Reconstructing brain magnetic susceptibility distributions from T2* phase images by TV-regularized 2-subproblem split Bregman iterations

References

• Chavhan GB, Babyn PS, Thomas B, Shroff MM, Haacke EM. Principles, techniques, and applications of T2*-based MR imaging and its special applications. Radiographics. 2009;29(5):1433–1449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogawa S, Tank DW, Menon R, et al. Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89(13):5951–5955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogawa S, Menon RS, Tank DW, et al. Functional brain mapping by blood oxygenation level-dependent contrast magnetic resonance imaging. A comparison of signal characteristics with a biophysical model. Biophys J. 1993;64(3):803–812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boxerman JL, Hamberg LM, Rosen BR, Weisskoff RM. MR contrast due to intravascular magnetic susceptibility perturbations. Magn Reson Med. 1995;34(4):555–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Rochefort L, Liu T, Kressler B, et al. Quantitative susceptibility map reconstruction from MR phase data using Bayesian regularization: validation and application to brain imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2010;63(1):194–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haacke EM, Tang J, Neelavalli J, Cheng YC. Susceptibility mapping as a means to visualize veins and quantify oxygen saturation. J Magn Reson Imag. 2010;32(3):663–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Liu T, de Rochefort L, et al. Morphology enabled dipole inversion for quantitative susceptibility mapping using structural consistency between the magnitude image and the susceptibility map. Neuroimage. 2012;59(3):2560–2568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweser F, Deistung A, Lehr BW, Reichenbach JR. Quantitative imaging of intrinsic magnetic tissue properties using MRI signal phase: an approach to in vivo brain iron metabolism? Neuroimage. 2011;54(4):2789–2807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweser F, Sommer K, Deistung A, Reichenbach JR. Quantitative susceptibility mapping for investigating subtle susceptibility variations in the human brain. Neuroimage. 2012;62(3):2083–2100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shmueli K, de Zwart JA, van Gelderen P, Li TQ, Dodd SJ, Duyn JH. Magnetic susceptibility mapping of brain tissue in vivo using MRI phase data. Magn Reson Med. 2009;62(6):1510–1522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wharton S, Bowtell R. Whole-brain susceptibility mapping at high field: a comparison of multiple- and single-orientation methods. Neuroimage. 2010;53(2):515–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wharton S, Schafer A, Bowtell R. Susceptibility mapping in the human brain using threshold-based k-space division. Magn Reson Med. 2010;63(5):1292–1304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Calhoun V. Computed inverse resonance imaging for magnetic susceptibility map reconstruction. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012;36(2):265–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepulveda NG, Thomas IM, Wikswo JP. Magnetic susceptibility tomography for three-dimensional imaging of diamagnetic and paramagnetic objects. IEEE Trans Magnetics. 1994;30(6):5062–5069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Calhoun V. 4D Magnetic Susceptibility Tomography for Susceptibility-Based Functional Imaging. Seattle, WA: Organization for Human Brain Mapping; 2013; #1934.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Chen Z, Calhoun VD. Voxel magnetic field disturbance from remote vasculature in BOLD fMRI. In: Pelc NJ, Samei E, Nishikawa RM, editors. Physics of Medical Imaging. Orlando, FL: SPIE Physics in Medical Imaging; 2011; #79613x.
