Study of optimal exposure windows using 320-Detector rows dynamic volume CT

References

• Einstein A, Henzlova M, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA. 2007;298:317–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles DR, Smail MA, Negus IS, et al. Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1840–1845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redberg R, Walsh J. Pay now, benefits may follow - the case of cardiac computed tomographic angiography. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2309–2311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F, et al. International prospective multicenter study on radiation dose estimates of coronary CT angiography in daily practice; aThe PROTECTION I study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;2:S19-S20.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA. 2007;298:317–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul JF, Abada HT. Strategies for reduction of radiation dose in cardiac multislice CT. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:2028–2037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, et al. Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: First experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:191–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horiguchi J, Kiguchi M, Fujioka C, et al. Radiation dose, image quality, stenosis measurement, and CT densitometry using ECG-triggered coronary 64-MDCT angiography: A phantom study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earls J, Berman E, Urban B, et al. Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: Improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology. 2008;246:742–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirai N, Horiguchi J, Fujioka C, et al. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: Assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose. Radiology. 2008;248:424–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuman W, Branch K, May J, et al. Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: Comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. Radiology. 2008;248:431–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weustink A, Neefjes L, Kyrzopoulos S, et al. Impact of heart rate frequency and variability on radiation exposure, image quality, and diagnostic performance in dual-source spiral CT coronary angiography. Radiology. 2009;253:672–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rybicki FJ, Otero HJ, Steigner ML, et al. Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;24:535–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steigner ML, Otero HJ, Cai T, et al. Narrowing the phase window width in prospectively ECG-gated single heart beat 320-detector row coronary CT angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;25:85–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoe J, Toh KH. First experience with 320-row multidetector CT coronary angiography scanning with prospective electrocardiogram gating to reduce radiation dose. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009;3:257–261.
   Google Scholar
• Hein PA, Romano VC, Lembcke A, May J, Rogalla P. Initial experience with a chest pain protocol using 320-slice volume MDCT. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:1148–1155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey M, Zimmermann E, Deissenrieder F, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography by 320-row computed tomography with lower radiation exposure and maintained diagnostic accuracy: Comparison of results with cardiac catheterization in a head-to-head pilot investigation. Circulation. 2009;120:867–875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitagawa K, Lardo A, Lima J, George R. Prospective ECG-gated 320 row detector computed tomography: Implications for CT angiography and perfusion imaging. Int J Card Imaging. 2009;25:201–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey M, Teige F, Schnapauff D, et al. Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:407–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leber AW, Knez A, Becker A, et al. Accuracy of multidetector spiral computed tomography in identifying and differentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: A comparative study with intracoronary ultrasound. J Am Col Cardiol. 2004;43:1241–1247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog C, Abolmaali N, Balzer JO, et al. Heart-rate-adapted image reconstruction in multidetector-row cardiac CT: Influence of physiological and technical prerequisite on image quality. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:2670–2678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Manzke R, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: Effect of heart rate. Radiology. 2005;234:86–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Boehm T, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: Effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Radiology. 2006;241:378–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seifarth H, Wienbeck S, Pusken M, et al. Optimal systolic and diastolic reconstruction windows for coronary CT angiography using dual-source CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:1317–1323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodoefel H, Burgstahler C, Tsiflikas I, et al. Dual-source CT: Effect of heart rate, heart rate variability, and calcification on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Radiology. 2008;247:346–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einstein AJ, Elliston CD, Arai AE, et al. Radiation dose from singleheartbeat coronary CT angiography performed with a 320-detector row volume scanner. Radiology. 2010;254:698–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah A, Gnoj J, Fisher V. Complications of selective coronary arteriography by the Judkins technique and their prevention. Am Heart J. 1975;90:353–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husmann L, Leschka S, Desbiolles L, et al. Coronary artery motion and cardiac phases: Dependency on heart rate - implications for CT image reconstruction. Radiology. 2007;245:567–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hozumi T, Yoshida K, Akasaka T, et al. Noninvasive assessment of coronary flow velocity and coronary flow velocity reserve in the left anterior descending coronary artery by Doppler echocardiography: Comparison with invasive technique. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1251–1259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar