Gynecologic ultrasonography: recent advances and research in various technical modalities

References

• van den Bosch T, Luts J, Bourne T, et al. Interobserver agreement on reporting uterine intracavity lesions at gel infusion sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:158.
   Google Scholar
• Leone FPG, Timmerman D, Bourne T, et al. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of the endometrium and intrauterine lesions: A consensus opinion from the International Endometrial Tumour Analysis (IETA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35:103–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermejo C, Martinez Ten P, Cantarero C, et al. Three dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of Mullerian duct anomalies and concordance with magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 352010:593–601.
   Google Scholar
• van den Bosch T, Luts J, Bourne T, et al. Comparison of gel instillation sonography (GIS) with unenhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of uterine intracavity lesion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:19.
   Google Scholar
• Werbrouck E, van den Bosch T, Veldman J, et al. Saline infusion versus gel instillation sonography: A prospective cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:19–20.
   Google Scholar
• Emanuel MH, Tromp I, Betlem M. The diagnostic accuracy of gel instillation sonography (GIS) compared with saline infusion sonography (SIS): A randomised controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:20.
   Google Scholar
• Bij de Vaate M, Brolmann H, van der Slikke JW, et al. Gel instillation sonography (GIS) and saline infusion sonohysterography (SIS): Comparison of diagnostic accuracy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 34 Suppl 1:161.
   Google Scholar
• Negm S, Kamel R, Momtaz M, et al. Classification of submucous myomas using 3D multislice saline infusion sonohysterography and its correlation with hysteroscopy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 34 Suppl 1:158.
   Google Scholar
• Mavrelos D, Ben Nagi J, Lee C, et al. Three dimensional saline infusion sonohysterography for the preoperative prediction of submucous fibroid respectability. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1: 159–160.
   Google Scholar
• van den Bosch T, Luts J, Bourne T, et al. The influence of gel-infusion on the vascularity of endometrial polyps. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:160.
   Google Scholar
• Exacoustos C, Vaquero E, Romeo V, et al. Three dimensional sonographic assessment of septate uterus: Correlation between morphology, volume and vascularity of the septum and reproductive outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:29.
   Google Scholar
• Jalinik K, Chmielevski G, Romejko-Wolniewicz E, et al. The diagnostic value of transvaginal sonography compared to hysteroscopy in endometrial polyp and submucous fibroid detection. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:161.
   Google Scholar
• Momtaz M, Ebrashy A, Aboulghar M, et al. 3D sonohysterography versus 3D ultrasound examination of the coronal plane of the uterus in fertile women with suspected uterine cavity lesion or anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:28.
   Google Scholar
• Morel O, Malartic C, Rivain A, et al. Interest of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging for the pretherapeutic evaluation of symptomatic uterine fibroids: Evaluation in 68 cases. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 34 Suppl 1:159.
   Google Scholar
• Exacoustos C, Di-Giovanni A, Szabolcz B, et al. Feasibility of automated sonographic tubal patency evaluation using three-dimensional Coded Contrast Imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:101.
   Google Scholar
• Alcázar JL, Castillo G, Míngues JÁ, et al. Endometrial blood flow mapping using transvaginal power Doppler sonography in women with postmenopausal bleeding and thickened endometrium. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21:583–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmerman D, Verguts J, Konstantonovic ML, et al. The pedicle artery sign based on sonography with color Doppler imaging can replace second-stage test in women with abnormal bleeding. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22:166–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cil AP, Tulunay G, Kose MF, et al. Power Doppler properties of endometrial polyps and submucosal fibroids:A preliminary observation study in women with known intracavitary lesions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35:233–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opolskiene G, Sladkevicius P, Jakubkiene L, et al. Three dimensional ultrasound imaging for discrimination between benign and malignant endometrium in women with postmenopausal bleeding and sonographic endometrial thickness of at least 4.5 mm. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35:94–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldman J, van den Bosch T, Werbrouck E, et al. Endometrial thickness measurement with and without fluid contrast ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:21.
   Google Scholar
• Leone F, Marciante C, Crepaldi A, et al. Saline contrast sonohysterography with liquid-based endometrial cytology in post-menopausal women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:53–54.
   Google Scholar
• Alberto R, Calcagno A, Vascotto L, et al. The diagnostic value of endometrial volume and vascularity measurement by transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasonography and power Doppler angiography in patients with postmenopausal bleeding. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:158.
   Google Scholar
• Alcazar J, Albela S, Galvan R. Assessing myometrial infiltration by endometrial cancer: Uterine virtual navigation with three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:53.
   Google Scholar
• van den Bosch T, Domali E, Werbrouck E, et al. VOCAL in the evaluation of the endometrium: A pilot study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:160.
   Google Scholar
• Albela S, Martinez-Roman S, Pahisa J, et al. Myometrial invasion of endometrial cancer: Comparison of 3D US and RM imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:53.
   Google Scholar
• Opolskiene G, Sladkievicius P, Valentin L. Ultrasound assessment of endometrial morphology and vascularity to predict endometrial malignancy in women with postmenopausal bleeding and sonographic endometrial thickness $4.5 mm. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30:332–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galván R, Mercé L, Jurado M, et al. Three-dimensional power Doppler angiography in endometrial cancer: Correlation with tumour characteristics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35:723–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald J, Doran S, DeSimone CH, et al. Predicting risk of malignancy in adnexal masses. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115:687–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ameye L, van Holsbeke C, Testa A. Intercenter variability in ultrasound features of malignant and benign adnexal masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:48–49.
   Google Scholar
• Kudla MJ, Alcazar J, Timor-Tritsch I, et al. Comparison of volume evaluation of pathological and normal ovaries obtained with the use of VOCAL 3D software versus the “3 distances” method. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:49.
   Google Scholar
• Valentin LI, Ameye L, Savelli L. Unilocular solid adnexal masses with papillary projections but not other solid components: Is there a logistic regression model that can help? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 34 Suppl 1:48.
   Google Scholar
• van Holsbeke C, van Calster B, Guerriero S, et al. Endometriomas: Their ultrasound characteristics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35:730–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardanis K, Zdichavsky M, Kramer M, et al. Minimally invasive surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis in the rectovaginal septum. Geburtsh Frauenheilk. 2010;70:194–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drobný J. Sonography in the management of symptomatic pregnancies of unknown location. Bratisl Med J. 2008;109:254–259.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg Y, Lavie O, Keidar R, et al. Ultrasonographic characteristics of borderline ovarian tumours – 5-year experience of a single institution. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:140–141.
   Google Scholar
• Guerriero S, Alcazar J, Pascual MA, et al. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement of color Doppler in adnexal malignancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:141.
   Google Scholar
• Alcazar J, Kudla MJ. Does spherical sample size affect the performance of 3D power Doppler indexes for predicting malignancy in vascularized adnexal masses? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:44.
   Google Scholar
• Czekierdowski A, Smolen A, Kotarski J. Three-dimensional high-definition color Doppler flow imaging and “vascular” tumour biopsy to assess complex ovarian masses: A preliminary experience. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:50.
   Google Scholar
• Alberto R, Capodicasa V, Fachechi G, et al. The Pelvic Masses Score (PMS): A proposed new scoring system to evaluate pelvic masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:139.
   Google Scholar
• Amor F, Vaccaro H, León M, et al. GI-RADS: A new proposal for classifying adnexal masses based on sonographic findings. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:141–142.
   Google Scholar
• Giunchi S, Kuleva M, Ghi T, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of expert transvaginal ultrasound and PET/CT in the evaluation of adnexal masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:43–44.
   Google Scholar
• Pinschke M, Gnann D, Smekal I, et al. Asymptomatic adnexal masses: Accuracy of characterization with ultrasound scoring systems, color Doppler sonography, 3D-ultrasound, and MR imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:139.
   Google Scholar
• Holland TK, Yazbek J, Hoo W, et al. The value of transvaginal ultrasound in assessing of severity of pelvic endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:23.
   Google Scholar
• van Schoubroeck D, Meuleman C, van den Bosch T, et al. Ultrasound in the detection of rectal-and distal sigmoid involvement of deep endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:24.
   Google Scholar
• Cosmi E, Dessole S, Saccardi C, et al. Deep infiltrating endometriosis: Sonovaginography or nuclear magnetic resonance? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:24.
   Google Scholar
• Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Pilloni M, et al. Transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of vesico-peritoneal fistula due to deep infiltrating endometriosis as a cause of uroperitoneum. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 34 Suppl 1:284.
   Google Scholar
• Guerriero S, Saba I, Ajossa S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal modified ultrasonography in the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:24.
   Google Scholar
• Savelli L, Manuzzi L, Pollastri P, et al. Transvaginal sonography and double-contrast barium enema in the diagnosis of intestinal deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 34 Suppl 1:25.
   Google Scholar
• Alcazar J, León M, Guerriero S. Assessment of cyst content by using mean gray value for discriminating ovarian endometrioma from other unilocular cyst in premenopausal women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:25.
   Google Scholar
• Guerriero S, Alcazar J, Ajossa S, et al. The potential of three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound for the detection of deep endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:281.
   Google Scholar
• Guerriero S, Piras B, Ajossa S, et al. Extrauterine undifferentiated endometroid stromal sarcoma arising in endometriosis of the rectovaginal septum of a menopausal patient with recent onset of pelvic pain. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:160.
   Google Scholar
• Testa A, van Holsbeke C, Licameli A, et al. Ovarian cancer arising in endometrioma: Ultrasound findings. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:50.
   Google Scholar
• Bignardi T, Alhamdan D, Riemke J, etal. Endometrial volume measurements by transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound for the prediction of outcome in the pregnancies of unknown location. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:16.
   Google Scholar
• Hoo W, Jones B, Backos M, et al. Does an intact endometrial midline echo predict ectopic pregnancy in women with pregnancies of unknown location. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:16.
   Google Scholar
• Chetty M, Sawyer E, Dew T, et al. Novel biochemical markers to predict spontaneous resolution of pregnancies of unknown location. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34 Suppl 1:16.
   Google Scholar
• Hillaby K, Aslam N, Salim R, et al. The value of detection of normal ovarian tissue (the “ovarian crescent sign”) in the differential diagnosis of adnexal masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23:63–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazbek J, Aslam N, Tailor A, et al. A comparative study of the risk of malignancy index and the “crescent ovarian sign” for the diagnosis of invasive ovarian cancer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28:320–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Holsbeke C, van Belle V, Leone FPG, et al. Prospective external validation of the ovarian crescent sign as a single ultrasound parameter to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal pathology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;36:81–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modesitt SC, Pavlik EJ, Ueland FR, et al. Risk of malignancy in unilocular ovarian cyst tumours less than 10 cm in diameter: A long-term follow-up study. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:594–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im S, Gordon A, Buttin B, et al. Validation of referral guidelines for women with pelvic masses. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:34–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar