Teleradiology: current perspectives

References

• Silva E, Breslau J, Barr RM, et al. ACR white paper on teleradiology practice: a report from the Task Force on Teleradiology Practice. J Am Coll Radiol. 2013;10:575–585.
   Google Scholar
• European Society of Radiology. The future role of radiology in healthcare. Insights Imaging. 2010;1:2–11.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter TB, Krupinski EA, Weinstein RS. Factors in the selection of a teleradiology provider in the United States. J Telemed Telecare. 2013;19:352–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg C, Kroos K, Rosemberg B, Hosten N, Flessa S. Teleradiology from the provider’s perspective – cost analysis for a mid-size university hospital. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:2197–2205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrall JH. Teleradiology: two-edged sword or friend of radiology practice? J Am Coll Radiol. 2009;6:73–75.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley WG Jr. Off-site teleradiology: the pros. Radiology. 2008;248:337–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boland GW. Teleradiology coming of age: winners and losers. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:1161–1162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brant-Zawadzki M. The goose and the nighthawk: a bedtime fable for young radiologists (with apologies to the Brothers Grimm). J Am Coll Radiol. 2006;3:231–232.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley WG Jr. Special focus: outsourcing after hours radiology – another point of view: use of a nighthawk service in an academic radiology department. J Am Coll Radiol. 2007;4:675–677.
   Google Scholar
• Levin DC, Rao VM. Outsourcing to teleradiology companies: bad for radiology, bad for radiologists. J Am Coll Radiol. 2011;8:104–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaye AH, Forman HP, Kapoor R, Sunshine JH. A survey of radiology practices’ use of after-hours radiology services. J Am Coll Radiol. 2008;5:748–758.
   Google Scholar
• Norweck JT, Seibert JA, Andriole KP, et al. ACR-AAPM-SIIM Technical Standard for Electronic Practice of Medical Imaging. J Digit Imaging. 2013;26:38–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranschaert E, Binkhuysen FB, Ziekenhuis JB. European teleradiology now and in the future: results of a survey. Int J CARS. 2012;7:S97–S102.
   Google Scholar
• Marti-Bonmati L, Morales A, Bach LD. [Toward the appropriate use of teleradiology]. Radiologia. 2012;54:115–123. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Kazley AS, McLeod AC, Wager KA. Telemedicine in an international context: definition, use, and future. Adv Health Care Manag. 2012;12:143–169.
   Google Scholar
• Venco S. The emergence of a new medical model: the international division of labour and the formation of an international outsourcing chain in teleradiology. Work Org Labour Globaliz. 2012;6:45–57.
   Google Scholar
• Cenname G, D’Ambrosio ID, Ajello C. Teleradiology: case series and experience acquired in the military field. Radiol Med. 2013;118:688–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck JJW. Trauma imaging in and out of conflict: a review of the evidence. Radiography. 2012;18:292–295.
   Google Scholar
• Poropatich R, Lai E, McVeigh F, Bashshur R. The US Army Telemedicine and m-Health Program: making a difference at home and abroad. Telemed J E Health. 2013;19:380–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marino R, Ghanim A. Teledentistry: a systematic review of the literature. J Telemed Telecare. 2013;19:179–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi JW. Clinical usefulness of teleradiology in general dental practice. Imaging Sci Dent. 2013;43:99–104.
   Google Scholar
• Tublin M, Brown C, Pacella C, Tublin D, Yealy D. Overnight subspecialty radiology coverage: review of a practice model and analysis of its impact on CT utilization rates in academic and community emergency departments. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199:623–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark JR, Huckman RS, Staats BR. Learning from customers: individual and organizational effects in outsourced radiological services. Organization Sci. 2012;24:1539–1557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Relyea-Chew A. Major regulatory changes and the impact on diagnostic imaging in the United Sates 2005 to 2012. Acad Radiol. 2013;20:1063–1068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satoh H, Niki N, Eguchi K, et al. Teleradiology network system on cloud using the web medical image conference system with a new information security solution. Proc SPIE Med Imaging. 2013;8674:86740X-1.
   Google Scholar
• Nyeem H, Boles W, Boyd C. A review of medical image watermarking requirements for teleradiology. J Digit Imaging. 2013;26:326–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO [homepage on the Internet]. ISO 27799:2008 Health informatics – information security management in health using ISO/IEC 27002. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization. Available from: http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=41298. Accessed December 1, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Koutelakis GV, Anastassopoulos GK, Lymberopoulos DK. Application of a multiprotocol medical imaging communications and an extended DICOM WADO service in a teleradiology architecture. Int J Telemed Appl. 2012;2012:271758.
   Google Scholar
• Krupinski EA, McNeill K, Ovitt TW, Alden S, Holcomb M. Patterns of use and satisfaction with a university-based teleradiology system. J Digit Imaging. 1999;12:166–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salazar AJ, Camacho JC, Aguirre DA. Comparison between different cost devices for digital capture of X-ray films: an image characteristics detection approach. J Digit Imaging. 2012;25:91–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramson RG. Variability in radiology practice in the United States: a former teleradiologist’s perspective. Radiology. 2012;263:318–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fruehwald J, Jantsch M, Pinker K, et al. Teleradiology with uncompressed digital mammograms: clinical assessment. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82:412–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein RS, Lopez AM, Barker GP, Krupinski EA, Descour MR, Scott KM. The innovative bundling of teleradiology, telepathology, and teleoncology services. IBM Syst J. 2007;46:69–84.
   Google Scholar
• Hohmann J, de Villiers P, Urigo C, Sarpi D, Newerla C, Brookes J. Quality assessment of out sourced after-hours computed tomography teleradiology reports in a Central London University Hospital. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:e875–e879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Agrawal A, Pandit M, Kalyanpur A. Systematic survey of discrepancy rates in an international teleradiology service. Emerg Radiol. 2011;18:23–29.
   Google Scholar
• Wong WS, Roubal I, Jackson DB, Paik WN, Wong VK. Outsourced teleradiology imaging services: an analysis of discordant interpretation in 124,870 cases. J Am Coll Radiol. 2005;2:478–484.
   Google Scholar
• Platts-Mills TF, Hendey GW, Ferguson B. Teleradiology interpretations of emergency department computed tomography scans. J Emerg Med. 2010;38:188–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens KJ, Griffiths KL, Rosenberg J, Mahadevan S, Zatz LM, Leung AN. Discordance rates between preliminary and final radiology reports on cross-sectional imaging studies at a level 1 trauma center. Acad Radiol. 2008;15:1217–1226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strub WM, Vagal AA, Tomsick T, Moulton JS. Overnight resident preliminary interpretations on CT examinations: should the process continue? Emerg Radiol. 2006;13:19–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Filippi CG, Schneider B, Burbank HN, Alsofrom GF, Linnell G, Ratkovits B. Discrepancy rates of radiology resident interpretations of on-call neuroradiology MR imaging studies. Radiology. 2008;249:972–979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs RH, Rowbotham E, Johnstone AL, Chalmers AG. Provisional reporting of polytrauma CT by oncall radiology registrars. Is it safe? Clin Radiol. 2010;65:616–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Food and Drug Administration. Mobile Medical Applications: Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff. Silver Spring, MD: Food and Drug Administration; 2013. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/UCM263366.pdf. Accessed October 15, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Szekely A, Talanow R, Bagyi P. Smartphones, tablets and mobile applications for radiology. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82:829–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modi J, Sharma P, Earl A, Simpson M, Mitchell JR, Goyal M. iPhone-based teleradiology for the diagnosis of acute cervico-dorsal spine trauma. Can J Neurol Sci. 2010;37:849–854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell JR, Sharma P, Modi J, et al. A Smartphone client-server teleradiology system for primary diagnosis of acute stroke. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13:e31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toomey RJ, Ryan JT, McEntee MF, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of handheld devices for emergency radiologic consultation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:469–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson PT, Zimmerman SL, Heath D, et al. The iPad as a mobile device for CT display and interpretation: diagnostic accuracy for identification of pulmonary embolism. Emerg Radiol. 2012;19:323–327.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhatia A, Patel S, Pantol G, Wu YY, Plitnikas M, Hancock C. Intra and inter-observer reliability of mobile tablet PACS viewer system vs standard PACS viewing station-diagnosis of acute nervous system events. Open J Radiol. 2013;3:91–98.
   Google Scholar
• Abboud S, Weiss F, Siegel E, Jeudy J. TB or not TB: interreader and intrareader variability in screening diagnosis on an iPad versus a traditional display. J Am Coll Radiol. 2013;10:42–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues MA, Visvanathan A, Murchison JT, Brady RR. Radiology smartphone applications; current provision and caution. Insights Imaging. 2013;4:555–562.
   Google Scholar
• Ege T, Kose O, Koca K, Demiralp B, Basbozkurt. Use of the iPhone for radiographic evaluation of the hallux valgus. Skeletal Radiol. 2013;42:269–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Food and Drug Administration. FDA Medical Image Communications Device Guidance. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=892.2020. Accessed December 1, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Schwamm LH, Holloway RG, Amarenco P, et al. American Heart Association Stroke Council; Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. A review of the evidence for the use of telemedicine within stroke systems of care: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2009;40:2616–2634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demaerschalk BM, Bobrow BJ, Raman R, et al. CT interpretation in a telestroke network: agreement among a spoke radiologist, hub vascular neurologist, and hub neuroradiologist. Stroke. 2012;43:3095–3097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demaerschalk BM, Vargas JE, Cannner DD, et al. Smartphone teleradiology application is successfully incorporated into a telestroke network environment. Stroke. 2012;43:3098–3101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JB, Choi HJ, Lee JH, Kang BS. An assessment of the iPad 2 as a CT teleradiology tool using brain CT with subtle intracranial hemorrhage under conventional illumination. J Digit Imaging. 2013;26:683–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NEMA [homepage on the Internet]. The DICOM standard. Rosslyn, VA: NEMA [updated 2009]. Available from: http://medical.nema.org/standard.html. Accessed October 15, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Health Level Seven International [homepage on the Internet]. Available from: http://hl7.org. Accessed October 15, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• HHS.gov [homepage on the Internet]. Health information privacy. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services. Available from: http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/hipaa/enforcement/sag/index.html. Accessed October 16, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlman M, Meyer M, Krupinski EA. Direct reporting of results to patients: the future of radiology? Acad Radiol. 2012;19:646–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu PA, Ruiz-Wibbelsmann JA, Spielman SB, et al. Creating a patient-centered imaging service: determining what patients want. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:605–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• My Patient Connection [homepage one the Internet]. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology. Available from: http://www.mypatientconnection.com/Articles/NeimanLetter.aspx. Accessed December 1, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• American College of Radiology. ACR practice guideline for communication of diagnostic imaging findings. http://www.guideline.gov/content.aspx?id=32541. Accessed December 1, 2013.
   Google Scholar