomies for patients with uterine leiomyomas in China in 2010. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;129(1):71–74. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.10.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busse R, Geissler A, Aaviksoo A, et al. Diagnosis related groups in Europe: moving towards transparency, efficiency, and quality in hospitals? BMJ. 2013:346:f3197. doi:10.1136/bmj.f3197
   Google Scholar
• Hunter WG, Hesson A, Davis JK, et al. Patient-physician discussions about costs: definitions and impact on cost conversation incidence estimates. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:108. doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1353-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polyzos N, Karanikas H, Thireos E, et al. Reforming reimbursement of public hospitals in Greece during the economic crisis: implementation of a DRG system. Health Policy. 2013;109(1):14–22. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.09.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn K. After the revolution: dRGs at age 30. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(6):426–429. doi:10.7326/M13-2115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isilak Z, Yalcin M, Un H, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided lesion or patient management? Chin Med J. 2015;128(23):3266. doi:10.4103/0366-6999.170273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurgar E, Barton S, Karner C, et al. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions for the treatment of anogenital warts: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2016;20(24):1–486. doi:10.3310/hta20240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldfield N. The evolution of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs): from its beginnings in case-mix and resource use theory, to its implementation for payment and now for its current utilization for quality within and outside the hospital. Qual Manag Health Care. 2010;19(1):3–16. doi:10.1097/QMH.0b013e3181ccbcc3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quentin W, Scheller-Kreinsen D, Geissler A, et al. Appendectomy and diagnosis-related groups (DRGs): patient classification and hospital reimbursement in 11 European countries. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012;397(2):317–326. doi:10.1007/s00423-011-0877-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu SW, Pan Q, Chen T, et al. Research of medical expenditure among inpatients with unstable angina pectoris in a single center. Chin Med J. 2017;130(13):1529–1533. doi:10.4103/0366-6999.208242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Fang C, Wu C, et al. DRG grouping by machine learning: from expert-oriented to data-based method. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021;21(1):312. doi:10.1186/s12911-021-01676-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Office of the National Medical Security Administration. Notice on the issuance of paid national pilot technical specifications and grouping schemes for disease diagnostic related groups; 2019. Available from: http://www.nhsa.gov.cn/art/2019/10/24/art_37_1878.html. Accessed July 10, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Zou K, Li HY, Zhou D, et al. The effects of diagnosis-related groups payment on hospital healthcare in China: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):112. doi:10.1186/s12913-020-4957-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo AJ, Chang WF, Xin ZR, et al. Diagnosis related group grouping study of senile cataract patients based on E-CHAID algorithm. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018;11(2):308–313. doi:10.18240/ijo.2018.02.21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu SW, Pan Q, Chen T. Research on diagnosis-related group grouping of inpatient medical expenditure in colorectal cancer patients based on a decision tree model. World J Clin Cases. 2020;8(12):2484–2493. doi:10.12998/wjcc.v8.i12.2484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhi M, Hu L, Geng F, et al. Analysis of the cost and case-mix of post-acute stroke patients in china using quantile regression and the decision-tree models. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022;15:1113–1127. doi:10.2147/RMHP.S361385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu T, He Z, Zhou Q, et al. Analysis of the factors influencing lung cancer hospitalization expenses using data mining. Thorac Cancer. 2015;6(3):338–345. doi:10.1111/1759-7714.12147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs D, De Ville B, Suen E. A method of choosing multiway partitions for classification and decision trees. J Appl Stat. 1991;18(1):49–62.
   Google Scholar
• Tanguy-Melac A, Aguade AS, Fagot-Campagna A, et al. Management and intensity of medical end-of-life care in people with colorectal cancer during the year before their death in 2015: a French national observational study. Cancer Med. 2019;8(15):6671–6683. doi:10.1002/cam4.2527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu XZ. DRGs case-mix study on hospitalization costs of pneumonia patients. China Health Statistics. 2020;37(2):235–238.
   Google Scholar
• Wang S, Rao KQ, Liu LH. Current status of DRG payment in china and reference of DRG payment in the world. Chin J Hospital Admin. 2015;31(2):81–83.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou LY, Sun MJ, Xia XJ, et al. Study on DRGs grouping of patients with uterine leiomyoma surgery in a 3A hospital in Shanxi Province. China Health Ser Manage. 2023;40(2):95–99+135.
   Google Scholar
• Newbold RR, DiAugustine RP, Risinger JI, et al. Advances in uterine leiomyoma research: conference overview, summary, and future research recommendations. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108(Suppl 5):769–773. doi:10.1289/ehp.00108s5769
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• The SAGES-MIRA Robotic Surgery Consensus Group. A consensus document on robotic surgery; 2007. Available from: http://www.sages.org/publications/guidelines/consensus-document-robotic-surgery. Accessed July 10, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Su FY, Fu ML, Zhao QH, et al. Analysis of hospitalization costs related to fall injuries in elderly patients. World J Clin Cases. 2021;9(6):1271–1283. doi:10.12998/wjcc.v9.i6.1271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasdai D, Garratt KN, Holmes DR, et al. Coronary angioplasty and intracoronary thrombolysis are of limited efficacy in resolving early intracoronary stent thrombosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28(2):361–367. doi:10.1016/0735-1097(96)00136-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox KM. Investigators EUtOrocewPiscAd. Efficacy of perindopril in reduction of cardiovascular events among patients with stable coronary artery disease: randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial (the Europa study). Lancet. 2003;362(9386):782–788. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14286-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng S, Luo L, Fang Y, et al. Cost control of treatment for cerebrovascular patients using a machine learning model in Western China. J Healthc Eng. 2021;2021:6158961. doi:10.1155/2021/6158961
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brügger U, Eichler K. Impact of introducing a DRG reimbursement system in an acute inpatient hospital setting: a literature review. Rheumatology. 2010;46(3):556–557.
   Google Scholar
• Jin PM, Hua W, Chen J, et al. Study on establishing hospitalization expense standard of single disease based on disease diagnosis correlation group method. China Health Econo. 2017;36(2):26–28.
   Google Scholar
• Li YW, Xie HY, Zhang B, et al. Effect of clinical pathway on improving the quality of medical service in hysterectomy for uterine leiomyoma. China Health Qual Manage. 2013;20(1):28–30.
   Google Scholar
• Tanner K, Sabrine N, Wren C. Cardiovascular malformations among preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2005;116(6):e833–e838. doi:10.1542/peds.2005-0397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Z. Analysis of the influence of quality control of the first page of medical record on DRG. China Health Econo. 2018;37(12):94–95.
   Google Scholar
• ConwayLenihan A, Ahern S, Moore S, et al. Factors influencing the variation in GMS prescribing expenditure in Ireland. Health Econ Rev. 2016;6(1):13. doi:10.1186/s13561-016-0090-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar