143
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Assessment of the acute abdomen: role of the plain abdominal radiograph

&
Pages 93-105 | Published online: 16 Nov 2010

References

  • de Dombal FT. Diagnosis of Acute Abdominal Pain. 2nd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1991:1–10.
  • Schurink GW, Bode PJ, van Luijt PA, van Vugt AB. The value of physical examination in the diagnosis of patients with blunt abdominal trauma: a retrospective study. Injury. 1997;28(4):261–265.
  • Ferrera PC, Verdile VP, Bartfield JM, Snyder HS, Salluzzo RF. Injuries distracting from intra-abdominal injuries after blunt trauma. Am J Emerg Med. 1998;16(2):145–149.
  • Levine MS. Plain film diagnosis of the acute abdomen. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1985;3(3):541–562.
  • McCook TA, Ravin CE, Rice RP Abdominal radiography in the emergency department: a prospective analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 1982;11(1):7–8.
  • Gore RM, Miller FH, Pereles FS, Yaghmai V, Berlin JW. Helical CT in the evaluation of the acute abdomen. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174(4):901–913.
  • Kundra V, Silverman PM. Impact of multislice CT on imaging of acute abdominal disease. Radiol Clin North Am. 2003;41(6):1083–1093.
  • Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S, Marincek B. Multi-detector computed tomography of acute abdomen. Eur Radiol. 2005;15(12):2435–2447.
  • Rydberg J, Buckwalter KA, Caldemeyer KS, et al. Multisection CT: scanning techniques and clinical applications. Radiographics. 2000;20(6):1787–1806.
  • Stoker J, van Randen A, Lameris W, Boermeester MA. Imaging patients with acute abdominal pain. Radiology. 2009;253(1):31–46.
  • The Royal College of Radiologists. Making the Best Use of Clinical Radiology Services: Referral Guidelines. London: The Royal College of Radiologists; 2007.
  • American College of Radiology. American College of Radiology practice guidelines for the performance of abdominal radiography. In: American College of Radiology Practice Guidelines. Reston (VA): American College of Radiology; 2006:301–305.
  • Smith JE, Hall EJ. The use of plain abdominal X-rays in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2009;26(3):160–163.
  • Markus JB, Somers S, Franic SE, Moola C, Stevenson GW. Interobserver variation in the interpretation of abdominal radiographs. Radiology. 1989;171(1):69–71.
  • Ahn SH, Mayo-Smith WW, Murphy BL, Reinert SE, Cronan JJ. Acute nontraumatic abdominal pain in adult patients: abdominal radiography compared with CT evaluation. Radiology. 2002;225(1):159–164.
  • MacKersie AB, Lane MJ, Gerhardt RT, et al. Nontraumatic acute abdominal pain: Unenhanced helical CT compared with three-view acute abdominal series. Radiology. 2005;237(1):114–122.
  • Kellow ZS, Maclnnes M, Kurzencwyg D, et al. The role of abdominal radiography in the evaluation of the nontrauma emergency patient. Radiology. 2008;248(3):887–893.
  • van Randen A, Lameris W, Luitse JS, et al. The role of plain radiographs in patients with acute abdominal pain at the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2010 Apr 23; article in press, available on line. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.12.020.
  • Bohner H, Yang Q, Franke C, Verreet PR, Ohmann C. Simple data from history and physical examination help to exclude bowel obstruction and to avoid radiographic studies in patients with acute abdominal pain. Eur J Surg. 1998;164(10):777–784.
  • Suri S, Gupta S, Sudhakar PJ, Venkataramu NK, Sood B, Wig JD. Comparative evaluation of plain films, ultrasound and CT in the diagnosis of intestinal obstruction. Acta Radiol. 1999;40(4):422–428.
  • Maglinte DD, Reyes BL, Harmon BH, et al. Reliability and role of plain film radiography and CT in the diagnosis of small-bowel obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167(6):1451–1455.
  • Frager D, Medwid SW, Baer JW, Mollinelli B, Friedman M. CT of small- bowel obstruction: value in establishing the diagnosis and determining the degree and cause. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;162(1):37–41.
  • Ros PR, Huprich JE. ACR appropriateness criteria on suspected small- bowel obstruction. J Am Coll Radiol. 2006;3(11):838–841.
  • Godfrey EM, Addley HC, Shaw AS. The use of computed tomography in the detection and characterisation of large bowel obstruction. N Z Med J. 2009;122(1305):57–73.
  • Smith RC, Rosenfield AT, Choe KA, et al. Acute flank pain: comparison of non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography. Radiology. 1995;194(3):789–794.
  • Sommer FG, Jeffrey RB Jr, Rubin GD, et al. Detection of ureteral calculi in patients with suspected renal colic: value of reformatted non contrast helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165(3):509–513.
  • Sourtzis S, Thibeau JF, Damry N, Raslan A, Vandendris M, Bellemans M. Radiologic investigation of renal colic: unenhanced helical CT compared to excretory urography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172(6):1491–1494.
  • Smith RC, Verga M, McCarthy S, Rosenfield AT. Diagnosis of acute flank pain: value of unenhanced helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166(1):97–101.
  • Levine JA, Neitlich J, Verga M, Dalrymple N, Smith RC. Ureteral calculi in patients with flank pain: correlation of plain radiography with unenhanced helical CT. Radiology. 1997;204(1):27–31.
  • Roa PM, Rhea JT, Rao JA, Conn AK. Plain abdominal radiography in clinically suspected appendicitis: diagnostic yield, resource use, and comparison with CT. Am J Emerg Med. 1999;17(4):325–328.
  • Otero HJ, Ondategui-Parra S, Erturk SM, Ochoa RE, Gonzalez-Beicos A, Ros PR. Imaging utilization in the management of appendicitis and its impact on hospital charges. Emerg Radiol. 2008;15(1):23–28.
  • van Randen A, Bipat S, Zwinderman AH, Ubbink DT, Stoker J, Boermeester MA. Acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of CT and graded compression US related to prevalence of disease. Radiology. 2008;249(1):97–106.
  • Cobben LP, Groot I, Haans L, Blickman JG, Puylaert J. MRI for clinically suspected appendicitis during pregnancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183(3):671–675.
  • Pedrosa I, Levine D, Eyvazzadeh AD, Siewert B, Ngo L, Rofsky NM. MR imaging evaluation of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Radiology. 2006;238(3):891–899.
  • Vu L, Ambrose D, Vos P, Tiwari P, Rosengarten M, Wiseman S. Evaluation of MRI for the diagnosis of appendicitis during pregnancy when ultrasound is inconclusive. J Surg Res. 2009;156(1):145–149.
  • Lee PW. The plain X-ray in the acute abdomen: a surgeon’s evaluation. Br J Surg. 1976;63(10):763–766.
  • Flak B, Rowley VA. Acute abdomen: plain film utilization and analysis. Can Assoc Radiol J. 1993;44(6):423–428.
  • Stapakis JC, Thickman D. Diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum: abdominal CT vs upright chest film. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1992;16(5):713–716.
  • Hainaux B, Agneessens E, Bertinotti R, et al. Accuracy of MDCT in predicting site of gastrointestinal tract perforation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187(5):1179–1183.
  • Morris-Stiff G, Stiff RE, Morris-Stiff H. Abdominal radiograph requesting in the setting of acute abdominal pain: temporal trends and appropriateness of requesting. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006;88(3):270–274.
  • Laméris W, van Randen A, van Es HW, et al. Imaging strategies for detection of urgent conditions in patients with acute abdominal pain: diagnostic accuracy study. BMJ. 2009;338:b2431.
  • Sala E, Watson CJ, Beadsmoore C, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of routine early abdominal computed tomography in patients with non-specific abdominal pain. Clin Radiol. 2007;62(10):961–969.