   Google Scholar
• Li L, Leigh JS. Quantifying arbitrary magnetic susceptibility distributions with MR. Magn Reson Med. 2004;51(5):1077–1082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu T, Liu J, de Rochefort L, et al. Morphology enabled dipole inversion (MEDI) from a single-angle acquisition: comparison with COSMOS in human brain imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2011;66(3):777–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kressler B, de Rochefort L, Liu T, Spincemaille P, Jiang Q, Wang Y. Nonlinear regularization for per voxel estimation of magnetic susceptibility distributions from MRI field maps. IEEE Trans Med Imag. 2010;29(2):273–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweser F, Deistung A, Lehr BW, Reichenbach JR. Differentiation between diamagnetic and paramagnetic cerebral lesions based on magnetic susceptibility mapping. Med Phys. 2010;37(10):5165–5178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Wu B, Liu C. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain reflects spatial variation in tissue composition. Neuroimage. 2011;55(4):1645–1656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai J, Osher S, Shen Z. Split Bregman methods and frame based image restoration. Multiscale Model Simul. 2009;8(2):337–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein T, Osher S. The split Bregman method for L1-regularized problems. SIAM J Imaging Sci. 2009;2(2):323–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osher S, Burger M, Goldfarb D, Xu J, Yin W. An iterative regularization method for total variation-based image restoration. Multiscale Model Simul. 2005;4(2):30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel CR, Oman ME. Fast, robust total variation-based reconstruction of noisy, blurred images. IEEE Trans Image Process. 1998;7(6):813–824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambolle A, Lions PL. Image recovery via total variational minimization and related problems. Numer Math. 1997;76:22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan T, Esedoglu S, Park F, Yip A. Recent developments in total variation image restoration. In: Paragios N, Chen Y, Faugeras O, editors. Handbook of Mathematical Models in Computer Vision. New York: Springer; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Combettes PL, Pesquet JC. Image restoration subject to a total variation constraint. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2004;13(9):1213–1222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng YC, Neelavalli J, Haacke EM. Limitations of calculating field distributions and magnetic susceptibilities in MRI using a Fourier based method. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54(5):1169–1189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitz JR, Milford FJ, Christy RW. Foundations of Electromagnetic Theory. New York: Addison-Wisley; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Calhoun V. Volumetric Computational Model for Neurovascular Coupling and BOLD fMRI. Quebec, CA: Organization for Human Brain Mapping; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Calhoun VD. Magnitude and phase behavior of multiresolution BOLD signal. Concepts Magn Reson. 2010;37B(3):129–135.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Liu J, Calhoun VD. Susceptibility-based functional brain mapping by 3D deconvolution of an MR-phase activation map. J Neurosci Methods. 2013;216(1):33–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Calhoun VD. Two pitfalls of BOLD fMRI magnitude-based neuroimage analysis: non-negativity and edge effect. J Neurosci Methods. 2011;199(2):363–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu T, Spincemaille P, de Rochefort L, Kressler B, Wang Y. Calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling (COSMOS): a method for conditioning the inverse problem from measured magnetic field map to susceptibility source image in MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2009;61(1):196–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao B, Li TQ, Gelderen P, Shmueli K, de Zwart JA, Duyn JH. Susceptibility contrast in high field MRI of human brain as a function of tissue iron content. Neuroimage. 2009;44(4):1259–1266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson M, Bone D, Elmqvist H. Total variation norm for three-dimensional iterative reconstruction in limited view angle tomography. Phys Med Biol. 2001;46(3):853–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi SH, Marquina A, Osher SJ, Dinov I, Van Horn JD, Toga AW. MRI resolution enhancement using total variation regularization. Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imag. 2009;2009:161–164.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Calhoun V. A computational multiresolution BOLD fMRI model. IEEE Trans BioMed Eng. 2011;58(10):2995–2999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Calhoun V. Volumetric BOLD fMRI simulation: from neurovascular coupling to multivoxel imaging. BMC Med Imag. 2012;12:8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Calhoun V. Computed diffusion contribution in the complex BOLD fMRI signal. Concepts Magn Reson. 2012;40A(3):128–145.
   Google Scholar
• Arja SK, Feng Z, Chen Z, et al. Changes in fMRI magnitude data and phase data observed in block-design and event-related tasks. Neuroimage. 2009;59(4):14.
   Google Scholar
• Feng Z, Caprihan A, Blagoev KB, Calhoun VD. Biophysical modeling of phase changes in BOLD fMRI. Neuroimage. 2009;47(2):540–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudin L, Osher S, Fatemi E. Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Physics D. 1992;60:259–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi SH, Marquina A, Osher SJ, et al. Edge-enhanced image reconstruction using total variation and Bregman refinement. Lect Notes Comput Sci. 2009;5567:389–400.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Chen Z, Calhoun VD. Blood oxygenation level-dependent functional MRI signal turbulence caused by ultrahigh spatial resolution: numerical simulation and theoretical explanation. NMR Biomed. 2013;26:248–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar